Endy Times

@SethDillon You will be remembered for what you & your co-conspirators, did to Charlie at the Hamptons, and at UVU. Look how stressed he was the day after the Hamptons ordeal that you & your cohorts put him through.

This is what I want to be remembered for.

@nosoup4knowles Poor Charlie, he was left with no choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause & was dead at 31. Candace is the friend risking it all to get him justice, while Erika tries 2 hand over his legacy to ppl who called him a “Jew hater”, & “antisemite” in life, & “racist” & evil in death.

Me: it's gross that Candace is taking shots at Charlie's wife & friends CandyFans: idiot. The people closest to the victim are always the suspects Me: were Candace and Charlie close? CFs: YESSS. She was his bestest friend ever!!! Me: 🤔 CF: shut up Me: I didn't say anything

@BillAckman @X After what you and your cohorts did to Charlie at the Hamptons, and then at UVU, I believe that Ronda is the correct party is this dispute, and I wish her the best. May God deal with you decisively for all your nefarious acts against Ronda, Charlie and others.

I am reaching out to the @X community for advice with the likely risk of sharing TMI. I have been sufficiently upset about the whole matter that I have lost sleep thinking about it and I am hoping that this post will enable me to get this matter off my chest. By way of background, I started a family office called TABLE about 15 years ago and hired a friend who had previously managed a family office, and years earlier, had been my personal accountant. She is someone that I trusted implicitly and consider to be a good person. The office started small, but over the last decade, the number of personnel and the cost of the office grew massively. The growth was entirely on the operational side as the investment team has remained tiny. While my investment portfolio grew substantially, the investments I had made were almost entirely passive and TABLE simply needed to account for them and meet capital calls as they came in. While TABLE purchased additional software and other systems that were supposed to improve productivity, the team kept increasing in size at a rapid rate, and the expenses continued to grow even faster. While I would periodically question the growing expenses and high staff turnover, I stayed uninvolved with the office other than a once-a-year meeting when I briefly reviewed the operations and the financials and determined bonus compensation for the President and the CFO. I spent no time with any of the other employees or the operations. The whole idea behind TABLE was that it would handle everything other than my day job so that I would have more time for my job and my family. Over the last six years, expenses ballooned even further, employee turnover accelerated, and I became concerned that all was not well at TABLE. It was time for me to take a look at what was going on. Nearly four years ago, I recruited my nephew who had recently graduated from Harvard and put him to work at Bremont, a British watchmaker, one of my only active personal investments to figure out the issues at the company and ultimately assist in executing a turnaround. He did a superb job. When he returned from the UK late last year after a few years at Bremont, I asked him to help me figure out what was going on with TABLE. When I explained to TABLE’s president what he would be doing, she became incredibly defensive, which naturally made me more concerned. My nephew went to work by first meeting with each employee to understand their roles at the company and to learn from them what ideas they had on how things could be improved. He got an earful. Our first step in helping to turn around TABLE was a reduction in force including the president and about a third of the team, retaining excellent talent that had been desperate for new leadership. Now here is where I need your advice. All but one of the employees who were terminated acted professionally and were gracious on the way out (excluding the president who had a notice period in her contract, is currently still being paid, and with whom I have not yet had a discussion). The highest compensated terminated employee other than the president, an in-house lawyer (let’s call her Ronda), told us that three months of severance was not enough and demanded two years’ severance despite having worked at the company for only two and one half years. When I learned of Ronda's request for severance, I offered to speak with her to understand what she was thinking, but she refused to do so. A few days ago, we received a threatening letter from a Silicon Valley law firm. In the letter, Ronda’s counsel suggests that her termination is part of longstanding issues of ‘harassment and gender discrimination’ – an interesting claim in light of the fact that Ronda was in charge of workplace compliance – and that her termination was due to: “unlawful, retaliatory, and harmful conduct directed towards her. Both [Ronda] and I [Ronda’s lawyer] have spoken with you about [Ronda’s] view of what a reasonable resolution would include given the circumstances. Thus far, TABLE has refused to provide any substantive response. This letter provides the last opportunity to reach a satisfactory agreement. If we cannot do so, [Ronda] will seek all appropriate relief in a court of competent jurisdiction.” The letter goes on to explain the basis for the “unsafe work environment” claim at TABLE: “In early 2026, Pershing Square’s founder Bill Ackman installed his nephew in an unidentified role at TABLE, Ackman’s family office. [His nephew]—whose only work experience had been for TABLE where he was seconded abroad for the last four years to a UK watch company held by Ackman—began appearing at TABLE’s offices and conducting interviews of employees without a clear explanation of his role or the purposes of these interviews. During this period, he made a series of inappropriate and genderbased [sic] comments to multiple employees that created an unsafe work environment. Among other things, [his nephew] made remarks about female employees’ ages (“Tell me you are nowhere near 40”), physical appearance (“Your body does not look like you have kids”), as well as intrusive questions about family planning and sexual orientation (“Who carried your son? Who will carry your next child?”). These incidents were reported to senior leadership at TABLE and Pershing Square. Rather than being addressed appropriately, the response from senior management reflected, at best, willful blindness to the inappropriateness of [his nephew]’s remarks and, at worst, tacit endorsement.” The above allegations about my nephew had previously been brought to my attention by TABLE’s president when they occurred. When I learned of them, I told the president that I would speak to him directly and encouraged her to arrange for him to get workplace sensitivity training. The president assured me that she would do so. When I spoke to my nephew, he explained what he actually had said and how his actual remarks had been received, not at all as alleged in the legal letter from Ronda’s counsel. I have also spoken to others at the lunch table who confirmed his description of the facts. In any case, he meant no harm, was simply trying to build rapport with other employees, and no one, as far as I understand, was offended. Ironically, Ronda claims in her legal letter that TABLE didn’t take HR compliance seriously, yet Ronda was in charge of HR compliance at TABLE and the person who gave my nephew his workplace sensitivity training after the alleged incidents. In any case, Ronda, as head of compliance, should have kept a record or raised an alarm if indeed there was pervasive harassment or other such problems at the company, and there is no evidence whatsoever that this is true. So why does Ronda believe she can get me to pay her nearly $2 million, i.e., two years of severance, nearly one year of severance for each of her years at the company? Well, here is where some more background would be helpful. Over the last two months, I have been consumed with a major family medical issue – one of my older daughters had a massive brain hemorrhage on February 5th and has since been making progress on her recovery – and I am in the midst of a major transaction for my company which I am executing from a hospital room office next to her . While the latter business matter is publicly known, the details of my daughter’s situation are only known to Ronda because of her role at our family office. Now, let’s get back to the subject at hand. Unfortunately, while New York and many other states have employment-at-will, there has emerged an industry of lawyers who make a living from bringing fake gender, race, LGBTQ and other discrimination employment claims in order to extract larger severance payments for terminated employees, and it needs to stop. The fake claim system succeeds because it costs little to have a lawyer send a threatening letter and nearly all of the lawyers in this field work on contingency so there is no or minimal cash cost to bring a claim. And inevitably, nearly 100% of these claims are settled because the public relations and legal costs of defending them exceed the dollar cost of the settlement. The claims are nearly always settled with a confidentiality agreement where the employee who asserts the fake claims remains anonymous and as a result, there is no reputational cost to bringing false claims. The consequences of this sleazy system (let’s call it ‘the System’) are the increased costs of doing business which is a tax on the economy and society. There are other more serious problems due to the System. Unfortunately, the existence of an industry of plaintiff firms and terminated employees willing to make these claims makes it riskier for companies to hire employees from a protected class, i.e., LGBTQ, seniors, women, people of color etc. because it is that much more reputationally damaging and expensive to be accused of racism, sexism, and/or intolerance for sexual diversity than for firing a white male as juries generally have less sympathy for white males. The System therefore increases the risk of discrimination rather than reducing it, and the people bringing these fake claims are thereby causing enormous harm to the other members of these protected classes. So what happened here? Ronda was vastly overpaid and overqualified for the job that she did at TABLE. She was paid $1.05 million plus benefits last year for her work which was largely comprised of filling out subscription agreements and overseeing an outside law firm on closing passive investments in funds and in private and venture stage companies, some compliance work, and managing the office move from one office to another. She had a very good gig as she was highly paid, only had to go into the office three days a week, and could work from anywhere during the summer. Once my nephew showed up and started to investigate what was going on, she likely concluded that there was a reasonable possibility she would be terminated, as her job was in the too-easy-and-to-good-to-be-true category. The problem was that she was not in a protected class due to her race, age or sexual identity so she had to construct the basis for a claim. While she is female and could in theory bring a gender-based discrimination claim, she reported to the president who is female and to whom she is very close, which makes it difficult for her to bring a harassment claim against her former boss. When my nephew complimented a TABLE employee at lunch about how young she looked – in response to saying she was going to her 40-year-old sister’s birthday party, he said ‘she must be your older sister’ – Ronda immediately reported it to our external HR lawyer. She thereby began building her case. The other problem for Ronda bringing a claim is that she was terminated alongside 30% of other TABLE employees as part of a restructuring so it is very difficult for her to say that she was targeted in her termination or was retaliated against. TABLE is now hiring an external fractional general counsel as that is all the company needs to process the relatively limited amount of legal work we do internally. In short, Ronda was eminently qualified and capable and did her job. She was just too much horsepower for what is largely an administrative legal role so she had to come up with something else to bring a claim. Now Ronda knew I was a good target and it was a good time to bring a claim against me. She also knew that I was under a lot of pressure because on March 4th when Ronda was terminated, my daughter had not yet emerged from consciousness, she was not yet breathing on her own, and my daughter and we were fighting for her life. I was and remain deeply engaged in her recovery while at the same time I was working on finishing the closing for the private placement round for my upcoming IPO. Ronda also knew that publicity about supposed gender discrimination and a “hostile and unsafe work environment” are not things that a CEO of a company about to go public wants to have released into the media. And she may have thought that the nearly $2 million she was asking for would be considered small in the context of the reputational damage a lawsuit could cause, regardless of the fact that two years of severance was an absurd amount for an employee who had only worked at TABLE for 30 months. She also likely considered that I wouldn’t want to embarrass my nephew by dragging him into the klieg lights when her claims emerged publicly. So, in summary, game theory would say that I would certainly settle this case, for why would I risk negative publicity at a time when I was preparing our company to go public and also risk embarrassing my nephew. Notably, she hired a Silicon Valley law firm, rather than a typical NY employment firm. This struck me as interesting as her husband works for one of the most prominent Silicon Valley venture firms whose CEO, I am sure, has no tolerance for these kinds of fake claims that sadly many venture-backed companies also have to deal with. I mention this as I suspect her husband likely has been working with her on the strategy for squeezing me as, in addition to being a computer scientist, he is a game theorist. My only advice for him is to understand more about your opponent before you launch your first move. All of the above said, gender, race, LGBTQ and other such discrimination is a real thing. Many people have been harmed and deserve compensation for this discrimination, and these companies and individuals should be punished for engaging in such behavior. Which brings me to the advice I am seeking from the X community. I am not planning to follow the typical path and settle this ‘claim.’ Rather, I am going to fight this nonsense to the end of the earth in the hope that it inspires other CEOs to do the same so we shut down this despicable behavior that is a large tax on society, employment, and the economy and contributes to workplace discrimination rather than reducing it. Do you agree or disagree that this is the right approach?

@AndrewKolvet You usurpers aren’t going to get away with what u did to Charlie @AndrewKolvet. I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but God’s judgment has hastened during these times. Charlie’s blood is crying out to God for vengeance & whether you believe it or not, Charlie will be avenged speedily

Let's break down why this F-15E Strike Eagle being shot down matters to the legacy media so much this morning. When President Trump declared that we had air dominance over Iran, and then this happens, they were only all too eager to play it up because they want to make the president look bad. This is war. There's always bad things that happen in war. This is why we haven't been frothing at the mouth to go to war and why I don't support boots on the ground. But the legacy media practically cheering this on is disgusting, too. We've successfully flown thousands of sortie missions without incident in Iran. We've transitioned from stealth aircraft (F-35s and B-2s) to non-stealth aircraft as Iran's air defenses have been degraded and destroyed. Despite the air dominance, there is always a chance of our aircraft being shot down by a "golden BB," which is usually heat seeking missiles that are very difficult to detect, and the military pilots flying missions over Iran know this very well. This is war, bad things happen, even when you have such massive dominance of the skies. The fact that ONE F-15E being shot down is such big news only underscores how effective our military actually is.

@NoahsArk1000 From his conversation with Candace, Charlie knew about the Talmud. I hate that even though he was so diplomatic, they killed him anyway.

Charlie Kirk was confronted about the Talmud and this is how he responded. Must watch and share. Here are some Talmudic references that you should know about:

@georgejone66403 @paramounttactcl Learn not to spread your ignorance online. Some people are unlearned on the subject matter, and could easily be misled by your flawed averments.

@EndyTimes @paramounttactcl Incorrect, but thanks for playing.

🚨 Candace Seeks Dismissal of Macron Case! Didn’t she “welcome discovery” and couldn’t wait for the trial?

@georgejone66403 @paramounttactcl The LLC is registered, meaning formed in Delaware, not incorporated. A Delaware court lacks jurisdiction over the Macron claim because Candace’s podcast’s principal place of business (headquarters) is in Tennessee, where she is resident & where the alleged defamation happened.

@EndyTimes @paramounttactcl Genuine Parts didn't incorporate in Delaware; Candace owens LLC *is* incorporated in Delaware. Read it closer.

@georgejone66403 @paramounttactcl It’s a lie to say that Candace consented to be sued in Delaware, by registering her LLC there. Read Genuine Parts Co. v Cepec (2016). The Delaware Supreme Court held that registering your Co. in Delaware, isn’t consent to be sued there for something that happened in another state

@EndyTimes @paramounttactcl I'm using layman's terms here, for somewhat obvious reasons. You can sue a business where it is registered and formed. In fact, the business *chooses* that jurisdiction when it makes the choice to form under the friendly laws of Delaware. In essence, *candace* chose

@georgejone66403 @paramounttactcl Candace is resident in Tennessee, and the cause of action (the alleged defamation) happened in Tennessee, so a Tennessee court has jurisdiction. Delaware doesn’t have specific jurisdiction, meaning it doesn’t have a meaningful connection to the dispute.

@georgejone66403 @paramounttactcl You obviously don’t understand the law. The LLC is registered in Delaware. It’s not a resident of Delaware. You sue where the defendant is resident or where the cause of action occurred, which is Tennessee on both accounts. This is a trite principle.

@EndyTimes @paramounttactcl I'm gonna blow your mind with this: where is Candace Owens LLC a resident?

@georgejone66403 @paramounttactcl No she didn’t. Jurisdiction is always where the Defendant is resident or where the cause of action (alleged defamation) happened. Currently, she has her attorney Noah in Tennessee, who’s had to obtain a local attorney in Delaware, to do all their court filings.

@EndyTimes @paramounttactcl Candace made Delaware a proper jurisdiction

@EYakoby The Gaza genocide changed everything for most of us. We got the opportunity to see true evil and it shocked our consciences. Therefore, like Candace did, we changed our minds.

Candace Owens 7 years ago. You can’t tell me she has not either been paid to a full 180 or is severely mentally ill.

@BasedSamParker *taken

@BasedSamParker It doesn’t even prove that the picture was take on 9/10.

What if I told you the picture on the left doesn't prove Tyler Robinson k*illed Charlie any more than the picture on the right proves Charlie k*lled himself?

@LauraLoomer Just don’t cry when Iran retaliates and blows up Israel’s infrastructure equally.

If we really want to be taken seriously when we talk about sending Iran “back to the stone ages” then this is what needs to happen. The US needs to bomb Iran’s: Power & water infrastructure Bank and financial institutions Production/storage facilities for fertilizer and pesticides Every single Islamist/regime “cultural heritage” sites, including every single mosque Natural gas and oil pipelines Kharg Island Civil logistics hubs Courthouses and jails All of these need to be hit. We need to deprive Iran of all the niceties of a moderne day society, and we need to do so now. And then we need to make the people beg on their knees for humanitarian food assistance from the international Red Cross so that the people force Iran to surrender to the US. This is how you WIN wars. Cutis LeMay understood this very well. It’s time to carpet bomb Iran. Force them to their knees. Destroy the infrastructure. It’s the only way.

@kate_p45 @MrsErikaKirk @PressSec How come she has a fat face? It must be the influence of cortisol, for what she did to Charlie.

⁦@MrsErikaKirk⁩ did Charlie proud last night! ❤️🇺🇸 Great conversation between Erika and ⁦⁦@PressSec⁩ MAGA

@AlaskaBird__ You’re lying. She was covering “Becoming Brigitte” season 1 and the Blake Lively stuff and doing very well at both. In fact, she was so good at covering the Blake Lively stuff that she cornered that market.

Candace’s heyday is coming to a close. I jumped down the Candace rabbit hole way before we lost Charlie Kirk. I just happened to be at the right place at the right time. (Or the wrong place at the wrong time 😐) NO ONE was talking about her this time last year. I’ve seen the ebb and flow of creators clipping her and making TikTok videos on her ‘investigations’. It’s safe to say, Candace has peaked. Have you noticed the clips of her show are waning on X? Creators are so sick of her, having to watch her for a few sound bites isn’t worth it. She hasn’t gotten less ridiculous, she’s just crossing over into irrelevance. Obscure YouTubers & Micro influencers FTW. 🙌 x.com/bren45000/stat…

@paramounttactcl If that’s the case, good becuz Erika keeps sending out cease and desist letters that lie they’re suffering damages from the “conspiracy theories”. Still can’t believe DEI Queen, Erika Kirk, was hired to shield herself & her co-conspirators from public scrutiny & failed badly, lol

Here's some facts the DEI Queen of Conspiratardia and her followers are going to have a hard time coping with. Since Charlie Kirk’s death, TPUSA has grown exponentially and is more successful than ever! Their lies, defamation, and smear campaigns are failing!

@TheEddie757 @megbasham @candaceoshow We went from they didn’t text after 2019 to coping. In all these, Charlie reaches out first. Here’s more: Charlie encouraging Candace after Ben maligned her. Charlie tweeting in defense of Candace, when she was smeared as an antisemite. Feb 2024 Charlie brings up Catholicism.

@EndyTimes @megbasham @candaceoshow A couple of casual texts does not a close confidant and best friend make. If I read these correctly, it appears Candace is reaching out to him as well. Nobody claims Charlie did not remain cordial, but “close” is a different story.

👨‍⚖️⚖️ Candace Owens Reacts to Trump Telling Erika to Sue Critics "Most of us welcome a lawsuit because then they would be required to give us the information that we're asking for."