



eursnobs sucks
441 posts

@Europoorupset
dedicated to showing how poorly informed and traveled the average European is about the world.





England have the infrastructure and requirements to host the FIFA World Cup on their own. The country has a strong pool of world-class stadiums, including: Wembley Stadium (90,000) Old Trafford (74,000+) Tottenham Hotspur Stadium (62,000+) London Stadium (62,000+) Emirates Stadium (60,000+) Etihad Stadium (53,000+) Anfield (61,000+) St James' Park (52,000+) Villa Park (42,000+) Stamford Bridge (40,000+) Stadium of Light (48,000+) Elland Road (53,000) Hill Dickinson Stadium (52,000+) In all, United Kingdom will host conveniently.



“the superbowl is bigger than the worldcup”😭

Early days but so far this is the worst World Cup of my lifetime: - half empty stadiums - bang average atmosphere - rubbish kick off times - VAR appalling - poor quality teams due to expanded tournament What a wasted opportunity. #WorldCupVibes






The biggest stadiums in the US vs. UK 👀🏟️

This is legit where the World Cup final will be played. I don't know why people hate it, looks majestic to me. USA got this absolutely right.

Stadium legit has no soul. Just big and grey.






This stadium is literally from the future 🔥




Gridiron requires massive physical bulk and basketball requires one to be really tall. Neither of these are good qualities for a footballer. Also, I really doubt baseballers have the foot skill to dribble a ball.









How can this cost €4.75B back in 2016 😂 Even after adjusting inflation, the Allianz was still 10x cheaper man Looks like a €200 million prestige project of Romanian president in Bucharest suburbs