FD2you 👀

130.9K posts

FD2you 👀 banner
FD2you 👀

FD2you 👀

@FD2you

Previously the account for the now closed https://t.co/8ZICJFv1t8. Thanks Amazon for your cheating ways. We’ve now time to help expose the Globalist Agenda

가입일 Mayıs 2010
557 팔로잉1K 팔로워
FD2you 👀
FD2you 👀@FD2you·
@AstronautSauce @PulseOrbit @EricLDaugh Absolutely. Besides his apparent love for China and all things anti-Trump, he is FAR too connected to our questionable election systems, for someone with such a biased outlook. Only people who can’t see it, are those not willing to honestly look.👇🏼
FD2you 👀@FD2you

Right? I mean, just imagine the damage a powerful billionaire could do, especially when they are so closely tied to the @UN and their desperation to keep Agenda 2030 safe from Trump presidency. I wonder what that might look like.

English
0
0
0
2
✩ . ✰ O_O ✰ . ✩
✩ . ✰ O_O ✰ . ✩@AstronautSauce·
@PulseOrbit @EricLDaugh It is the entire British Empire running operations for the entire BRICS alliance of Russia, China, India, and the Islamic states, at the request of the Democrats and the morons in DC. Soros is simply the first one who was caught.
English
1
0
1
41
Eric Daugherty
Eric Daugherty@EricLDaugh·
🚨 HOLY SMOKES. It was just confirmed that No Kings protests are funded by 500 ORGANIZATIONS with $3 BILLION in annual revenue nationwide Fox investigated and found that it's George Soros and Neville Singham-linked groups and nonprofits Marxist groups are involved, including the Party for Socialism and Liberation, and People's Forum It's being called a "STAGED, MANAGED PRODUCTION" We ALL KNEW it was staged and funded!
English
842
6.4K
13.2K
258.3K
FD2you 👀
FD2you 👀@FD2you·
@PulseOrbit @EricLDaugh But which group of billionaires are against Trump, because he’s dangerous to THEIR agenda? Trump may end up being a tyrant, but he will still be local, rather than global, plus our prison will be beautiful and civil, whereas the other guys was gonna be dirty, dangerous, and gay.
FD2you 👀@FD2you

Notice “Global Governance”, “Internet Governance”, “Digital ID”. They need a willing American government for this. Trump got in their way and cost them four years of progress. No wonder they’re so desperate to stop him at any cost.

English
0
0
1
29
HUSSEIN
HUSSEIN@PulseOrbit·
@EricLDaugh Keep screaming 'Soros' to deflect. The real corruption runs deeper than one billionaire."
HUSSEIN tweet media
English
12
0
29
1.2K
Matt
Matt@801formal_llama·
@FD2you @ChrisMartzWX There's just no good evidence to support that. The modern climate consensus didn't always exist and was a challenge to very powerful industries but it still formed all over the world. That should be compelling.
English
1
0
0
11
Chris Martz
Chris Martz@ChrisMartzWX·
What was the global average surface temperature in 7,672 B.C.? Please give me an answer to the nearest tenth of a degree Celsius. Show your math.
Matt@801formal_llama

@ChrisMartzWX @nudawaya Like 5 of the hottest years on record were in the last decade. Microplastics are in our balls.

English
52
62
866
24.3K
FD2you 👀
FD2you 👀@FD2you·
@801formal_llama @tazjam @ChrisMartzWX I’ve responded to that continually here, but you don’t seem to want to accept the possibility that Establishment science is defending its 19th century gas theory from losing out to 21st century electromagnetic observations. I guess we’re done here. Thanks for the discussion.
English
0
0
1
6
Matt
Matt@801formal_llama·
@FD2you @tazjam @ChrisMartzWX Reputable journals do have people with significant knowledge in the journal's speciality. The problem with conspiracies is they're infinitely malleable. "Why don't experts around the world agree?" "They're all corrupt." There's no response to that.
English
1
0
0
6
FD2you 👀
FD2you 👀@FD2you·
@801formal_llama @ChrisMartzWX They are not MY ideas. I only learn from others. You know…the people that climate science calls “hacks”, “shills”, and “pseudoscientists”. The climate scientists can’t give up a lifetime of work to allow a paradigm shift to make that work irrelevant, so they get defensive.
English
1
0
1
12
Matt
Matt@801formal_llama·
@FD2you @ChrisMartzWX I'm not a climate scientist. But if you think your ideas are compelling you should submit them to other experts and if they're convinced you might win a Nobel prize yourself.
English
1
0
0
14
FD2you 👀
FD2you 👀@FD2you·
@801formal_llama @tazjam @ChrisMartzWX Peer review doesn’t work, when the reviewers don’t have any knowledge on the topic. The climate scam is built on the willful ignorance of “experts”, who clearly aren’t concerned about challenging science, so they bash it, instead of seeing how it might disprove their hypothesis.
English
1
0
0
7
Matt
Matt@801formal_llama·
@FD2you @tazjam @ChrisMartzWX Experts have to convince other experts. That's how our system works. People with ground breaking ideas also sometimes have bad ideas. That's why we do peer review and rely on consensus rather than any individual scientist no matter how decorated.
English
1
0
0
6
FD2you 👀
FD2you 👀@FD2you·
@801formal_llama @ChrisMartzWX The evidence shows in the lies of omission. Where are be the studies into the electromagnetic forcings in climate? Why is it all focused on CO2, when we now know how cyclical EPP can affect global circulations?👇🏼
FD2you 👀@FD2you

The lies of omission are what expose the Climate Con. They’re so desperate to keep the con going, but science keeps on showing the lies. The @IPCC_CH has known about cyclical EPP for almost 20yrs, so why is Establishment science still pretending CO2 is doing all the work?

English
1
0
1
16
Matt
Matt@801formal_llama·
@FD2you @ChrisMartzWX There is consensus and while any system composed of humans is going to be subject to certain biases there's no reason to think the overwhelming consensus on climate change's risks to humanity is the result of that.
English
1
0
0
9
FD2you 👀
FD2you 👀@FD2you·
@801formal_llama @tazjam @ChrisMartzWX You say that while ignoring the actual words of a Noble Laureate who was censured for “wrongthink”. Alfvén may’ve been censured, but he continues to be shown as right. Imagine where science would be had they regarded the value in his work. It’s a crime against humanity.
FD2you 👀 tweet media
New Scientist@newscientist

Bombshell results from a major study on dark energy have raised doubts about the standard model of cosmology, forcing scientists to search for a new model of the universe. #Echobox=1746643092" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">newscientist.com/article/247834…

English
1
0
0
13
Matt
Matt@801formal_llama·
@FD2you @tazjam @ChrisMartzWX That's not true. Most important scientific advances were controversial and then through peer review and testing came to be accepted.
English
1
0
0
8
FD2you 👀
FD2you 👀@FD2you·
@801formal_llama @ChrisMartzWX And that’s why I’ve shown you that there is no actual scientific consensus in the climate argument and how the peer review process is easily hijacked by bad players, posing as “authority”. Isn’t science about challenging what we know, rather than defending what many believe?
English
1
0
1
11
Matt
Matt@801formal_llama·
@FD2you @ChrisMartzWX That's why I care about consensus in areas where I myself am not an expert.
English
1
0
0
13
FD2you 👀
FD2you 👀@FD2you·
@801formal_llama @tazjam @ChrisMartzWX Peer review systems rely on the opinions of authority from the top. Just a few sellouts in positions of status can manipulate the status quo in their most beneficial direction to create & maintain the desired narrative & the suppression of info. But yeah…”trust the science”.👇🏼
FD2you 👀@FD2you

Does bias in the “peer” review process slow scientific advancement? Look no further than 1970 Nobel Prize winning physicist, Hannes Alfvén, to see where the peer review system fails. When a dying paradigm is defending itself, real scientific advances are ignored & delayed.

English
1
0
0
14
Matt
Matt@801formal_llama·
@FD2you @tazjam @ChrisMartzWX That's not the right way to evaluate it. The question would be why, with so much money in fossil fuels would consensus have ever formed if it was just about money. Exxon knew it was a threat to their business in the 80s well before there was much social stigma on any side.
English
1
0
1
11
FD2you 👀
FD2you 👀@FD2you·
@801formal_llama @ChrisMartzWX My point is for EVERY claim you have to support the AGW narrative, the other side has a valid response that counters it. The AGW hypothesis had its day back in the 90, but in 2026, there is FAR too much evidence for naturally changing climate. No emissions needed.👇🏼
FD2you 👀@FD2you

@newscientist Then again, maybe CO2 levels are perfectly natural, as we’re still coming out of a MASSIVE Grand Solar Maximum. There is FAR too much actual scientific evidence that global warming was part of a natural warm/cool cycle, just like our seasons. mdpi.com/2413-4155/5/3/…

English
1
0
1
19
Matt
Matt@801formal_llama·
@FD2you @ChrisMartzWX Scientists don't typically do their best work in old age and I don't care about any particular scientist. My point was that Exxon's models all the way from the 80s have been pretty accurate.
English
1
0
0
18
FD2you 👀
FD2you 👀@FD2you·
@DefiantLs The Left is not quite as TOLERANT as they try to pretend they are.
FD2you 👀 tweet media
English
0
0
13
286
Defiant L’s
Defiant L’s@DefiantLs·
NBA star Tristian Thompson under fire from the left after he went to the White House to show support for Trump.
English
35
120
1.8K
33.4K
AwakenedOutlaw⚒️
AwakenedOutlaw⚒️@AwakenedOutlaw·
In fact, there are soooo gosh darn many people there today that Brian used protest footage from October 18, 2025.
English
41
252
1.2K
18.1K
Art Candee 🍿🥤
Art Candee 🍿🥤@ArtCandee·
Holy sh*t! San Diego is showing up for No Kings! Massive protest!
Art Candee 🍿🥤 tweet media
English
165
2.1K
8.2K
77.5K
FD2you 👀 리트윗함
GunShyMartyr
GunShyMartyr@jimmy_rustlin·
Makes sense now.
GunShyMartyr tweet media
English
125
2.4K
7.7K
120.8K
FD2you 👀
FD2you 👀@FD2you·
@801formal_llama @tazjam @ChrisMartzWX You are somewhat right, considering the world’s most profitable corporation is a petroleum company, due to consolidation from overbearing regulations, but the global Climate Scam is expected to require $4.3 TRILLION per year, so it would seem the BIG money is in the Climate Scam.
FD2you 👀@FD2you

Other than shifting the global balance of wealth, what are they REALLY doing with the TRILLIONS that is spent in the name of climate? How about a 4x increase in spending, in the next 7yrs? The #ClimateScam is the greatest Long Con ever attempted. un.org/en/climatechan…

English
1
0
0
20
FD2you 👀
FD2you 👀@FD2you·
@801formal_llama @ChrisMartzWX And yet, the lead scientist on those Exxon reports seems to have wanted his legacy to be set straight after he died. “In the last few years of his life Roger was convinced that more CO2 would benefit the Earth.”👇🏼
FD2you 👀@FD2you

It’s probably important to note that the lead author of those Exxon reports, changed his mind after he retired and no longer had to follow the company directives. iowaclimate.org/2017/02/27/rog…

English
1
0
1
32
Matt
Matt@801formal_llama·
@FD2you @ChrisMartzWX There's no reason to think there's some pro global warming bias. There are lots of big industries that could support research. Exxons own investigations found human caused global warming would be a serious issue.
English
2
0
0
46
FD2you 👀
FD2you 👀@FD2you·
@801formal_llama @ChrisMartzWX But there is NO scientific consensus on climate change, because the perspectives of “those who would directly benefit from proving it wrong” are being disregarded as “pseudoscience”, or some other BS. Lies of omission expose the con.
FD2you 👀@FD2you

@Diver_Flemming @MatthewWielicki “hold CONTRA SCIENTIFIC opinions” Um, yeah…that’s how science works. Where would we be w/o disagreement & scientific discourse? Science tells us how to define a “consensus”. “only if shared by those who would directly benefit from proving it wrong” pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC65…

English
1
0
4
77
Matt
Matt@801formal_llama·
@FD2you @ChrisMartzWX I referenced consensus specifically to emphasize that it's not a matter of "authority". Albert Einstein submitted his theories to journals so experts could evaluate his ideas. That's how it should work.
English
1
0
2
56
FD2you 👀
FD2you 👀@FD2you·
@801formal_llama @ChrisMartzWX Yeah, you’re gonna be easily manipulated, if you’re reliant on the words of experts. That explains so much about you and your ability for an honest argument. I wish you well.
FD2you 👀 tweet media
English
1
0
3
53
Matt
Matt@801formal_llama·
@FD2you @ChrisMartzWX No. Neither Al Gore or Greta are climate scientists to my knowledge. And individual scientists aren't even authoritative on their own. We want to look for consensus of experts.
English
1
0
1
57

탐색

@AstronautSauce @PulseOrbit @EricLDaugh @801formal_llama @ChrisMartzWX @tazjam @elonmusk @BarackObama