Frame Breakerr

924 posts

Frame Breakerr

Frame Breakerr

@FrameBreakerr

Dedicated to exposing how news framing manipulates public perception and revealing what’s left out.

가입일 Nisan 2025
49 팔로잉33 팔로워
Frame Breakerr
Frame Breakerr@FrameBreakerr·
@DrMakaryFDA Are you guys going to unleash Anktiva methodically, as in around the elections or something?
English
0
0
1
21
Dr. Marty Makary
Dr. Marty Makary@DrMakaryFDA·
FDA is moving proactively to advance potential therapies to address America’s mental health crisis. It’s time for new approaches.
English
141
169
1.1K
50K
Frame Breakerr 리트윗함
Pino Americano
Pino Americano@PinoAmericano·
RFK Jr is the first HHS Secretary in my lifetime that is actually making America more healthy.
English
62
456
5.6K
33.6K
Frame Breakerr
Frame Breakerr@FrameBreakerr·
@IamTheTrashMan @AaronSiriSG Bitch, if you have something to say.. try arguing the points he makes instead of acting like a little cunt. Challenge what is being said you fucking idiot.
English
0
0
1
7
trash
trash@IamTheTrashMan·
@AaronSiriSG Bitch hep B vaccine has been given for decades, billions of doses, and hep B is essentially non-existent in the US. It’s absolutely safe and decades of observation has proved this. What the fuck is wrong with you? Or are you just pushing the grift for your own financial gain?
English
14
0
19
641
Aaron Siri
Aaron Siri@AaronSiriSG·
RFK Jr. is correct. Hep B vaccines given to infants (Recombivax HB and Engerix B) were not proven safe before licensure and have not been proven safe thereafter. The proof is unassailable. Recombivax HB was licensed based on a clinical trial with 147 children monitored for 5 days after injection and no control group.* Engerix B had only 4 days of monitoring after injection with no control group.** Fun fact: trials to license vaccines for chickens require “daily observation records [] for at least 21 days after vaccination.”*** As for post licensure safety, CDC and HRSA commissioned the Institute of Medicine (IOM) to review (what these agencies said were) 25 serious commonly-claimed injuries from Hep B vaccines, and the IOM concluded that for 24 of them, neither CDC nor the medical community had done the studies needed for them to reach a conclusion on whether Hep B vaccines caused these conditions.**** Meaning, at best, the serious harms reported from Hep B vaccines were never taken seriously and properly studied. Here is another fun fact: Hep B mortality has gone upsince the introduction of the Hep B vaccine. The first Hep B vaccine was introduced in 1981 and was made with human blood plasma from donors who were chronically infected with the Hep B virus. In 1986, a new Hep B vaccine using recombinant DNA technology (without human blood) was licensed. Mortality from Hep B climbed after introduction of the 1981 vaccine, continued to climb after the introduction of the 1986 vaccine, and has never returned to pre-vaccination levels. In 1980, there were 294 deaths in the United States from Hep B. Today, there are around 1,700 deaths per year.* Here is another inconvenient data point: in the only study comparing children who received Hep B vaccines in the first month of life to those who did not, researchers from Stony Brook University Medical Center found that the vaccinated children had three times the risk of autism. As the study explained: "Result was significant for the risk of autism in children who received their first dose of Hepatitis B vaccine during the first month of life (OR 3.00, 95% CI 1.11, 8.13), compared with those who received the vaccination after the first month of life or not at all."***** Other studies finding statistically significant elevated risk for various neurological and other harms from these products abound. The hard cold reality is that if Hep B vaccines were safe, they would not need immunity to liability for the injuries they won’t cause. They need this immunity because the reality is, after 40 years of use, they know what would happen if the immunity were lifted… Below is a short video discussing these points and see Vaccines, Amen for a full discussion, including discussion of my deposition of the principal investigator of the childhood Hep B trial for Recombivax HB, or see: cdc.gov/acip/downloads… * fda.gov/media/74274/do…** fda.gov/media/119403/d…*** aphis.usda.gov/sites/default/…**** #3" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">nationalacademies.org/read/13164/cha…***** pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21058170/Video breaking down some of the above: x.com/AaronSiriSG/st…
End Tribalism in Politics@EndTribalism

RFK Jr. calmly breaks down to a Democrat representative why it’s critical parents have vaccine choice when it comes to the Hep B vaccine. “We just believe that Americans should have that choice, and that the state should not make that choice for them.” “The Hepatitis B vaccine was not safety tested.” “It had a 4-day test with no placebo.” “We don’t know what the risk profile is, and parents are allowed to ask that question.”

English
68
784
2.4K
68.5K
Frame Breakerr
Frame Breakerr@FrameBreakerr·
@BenMazer Usually the case is, people such as yourself cannot defend the actual argument due to the fact that A) you do not know enough about it Or B) you aren’t here to actually discuss it Which is it? I’d love to know.
English
1
0
1
8
Frame Breakerr
Frame Breakerr@FrameBreakerr·
@BenMazer Classic. You choose to not engage w what I’ve said, but turn to insults. You should realize this makes you look incredibly weak.
English
0
0
1
5
Psymon Link
Psymon Link@PsymonLink·
@FrameBreakerr @Vershungphl @Acyn Appreciate the kind words. It can be tense out there. Discourse goals: - Shields down - Have patience - Be civil We are all a product of what we consume.
English
1
0
1
16
Acyn
Acyn@Acyn·
Sec. Kennedy: Mercury is absolutely—it’s the most powerful neurotoxin we know of in the universe. Rep. Harder: So why are you working for an administration that is doubling the amount of mercury pollution in our air and water? Sec. Kennedy: I am running HHS and I’m ending the chronic disease epidemic. I’m not going to comment on that because I don’t know anything about it. Rep. Harder: Well, that’s very convenient for you, and it shows a significant degree of cowardice. It’s not just mercury. President Trump in July 2025 granted 50 chemical plants— Sec. Kennedy: Why don’t you ask me something that I’m in charge of instead of other things? Rep. Harder: Are you not in charge of Health and Human Services?
English
672
10.5K
57.7K
2.3M
Rep. Haley Stevens
Rep. Haley Stevens@RepHaleyStevens·
RFK Jr. must resign. If he refuses, I have his impeachment articles right here.
English
1.5K
201
661
218.4K
Frame Breakerr
Frame Breakerr@FrameBreakerr·
@RepJoshHarder But that conclusion only holds if you accept the earlier framing errors (same authority, same role, same responsibility). 🧵8
English
0
0
0
4
Frame Breakerr
Frame Breakerr@FrameBreakerr·
@RepJoshHarder Finally, it’s a classic hearing tactic: a gotcha frame. The goal isn’t to clarify policy, it’s to produce a moment that sounds like inconsistency: “You used to fight this, now you’re not doing anything.” 🧵7
English
0
0
0
8
Frame Breakerr
Frame Breakerr@FrameBreakerr·
@RepJoshHarder Third, it collapses roles. It treats: past advocacy or legal work and current agency authority as if they’re the same thing. They’re not. Being an advocate is about pushing issues broadly. Running a specific agency is about operating within defined jurisdiction.🧵6
English
0
0
0
3
Frame Breakerr
Frame Breakerr@FrameBreakerr·
@RepJoshHarder In reality, holding a position inside HHS doesn’t give someone the authority to set or override EPA policy. So the expectation being set isn’t just unrealistic, it’s structurally impossible.🧵5
English
0
0
0
4
Frame Breakerr
Frame Breakerr@FrameBreakerr·
@RepJoshHarder Second, it inflates responsibility. The logic being used is: “You spent your career caring about this issue, therefore you should be acting on it right now.” That only works if you ignore the constraints of the role. 🧵4
English
0
0
0
4
Frame Breakerr
Frame Breakerr@FrameBreakerr·
@RepJoshHarder Those are different agencies with different legal authority. Treating them as interchangeable creates a false premise from the start.🧵3
English
0
0
0
4
Frame Breakerr
Frame Breakerr@FrameBreakerr·
@RepJoshHarder This is a combination of jurisdictional conflation, responsibility inflation, and a gotcha setup. First, the question blurs the line between what the Environmental Protection Agency actually controls and what the Department of Health and Human Services is responsible for.🧵2
English
0
0
0
5
Frame Breakerr
Frame Breakerr@FrameBreakerr·
@RepJoshHarder For anyone that wishes to understand what Josh Harder was doing here through the lens of framing.. please follow along. Also, for anyone confused about this explanation, feel free to ask me to elaborate if you do not understand. 🧵1
English
0
0
0
7
Frame Breakerr
Frame Breakerr@FrameBreakerr·
@PsymonLink @Vershungphl @Acyn I like how you handle these commenters.. I try to approach every debate through epistemology and framing, but these people can get under your skin if you let them. Nice job redirecting their extremely child like responses.
English
1
0
2
23