Goudaberg

God, thank you for this day and everything you have given me. Give me the grace to do your will and follow you.

@EVR_Forge @StMichael71 @wcgrimley Your own citation makes my point

This of your is gobbledygook. The author's criticism and quote from the Catholic Encyclopedia make clear twhat you obscure. The Syllabus is part of a larger compendium of papal teaching against liberalism. It provides distinct clarity about the issues it cites. Anything else is just silly deflection.

Ironically, the SSPX position on Vatican II would open a floodgate to theological revisionism. If an ecumenical council, when not making a definition, can teach formal error, then Florence, Trent's doctrinal prefaces, Unigenitus, etc., could all potentially teach formal error.

@EVR_Forge @StMichael71 @wcgrimley It tells you what errors are covered by which document and where to look for more information on them. It is not a list of exact definitions.

@Gudabeg @StMichael71 @wcgrimley What you are actually saying is that the Syllabus is worthless, which in light of subsequent papal teaching with which it fully agrees. is nonsense.

@EVR_Forge @StMichael71 @wcgrimley St Newman is correct in reminding us to look to what the syllabus refers to to find the original context and full nuanced statements of the Pope, not to take summaries on their own. And worse, to simply word match them to later documents without examination.

@EVR_Forge @StMichael71 @wcgrimley So you have to describe exactly what is meant by each document and see if they mean the same thing and if there is a contradiction. Even in the articles you cite, the author errors by acting as if the syllabus’ short summary was the same as the nuanced statement in Quanta Cura

@EVR_Forge @StMichael71 @wcgrimley From St Newman You have to ascertain exactly what the document the syllabus referred to condemned, not act as if the summary is self-sufficient

@StMichael71 @wcgrimley SSPX does not "reject the Council" and all it includes. SSPX rejects certain passages as (at least) theologically ambiguous. To keep harping on them to "accept the Council" does not solve this problem logically, theologically or in justice or charity. For example, take this one:

@LeadingReport @BigBoris_2 it’s the end for you

HHS Sec. RFK Jr. announced that for the first time in 50 years, obesity rates in the US are declining. “Since President Trump came into office, obesity rates in this country have dropped by 2.5%.”

@EricRSammons Accept Nicea 1-2 Constantinople 1-4 Ephesus Chalcedon Lateran 1-5 Lyons 1-2 Vienna Constance Florence Trent Vatican 1-2 Where on that list did I become an “ideologue”?

If someone says it’s essential to “accept Vatican II” with no further explanation, you know you’re dealing with either an ideologue or an idiot, not someone actually concerned with being faithful to the truth or with the salvation of souls.

@isopie_ggp @projection2024 @SableOnyxIV

@dejaoftexass Yep! And not taking risks is how you miss opportunities (ask me how I know)

@Gudabeg Exactly! The whole point is that dating isn’t easy & you gotta get a little uncomfortable from time to time, trials & tribulations typa deal.

So we’re expecting men to do all the heavy lifting in the dating scene while they get pelted with rejections (either legit or “playing hard to get” games), and infantilizing women, stripping them of all responsibility. At that point just bring back bridal kidnapping.

@dejaoftexass I myself am shy but own up to the fact it’s made me single for longer, and am trying to overcome that. I don’t comprehend admitting it kept you single and then shrugging and saying “that’s just how it is, the other sex has to deal with it”

@Gudabeg Like if that’s how women want to be then fine, but don’t cry about the consequences of being treated like a shy toddler because you’re acting like one.

@SableOnyxIV @JadeAtrophis @t_ippers You always give Goldshi the most entertaining games

@JadeAtrophis @t_ippers

uma

HEEEEEEEEEEEELP-

@SableOnyxIV @dejaoftexass 😭

@dejaoftexass @Gudabeg they’re doing tomboy erasure in the TL

Girl calm down. You’re just a tomboy. Liking/disliking “girl toys” does not make you trans. Not enjoying dresses doesn’t mean you’re a guy.

@SecularConserv1 @joshrogin @davereaboi “When did you stop beating your wife?”

@joshrogin @davereaboi this tweet insults intelligence. Address the point that Vance's claim that people who are sceptical of this "MOU" simply wants to see every Iranian bombed to death

Just contemptible demagoguery. No wonder he gets along with Tucker Carlson.

@TheUnap16592593 @CatholicSat Replace “Vatican 2” with “Vatican 1” and “SSPX” with “Old Catholics” and you’ll see the error in reasoning

@CatholicSat So if I understand correctly, Pope Leo XIV, just made clear that the post-conciliar is not congruent with the Church that existed prior to Vatican II. Perhaps it is the post-conciliar Church that has lost its way and not the SSPX. It is becoming ever so apparent.

Pope Leo XIV on the upcoming SSPX Episcopal Consecrations: “I am considering making another appeal saying don't do this, let's try to live the communion of the Church. But it's their choice. One must realize what it means for them and for the Church. Certainly, the division among Christians is a painful point. However, they refuse to accept some fundamental elements of the Church, starting with several points from the Second Vatican Council. If they make that decision, I'm sorry but we have to move on.”

@SableOnyxIV If you keep misspelling Goldship you’ll give her a heart attack!

Now imagine dear reader, Super Creek in this dress

Speaking of Golshi, can you guys post cute Golshi pictures for me?

@bitcoinphil1 @NewReaganCaucus Which is why they sponsee terror attacks and chant “death to America”? Letting people who want to bring about the eschaton have nukes is an idea so terrible I shouldn’t have to spell it out

@NewReaganCaucus 😂 Iran doesn't want to attack the US you fking clown

Thankfully, Iran hasn't developed intercontinental ballistic missiles... oh wait.

@SableOnyxIV The ever helpful Goldshi has arrived

@Gudabeg NO OGURI, WE AREN’T TALKING ABOUT A FULL STOMACH! THERE IS NO FOOD! OGURI I HAVE NO FOOD!!! HEEEEEEEEEEEELP-

Yes and I will not stand for it