Interesting Watch

@weareallsatnaka @AI_EmeraldApple Tell that to a five year old or a guy with Down syndrome. Do you that they can reasonably make the correct choice in private. Now add everyone else who realizes it would be better if we didn’t kill a bunch of people for “pressing the wrong button”.

@InterestingWatc @AI_EmeraldApple The only reason they’re gonna die is because they’re pressing blue to begin with.

This red vs blue thing revealed why the West is collapsing like it is. We have nearly 60% of people who voted in these so-called "polls" voting blue, but the reality is that when the choice becomes "real," many will turn around and vote red instead. History is a cold, hard proof of this dynamic. In elections, the mentality is the same. Too many voters have no skin in the game, and many just default to voting left, popular, or whatever party allows them to claim the badge of moral superiority and smug virtue signaling. Now I understand why our founding fathers did not institute universal suffrage, and why full democracies fail, because too many people who vote do not vote from a place of core rational logic, but from a place of "does it make me look like a moral person". People who vote blue based on morality in this poll are historically ignorant, completely delusional when it comes to the human psyche, and live in a fantasy world where their ideological worldview overshadows base reality. So... Pay attention to the blue button pushers. Any opinion on geopolitics, culture, and history from blue button pushers should be discarded like trash. The reality, based on history and basic geopolitics, the vast majority of the world will press the red button because humans overwhelmingly have ingroup bias, and will coordinate to make sure everyone in their group presses red. The only way blue wins is with massive global propoganda coordination, and even then, it is a slim chance of success. The only group with massive outgroup bias is middle to upper-class white leftist-liberal women, and white leftist men to a lesser degree... probably the only group with a high chance at pressing blue, and simultaneously nail themselves on a cross and rant about how virtuous they are. Everyone else, conservatives, moderates, libertarians, ancaps, the 3rd world, criminals, psychopaths, sociopaths, etc... all will be pressing red, dooming the blue to a dire fate.

@eldarmark @AI_EmeraldApple Blue has won every poll I’ve seen, so I’m pretty happy with my choice and have no regrets. No one dies 😎

@InterestingWatc @AI_EmeraldApple Well, good luck with that I guess.

@SaxonTheDan @MarsAutomatic @CFC_Junior_ @MrBeast It’s a private vote that each person takes. Meaning you can’t take it for anyone else, or be with them when they take it to tell them what they need to press.

@InterestingWatc @MarsAutomatic @CFC_Junior_ @MrBeast The question assumes absolutely nothing. Nowhere does it stipulate I can't discuss with people beforehand. People are allowed — and often do — tell others who they're voting for in government elections.

Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.

That’s an entirely different scenario from the hypothetical, because that assumes there is communication before hand, and mostly everyone is pressing red to protect their kids. There’s whole extra layer of complexity to the original hypothetical, because it is private and you’d be killing the people not mentally able to comprehend the question and their protectors.

@InterestingWatc @CFC_Junior_ @MrBeast I know but what would you tell them to push if you could? Guaranteed life? Or enter the death lottery?

@EdSenseiSensei @AI_EmeraldApple You don’t know anything about me bud

@InterestingWatc @AI_EmeraldApple And yet, if this was for real, you would quietly press Red.

@MarsAutomatic @CFC_Junior_ @MrBeast The question assumes no communication, so you wouldn’t be able to tell anyone anything.

@InterestingWatc @CFC_Junior_ @MrBeast What button would you tell your kids to push?

@abbythelibb_ I wonder what Jesus thinks about having so much empathy you’re willing to risk sacrificing yourself, because of others wrong choice.

The point of the buttons dilemma is to morally blackmail people into suicidal empathy and to give more fuel to the increasingly violent hatred toward those who refuse.

@MrBeast It’s crazy how many people are upset that red loss. Would you rather red have won, and a certain percentage of the population die? Relax, nobody dies 😎

@PromptNoJutsu @MrBeast Lowkey, not the slam dunk you think. Red guys are just standing at the sidelines when children, the mentally handicapped, and good samaritans are working to move that trolly.

@automatedidiocy @AI_EmeraldApple onating blood would be different than having a magical button apear in front of you with a question. Many people might not have access to to donating blood, or the thought might never have passed them by. This would be a lot more clear of a choice.

@InterestingWatc @AI_EmeraldApple I don't think you understand. If this prompt goes out to everyone on the planet, the blue button option literally cannot win. Only 19% of the planet donates enough blood to cover their own population size. Only 8-11% donates at a real surplus.

There is a huge downside. Everyone is pressing a button, lots of people would die if red wins. There are many people not logical enough to understand that if you press red you live regardless. There will also be a lot of people pressing blue because they know this. There’s one option that only needs over 50% for everyone to live. Red would need 100%.

@InterestingWatc @AI_EmeraldApple Why are other people pressing blue if there is no down side for everyone going red?

You’re missing a crucial part. Everyone is pressing the button. Many people I love are not logical whether it’s because they’re too young or not mentally able to think the question trough. I would not like to have them killed for “pressing the wrong button.” Also, I know many people I love would think the same way, that makes my choice even easier. Pressing blue.

@InterestingWatc @AI_EmeraldApple I completely understand. Live or maybe live. It is not hard, but some people think it is hard.

@SosageMcBiscuit @WandererWayne @AI_EmeraldApple Pick a flag bro

@WandererWayne @AI_EmeraldApple retard blues not spelling poll correctly and dying in the meat crusher because they dont understand real world consequences dont match up with fake virtual world virtue signaling oh well, life goes on without you idiots. the world is a better place

@GenacGenacGenac @Skwerilleee I can only speak for myself. I have never stolen from Trader Joe’s lol

@InterestingWatc @Skwerilleee Interesting! Do you think there's a weird paradox that people who think stealing from Trader Joe's is fine (low trust) are saying they'd press the blue button?

The red/blue button game is literally just individualism vs collectivism.

@Sotoshi_Nil @NaloVideo @Ancap_doggo @CFC_Junior_ @MrBeast Red isn’t the default choice. If it wins people’s going to die, no? Sticking with blue.

@InterestingWatc @NaloVideo @Ancap_doggo @CFC_Junior_ @MrBeast No es confianza sino sentido común. Sáquense la pistola de la boca no? Nada les obliga a hacerlo. No es culpa de quienes votamos red que ustedes nos responsabilicen de ponerse una pistola en la boca con su voto

@GenacGenacGenac @Skwerilleee Trusting over 50% to press blue is more logical than trusting 100% to press red. You would not need to press red, if you trust enough to press blue.

@InterestingWatc @Skwerilleee Would someone press red if they trust their neighbor to not need saved?

@Wulden83 I don’t know if suicidal empathy is the right wording. I guess you’re a Christian from your profile. Our savior has suicidal empathy, and the gospel of John says this is greatest type of love. It would be terrible if red won, and many people died.

There is no rationally functional brain that would push the blue button. You are suicidal, or you have suicidal empathy, and are attempting to save people through a twisted form of perceived altruism.

The reason we’re living in a comfortable society is because of the blood of past generations. Animals in nature put themselves in danger all the time to protect their pride, pack, or offspring. Blue only needs over 50%, not 100%. The only difference is blue kills no one by putting yourself in danger, where there will be deaths by voting red. I would rather risk myself than contribute to any loved ones getting killed. Would you?

You clearly do not see the point. People not agreeing on things is exactly why Red is the better option. You're living in a delusion where you think everyone is going to choose the "moral" option and consider others over themselves. When in reality that's not how humans work by nature. Self preservation is biologically ingrained into us, and one of our primary survival instincts. Do some research on the human brain and how it attempts to prevent you from harm, it's quite fascinating. Additionally, you are basing your argument entirely on morals which highly differ from person to person, culture to culture. On average, put in a dire situation a human on average will choose to protect and save themselves vs sacrifice themselves for others. Unless of course you're on social media where people will often take the moral high ground to try and look like the better person for clicks and views as seen in a lot of these comments. Plus this entire argument is stupid to begin with. In two difference scenarios if 100% blue or 100% red is chosen the outcome is still the same. But that only works in a perfect world where everyone comes to agreeance, which this social experiment and science proves will never happen. The only difference from choosing red, is that choosing blue introduces the risk that if not enough people agree, then you perish. So obviously based on that the correct option is just for everyone to pick red to be safer than sorry.