Jon Crowell

347 posts

Jon Crowell

Jon Crowell

@JonCrowellOrg

I feel, therefore I am.

Pennsylvania 가입일 Eylül 2023
2K 팔로잉355 팔로워
Jon Crowell
Jon Crowell@JonCrowellOrg·
@JoelMCurzon It strikes me as obvious -- and in any case it has been confirmed via physics and fine-tuning.
English
0
0
0
2
Joel M. Curzon
Joel M. Curzon@JoelMCurzon·
Theism is essentially a claim that fundamental reality is some kind of ‘person.’ If that claim doesn’t strike you as utterly bizarre, why doesn’t it?
Joel M. Curzon tweet mediaJoel M. Curzon tweet media
English
19
3
28
1.3K
Jon Crowell
Jon Crowell@JonCrowellOrg·
@BrianSuttererMD I guess you didn't realize that people have actually thought about this issue?
English
0
0
0
8
Brian Sutterer MD
Brian Sutterer MD@BrianSuttererMD·
If an athlete identified as female and was raised truly as a female despite DSD, thinks of themselves as female etc; of course an sry positive test will disrupt their world. You’re being very presumptive if you assume any female competing with sry gene would have certainly known by now in their life
English
7
1
14
1.1K
Brian Sutterer MD
Brian Sutterer MD@BrianSuttererMD·
I don’t think the sports world is ready for how many unexpected positive tests they are going to find if every athlete is tested. Especially anxious to see how this plays out in sports like women’s basketball, where genetic gender testing isn’t done If they are truly going to do genetic testing on every female athlete, guaranteed there will be unexpected positives that will have a major life impact in the athlete who may have had no idea.
The Associated Press@AP

BREAKING: Trans women athletes are banned from the Olympics by a new IOC policy on female eligibility. apnews.com/article/ioc-ol…

English
159
105
1.7K
351.7K
Jon Crowell
Jon Crowell@JonCrowellOrg·
@jessesingal I think Shellenberger has brain worms as a general rule, but this seems like correct analysis. What do you think is wrong with it?
English
0
0
3
43
Jesse Singal
Jesse Singal@jessesingal·
Michael Shellenberger accuses effective altruists of "reject[ing]" the ten commandments and disagreeing that "life is sacred." Genuinely unsure where to even begin with this, on multiple levels.
Jesse Singal tweet media
English
8
1
30
3.5K
Jon Crowell
Jon Crowell@JonCrowellOrg·
@peterrhague I'm not surprised that no one cares about this. Been there, done that.
English
0
0
0
38
Peter Hague
Peter Hague@peterrhague·
For years people have asked “When will humans return to the Moon” with people guessing some year in the future. I’m not fully used to the answer being “Next Wednesday”
English
34
27
498
15.5K
Jon Crowell
Jon Crowell@JonCrowellOrg·
@MeghnaWBUR But remaking the Middle East is far more valuable and important than exploring Mars.
English
0
0
0
3
Meghna Chakrabarti
Meghna Chakrabarti@MeghnaWBUR·
We could build 100 more rovers for the price of one Iran was supplemental. Read ⬇️
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta

A $2.5 billion robot has been alone on another planet for 13 years and is still doing science. The scale of that sentence gets worse the longer you think about it. Curiosity landed in August 2012. Obama was president. Instagram had 80 million users. The iPhone 5 hadn’t shipped yet. The rover was designed for a two-year mission and 20 kilometers of driving. It’s now driven 35.5 kilometers, climbed over 327 meters up the side of a mountain, drilled 46 holes into Martian rock, and is currently running its fifth mission extension. The computer running all of this has 256 MB of RAM and a 200 MHz processor. Your AirPods have more computing power. Every command sent from Earth takes 14 minutes to arrive. Every photo sent back takes the same 14 minutes. When Curiosity drills into a rock, the team in Pasadena won’t know if it worked for half an hour. They’ve been operating on that delay, every single day, for 4,846 Martian sols. The power source is 10.6 pounds of plutonium-238 generating about 110 watts. Less than a ceiling fan. It will keep producing electricity for decades because the half-life of Pu-238 is 87.7 years. The rover will run out of moving parts before it runs out of power. And those wheels. Machined from single blocks of aluminum, 0.75 millimeters thick. Half a dime. JPL watched them get shredded by Martian rock starting in 2013, rerouted the entire mission path, taught the rover to drive backwards, and kept going. The wheels look like they lost a fight with a can opener. The rover is still climbing a mountain. Every iPhone you’ve owned since 2012 is in a landfill. Curiosity is on Mars, 140 million miles from the nearest repair shop, running on a ceiling fan’s worth of nuclear power, sending data through a 14-minute time delay, on shredded wheels, doing geology that rewrites what we know about whether life ever existed somewhere other than Earth. We built that. With 0.01% of the federal budget.

English
1
0
1
164
Jon Crowell
Jon Crowell@JonCrowellOrg·
@powerbottomdad1 Not for the coders -- they have to pay to use it. Of course it is profitable for the companies providing it. Coders think they are more productive, but they really aren't.
English
1
0
1
8
Jon Crowell
Jon Crowell@JonCrowellOrg·
@melodyskim Why would you want a husband if you could have a job instead?
English
0
0
1
11
Jeremy Coles
Jeremy Coles@JeremyTColes·
@JonCrowellOrg @PaulMSherman It’s funny that you mention “propositional content,” while clearly not understanding the propositional content of the first amendment and the rights they protect.
English
1
0
0
13
Jon Crowell
Jon Crowell@JonCrowellOrg·
@stevemagness Yes it does -- because disingenuous and perverted ideologues use intersex conditions to push their agenda. Notice that you're the one who brought up CAIS.
English
0
0
0
6
Simon Hill MSc, BSc
Simon Hill MSc, BSc@theproof·
What happened to the clinical study that Shawn Baker was raising money for? Was that study conducted, or if not, where is the money?
Simon Hill MSc, BSc tweet mediaSimon Hill MSc, BSc tweet mediaSimon Hill MSc, BSc tweet mediaSimon Hill MSc, BSc tweet media
English
22
13
136
13.7K
Jon Crowell
Jon Crowell@JonCrowellOrg·
@Kalshi Retail investors are likely to be the least sophisticated, which is why Elon wants them in. But Elon-fanboys deserver to lost their shirts, so it is okay. The danger is that the fanboys might sell TSLA to buy SpaceX, though.
English
0
0
1
73
Kalshi
Kalshi@Kalshi·
JUST IN: SpaceX IPO to reportedly reserve up to 30% for retail investors
English
112
181
2.7K
164.9K
Jon Crowell
Jon Crowell@JonCrowellOrg·
@JeremyTColes @PaulMSherman No, it very obviously is not -- it has no propositional content. And yes, "speech" is the thing the First Amendment is concerned with. Porn is not speech.
English
1
0
0
25
Jeremy Coles
Jeremy Coles@JeremyTColes·
@JonCrowellOrg @PaulMSherman But if very obviously is. And the restrictions of it aren’t based on whether it’s speech or not, it’s based on whether the government has a legitimate basis for those restrictions, despite being speech.
English
1
0
0
13