TechKatystudt Mechazilla

6K posts

TechKatystudt Mechazilla banner
TechKatystudt Mechazilla

TechKatystudt Mechazilla

@Katystudt

Technology, 3D printer, models Starbase OLIT mechazilla, starship, photography and 3D model maker .

North germany 가입일 Nisan 2014
1.1K 팔로잉432 팔로워
TechKatystudt Mechazilla 리트윗함
Scott Manley
Scott Manley@DJSnM·
Yesterday while driving to the airport for a training flight I heard @NASAAdmin talking about the impact flashes observed by Artermis II crew on the dark side of the moon. Specifically I heard these described as 'Micrometeorites' and thought they would be bigger, so it got my brain running on estimating the actual size of these objects based on what I knew. By the time I got to the airport 10 minutes later I had concluded the mass of these impactors is kilograms, so not 'micro' meteors, and that's not a dig at Jared by any means, for his EVA on Polaris Dawn he had almost certainly discussed micrometeorites, things the size of a grain of sand, that could damage the suit. But, what I really want to talk about is the mental arithmetic I did while driving, because I do these order of magnitude estimates for all sorts of questions. So I don't have any deep understanding of how bright the flashes would have been to be visible to the crew, I don't have a deep understanding of human visual acuity. But I started from the assumption that this is comparable to a faint star appearing for a second or so. I know the absolute magnitude of the sun is 4.8, that's how bright the sun appears at 10 parsecs. That's towards the fainter end of stars, and if one appeared for a fraction of a second it might register. I know a Parsec is 206265AU. (and 206265 is number of arc seconds in a radian). I also know the solar constant at earth is about 1370W/m^2. So to get the solar flux at 10 parsecs I'd have to divide by 2062650^2 - but that's too much math, just approximate to (2*10^6)^2 - or 4x10^12. dividing 1370 by 4 is roughly 350 or 3.5x10^2 Which puts solar illumination at 10parsecs at about 3.5x10^-10 W/m^2 So that's my standard light flux for 'faint star'. Let's now assume the flash lasts 1 second to avoid adding extra math, change watts into joules. Now, reverse this and figure out the energy of the object on the moon, for that we'd need to know how far they were from the moon. And I didn't carry that around in my head, but, I knew the closest approach was about 4000 miles, and the eclipse was past closest approach. So I used the number of 10,000km because that's 10^7m making the math easy - I need the square of that so 10^14. To figure out the energy emitted we take the energy per square meter and multiply it by the surface area of the sphere with a radius equivalent to astronaut's viewing distance. Take that 3.5x^-10J and multiply it by 4xPIx10^14 4 Pi is about 12.5, so I use 3.5x12.5 as about 40 (because I know 12.5x4 = 50). It's about 7% low but I don't care for small errors. So total energy is 4x10^5J. But that's just the energy that comes out as light, the energy of an impactor mostly goes into other forms, I learned this while making my video on @NASAAmes Vertical Gun Range. I know it's between 0.01-1% of the kinetic energy that comes out as light. So, using 10^-3 that gives impactor energy of 4x10^8J Now figure out the impactor mass, impact speeds are 10-15km/sec, remember kinetic energy goes as v^2. Now you might think that 10km/sec gets you a nice factor of 10^8, but then you need to multiply the mass by a factor of 2 (because of 1/2 m v^2). But if you use 14.14km/sec then that eliminates the factor of 2, and puts the velocity closer to the high end. So, point is I just adjust the energy by 10^8 and leave the 4 part as my mass estimate. 4kg of course. Not a micrometeorite. So, my mass estimate for an impactor is on the order of a few kilograms, but there's massive error bars here, because I don't know how bright the flashes looked to the astronauts, I don't have a detailed model of the human visual system or the luminance conversion efficiency of meteorites. I have an order of magnitude estimate I did in my head while driving, and 90% of the process is just multiplying by powers of 10, simply adjusting the exponent. Sure you have to carry numbers around like the solar constant, absolute magnitude of the sun etc. But I bet many of you have esoteric numbers you carry around in your heads. I then proceeded to go flying and feel soundly humbled by ATC overloading my brain.
Scott Manley tweet media
English
74
77
1.5K
77.8K
TechKatystudt Mechazilla 리트윗함
Tony Bela - InfographicTony
Tony Bela - InfographicTony@InfographicTony·
Hopefully not too much longer to wait for Starship Flight 12. My (unofficial) infographic is coming soon, meanwhile, here is a sneak peek.
Tony Bela - InfographicTony tweet media
English
9
20
184
3.4K
TechKatystudt Mechazilla 리트윗함
BRANDON M. WYNN
BRANDON M. WYNN@BrandonMWynn·
This sequence is FUCKING UNBELIEVABLE…bravo SpaceX production team. Bravo.
IGW@interstellargw

BREAKING: @SpaceX has just dropped the first episode of a new Starship docu-series; “Test Like You Fly” The 25 minute episode features never before seen footage from Starbase, and covers the on-going development of Starship V3… Watch Here: spacex.com/content/starsh…

English
8
73
1.6K
77.5K
TechKatystudt Mechazilla 리트윗함
Goose
Goose@megagoose11·
WOAW THE PERSPECTIVE SHIFT
English
1
14
385
4.9K
TechKatystudt Mechazilla 리트윗함
Avid Space
Avid Space@LabPadre·
More testing at Pad-2 this evening. The cryogenic pipework leading up the tower to the SQD has been spotted with frost and the tower vent has been active. our Nerdle cam has had a great view. youtube.com/live/edq_1W5lP…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
1
21
414
12.5K
TechKatystudt Mechazilla 리트윗함
Ezekiel Overstreet 🚀
Ezekiel Overstreet 🚀@EzekielOverstr1·
Seeing the trivent actually vent is surreal!
English
2
8
114
4.4K
TechKatystudt Mechazilla 리트윗함
NSF - NASASpaceflight.com
NSF - NASASpaceflight.com@NASASpaceflight·
Starships are lining up for upcoming flights from Starbase (and potentially KSC via barge), with production underway through at least Ship 48 and Ship 41 (Flight 14) already in stacking. ➡️youtu.be/gsQdK7gC6FM
YouTube video
YouTube
English
9
66
760
37.3K
TechKatystudt Mechazilla 리트윗함
Everyday Astronaut
Everyday Astronaut@Erdayastronaut·
SNEAK PEEK 👀 Here's an overview of Starship HLS's mission profile. We eventually go over all the numbers & do some calcs to see if there's ways to reduce the tankers. I'll have a full-ish 90 min rough draft review up tonight for X subscribers, Patrons & YouTube members!
English
194
236
3.7K
184.3K
TechKatystudt Mechazilla 리트윗함
DogeDesigner
DogeDesigner@cb_doge·
Incredible footage of Starship
English
170
356
2.4K
54K
TechKatystudt Mechazilla 리트윗함
NASA
NASA@NASA·
Let's see… a five-letter word for happiness: space! 🦀 @NASAHubble captures the intricate structure of the Krab, er, Crab Nebula in this image.
NASA tweet media
English
2.2K
8.8K
45K
1.5M
TechKatystudt Mechazilla 리트윗함
Surajit
Surajit@surajit_ghosh2·
One of the U.S. Navy’s first-contact team members released new video of the Artemis II recovery following their Pacific Ocean recovery, captured by Reid Wiseman
English
35
331
4.6K
136.8K
TechKatystudt Mechazilla 리트윗함
Marcus House
Marcus House@MarcusHouse·
I'm absolutely blown away by everything we've leaned on Starship here earlier. 🤯 More pumped than ever for Starship Flight 12. How about you!? 🚀 I've got loads to catch you up on here! 😍 youtu.be/zsM8SZV8DnY
YouTube video
YouTube
English
20
48
943
19.9K
TechKatystudt Mechazilla 리트윗함
RocketEnthusiast
RocketEnthusiast@IEnjoyStarshi·
Mass producing an engine like Raptor 3 is no easy task, this is insane
RocketEnthusiast tweet mediaRocketEnthusiast tweet mediaRocketEnthusiast tweet mediaRocketEnthusiast tweet media
English
23
156
2.1K
65.1K
TechKatystudt Mechazilla 리트윗함
Mark Federschmidt
Mark Federschmidt@BoosterTribe·
@elonmusk idea for a 4th of July Starship launch 🚀 🤣.
Mark Federschmidt tweet media
English
17
8
106
2.5K
TechKatystudt Mechazilla 리트윗함
IGW
IGW@interstellargw·
BREAKING: @SpaceX has just dropped the first episode of a new Starship docu-series; “Test Like You Fly” The 25 minute episode features never before seen footage from Starbase, and covers the on-going development of Starship V3… Watch Here: spacex.com/content/starsh…
IGW tweet mediaIGW tweet mediaIGW tweet mediaIGW tweet media
English
13
201
2.1K
124.4K