Rewild America

93 posts

Rewild America

Rewild America

@MehtaSleepy

가입일 Ocak 2025
41 팔로잉4 팔로워
Rewild America
Rewild America@MehtaSleepy·
@NikolovScience This isn't PEER reviewed this is co conspirator reviewed. Give me a break. This is all propaganda - not a single reputable peer.
English
0
0
0
2
Ned Nikolov, Ph.D.
Ned Nikolov, Ph.D.@NikolovScience·
This is an updated list of peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations, video podcasts, and key blog articles explaining various aspect of our new climate-science paradigm currently known as the Nikolov-Zeller (NZ) Climate Concept. This full-fledged, physics-based and data-driven concept will eventually replace the "greenhouse theory" of climate change, which was proposed as a pure conjecture more than 120 years ago, and is now falsified by modern satellite observations from projects such as NASA CERES (ceres.larc.nasa.gov): Peer-reviewed Scientific Papers: - 2014. On the average temperature of airless spherical bodies and the magnitude of Earth’s atmospheric thermal effect: springerplus.springeropen.com/articles/10.11… - 2017. New Insights on the Physical Nature of the Atmospheric Greenhouse Effect Deduced from an Empirical Planetary Temperature Model: omicsonline.org/open-access/Ne… - 2024. Roles of Earth’s Albedo Variations and Top-of-the-Atmosphere Energy Imbalance in Recent Warming: New Insights from Satellite and Surface Observations: mdpi.com/2673-7418/4/3/… Video Presentations & Podcasts: - 2021. Demystifying the Atmospheric Thermal Effect. Toward a New Paradigm of Climate Science: vimeo.com/602819278 - 2021. Drivers of Earth's Paleoclimate, a New Paradigm of Understanding: youtube.com/watch?v=DpUkPP… - 2024. Beyond the Greenhouse Theory: youtube.com/watch?v=L1GgmB… - 2025. The ill-defined “Greenhouse Effect” and Greenhouse-Gas "Radiative Forcing" youtube.com/watch?v=tTMEc5… - 2025. What's the Truth? Unpacking Climate Science (Podcast with Dr. Shawn Baker): youtube.com/watch?v=-DhlH6… - 2026. Is the Global Mean Surface Temperature Physically Meaningful? youtube.com/watch?v=WqmxpW… Blog Articles: - 2022. Dispelling the Milankovitch Myth: Why were Ice Ages not caused by Orbital Cycles? tallbloke.wordpress.com/2022/01/03/ned… - 2022. A Surface Solar Radiation Dataset exposes a major manipulation of Global Temperature Records between 1960 and 1980: tallbloke.wordpress.com/2022/07/11/ned… - 2024. Misrepresentation of Critical Satellite Data by the IPCC 6th Assessment Report: tallbloke.wordpress.com/2024/07/26/nik… - 2024. An Open Letter to IPCC discussing omissions & data misrepresentations in AR6: tallbloke.wordpress.com/wp-content/upl… Spread the word about our new climate science, for it has the power to save the World through knowledge from a self-induced destruction caused by collective ignorance!
YouTube video
YouTube
YouTube video
YouTube
YouTube video
YouTube
YouTube video
YouTube
YouTube video
YouTube
Ned Nikolov, Ph.D. tweet media
English
49
212
459
25.7K
Rewild America
Rewild America@MehtaSleepy·
@socratesccost like who even are you talking to...get a life...and yes no continents are jelly beans and the continents release heat and absorb it...none of what you said relates to climate science
English
1
0
0
18
Rewild America
Rewild America@MehtaSleepy·
@lasee_frank Ha ha what an idiot. That's called deforestation fool. Made me literally fall off my chair laughing
English
0
0
0
41
Frank Lasee @truthinenergyandclimate
The climate propagandists keep making stuff up to scare you with. Rather than admit there are good things about our little warmer world and more CO2. Crops grow better and bigger with less water and tolerate heat better. WOW! That should be celebrated. Not with climate cultists. They lie and say, well, the food isn't as nutritious. When in fact it is. wattsupwiththat.com/2026/05/08/no-…
Frank Lasee @truthinenergyandclimate tweet media
English
15
28
76
4.1K
Elie Jarrouge, MD
Elie Jarrouge, MD@ElieJarrougeMD·
I’m a board-certified internal medicine physician licensed in multiple state. I treat obesity, type 2 diabetes, and hypertension every day. I rarely write a prescription for any of them. Here’s why… 🧵
English
11
27
271
41.5K
Rewild America
Rewild America@MehtaSleepy·
@WeiZhangAtmos @ChrisGloninger Don't condescend Wei. I am older than you I suspect. Get a brain. We forecast weather not climate. They are different. Climate change should be in geologic time not chronologic time. That's what's happening because of AGW.
English
0
0
0
8
Wei. Zhang
Wei. Zhang@WeiZhangAtmos·
@ChrisGloninger Here we go with the “Exxon Knew” nonsense. Give it a rest, Chris. You’re a young man …get a life. No one knew how to forecast climate in 1977 and they still don’t. “SPOCK knew”, LOL youtu.be/NQSBn50o_8M?si…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
3
0
1
86
Chris Gloninger, CCM, CBM
Chris Gloninger, CCM, CBM@ChrisGloninger·
You know that feeling at the beach when the afternoon breeze kicks in and everything gets better? A new study in Nature Climate Change just found that 67% of major coastal cities, New York, London, Shanghai, are already losing those breeze days. The ocean is warming too fast and the engine is stalling. Under high emissions we lose another 27% by 2050. Hotter cities. Worse air. More heat deaths. ExxonMobil knew about climate change in 1977. And they knew.: #SeaBreeze #ClimateChange #BigOil #ClimateScience
English
31
34
72
2.5K
Science Blog
Science Blog@ScienceBlog3·
Earth's temperature can be calculated via gas laws, Stefan-Boltzmann principles, and measurable variables like pressure and irradiance. We don't need the magical thermodynamics of eGHG theory and all the hidden fudge that comes with it.
Ned Nikolov, Ph.D.@NikolovScience

Well, how about the bigger truth that any amount of human carbon emissions is inconsequential to climate? That's because the entire "greenhouse-gas" theory of climate change relied upon by IPCC models is physically wrong! See this published new science: x.com/NikolovScience…

English
1
4
10
299
Rewild America
Rewild America@MehtaSleepy·
@ChrisMartzWX Chris you are more interested in policy than science...that's clear....become a politician ..I think you will do a better job than with the pseudo science you pedal. Seriously I applaud your energy and focus
English
1
0
0
976
Chris Martz
Chris Martz@ChrisMartzWX·
Amazing how fast the climate scam disappeared as soon as these AI data centers started being built.
English
405
5.9K
45.4K
667.7K
Rewild America
Rewild America@MehtaSleepy·
@ryankatzrosene Fredericton NB is in a three year drought I just found out...may 25-april 2026 rainfall only 25 cm versus 45 annual needed for example. Never saw this in the almost 40 years my parents lived there..wildfires every year
English
0
0
1
107
Prof. Ryan Katz-Rosene
Prof. Ryan Katz-Rosene@ryankatzrosene·
The rate of warming HAS to slow down in the coming decades. It has to! If it doesn’t, we’re truly fucked. Thankfully, the science suggests that if we ambitiously cut anthropogenic GHG emissions, this should happen. But we’re running out of time; and the more we wait to get to Net Zero, the less certain we are about the system behaving the way we expect it to…
Jeff Berardelli@WeatherProf

“One of these things is not like the others…” Incidentally made famous by Sesame Street, but it feels appropriate for this visual. This shows the rate of global temperature change over the past 2000 years - in 25 year increments. The rate of change over the past 50 years just jumps off the page! The last 25 years is quite shocking. When evaluating the risk posed by a warming Earth, it’s the “rate” of change that matters. Scientists know of no other period where temperatures have changed even close to as fast as it is today. That rapid rate of warming and changes in our climate is the biggest threat because it’s beyond the rate of adaptation of much life on Earth. You may ask, how do we know the temperature of the distant past when we didn’t have thermometers? We use proxy data - tree rings, coral layers, sediment cores, ice cores etc… and piece together a reconstruction of the past. For instance, tree rings tell you how warm and dry a period was based on how thick the ring is in that given year. More rain = thicker tree ring. Climate skeptics famously say: “But the planet was much warmer 56 million years ago”.. that’s true, and the reason they know that is from climate scientists using proxy data. Specifically the data up to 1850 in this graph uses PAGES2K - a consortium of hundreds of Paleoclimatologist’s using records from all over Earth, meticulously pieced together. Some periods are more accurate with lots of data, others have less data and lower resolution. Therefore 25 years increments are about as fine detail as we can get. For 1850-2025 the graph uses Berkeley Earth data, one of the common datasets used by scientists. Bottom line: Earth is warming at rates never experienced during the reign of humans, and it’s us humans who have become Earth’s greatest force of nature.

English
27
39
112
5.7K
Rewild America
Rewild America@MehtaSleepy·
@ScienceBlog3 @blizzard219 @Robin_Hagues @AC28881680 @NikolovScience Your issue is all policy. You are fired up because the policy is your problem. We can all agree on that but solar cycles, solar flares causing pressure increases (sure but not systemic over 40 years) and solar rotation around galaxy is all just psuedo science. How do we disprove
English
1
0
0
23
Rewild America
Rewild America@MehtaSleepy·
@ScienceBlog3 @blizzard219 @NikolovScience Sea level rise impacts low lying area now ..verifiable ..co2 coalition shows urchins proliferating as a good thing ..no that means the kelp Forest is being decimated. The ignorance beyond physics ( you're a freaking giss guy) is staggering
English
1
0
0
13
Rewild America
Rewild America@MehtaSleepy·
@ScienceBlog3 @blizzard219 @NikolovScience The N and Z model cannot be demonstrated in any lab anywhere. It is pseudo science( cannot be proven or disproven) because the trigger cannot be validated. Solar changes ( N and Z) or Solar galactic position ( other) is as pseudo science as it gets.
English
1
0
0
15
Science Blog
Science Blog@ScienceBlog3·
@blizzard219 @MehtaSleepy @NikolovScience No, the fundamental problem is the Atmospheric Thermal Effect (ATE) is stronger than previously thought (89-90k vs. the 33k used in models). We can calculate this now and it's a fundamental assumption that causes models to run hot.
English
2
0
1
21
Rewild America
Rewild America@MehtaSleepy·
@ScienceBlog3 @NikolovScience @blizzard219 There is nothing simpler than looking at the sensor in Hawaii that shows C02 in the atmosphere at over 430 ppm. Yes at the galactic level, Ned's pseudo science masked with equations may show change as undetectable but here on earth its plenty detectible and very potent.
English
1
0
0
9
Science Blog
Science Blog@ScienceBlog3·
@MehtaSleepy @NikolovScience @blizzard219 Ned offers a simple, straightforward, and calculable answer. By comparison, the greenhouse gas (GHG) theory, or “enhanced GHG theory”, is an overly complicated mess built on assumptive logic and magical thermodynamics. It’s popular mainstream fringe science.
English
2
0
0
24
Rewild America
Rewild America@MehtaSleepy·
@bryan_johnson our ancestors might well have sat all day and definitely even processed foods is better than maggot infested raw carrion and parasite infused water which I am sure they had to eat/drink at times...
English
0
0
2
1.9K
Bryan Johnson
Bryan Johnson@bryan_johnson·
Society was built to make money. Indifferent to your health and sanity. For example, we did not evolve to: + sit 10 hours a day + have our attention fractured 300 times daily + compare ourselves to millions of others + travel 9 time zones in 13 hours + tolerate sounds above 85 dB causing hearing loss + outsmart algorithms hijacking our reward system + breathe fine particulate air pollution + live under 16+ hrs of artificial light a day + have 3 courses of antibiotics before age 2 + eat ultra-processed foods for 60% of daily calories + consume 17 teaspoons of added sugar a day So if you're feeling down in the dumps, maybe fatigued, a little or a lot depressed, anxious, that's why.
English
256
524
5.7K
330.3K