Mortiel
12.3K posts

Mortiel
@Mortiel
Games Industry Consumer Advocacy and Commentary | Systems Engineer | Proud Dad X2 | Rothbardian



@DesignLvLUp If AI were politics, which I don’t for a moment believe, then you are seeking a political disclosure. You might as well ask Steam to demand developers make political party disclosures or position disclosures on whatever social issues you advocate for; it would be the same.





Console hardware sales in May in the US hit all time lows PlayStation hardware was lowest in 25 years, while Xbox unit sales were the lowest ever recorded in history

always hated competitive gaming




The state of gaming rn





@TheOtherFrost Food lists ingredients because they directly affect the buyer; people have allergies and dietary sensitivities. AI development tools aren’t comparable; AI opposition is a political movement and Steam AI disclosures are political signals like ESG disclosures.




If you ever wonder why the Epic Games Store will never be as well-liked as Steam: Epic chooses repeatedly to put publishers above consumers, then uses "think of the poor devs!" as a shield. Based on how successful EGS has been, it seems like no one is buying the shtick.



Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney has called Valve’s AI disclosure policy on Steam “irresponsible,” arguing that forcing developers to label games using AI could unfairly target smaller studios. Sweeney believes AI will soon be a normal part of game development, so requiring developers to label games that use AI “makes no sense.” "I think it's really irresponsible of Valve. They shouldn't do it, because it makes it much, much, much harder for a game developer to have a chance of success. You have to choose from either not using tools that can make you way more productive, and probably failing due to competition that does." He also warned that these labels could make it easier for people to review-bomb games, especially those made by smaller studios.





