Shade
342 posts
@mweinbach We literally have a week to enjoy it before they start nerfing
English
2 prompts deep into Opus 4.7 and benchmarks don’t do it justice. Way better behavior and instruction following. Pretty massive improvement in actual usage.
English
Russia raided nearly 100 suspected crypto criminals in a single day. What they found inside the apartments was not what anyone expected.
> Russian authorities were investigating an illegal crypto exchange network called Cryptex.
> Operating since 2013, Cryptex had processed over $1.4 BILLION in transactions.
> Their main clients were ransomware hackers, cybercriminals and money launderers across the world.
> In 2023 alone, the network moved over $1.1 BILLION and generated $38 MILLION in illegal income for those involved.
> On October 2, 2024, Russian federal investigators launched coordinated raids across 14 regions of the country.
> 148 locations searched. 96 people detained and transported to Moscow.
> This is what they seized:
> Robinson helicopters. Bentleys. Rolls Royces. Porsches. A Tesla Cybertruck. Boats. Snowmobiles. Bundles of cash.
> 1.5 BILLION rubles confiscated in a single day. Roughly $16 MILLION.
> Russian media called it the largest crypto crackdown in the country's history.
> The man at the top was Sergey Ivanov, known online as "Taleon."
> The US Treasury alleged he had been laundering crypto for ransomware operators, darknet vendors, and carding shops for approximately 20 years.
> The week before the Russian raids, the US had already moved.
> The Secret Service seized Cryptex's domains. The DOJ unsealed indictments against two Russian nationals.
> The State Department posted a bounty of up to $11 MILLION for information on Ivanov.
> Then Russia followed with the physical raids days later.
> Whether the two governments directly coordinated has never been confirmed.
> The suspects face up to 20 years in prison.
> One of the largest crypto laundering networks ever uncovered, hiding the proceeds in helicopters and luxury cars across 14 regions of Russia.
They laundered over a BILLION dollars for the world's most dangerous hackers. Then parked the evidence in their driveways.
English
thanks for giving us Opus 4.7 with Mythos mogging it ur actually goated for that. it’s probably the coolest thing ive seen in my life, you released an AI model to AI users but you put Mythos there so we know it's the mid version. heroic. i love worse models thats fire bro thanks
English
Claude Opus 4.7 with max intelligence inside of Claude Code still does not pass the car wash test.
Are we cooked?
English
@justinsuntron You only calling for help to save your money
Let's be honest - if your tokens hadn't been frozen, you wouldn't have said a word right now
English
这是"世界暴政", 不是"世界自由金融"
此提案被包装成"治理对齐信号"和"长期承诺"，但剥开包装来看，这是我见过的最荒谬的治理骗局之一。我逐条说明。
一、反对即受罚——经典的胁迫手段
这不是一次合法的投票，而是胁迫，这个提案的设计本身就是一个逻辑陷阱：任何投反对票的人，其代币将被无限期锁定，没有任何解锁路径。
换句话说，你反对这个提案，你就被惩罚。这不叫投票，这叫胁迫。世界上哪有一种民主程序是同意就给你好处、反对就关你禁闭的？
二、投票者已被选择性冻结
我个人持有约4%的投票权，但我的代币已被冻结，我被强制排除在投票过程之外。
我并非个例。
大量持有重大投票权的持有人都处于同样的状态。与此同时，团队掌握着冻结代币的权力——他们决定谁能投票、谁不能投票。这意味着什么？意味着在投票开始之前，结果就已经被决定了。
这不是治理投票。这是一场警察已经封锁了议会大门、只放自己人进去举手的表演。投票池已经被清洗过了，剩下的只有同意票。
这种投票的结果没有任何约束力。
三、全部实际权力被匿名者窃取
WLFI智能合约的实际控制权掌握在一个3/5匿名多签手中，而一个匿名的guardian EOA则拥有将持有WLFI的地址列入黑名单的权力。
请注意——是匿名的。
这个匿名多签可以无视任何投票结果，直接在合约层面执行任何操作。所谓的治理提案、链上投票、社区讨论，统统不过是一场戏。真正的权力从未被交给任何其他人，而他们试图用这些把戏来愚弄社区，简直可笑。
事实是：权力掌握在没有人知道、也无法验证其所有者身份的匿名钱包地址手中。这不是去中心化治理，这是披着DAO外衣的独裁。
四、投票者必须实名，统治者却匿名——比暴政还过分
最讽刺的部分在于：WLFI要求每一个参与投票的持有人完成身份验证、电子签署确认、满足合规资格要求。你想行使自己的权利？请先亮出身份。
但真正掌握合约生杀大权的guardian和多签签名者是谁？没有人被告知，完全没有透明度。被统治者必须实名，而拥有绝对权力的统治者却是匿名的。你的选民要登记造册、接受审查、被审核资格、被指示如何投票——而你的独裁者连脸都不露。
五、数十亿美元财产权利的赤裸侵犯
让我们不要忘记这个提案的真实利害：这不是一个无关痛痒的参数调整或协议升级。这个投票要决定的是高达数十亿美元资产的解锁时间表、治理与归属权的重新分配，以及最极端的——数十亿枚代币的永久销毁。这是对持有人财产权利赤裸裸的剥夺。
在一个投反对票就被惩罚、大量持有人被冻结投票权、实际控制权在匿名钱包手中的环境下，用这样一场伪投票来决定数十亿美元资产的命运？
这不是治理，这是一场骗局，完全背离了这个协议的初衷。任何法治社会都不会允许这种事情发生。在传统金融市场中，任何涉及这种规模的资产处置，都需要经过严格的监管审查、独立董事会批准和少数股东保护程序。
而在这里，几个匿名钱包就可以决定一切。代币的永久销毁意味着持有人的财产被不可逆地消灭——没有赔偿，没有追索权，没有任何正当程序。这已经远远超出了所谓"去中心化治理"的范畴，这是对财产权的系统性侵犯。
结论
我重申，这个提案是非法治理。这是少数被筛选出来的人在行使权力，精心策划一场进一步的权力巩固和财产掠夺行动。
反对者因投反对票而受罚，异见者被冻结，实际控制权在匿名钱包手中，行使权利的人必须自证身份，而数十亿美元资产的命运就这样被一场伪投票裁决。
这不是去中心化金融应有的样子。在这种条件下产生的结果不具备合法性，不应具有约束力，不应被承认。
我呼吁所有WLFI持有人认清这个提案的本质，在所有公开渠道表达反对，并保留一切法律追诉权利。
WLFI@worldlibertyfi
We’ve just posted a governance proposal to the forum for community discussion, and we believe it represents one of the strongest long-term governance alignment signals in DeFi. Here's what it does 🧵
中文
I have always been an ardent supporter of President Trump and his crypto friendly policy.
As an early supporter who invested heavily in World Liberty Financial, I did so because I believed in the vision that was presented to the public: a decentralized finance platform that would promote financial freedom, remove intermediaries, and bring the benefits of DeFi to mainstream Americans.
What was never disclosed — to me or to any investor — is that World Liberty embedded a backdoor blacklisting function in the smart contract used to deploy WLFI tokens. This function gives the Company unilateral power to freeze, restrict, and effectively confiscate the property rights of any token holder, without notice, without cause, and without recourse.
This is the opposite of decentralization. This is a trap door marketed as an open door.
I denounce the ongoing token scandals by the bad actors at WLFI.
I am the first and single largest victim, as a result of their wrongful blacklisting of my WLFI token wallet back in 2025, that violates basic investor rights and blockchain principles of fairness.
Every action taken by the WLFI team to extract fees from users, to secretly implant backdoor controls over user assets, to freeze investor funds without disclosure or due process, and to treat the crypto community as a personal ATM — all of these actions are illegitimate and were never authorized by any fair, transparent, or good-faith community governance process.
The governance votes cited to justify these actions were not conducted through a fair or transparent process. Key information was withheld from voters, meaningful participation was restricted, and the outcomes were predetermined. These votes do not represent the will of the community — they represent the will of those who designed them.
These actions have nothing to do with me. They have nothing to do with the investors who believed the promises this project made. We oppose every one of these actions in the strongest possible terms.
The WLFI team’s actions erode trust in the project. Unlock the tokens and uphold transparency for the community. Let’s build with integrity, not misconduct.
English
@robinebers If they intentionally nerfed the models for the sake of a new release they should refund part of the subscription fees to users. When they release the new model any model will look incredibly advanced compared to the current ones. This looks like a scam.
English
RE: Opus 4.6
never have I been more convinced that they fucked this model up - hopefully in preparation for a new release, but holy shit it is genuinely acting worst than ChatGPT on the web
English
OPUS 4.6 NERFED, 4.5 UNTOUCHED
- Opus 4.6 fails the same test every time while 4.5 passes consistently
- Users report big quality drop; many switching back to 4.5 in Claude Code
English