Si Simple

Sapphirelipa. A Sister from the future, a Sister from the past.

🆔Government to public: Do you want digital ID checks to be used to enforce a social media ban for under-16s ☐ Yes ☐ Definitely yes ☐ Strongly yes ☐ Yes 100% The “consultation” doesn’t appear to have a box for disagreeing.

@eli_schein Sometimes 50% of something is better than 100% of nothing

Artists - if you were offered major gallery representation, and this meant operating with normal economic splits, would you:

@FoundationHelp @foundation @Blackdoveart @privy_io @thirdweb When I sell on opensea they don't take custody of the token so I don't understand why you need to do that?

Thank you for the patience community. Over the last 24 hours we completely migrated foundation.app to @Blackdoveart's hosting infrastructure. We upgraded a number of existing services, including @privy_io for wallet compatibility and @thirdweb for indexing solutions.

@FoundationHelp @foundation @Blackdoveart @privy_io @thirdweb I can sell on rarible and opensea at the same time

@walasavagephoto @muriellondon I think if someone angrily burnt one of my artworks I'd remint but just change the colour of one pixel

@SiSimple7 @muriellondon Ah, right. So I think the general consensus among artists and collectors is that anything sent to the burn address "no longer exists" in practice; it's there, but if a new one is made, it's not 2/2 to the community at large. Maybe I'm off base here, but I don't think so.

Question for artists. If a collector burns several of your works, including some 1/1s… would you remint them just to keep them in your own wallet, not to list them for sale? Is that generally considered acceptable in the space, or is the burn usually respected as final?

@walasavagephoto @muriellondon Essentially reminting is a completely new token but the artist is adding the same jpeg to it. So it's up to the artist to decide whether to tell people or not. The burned token will never have a new owner.

@walasavagephoto @muriellondon Anyone can take a token out of circulation as the burn address is just a wallet that no-one has the private key to (allegedly). It stops people spending those tokens.

@SiSimple7 @muriellondon I guess I'm confused about the burn mechanism. Doesn't only the artist have access to that function on Etherscan? Collectors can only send to 0x000?

@walasavagephoto @muriellondon It’s not in the burn address wallet. It’s on the blockchain. A crypto wallet isn’t where anything is stored

@SiSimple7 @muriellondon Nobody really thinks this in practice, do they? It's a little pedantic to say it's a 2/2, when one of them is in the burn address wallet.

@nftlisa One issue I have is if they're not letting any artists go don't they already have a massive roster? I feel like they should give a little tlc to the ones they already have

@SiSimple7 Post said that’s voluntary

Why is every third post someone being sad about SR pls just shut up and apply

@nftlisa I never got round to it either

Is it too late for me to do my first rodeo

@micolmicolmicol @pointline_ I'm a London local artist too :) 🫂

@pointline_ @SiSimple7 🫂

open call opportunity for london based artists! i’m curating a small showcase of art for a london based cafe / venue must be physical works / prints :) deadline: 17 march all details + application form below 🌀⤵️

@Bankless Sounds like what @jamesbloom_ did already

SuperRare Is Launching Liquid Editions SuperRare is redefining cryptoart with a new primitive where ERC-20 tokens become living, generative artworks. The token's market behavior directly shapes the visual output—no static files, just pure onchain dynamics. The first drop goes live Thursday. Here's how it works 👇 ~~ Analysis by @wmpeaster ~~ Networked Art as Canvas SuperRare has long been a force in cryptoart. Yet amid the ongoing bear market, veteran projects are exploring new approaches. SuperRare is now leaning into *networked art*, beginning with Liquid Editions. SuperRare's @rhtkpr explained that networked art "treats the network as part of the canvas [...] where participation matters, meaning can change over time, and the audience is not only viewing but also shaping the social reality around the piece." Liquid Editions specifically "treat the onchain market state as a creative primitive"—a new vocabulary for participation where art sits at the center. How It Works Liquid Editions use fungible ERC-20 tokens instead of NFTs as vessels. The token's market behavior—trades and transfers—determines the visual output in real-time. There's no static image file. A smart contract serving as an onchain renderer reads live market state and paints visual outputs continuously. The artwork functions as a product of its own economic activity, always on. The First Drop: Value Discovery The first launch drops Thursday, March 5th at 12:00pm ET. Value Discovery by @ripe0x known for To Be a Machine explores how image processing discovers "brightness" through error, and markets discover "price" through disagreement. The implementation: ripe launches two liquidity pools with distinct fee tiers for one token. The fee disparity creates a persistent price spread, which the onchain renderer reads to generate a degraded, shifting dollar bill image. Beyond Existing Models We've seen fungible art experiments before—DN-404 hybrids, fxhash Art Coins, Zora content coins. But these involve abstraction or separation: coins running parallel to NFTs, complementing collections, or representing external media. Liquid Editions differ because the coins *are* the art. Not counterparts. Not complements. Not representations of external media. They constitute the art itself—an indivisible part of the medium. This represents ownable programmable art that is always generated in real-time and always available for interaction. Whether through NFTs or ERC-20s, this is a new medium for the Ethereum ecosystem. Watch for the drop on Thursday.

@nftlisa My thoughts are feelings resemble a liquid that flows between people and connect like an ocean of emotion. In this world I believe everything is made of matter, including invisible emotions that gets between the skin, can be trapped in our organs until it drains out. Eg Sulking

@SiSimple7 Can you identify where the feelings are coming from?

Men in general are detached from themselves and their own feelings in so many ways, it doesn’t surprise me that in art they seek to intellectualize the experience or look for financial opportunities Feeling with your entire being is a luxury <3

@nikitabier Can you apply this to people posting explosions that happened months/years ago too?

Today we are revising our Creator Revenue Sharing policies to maintain authenticity of content on Timeline and prevent manipulation of the program. During times of war, it is critical that people have access to authentic information on the ground. With today’s AI technologies, it is trivial to create content that can mislead people. Starting now, users who post AI-generated videos of an armed conflict—without adding a disclosure that it was made with AI—will be suspended from Creator Revenue Sharing for 90 days. Subsequent violations will result in a permanent suspension from the program. This will be flagged to us by any post with a Community Note or if the content contains meta data (or other signals) from generative AI tools. We will continue to refine our policies and product to ensure X can be trusted during these critical moments.