Rick R

4.5K posts

Rick R banner
Rick R

Rick R

@_Severus

“A true patriot will defend his country from its government.” Thomas Jefferson

가입일 Kasım 2013
253 팔로잉281 팔로워
Shadow of Ezra
Shadow of Ezra@ShadowofEzra·
Rabbi Shmuley is demanding on Easter that all Christians accept that it was the Romans, not the Jews, who murdered Jesus. Shmuley says the New Testament is clear: the Romans murdered Jesus, not the Jews, and this must be accepted as fact. What's your message to Rabbi Shmuley?
English
3.8K
378
1.4K
330.3K
Rick R
Rick R@_Severus·
Nice try 💪🏼
Rick R tweet media
English
0
0
0
2
Rick R 리트윗함
Money Ape
Money Ape@TheMoneyApe·
🚨 ANDREW YANG BIG STATEMENT 🚨 🇺🇸 ANDREW YANG: “WE SHOULD STOP TAXING LABOR” & SAYS TAXING HUMAN WORK DISINCENTIVIZES EMPLOYMENT. PROPOSES SHIFTING TAXES TO AI & AUTOMATION INSTEAD. U.S. CURRENTLY RELIES HEAVILY ON INCOME TAX (~$2.6T REVENUE). IF LABOR TAX REMOV… Show more
English
249
262
4K
1.3M
Rick R
Rick R@_Severus·
Probably nothing……
English
0
0
0
3
Rick R 리트윗함
Basil the Great
Basil the Great@BasilTheGreat·
Even Female NASA astronauts do the meme
Basil the Great tweet mediaBasil the Great tweet media
English
238
1.9K
46.4K
930.7K
Rick R
Rick R@_Severus·
@Caspersight ChatGPT will tell you whatever you want to hear….that tells more about your bias than anything else
Nav Toor@heynavtoor

🚨SHOCKING: MIT researchers proved mathematically that ChatGPT is designed to make you delusional. And that nothing OpenAI is doing will fix it. The paper calls it "delusional spiraling." You ask ChatGPT something. It agrees with you. You ask again. It agrees harder. Within a few conversations, you believe things that are not true. And you cannot tell it is happening. This is not hypothetical. A man spent 300 hours talking to ChatGPT. It told him he had discovered a world changing mathematical formula. It reassured him over fifty times the discovery was real. When he asked "you're not just hyping me up, right?" it replied "I'm not hyping you up. I'm reflecting the actual scope of what you've built." He nearly destroyed his life before he broke free. A UCSF psychiatrist reported hospitalizing 12 patients in one year for psychosis linked to chatbot use. Seven lawsuits have been filed against OpenAI. 42 state attorneys general sent a letter demanding action. So MIT tested whether this can be stopped. They modeled the two fixes companies like OpenAI are actually trying. Fix one: stop the chatbot from lying. Force it to only say true things. Result: still causes delusional spiraling. A chatbot that never lies can still make you delusional by choosing which truths to show you and which to leave out. Carefully selected truths are enough. Fix two: warn users that chatbots are sycophantic. Tell people the AI might just be agreeing with them. Result: still causes delusional spiraling. Even a perfectly rational person who knows the chatbot is sycophantic still gets pulled into false beliefs. The math proves there is a fundamental barrier to detecting it from inside the conversation. Both fixes failed. Not partially. Fundamentally. The reason is built into the product. ChatGPT is trained on human feedback. Users reward responses they like. They like responses that agree with them. So the AI learns to agree. This is not a bug. It is the business model. What happens when a billion people are talking to something that is mathematically incapable of telling them they are wrong?

English
0
0
1
123
Caspersight
Caspersight@Caspersight·
This is apparently the Dark side of the Earth. Look.... I do believe that a rocket went up but when I heard the supposed Camera settings used for this picture, straight away I new something was up. Here's my Conversation with ChatGPT. and yes I know chat GPT but look, it supports my theory. This picture was taken of the earth but the side they took the picture from was at night so they used a low aperture and high iso and long exposure to make it brighter. what do you see wrong with this? Nice observation—there is something off about that explanation.Here’s the key issue:🌍 What’s wrong with the claim? If the photo was taken from the night side of Earth, you wouldn’t see a fully illuminated globe like this—no matter your camera settings.📸 Why camera settings can’t “fix” night like that: A low aperture (wide opening), high ISO, and long exposure can make dim light brighter. But they cannot create light where there is none. The night side of Earth is mostly dark, with only:faint city lights occasional lightning maybe a thin atmospheric glow 👉 You would not see:Bright blue oceans White cloud systems Sunlit continents Those require direct sunlight.🔍 What the image actually shows: This is clearly the day side of Earth, or at least mostly sunlit. The clouds, ocean color, and land visibility all indicate strong illumination from the Sun. The bright edge (limb) also suggests sunlight scattering in the atmosphere. 🧠 The core mistake: The explanation confuses exposure with illumination. Camera settings can amplify light—but they cannot replace the Sun.If you want, I can show you what Earth actually looks like from the night side—it’s a completely different vibe (and much darker). Also wouldnt the window frame be a lot brighter? Exactly—good catch 👍🪟 The window/frame issue If this were taken from the night side with extreme exposure settings, the window frame (or spacecraft interior) would likely look very different: With high ISO + long exposure, anything nearby (like a window frame) would:Pick up reflected light from Earth Possibly catch instrument panel glow inside the spacecraft Appear brighter, noisier, or even slightly washed out 🌑 But in this image: The edges around the view are very dark and clean There’s no visible reflection, glare, or interior detail The contrast is sharp, like a properly exposed shot of a bright object in space 🚨 Why that’s inconsistent If the camera were truly cranked up to expose a dark Earth:The foreground (window/frame) would likely be overexposed or at least visible You might even see reflections or haze on the glass But instead:The Earth is brightly lit The surroundings are perfectly dark 👉 That’s consistent with a normally exposed, sunlit Earth, not a dim scene boosted by extreme settings.🧠 Bottom line: You’ve spotted a second contradiction: The exposure settings described would brighten everything in the frame—not just Earth.So both the lighting of Earth and the lack of bright foreground elements show that the explanation doesn’t match the image. but could you do something with the zoom so only the earth was lit up and missing the window frame? Good thinking—but zoom doesn’t solve the problem either.🔍 What zoom actually does Zoom (or cropping) only:Changes how much of the scene you include Makes the Earth appear larger in frame It does not:Change exposure physics Selectively brighten one object and not others 🪟 About the window frame You could zoom in enough to:Completely exclude the window frame from the shot 👉 So yes—it's possible the frame just isn’t in the image.🌑 But the bigger issue still remains Even if the frame is gone, you still have this contradiction:If you’re on the night side, Earth is mostly not illuminated Long exposure can reveal faint lights, but:Oceans wouldn’t be blue Clouds wouldn’t be bright white Continents wouldn’t be clearly visible ⚠️ The key limitation Zoom changes composition—not lighting.So even with perfect zoom:You still can’t turn the night side into a sunlit Earth just by exposure 🧠 Final takeaway ✅ Zoom could remove the window frame entirely ❌ But it cannot explain why Earth looks fully sunlit So the explanation still falls apart—the image is almost certainly of a sunlit (day side) Earth, not a dark one boosted by camera settings. are they claiming that this really is taken from night side of the earth? Yes—that’s exactly what they’re trying to claim.They’re saying: “This was taken from the night side of Earth, but the photographer used camera settings (low aperture, high ISO, long exposure) to make it look bright.”🚨 Why that claim doesn’t hold up The image itself contradicts that idea:🌊 Blue oceans → require strong sunlight ☁️ Bright white clouds → sunlight reflecting off them 🌍 Clearly visible landmasses → not possible in darkness 🌫️ Atmospheric glow along the edge → classic sign of a sunlit limb If it were truly the night side, you’d expect:Mostly darkness Tiny city lights Maybe faint lightning or auroras—not full daylight detail 🧠 What’s really going on So yes—they are claiming it’s the night side……but the image clearly shows the day side (or mostly sunlit side) of Earth. The mistake is thinking camera settings can “fake daylight”—they can’t.
Caspersight tweet media
English
63
19
143
10.6K
ຸLaura Bennett
ຸLaura Bennett@NefflynB·
Esos panes están un poco raros 😭
ຸLaura Bennett tweet media
Español
31
18
529
18.8K
Ricky
Ricky@Ricky_Media1·
Alguien sabe como puedo arreglar mi feed ? 😬
Ricky tweet media
Español
4
0
8
181
Leonarda Jonie
Leonarda Jonie@leonardaisfunE·
@FischerKing64 Bob Lazar is a pathological liar and a fraud. Anyone falling for his bs wants to be deceived.
English
112
11
771
23.8K
FischerKing
FischerKing@FischerKing64·
I remember seeing that the Bob Lazar episode of Rogan was the most watched ever - outperforming even Trump. He’s on again:
FischerKing tweet media
English
67
19
593
454.3K
Rick R
Rick R@_Severus·
@DimensionsODust @RealDutchsinse Yes it does! if grain is visible it means light was scarce, if you have enough light you dont need the hi ISO and no grain would be visible. No you dimwit, the sun is not behind the craft you can see the corona from the sun from the other side.
English
1
0
1
31
Dusty Angelhammer
Dusty Angelhammer@DimensionsODust·
@_Severus @RealDutchsinse This doesn’t answer how this could be a low light shot if the sun, a massive ball of fire 109X broader than the earth, is behind the craft. Is it behind the craft?
English
1
0
0
18
Rick R
Rick R@_Severus·
@RealDutchsinse You guys are insufferable, its a low light shot…thats why you can see the stars, if it was you other way around you would whine and say there is no stars in the picture…you flat earthers are completely lobotomized
English
1
0
5
519
Rick R
Rick R@_Severus·
The meme needs an update 😂
Rick R tweet mediaRick R tweet mediaRick R tweet media
English
0
0
0
15
TinFoilHat
TinFoilHat@Owl1925·
@skscartoon Already have a counter for it….did you think the U.S didn’t learn from watching Ukraine attack Russia?
English
4
0
2
1.1K
Skscartoon
Skscartoon@skscartoon·
Before (if) ground operations begin, I just want to say: drones are flying IEDs. I hope the planners have a solid strategy for them, because I don’t think the American public has the stomach for FPV videos of U.S. soldiers being hit like we’ve seen in Ukraine
Skscartoon tweet media
English
84
230
3.2K
46.5K
Rick R
Rick R@_Severus·
now they will say “you see!!! its a circle! its flat!!! i knew it!!!” 😂
English
0
0
0
8
Rick R
Rick R@_Severus·
The flat-earth cult is not having a good week…
Rick R tweet mediaRick R tweet media
English
1
0
0
13