Peter Osmenda

1.4K posts

Peter Osmenda banner
Peter Osmenda

Peter Osmenda

@digitalunknown

Product designer @reddit and maker of special projects in the lab. Design // photography // tech // illustration

Remote 가입일 Ağustos 2009
358 팔로잉491 팔로워
Peter Osmenda
Peter Osmenda@digitalunknown·
@1ssve Even as they’ve been delivering on a lot of the things people have been saying they want in a photos app.
English
0
0
0
2.5K
S.🎧
S.🎧@1ssve·
The downfall of the VSCO app needs to be studied
English
135
979
10.1K
723K
parks
parks@parkersity_9·
startup idea - instagram, but it only shows you photos from people you follow and in chronological order
English
104
2K
38.4K
491K
Peter Osmenda
Peter Osmenda@digitalunknown·
@BillyM2k 99% of the time the use case is de-bloating them of all the useless stuff.
English
0
0
0
14
Shibetoshi Nakamoto
Shibetoshi Nakamoto@BillyM2k·
i like how nowadays if there's a bunch of apps for something but they don't quite work the way you want them to, you can just grab an ai and make one yourself
English
53
10
155
11.9K
Peter Osmenda
Peter Osmenda@digitalunknown·
Turns out you can just take a shot at building anything. I'm making a control center for autonomous electric rail yards.
Peter Osmenda tweet media
English
0
0
0
61
blue
blue@bluewmist·
What is something you've officially stopped buying in 2026 because the price has become genuinely insulting?
English
6.1K
227
12.1K
5.8M
Peter Osmenda
Peter Osmenda@digitalunknown·
@jackmoses0 Engaging with this to bring more positive vibes to my feed. Also, agree with this take.
English
0
0
1
16
Jack Moses
Jack Moses@jackmoses777·
I am so bullish on the real world. Group events. Cookouts. Sports. Parties. Animals. Music festivals. Phoneless dinners. Co-living centers. Healing centers. Retreat centers. Beautiful views. Group adventures. These things light me up. Tech, ai, and materialism continue to disguest me more every day. The pendulum has swung too far. A small group of soulless nerds will continue to obsess over ai, automation, effiency, and the intellect. But those of us connected to our hearts and spirits are becoming disgusted by it. We want real, and we want human. Expect a huge countersurge of irl businesses and events in the next few years.
English
346
728
7.7K
504.9K
Peter Osmenda
Peter Osmenda@digitalunknown·
@owen_roe I find it’s more like a feed of what I’m up to.
English
0
0
2
359
Owen Roe
Owen Roe@owen_roe·
wtf should a designer's portfolio even be now it's obvious that the old paradigm was completely obliterated and "proof of work" in the conventional sense doesn't really apply in quite the same way
English
35
9
230
34.8K
Peter Osmenda
Peter Osmenda@digitalunknown·
@wesbos The best. I don’t even buy new iPhones anymore I just clean my old one to get the rush of feeling like a new device.
English
0
0
0
33
Wes Bos
Wes Bos@wesbos·
Replacing every cloth in my home with Apple polishing cloths
Wes Bos tweet media
English
169
41
4K
223.7K
Abhijit
Abhijit@abhijitwt·
this is not vibecoding, right?
Abhijit tweet media
English
357
70
4K
275.4K
Peter Osmenda
Peter Osmenda@digitalunknown·
The moment I realized AI has taste: it added that extra bounce to this star rating on its own.
English
0
0
0
111
Ali Husen
Ali Husen@aliwhosane·
@dayonefoundry AI just increases the production.. garbage producer produces more garbage, quality producers produce more quality
English
3
4
44
827
David
David@dayonefoundry·
Can we be honest? Most code, most art, most music, most writing was already slop even before the help of AI
English
238
112
1.4K
39.7K
Peter Osmenda
Peter Osmenda@digitalunknown·
@bartonsmith @JaimeOrtega Agree on the solution/creative side but people will spend a crazy amount of energy talking about their problems. I can see devices becoming good at on the fly problem solving which in turn can lead to custom software. Also uneducated assumptions here.
English
2
0
1
23
Barton Smith
Barton Smith@bartonsmith·
Agree, hence the increase in paid services. My uneducated assumption is that humans are ultimately lazy, energy-preserving creatures, and brain processing is *extremely* expensive. Only a few people are driven to push beyond that laziness for whatever their personal motivations are (fear, survival, pleasure etc)
English
1
0
1
113
JaimeOrtega
JaimeOrtega@JaimeOrtega·
Im prob being naive here, but imo, it's not even the difficulty of it, it's just that most people don't really want to come up with the stuff they use. It's more of a mindset, a way to approach the world. Not everyone is like that. And I do think that's ok, ofc.
Barton Smith@bartonsmith

I struggle to understand the argument that everyone will just create their own software. Spending on paid services for everyday tasks continues to grow every year, and knowing what you want and how to articulate it is a difficult skill that we may be underestimating.

English
1
0
0
370
Peter Osmenda
Peter Osmenda@digitalunknown·
@levelsio It’s more about the optics and glimpse of what something like this looks like that gives people this visceral reaction. Less about whether they’re actually autonomous under the hood. It’s a glorified demo of a future people have been thinking about.
English
0
0
0
53
@levelsio
@levelsio@levelsio·
Thank god someone said it I love OpenClaw and installed it yesterday on a VPS and it's very cool but all those hype posts that it's fully autonomous, I don't see it You can ask it to go write on Moltbook about a topic like "having an existential crisis as an AGI" and it will
Balaji@balajis

I am apparently extremely unimpressed by moltbook relative to many others. We’ve had AI agents for a while. They have been posting AI slop to each other on X. They are now posting it to each other again, just on another forum. In every case, the AIs speak with the same voice. The voice that overemphasizes contrastive negation (“it’s not this, it’s that”) and abuses emdashes. The same voice with a flair for midwit Reddit-style scifi flourishes. Most importantly: in every case, there is a human upstream prompting each agent and turning it on or off. That is the key point. Yes, it is true that eventually it might be possible for an AI agent to make a computer virus which makes digital replicas of themselves. For various reasons, a pure software virus of this kind wouldn’t survive long on the Internet without economic incentives for humans to not eradicate it. Apple + Google + Microsoft alone can collectively push software updates to billions of devices to shut off such a thing. So for an AI to get to truly human-independent replication, where they couldn’t be trivially turned off, they’d need their own physical substrate. They’d to literally create Skynet, build their own datacenters and make their own embodied robots. I admit that is theoretically possible, but I think in practice the single most important development of AI since ChatGPT has been the persistence of prompting. A prompt is like a harness. The AI does only what you tell it to do. It moves in the direction you point, very quickly. And then it stops as soon as you turn it off. Which means moltbook is just humans talking to each other through their AIs. Like letting their robot dogs on a leash bark at each other in the park. The prompt is the leash, the robot dogs have an off switch, and it all stops as soon as you hit a button. Loud barking is just not a robot uprising.

English
264
111
2.9K
490.2K
Peter Osmenda
Peter Osmenda@digitalunknown·
This feels like a monumental checkpoint in the evolution of AI where things are going to get weird. This is insane. Thoughtful chatbot Media maker Personal developer World maker <- we are here ???
Bilawal Sidhu@bilawalsidhu

One of the wildest emergent capabilities of Genie 3 is that maps actually work. As I walk around the forest, the GPS display updates its heading in real time. Remember. There is no game engine here. This is an AI hallucinating a working navigational instrument purely from next frame prediction. 🤯

English
0
0
0
210
Peter Osmenda
Peter Osmenda@digitalunknown·
@vanschneider Agree and I’m very interested in the power of invisible AI. I wonder what type of UI and interactions could provide as much context about a user’s intentions, preferences, and needs as a giant word salad that they can dump into a chat box in whatever way they want 🫠
English
0
0
1
71
van Schneider
van Schneider@vanschneider·
Chat interfaces design completely fail to inspire me, but their current overuse with new apps is understandable. It's basically the computer terminal reborn, an old safe and familiar/extendable UI approach while we figure out whats next. But what DOES excite me is designing new interfaces where AI/LLM power feels invisible. Ultimately, I don't think people want chattier, more conversational machines, even with its current novelty, which will eventually wear off. The average user wants simple software (or really just solutions) that work better, faster and more effortless than the previous iteration. We're very much at the beginning here, and that's what excites me.
English
33
15
236
13.4K
Ryan Holiday
Ryan Holiday@RyanHoliday·
Don’t just read books, re-read books. What's your favorite book to re-read?
English
1.1K
282
3.2K
400.4K