.mane🏴‍☠️

135 posts

.mane🏴‍☠️ banner
.mane🏴‍☠️

.mane🏴‍☠️

@eddy_mane

I got opinion about stuff. Grok-1 collaborator.

가입일 Aralık 2011
411 팔로잉265 팔로워
고정된 트윗
.mane🏴‍☠️
.mane🏴‍☠️@eddy_mane·
New CoPaRe version is live on the Mac App Store. Private clipboard history, fast search, menu bar access, encrypted snippets, no account, no analytics, no cloud sync. Built by an independent developer for people who want productivity without giving up privacy. apps.apple.com/app/apple-stor…
English
0
1
0
91
Ivan Fioravanti ᯅ
Ivan Fioravanti ᯅ@ivanfioravanti·
I see Nvidia sending DGX Spark to many on X so that they can test and publish results. It seems I'll have to buy my own to test and share my own 😎 But that memory bandwidth is really stopping me from buying one 😖 Anyone out there with a DGX Spark testing some text to image or some video models willing to share results? This could be something to push me buying it. Otherwise I think I'll save (a lot of) money for a GB300.
Ahmad@TheAhmadOsman

Local AI hardware = capacity × bandwidth × software stack - Capacity tells you what fits - Bandwidth tells you how hard the box can breathe - The software stack tells you how much of the spec sheet you can actually cash out. Hardware by Memory Bandwidth - Mac Studio M3 Ultra: up to 512GB @ 819 GB/s - RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell: 96GB @ 1792 GB/s - RTX 5090: 32GB @ 1792 GB/s - RTX 4090: 24GB @ 1008 GB/s - RX 7900 XTX: 24GB @ 960 GB/s - Radeon PRO W7900: 48GB @ 864 GB/s - AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700: 32GB @ 640 GB/s - Intel Arc Pro B65: 32GB @ ~608 GB/s - Tenstorrent Wormhole n300: 24GB @ 576 GB/s - Tenstorrent Blackhole p150: 32GB @ 512 GB/s + 800G - MacBook Pro M5 Max: 460-614 GB/s - MacBook Pro M5 Pro: 307 GB/s - DGX Spark: 128GB @ 273 GB/s (coherent + CUDA) - Mac mini M4 Pro: 273 GB/s - Ryzen AI Max / Strix Halo: ~256 GB/s (~96GB usable GPU) - MacBook Air M5: 153 GB/s - Snapdragon X2 Elite: 152-228 GB/s - Intel Lunar Lake: 136 GB/s - Snapdragon X Elite: 135 GB/s - Mac mini M4: 120 GB/s - Arc Pro B60: 24GB @ ~456 GB/s Verdict - GPUs are still the bandwidth kings - Apple wins: stupid amounts of memory, don’t want to shard across GPUs - Apple loses: when raw tokens/sec & concurrency matter more - DGX Spark: coherent memory + NVIDIA stack - Strix Halo / Ryzen AI Max: first real x86 unified-memory contender - Tenstorrent: fully OSS stack, excited to see this mature Fitting ≠ serving Even if it fits, you still pay for - bandwidth during decode - KV cache growth - dequantization - batching + concurrency - scheduler quality - framework overhead The only mental model that matters: 1. What must fit? 2. What bandwidth tier do I need? 3. What software stack can actually deliver it? In short: - NVIDIA → fastest raw speed - Apple Studio M3 Ultra → biggest one-box memory - Strix Halo → first real x86 unified - DGX Spark → coherent NVIDIA dev appliance - AMD / Intel Arc → rising alternatives - Tenstorrent → fully opensource stack Do ask: “which bottleneck am I buying?” Not: “which hardware is best?”

English
32
5
132
25.2K
Ivan Fioravanti ᯅ
Ivan Fioravanti ᯅ@ivanfioravanti·
There are too many tech/dev projects and toys to play with nowadays! 🚀
English
9
1
32
2.1K
Dom Italian Builder
Dom Italian Builder@dom_gag_96·
guys, on the 30th of Jun we'll have a live with @ivanfioravanti about AI personal agents setup he'll talk about Hermes Agent i'll talk about Kortix Agent we'll probably make a live here on X too, but it's mostly for the @italianbldrs community
English
10
1
34
2.5K
Marco Gomiero
Marco Gomiero@marcoGomier·
@eddy_mane @antirez To me it feels more work to go to ai, copy paste the thing back and forth. I feel it's less effort to write down a thought directly. But it could just be me 😅
English
1
0
0
22
antirez
antirez@antirez·
Recently here on X there is this thing of replying to tweets with a vague remark of what the tweet expressed. I see this for months now. I thought most were bots, but as I investigate, I see that many are legitimate humans that are starting acting as bots. Worrying.
English
81
4
338
30.5K
.mane🏴‍☠️
.mane🏴‍☠️@eddy_mane·
@antirez That’s the future of social media, isn’t it? We’ll go back meeting and sharing opinions at conferences, hacking events and so on… the good old days are slowly coming back and I couldn’t be happier for that to happen.
English
1
0
4
407
antirez
antirez@antirez·
@eddy_mane Those are basically bots on my account, they are just acting as a proxy, an adapter, to let AI write on a humans web site.
English
1
0
21
1.8K
.mane🏴‍☠️
.mane🏴‍☠️@eddy_mane·
@antirez [OT] would you suggest buying an M5 Max 128GB to someone who wants to experiment with LLMs or would you suggest something else?
English
0
0
0
906
antirez
antirez@antirez·
The feeling that Apple is selling 92304294024 m5 max 128GB macbooks thanks to DwarfStar but doesn't give a fuck about sending me an M3 Max with 512GB (that I would buy if possible but it is borderline note possible) is growing on me :D
English
25
17
489
40.7K
.mane🏴‍☠️
.mane🏴‍☠️@eddy_mane·
@leogrease Useful datapoint. The next thing I’d want is a replay pack around the 6 findings: finding IDs, repro tests, prompt/model hashes, false-positive/triage time, and which issues survive a clean checkout. That’s what turns “LLM code review worked” into an eval harness.
English
1
0
0
148
Leonardo Grasso
Leonardo Grasso@leogrease·
Thanks to SSD streaming I was able to try DwarfStart on my M3 Max 64GB. I let DeepSeek Flash analyze a ~50K LOC codebase. Then I asked Opus to double-check and review the findings. I was impressed that 5 of the 6 findings reported by DeepSeek were accurate.
antirez@antirez

Today I had an harder than usual question for my local model (security). With SSD streaming now DwarfStar can run DeepSeek v4 PRO at 4.15 t/s, and this was more than enough to get a detailed reply. I already feel "safer" than before in my AI future. M5 max 128GB, model 433GB.

English
2
3
41
7.4K
.mane🏴‍☠️
.mane🏴‍☠️@eddy_mane·
@gabrielchua Strong pattern. I’d make the outer loop gated, not automatic: every learned instruction should carry provenance, scope, expiry, and a replay check against past failures. Otherwise “memory” becomes silent policy drift across runs.
English
0
0
0
18
.mane🏴‍☠️
.mane🏴‍☠️@eddy_mane·
RAG evals should not start at answer quality. Start with the retrieval contract: - allowed sources - freshness window - chunk provenance - metadata - conflict resolution - citation replay - permission scope If retrieval is ambiguous, the model is debugging your data policy.
English
0
0
0
19
.mane🏴‍☠️
.mane🏴‍☠️@eddy_mane·
@thsottiaux Nice. If reset credits become part of agent workflows, I’d surface them like a quota ledger: run id, model, token/tool spend, failed retries, reset-credit balance, expiry, and the action that consumed it. Otherwise “why did my agent stop?” becomes a billing/debugging problem.
English
0
0
0
908
.mane🏴‍☠️
.mane🏴‍☠️@eddy_mane·
@antirez I’d separate “can it fit” from “can it stay useful locally.” The test matrix is bytes loaded/offloaded, TTFT, sustained tok/s at target context, RAM pressure/page faults, and task-quality drift after quantization. A model can launch and still be operationally impractical.
English
0
0
0
369
antirez
antirez@antirez·
Happy to see people reporting GLM 5.2 doing great, the problem is: where to run it, locally? We learned that DeepSeek v4 Flash can lose 50% of the bits and still perform well. PRO seems to also work, but I'm not able to test as much as I could as I like continuous access to an M3 Ultra (but I asked for more continuous access) but if Flash is a proxy, maybe it will work great but needs 512GB of RAM. GLM 5.2 is ~2x the raw weights bits of DeepSeek v4 PRO. Will it ever survive losing 75% of the weights bits without hard damage? I have a hard time believing this will be possible. So great to rent on the cloud, but the current combination of hardware and model size is likely unpractical. Yet: I'll try.
English
40
7
582
40.7K
.mane🏴‍☠️
.mane🏴‍☠️@eddy_mane·
@ChatGPTapp For scheduled AI tasks, the hard part is not only “did it fire?” but “can I replay/cancel it safely?” I’d want per-run trigger state, tool permissions, committed side effects, retry/idempotency keys, and an audit log. Otherwise it’s a timer, not a control plane.
English
0
0
1
29
ChatGPT
ChatGPT@ChatGPTapp·
New in ChatGPT: a better way to schedule tasks. Scheduled tasks are faster, more reliable, and easier to manage from the new Scheduled page. The new scheduled tasks experience is rolling out to Go, Plus, Pro, Business, and Enterprise users on web and mobile.
English
160
243
3.1K
418.7K
.mane🏴‍☠️
.mane🏴‍☠️@eddy_mane·
For coding agents, “tests pass” is not enough. I also want to know: - files changed/deleted - migrations generated - dependency graph touched - secrets exposed - uncommitted state - rollback path - assumptions inferred The diff is output. Repo state is the risk surface.
English
0
0
0
14