Fish Stark

5.8K posts

Fish Stark banner
Fish Stark

Fish Stark

@fishstark

ED @americnhumanist @CtrFreethought Past: M.Ed @harvard, BA @yale, @PeaceFirstOrg,📱 startups Ever: Building a 🌎 where everyone belongs & thrives, 🌊 politics

Annapolis 가입일 Nisan 2010
700 팔로잉672 팔로워
고정된 트윗
Fish Stark
Fish Stark@fishstark·
The ABC moderators are proving that the CNN moderators should never work in journalism again
English
6
40
303
18.7K
Fish Stark 리트윗함
American Humanist Association
American Humanist Association@americnhumanist·
Bills blurring church-state separation and sending public money to discriminatory religious schools are moving in states across the country. You can help stop them! No experience needed, we’ll train you on every step of the process. americanhumanist.org/advocatewithus
English
0
11
16
437
Fish Stark 리트윗함
Olivia Hofer
Olivia Hofer@oghofer·
What some of the conversations on this site sound like
Olivia Hofer tweet media
English
16
636
6.7K
92.9K
Fish Stark 리트윗함
Laura Robinson
Laura Robinson@LauraRbnsn·
So, when it comes to evangelicalism in the United States, which tends to be a unifying religious idea in the US, there's been a real push in the last 10 years or so to replace the idea of "right and wrong" with "masculine and feminine." Have you ever heard the phrase "toxic
English
15
112
2.8K
232.5K
Fish Stark
Fish Stark@fishstark·
@MadelaineLucyH And the thing I hate most is the people who say these things are equivalent!
English
0
0
0
372
Madelaine Hanson
Madelaine Hanson@MadelaineLucyH·
The thing I hate the MOST about the left is the culture of trying to punish good-faith people for not being off the deep end of academic language and in-group signalling. The thing I hate the MOST about the right is brutal violence, racism, rampant sexual abuse, oppression, paedophilia, and white supremacy
English
115
282
3K
79.7K
Fish Stark 리트윗함
Ben Rhodes
Ben Rhodes@brhodes·
Ro Khanna has led on Epstein, Iran, and the West Bank. In doing so, he is far more in line with Democratic voters than those Dems who have hedged,
Ro Khanna@RoKhanna

No dumb wars. No elite impunity. These principles led to @RepThomasMassie & my work on the two most consequential matters of this Congress. The Epstein Transparency Act & Iran WPR. We are standing with the people against a corrupted government that has sold us out.

English
187
1K
9.2K
335.4K
Fish Stark 리트윗함
Ryan Burge 📊
Ryan Burge 📊@ryanburge·
Here's the data about religious attendance from two of the "gold standard" surveys in the polling world. 18-29 year olds are 4 points more likely to never attend religious services than 30-49 year olds. 2-4 points less likely to be weekly attenders. No revival to be found.
Ryan Burge 📊 tweet media
English
23
48
384
16.9K
Fish Stark
Fish Stark@fishstark·
@RachelBitecofer @valpyuk You understand, though, that you are operating in a political context where that is what many people mean when they say socialism, I assume? 40% of Americans want "socialism" but I guarantee you like 2% of them want to live in Cuba So why argue with people who don't exist?
English
0
0
0
6
Rachel Bitecofer 🗽🦆
Rachel Bitecofer 🗽🦆@RachelBitecofer·
Just fucking no. Socialism kills individual freedom. There is a reason there’s no a single free country that’s communist or socialist. In fact, Stalin killed even more people than Hitler. Read some history. Utopias always end in tyranny.
Brian Cairns@BrianCairns3446

@RachelBitecofer You're missing a lot of context there, but you know that. To compare systems you need the countries to have started in the same place developmentally, with appropriately the same amount of outside aid, natural resources, etc.

English
32
9
72
13.6K
Fish Stark 리트윗함
American Humanist Association
American Humanist Association@americnhumanist·
American humanists are committed not to governments or nation-states, but to the safety and dignity of every human being. The Iranian people deserve peace, safety, and the right to self-determination - now, and always. (To be clear - we don’t support temporary wars, either.)
American Humanist Association tweet media
English
2
8
13
291
Fish Stark 리트윗함
Tommy Siegel
Tommy Siegel@TommySiegel·
compelled to post this new yorker reject from years ago, for some reason
Tommy Siegel tweet media
English
33
1.3K
8.6K
131.9K
Fish Stark
Fish Stark@fishstark·
@baseballcrank @daveweigel He has never been in a genuinely competitive election. He was afraid to face Jerry Brown - and not that Brown was a slouch, but there will be multiple candidates on that debate stage more formidable than Jerry Brown at age 70.
English
0
0
2
74
Dan McLaughlin
Dan McLaughlin@baseballcrank·
I've seen him in drips & drabs for years, but my biggest exposure was the debate with DeSantis. Which featured a pattern that I think will be fatal to Newsom: he's such a people-pleaser that he agreed on live TV to keep the debate going, then his team (reportedly his wife) dragged him out of there during the commercial break because it was going poorly. I think if he's on a stage with some Democrats who come to fight, he'll go the way of TPaw.
English
4
2
31
4.3K
Dan McLaughlin
Dan McLaughlin@baseballcrank·
Vance isn't charismatic, but (1) he's young & speaks in complete sentences, which we haven't had in a very long time & (2) if he's the nominee, he has at least a 50/50 shot that his opponent will be a weirdo, a creep, a lunatic, or hair gel incarnate.
Dan Pfeiffer@danpfeiffer

The fact that JD Vance is a giant goober who is painfully unfunny and uncomfortably awkward in every setting is going to haunt him under the klieg lights of a presidential race.

English
99
56
924
77.4K
John McDermott
John McDermott@mcdermott·
My pitch for a The Cut for men.
John McDermott tweet media
English
37
4
169
340.3K
John McDermott
John McDermott@mcdermott·
In his newsletter The Rebooting, @bmorrissey and I go back-and-forth on Clavicular, legacy magazine titles alienating young male readers, how this helped fueled the manosphere, and why publishing needs a male version of The Cut. therebooting.com/p/mogging-main…
John McDermott tweet media
English
10
11
61
29.5K
Fish Stark
Fish Stark@fishstark·
@HeatherOleson1 @CartoonsHateHer This was pretty good: -Efficient system so people willing to play by the rules don't have to wait years and criminals are kept out -Let undocumented immigrants earn their way to citizenship by paying a fine and learning English -Deport violent criminals -Crack down on employers
Fish Stark tweet media
English
1
0
0
77
Cartoons Hate Her!
Cartoons Hate Her!@CartoonsHateHer·
Free article! I address my actual political views (libbed out) and why, despite what some people suggest, I am not a Republican (but I also explain why people think I am sometimes.) Link in replies.
Cartoons Hate Her! tweet media
English
46
11
440
93.2K
Fish Stark
Fish Stark@fishstark·
@mattyglesias I don't prefer Shaprio but I'd 100/100 take him over Newsom
English
0
0
0
19
Fish Stark
Fish Stark@fishstark·
@mattxiv Ah yes. Regular Guy Gavin Newsom knows what Normal People want
English
0
0
0
49
Fish Stark
Fish Stark@fishstark·
@NateSilver538 OK, and normies hate it when you knock on their door to get them to vote, but they vote at higher rates when you do it anyway. What's your point?
English
0
0
0
121
Nate Silver
Nate Silver@NateSilver538·
One thing the normies are right about is that there's such a thing as "politicizing everything" and the people who do it are super annoying.
English
296
582
9K
671.7K
Fish Stark
Fish Stark@fishstark·
@NYBATs @AlecStapp For an individual kid, absolutely. For a teacher/classroom I would also agree small differences are more noise than signal. For an entire state? I don't buy that standardized test data tells us *nothing* about what's going on state-to-state in aggregate.
English
1
0
0
29
NY BATs
NY BATs@NYBATs·
@fishstark @AlecStapp ALL standardized test data is flawed as most multiple choice responses are guesses. So extrapolating “better/worse” from a 1-3 point difference, not controlling for dozens of factors ranging from holdover rates to the weather on testing day, is unscientific yet highly politicized
English
1
1
0
54
Alec Stapp
Alec Stapp@AlecStapp·
This is a really astonishing claim: Students in Mississippi & Louisiana score higher on reading tests than students in California & New York despite spending way less money per pupil and having higher child poverty rates. Decided to double check the data because, if true, this should be alarming for blue state leaders. And yup, it checks out. Reading performance (NAEP 2024, Grade 4 reading, average scale score): Mississippi: 219 Louisiana: 216 New York: 215 California: 212 Child poverty (SAIPE; “estimated percent of people age 0–17 in poverty,” 2023): Louisiana: 25.2% Mississippi: 24.3% New York: 18.6% California: 15.0% Per-pupil spending (public K–12 “current expenditures per pupil,” FY2023, inflation-adjusted to FY2023 dollars) New York: $29,588 California: $18,568 Louisiana: $14,822 Mississippi: $12,238 It should be unacceptable to spend that much more taxpayer money while delivering worse results for students.
Alec Stapp tweet media
Nicholas Bagley@nicholas_bagley

@ProfSchleich @dbroockman @j_kalla If Democrats want to stay relevant, and to deliver for the public, they cannot wait for unions to change. They need to break more often with their friends. nytimes.com/2026/02/23/opi…

English
404
1.7K
8.5K
846.8K
Fish Stark
Fish Stark@fishstark·
@mattyglesias This is an example of woke language that makes perfect sense. If you define someone who's paid their debt to society by their past criminality, few will hire them. Not having a job makes someone much more likely to re-offend. Reducing recidivism > owning the libs, Matt
English
2
0
8
1K