David Bruce Smith

320.7K posts

David Bruce Smith banner
David Bruce Smith

David Bruce Smith

@hbbtruth

David - Common sense on #Politics #PublicPolicy #Sports #PopCulture in 🇺🇸🇬🇧🇸🇪🇫🇷 via my life in #Texas #Memphis #Miami #IU #Chicago #DC #FL 🛫🌍📺📽️🏈

South Florida, U.S.A. 🌴🏖️🌊 가입일 Ekim 2013
6.3K 팔로잉1.8K 팔로워
David Bruce Smith 리트윗함
RNC Research
RNC Research@RNCResearch·
Debbie Wasserman Schultz refuses to call on fellow Florida Democrat and fraudster Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick (who stole millions in FEMA funds) to resign.   CBS: “Should she resign?”   WASSERMAN SCHULTZ: “Well I’m going to wait to see…”
English
53
185
576
18.4K
David Bruce Smith 리트윗함
Jenny, Girl from 4th 🌍, 鄰白廢物 🧠 🪱
today, a car plowed into a restaurant in san francisco's chinatown the city decided to give them a violation notice and assessed them a fee hours later
Jenny, Girl from 4th 🌍, 鄰白廢物 🧠 🪱 tweet mediaJenny, Girl from 4th 🌍, 鄰白廢物 🧠 🪱 tweet media
English
74
186
2.4K
80.6K
David Bruce Smith 리트윗함
💥Susan Dyer Reynolds🗞️
Antoine Watson is smiling and his S.F. taxpayer funded lawyers are hugging him after he got off for killing an 84-year-old man.
💥Susan Dyer Reynolds🗞️ tweet media💥Susan Dyer Reynolds🗞️ tweet media
English
36
45
207
7.4K
David Bruce Smith 리트윗함
Kemi Badenoch
Kemi Badenoch@KemiBadenoch·
👇This is shocking. @_RobbieMoore has been doing a great job standing up for victims of the rape gangs and has held the authorities to account at every turn. The Home Office must urgently look into this.
Robbie Moore MP@_RobbieMoore

Over the past 9 months, I have been investigating how the Home Office has been preparing for the national grooming gangs inquiry - and crucially, whether vital evidence has been properly protected. What I’ve found is extremely concerning... In June last year, Baroness Louise Casey recommended a full national inquiry. Her Audit was clear that in the meantime, police forces, councils and authorities across the country should be required not to destroy any records that could be used as evidence. But we now know that didn’t happen. Freedom of Information requests now appear to show the Home Office waited a staggering 212 days - nearly seven months - before formally contacting police forces and other key agencies. Today, the Home Affairs select Committee has written directly to the Home Secretary warning that this 212 failure means that some records critical to the inquiry “might have been destroyed”. That is a staggering failure at the heart of government. I first raised the alarm on this in December, after uncovering that authorities in Bradford had not received any instruction at all from government. Just two days later, newly appointed Chair of the National Inquiry, Baroness Anne Longfield, wrote to the Government reinforcing exactly the same point. Yet even after that warning, it still took another 36 days for the Home Office to act and pass the Chair's message on to authorities. Freedom of information requests show that then-Permanent Secretary Antonio Romeo finally wrote to Home Office-funded Arm’s Length Bodies and Chief Constables across the country on 14 January 2026 - 7 months after the Casey Audit. The government now has serious and unavoidable questions it must answer. - Why was there such a delay? - What kind of records may have been lost? - What are the legal consequences if records have been lost, but the Home Office failed to act? Even now, it remains unclear whether local councils across the country were ever formally contacted at all about the protection of records. Unless the government can provide clear answers to these questions, they risk not only undermining confidence in this process, but failing victims who have already been let down for far too long. Read the Home Affairs Select Committee letter here: committees.parliament.uk/publications/5…

English
39
280
1.2K
34.5K
David Bruce Smith 리트윗함
RedGirls
RedGirls@RedGirls_4·
@PolitiBunny @DataRepublican @LeaderJohnThune @SenJohnBarrasso The 5 present - John Thune (R-SD, Majority Leader) - Eric Schmitt (R-MO) - Bernie Moreno (R-OH, presiding) - Mazie Hirono (D-HI) - Andy Kim (D-NJ) Confirmed by floor reports and C-SPAN coverage of the session; no roll call was taken.
English
1
3
13
126
David Bruce Smith 리트윗함
Mike Howell
Mike Howell@MHowellTweets·
This would cause some major issues for ICE and @IngrahamAngle is on the mark here. 1- yes it takes away ICE funding and puts it on a standalone, the loneliest funding stream possibly for the future. It also opens up ICE to conditions imposed via Republicans in reconciliation, something already signaled. Not to mention the giant scalp the left is taking here in proving they can scare Rs into abandoning ICE. OBB was a surge of money for a mission desperately needing scaling to meet the challenge of the amount of illegals, now they want to put its regular funding stream in perpetual question. 2- this would cause irreparable harm w/in ICE. It essentially would create two separate agencies. Allowing Congress to dictate how an agency’s resources can be operationally used in this way will set a horrible precedent. The litigation this opens up will be crippling, and the left is better situated with the judiciary and external litigation functions to make that happen. 3- it gives Democrats the major victory of essentially taking money from ICE out of OBB since regular funding in jeopardy moving forward. This will be a huge boon for their base turnout as compared to a Trump base that is frustrated on pace of deportations. It doesn't "diffuse" as much as it rewards Democrats and RINOs. 4- "don't talk about mass deportation" was the noise, this is the legislative signal 5- takes the wind out from the sails of the Save America Act by subjecting it to the same uncertainty of the reconciliation process. We need to keep Save America Act on floor not to run away from it. There is a reason why Democrats will like this.
Bonchie@bonchieredstate

Commentators need to get their talking points straight. ICE is funded over and above Biden levels through 2029 because of last year’s four-year appropriation passed by those “many Republicans.” Any deal to diffuse this issue for the midterms will not affect ICE enforcement.

English
60
601
1.4K
195.6K
David Bruce Smith 리트윗함
DataRepublican (small r)
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican·
Hello Senator Thune, At 3 AM on Friday, March 27th, in a near-empty chamber, you passed a bill by voice vote that excludes all funding for ICE and CBP. Let me repeat that: voice vote. No roll call. No record of who was there. No accountability. Just you, Barrasso, and a handful of senators shuffling paper in the dead of night while America slept. You could have demanded a recorded vote. You chose not to. You could have held the line for five more days until the House returned. You chose not to. You could have used the same procedural tools Democrats have used against you for 40 days. You chose not to. Instead, you gave Chuck Schumer exactly what he asked for, DHS funding minus immigration enforcement, and called it a win. Then you walked to the cameras and blamed the Democrats. Let's be precise about what you did: 1. You caved to a demand Democrats made on Day 1 of this shutdown. Forty-one days of supposed hardball negotiation, and you settled for their opening offer. 2. You handed them a template. The next time Democrats want to defund any agency — ICE, CBP, or anything else — they now know: just shut down DHS and wait. John Thune will fold at 3 AM. 3. You punted to reconciliation. "Good possibility," you said. Not "we will." Not "guaranteed." Just maybe. Meanwhile, ICE operates on fumes from last year's bill with no certainty of future funding. The precedent you set: You have argued for months that the filibuster is sacrosanct. That the 60-vote threshold protects minority rights. That we cannot bend Senate rules for policy wins. But at 3 AM on Friday, you bent every norm that actually mattered: • Voice vote to avoid accountability • Empty chamber to avoid debate • Midnight deal to avoid scrutiny • Immediate recess to avoid questions You'll bend the rules to avoid a fight. You just won't bend them to win one. What you've actually accomplished: Democrats demanded ICE restrictions. They got ICE defunded. Not reformed. Not restrained. Defunded. And you're out here tweeting about how Democrats are the "Defund the Police" party while you just voted to defund border enforcement at 3 in the morning. The question you should answer: Why did this deal have to happen at 3 AM? Why couldn't it happen at 3 PM, with cameras rolling and every senator on record? You know why. Because you didn't want your voters to see what surrender looks like. Here's my message: We saw it anyway. Stop hiding behind "Democrat obstruction." You're the Majority Leader. You set the schedule. You control the floor. You chose this outcome. Own it.
English
4.2K
27.4K
64.4K
889.8K
David Bruce Smith 리트윗함
MissionLoco
MissionLoco@MissionLoco·
In San Francisco, you can do this to a complete stranger, solely based on the fact that he’s old and an easy mark, and get away with it — because this judge believes, and I am pretty much quoting, “Prison wouldn’t be a good experience” for the murderer.
MissionLoco tweet mediaMissionLoco tweet mediaMissionLoco tweet mediaMissionLoco tweet media
Monthanus Ratanapakdee@ratanapakdee

After 3 years and 148 days since my father's tragic death, today the defendant showed no remorse, saying,”Your Honor, the rumor is I didn't kill him; he died two days later." His lack of guilt after nearly 4 years in jail is disturbing #JusticeForVictims #StopAsianHate #EndCrime

English
36
106
642
28.6K
David Bruce Smith 리트윗함
David Bruce Smith 리트윗함
Tim Burchett
Tim Burchett@timburchett·
Why did the Senate go home and leave us high and dry?
English
1.9K
6.4K
22.9K
220.7K
David Bruce Smith 리트윗함
RNC Research
RNC Research@RNCResearch·
.@TMZ making sure you saw Democrat socialist Bernie Sanders living large on his first class flight out of DC while he forces Americans to go without pay.
RNC Research tweet media
English
1.1K
5K
19.9K
1.1M
David Bruce Smith 리트윗함
Subversive Force
Subversive Force@sirwg202110·
🚨SHOCKING. Former Labour Blackburn MP Kate Hollern speaking about the ‘toxic’ general election campaign where she lost to Gaza thug Adnan Hussain MP. "At one point, I was told I was going to be beheaded. At another point, I was told I worshipped a false god. When someone tells you, 'You are going to be beheaded', and you see a picture of yourself on social media covered in blood, of course it worries you."🧵1/
English
302
2.4K
7.5K
454.2K
David Bruce Smith 리트윗함
Daily Mail
Daily Mail@DailyMail·
Two small boat migrants wanted for gang rape welcomed to UK and allowed to claim benefits trib.al/afYK6Ue
English
42
341
771
28.6K
David Bruce Smith 리트윗함
Scott Alan Meyers For Congress
Scott Alan Meyers For Congress@ScottAMeyersLA·
Noticeably silent on documented Los Angeles ballot fraud are the Democrats, specifically: 1) @LauraFriedmanCA 2) @MayorOfLA 3) @nithyavraman 4) @CD13LosAngeles, Hugo Soto Martinez 5) @cd1losangeles Eunisses Hernandez - and the two big ones who are charged with overseeing fair elections, 6(a) & (b)) @CASOSVote Secretary of State Shirley Weber & LA County Registrar of Voters Dean Logan @LACountyRRCC. One more: All local news stations in Los Angeles.
English
5
20
73
1.5K
David Bruce Smith 리트윗함
Joel Gilbert
Joel Gilbert@JoelSGilbert·
Just got this denial from the DEI California SUPREME COURT. The CA Constitution requires 5 years of PROVEN residency to run for governor, but they protected D.C. resident Eric Swalwell who has NO California residence. Swalwell lied to the court and provided NO documentation!
Joel Gilbert tweet media
English
135
1.3K
2.6K
36.6K