DataRepublican (small r)

30.3K posts

DataRepublican (small r) banner
DataRepublican (small r)

DataRepublican (small r)

@DataRepublican

I'm just a tool builder. • Elon Musk - “Worth following” • Charlie Kirk - “You're a must follow” • Contact: [email protected] • Substack: datarepublican

가입일 Ekim 2020
4.7K 팔로잉928.3K 팔로워
고정된 트윗
DataRepublican (small r)
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican·
Ok, I'm apparently not good at writing parables, because nearly everyone interpreted it wrong. I used a parable because I want to respect others' service records, especially when not all the facts are out yet. So let's pivot to a much more direct analogy. In 2016, career intelligence professionals, people who had genuinely spent their lives fighting America's enemies, became convinced that a foreign power had compromised the incoming president. They had data points. Real ones. Trump had business dealings in Moscow. He said nice things about Putin on camera. People in his orbit had meetings with Russian nationals. A dossier appeared with salacious claims. Each data point individually was... a data point. But they were looking for Russia. So they found Russia. Everywhere. They were so certain they were right that they leaked to the press. They used classification authority to spy on American citizens. They presented unverified opposition research to a FISA court as intelligence. Peter Strzok texted about "insurance policies." Andrew McCabe authorized leaks. They were experienced professionals who genuinely believed the republic was in danger. Their service records were real. Their concern was sincere. And they were wrong.
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican

I'm a Smurf. I've been hired to run counter-intelligence operations at Smurf Village. My role is political; I've personally gone up against the evil wizard Gargamel. But once I'm on the inside, I discover that Smurf Village has a relationship with a goat-riding human boy called Peewit. Peewit isn't a Smurf. He's caused a lot of damage with his antics over the years. Why is he even here? I start digging. I pull up Papa Smurf's history with Peewit. Papa Smurf has been collaborating with this kid for years. Protecting him. Making excuses for him. Why? Peewit is reckless. Peewit makes messes. But Papa Smurf keeps letting him back in. The more I dig, the more Peewit I find. He's everywhere. In every file, behind every favor, connected to every mess. A picture forms in my head: if I'm looking for Peewit everywhere and I keep finding Peewit, the only logical conclusion is that Peewit is the one controlling Papa Smurf. Then a prominent Smurf gets assassinated. They say Gargamel's people did it. Case closed, move along. But I get access to the dead Smurf's private messages. And there's Peewit. Right there in the chats. The same Peewit I've been laser-focused on all year. Pressuring him. Making demands. I bring this to Papa Smurf and his inner circle. I bring it with alarm. Papa Smurf looks at me funny. And then — just like that — I'm kicked out of the investigation. No explanation. Just... out. This is the final proof that Peewit is controlling the Smurf Village. I know what I saw. I have to get the truth out there. So I do the unthinkable. I leak the information.

English
584
576
4K
219.2K
DataRepublican (small r) 리트윗함
ThePersistence
ThePersistence@ScottPresler·
@SRCC @LeaderJohnThune Do not invoke cloture until we have 60 votes for the SAVE America Act. I mean this respectfully, but we are not going to let this issue go. The American people gave you the majority & we demand results. We demand election integrity. Pass the SAVE America Act!
English
236
4.1K
17.7K
79.6K
DataRepublican (small r) 리트윗함
ThePersistence
ThePersistence@ScottPresler·
Senator Mike Lee just confirmed that the Senate is working through the weekend — all weekend. This is the way. 👏 @BasedMikeLee
English
324
2.2K
15.5K
87.9K
DataRepublican (small r)
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican·
@CynicalPublius You would be amazed at how much FP, IR, whatever discourse ultimately boil down to "only my farts smell good; everyone else's stinks."
English
20
38
1.1K
9.2K
DataRepublican (small r)
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican·
I read you quite a bit back then. Thank you for all your coverage. They can still knowingly break the rules and still be sincere. Which might be also what happened here. Only they know what’s in their own intents. Even allowing for and taking out genuine malicious actors, it’s clear a lot of people bought into the “Russia is everywhere” hysteria and started seeing the slightest Russia connection as proof of Russian control of our government.
English
39
10
217
9K
TheLastRefuge
TheLastRefuge@TheLastRefuge2·
@DataRepublican It wasn't mistakes. I don't know where you were in real time in 2015 through 2018 when I was documenting it in day by day, play by play, granular detail... But I can assure you, they were not making mistakes.
English
20
69
643
12K
DataRepublican (small r)
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican·
Ok, I'm apparently not good at writing parables, because nearly everyone interpreted it wrong. I used a parable because I want to respect others' service records, especially when not all the facts are out yet. So let's pivot to a much more direct analogy. In 2016, career intelligence professionals, people who had genuinely spent their lives fighting America's enemies, became convinced that a foreign power had compromised the incoming president. They had data points. Real ones. Trump had business dealings in Moscow. He said nice things about Putin on camera. People in his orbit had meetings with Russian nationals. A dossier appeared with salacious claims. Each data point individually was... a data point. But they were looking for Russia. So they found Russia. Everywhere. They were so certain they were right that they leaked to the press. They used classification authority to spy on American citizens. They presented unverified opposition research to a FISA court as intelligence. Peter Strzok texted about "insurance policies." Andrew McCabe authorized leaks. They were experienced professionals who genuinely believed the republic was in danger. Their service records were real. Their concern was sincere. And they were wrong.
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican

I'm a Smurf. I've been hired to run counter-intelligence operations at Smurf Village. My role is political; I've personally gone up against the evil wizard Gargamel. But once I'm on the inside, I discover that Smurf Village has a relationship with a goat-riding human boy called Peewit. Peewit isn't a Smurf. He's caused a lot of damage with his antics over the years. Why is he even here? I start digging. I pull up Papa Smurf's history with Peewit. Papa Smurf has been collaborating with this kid for years. Protecting him. Making excuses for him. Why? Peewit is reckless. Peewit makes messes. But Papa Smurf keeps letting him back in. The more I dig, the more Peewit I find. He's everywhere. In every file, behind every favor, connected to every mess. A picture forms in my head: if I'm looking for Peewit everywhere and I keep finding Peewit, the only logical conclusion is that Peewit is the one controlling Papa Smurf. Then a prominent Smurf gets assassinated. They say Gargamel's people did it. Case closed, move along. But I get access to the dead Smurf's private messages. And there's Peewit. Right there in the chats. The same Peewit I've been laser-focused on all year. Pressuring him. Making demands. I bring this to Papa Smurf and his inner circle. I bring it with alarm. Papa Smurf looks at me funny. And then — just like that — I'm kicked out of the investigation. No explanation. Just... out. This is the final proof that Peewit is controlling the Smurf Village. I know what I saw. I have to get the truth out there. So I do the unthinkable. I leak the information.

English
584
576
4K
219.2K
Leigh Marcotte
Leigh Marcotte@labtechleigh·
The sad reality? MWEG (Mormon Women for Ethical Government) isn't the only "faith-based" group posing as grassroots while raking in millions in dark money. Infiltrating churches and faith communities is straight out of the globalist playbook, using religious cover to push agendas under the guise of "disagreeing better," "defending democracy" and "peace."
Leigh Marcotte tweet media
English
3
4
29
504
DataRepublican (small r) 리트윗함
Kim “Crusher” Coleman
Kim “Crusher” Coleman@kimfcoleman·
@DataRepublican joins Women’s Republican Club of SLC exposing MWEG’s funding. The worst of dark anti-America 💵 agendas. Frightening. Using the “Mormon” cover is a tactic across most faith groups in the nation, swapping out leaders of faith orgs. Follow the 💰@carolyn_phippen
Kim “Crusher” Coleman tweet mediaKim “Crusher” Coleman tweet media
English
15
132
611
23.5K
DataRepublican (small r)
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican·
@Alladdin1983 “There are always individuals in the intel community willing to bend the rules” I don’t think we disagree.
English
6
8
210
5.8K
Alladdin
Alladdin@Alladdin1983·
I think your assessment misses the mark. The intelligence in question appears to have been narrowly framed around Russia while sidelining other relevant actors. A major flaw in the intel process shows up when responding to RFIs (Requests for Information). Typically, multiple analysts produce separate assessments, each assigning their own confidence level—low, medium, or high. But what often happens is that leadership selectively elevates the most extreme or attention-grabbing assessment, presenting it as near fact while ignoring more measured analyses. Put simply: there are always individuals in the intel community willing to bend the rules to advance their careers—and that can skew the final product.
English
4
4
98
5.7K
DataRepublican (small r)
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican·
Both. Everything became a data point in their favor because they re-wired themselves to look for data points in their favor. When a whole country is involved, like Russia, even the most benign ally becomes Peewit in my analogy. Even our best-behaved allies have a lot of dirt on them. You’ll find a connection everywhere you look.
English
10
3
107
4.1K
David Malone
David Malone@wdmalone·
@DataRepublican So sister, distilling your more direct point... are you saying their were genuine in their concern and simply following data or they were biased to some degree?
English
4
0
15
4.7K
Dan Schwartz
Dan Schwartz@Dan_Schwartz·
@DataRepublican, to put it politely, writing parables & allegories is not your strong suit. x.com/DataRepublican… ~
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican

I'm a Smurf. I've been hired to run counter-intelligence operations at Smurf Village. My role is political; I've personally gone up against the evil wizard Gargamel. But once I'm on the inside, I discover that Smurf Village has a relationship with a goat-riding human boy called Peewit. Peewit isn't a Smurf. He's caused a lot of damage with his antics over the years. Why is he even here? I start digging. I pull up Papa Smurf's history with Peewit. Papa Smurf has been collaborating with this kid for years. Protecting him. Making excuses for him. Why? Peewit is reckless. Peewit makes messes. But Papa Smurf keeps letting him back in. The more I dig, the more Peewit I find. He's everywhere. In every file, behind every favor, connected to every mess. A picture forms in my head: if I'm looking for Peewit everywhere and I keep finding Peewit, the only logical conclusion is that Peewit is the one controlling Papa Smurf. Then a prominent Smurf gets assassinated. They say Gargamel's people did it. Case closed, move along. But I get access to the dead Smurf's private messages. And there's Peewit. Right there in the chats. The same Peewit I've been laser-focused on all year. Pressuring him. Making demands. I bring this to Papa Smurf and his inner circle. I bring it with alarm. Papa Smurf looks at me funny. And then — just like that — I'm kicked out of the investigation. No explanation. Just... out. This is the final proof that Peewit is controlling the Smurf Village. I know what I saw. I have to get the truth out there. So I do the unthinkable. I leak the information.

English
1
0
2
95
DataRepublican (small r) 리트윗함
Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻
🔥🔥🔥Holy Cow! John Brennan is linked to global disinfo and anti conservative orgs! You see, the Intelligence Studies Project (ISP) that John Brennan and two other ex CIA belonged to was involved in the Global Disinformation Index (GDI) thru the Global Disinformation Lab (GDIL). It’s also affiliated with the illiberalism Studies Program. Plus, I have a massive surprise at the end! Remember the Texas National Security Network? It’s the entire University Of Texas state wide campus’s and its orgs. They all work together interchangeably. Part of this Network is the LBJ School of Public Affairs. LBJ is where ex CIA John Brennan, Paul Pope, and Stephen Slick run the Intelligence Studies Program. Both Global Disinformation Lab cofounders (Ryan Williams and Kiril Avramov) are from LBJ. Ryan Williams headed up the Global Disinformation Labs Project Evergreen. Where they used a Policy Research Project team from the LBJ School of Public Affairs to write a database of global policy responses to disinformation. Brennan, Pope, and Slicks Intelligence Studies Project is at LJB and often sponsored events for the Global Disinformation Lab. Just one big happy family. The Global Disinformation Lab proclaimed an outright partnership with the Global Disinformation Index. And also worked with each other on a Disinformation Risk Assessment. Here are the Global Disinformation Labs affiliates. -illiberalism Studies Program -Intelligence Studies Project -Strauss center -Clements center -Center for European Studies university Texas Austin -Center for Russian, Eastern European and Eurasian Studies (CREEES) * Intelligence Studies Project is ran By Strauss and Clements at LBJ. Biden’s State department worked with them too. Liz Allen the Under Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy and Public was their go to. “Really appreciate US Dept of States efforts in working to understand and countering mis- and disinformation. Looking forward to jointly collaborating on these efforts!” ♦️The Illiberalism Studies Program: “Addresses questions related to democratic backlash, the spread of authoritarianism, post-liberalism, the far right, populism and nationalism.” “Adherents of illiberalism argue that, in the face of a liberalism that has “gone too far,” it is time to reassert the rights of the collective, or of an alleged silent majority, by restoring national sovereignty in various spheres: politically, by rejecting supranational and multilateral institutions in favor of the nation-state and preferring a strong leader.” Plus I have a 110 page report where they compare republican Christians to Russians: “Marlene Laruelle explores the parallel between US Christian nationalism and the Russian case of a blending of the Russian Orthodox Church with the political language of the Putin regime. ♦️Now the Global Disinformation Lab works on more than disinfo. They work with the Army Cyber Institute of the U.S. Military Academy at West Point to the tune of $250,000. This also involves Threatcasting which I have previously discussed during my CTI League files exposé. I don’t trust this disinfo lab in this arena. They also run Project Tearline, where the military even gave it its own website. Tearline.mil ♦️ Now for even more big news! John Brennan was involved in a US Election LBJ Policy Research Project headed by Stephan Slick. This also involved Chris Krebs, Michael Daniel, Nick Rasmussen, & more. I have this below mentioned 243 page report and Brennan talks Russiagate outta the wazoo. I think a lot of X folks in the Spygate corner would be extremely interested in this. “Working in collaboration with Nicholas Rasmussen, an Intelligence Studies Project Senior Fellow who serves as the director of the Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism, Slick & his students will draft a final report to counterparts at Office of the DNI that includes recommendations to defend against future attempts to influence elections. Sources to follow!
Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻 tweet mediaBad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻 tweet mediaBad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻 tweet mediaBad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻 tweet media
Bad Kitty Unleashed 🦁 💪🏻@pepesgrandma

🔥🔥🔥Breaking! War on the Rocks (WOTR) has some additional amazing partnerships and connections. Even leading to ex CIA staffers John Brennan, Paul Pope, Stephen Slick, and David Petraeus! After Trumps 2016 win, John Brennan didn’t just disappear into TV land. No, he stayed involved with the vast network of the University of Texas, his Alma mater. Where a SOCOM individual, identified as a British asset, once wrote the Global Disinformation Index. Yeah you are about to see the University of Texas quite differently. The above mentioned British asset, according to a whistleblower, was told by Obama to prevent Trump from winning again. Where War On The Rocks comes in, is the Texas National Security Network and its Texas National Security Review. The Texas National Security Network is vast and is essentially at least 22 entities or more enveloping the University of Texas Campus’s and orgs. A few noteworthy examples: - Intelligence Studies Project - Strauss Center - Clements Center - University of Texas, Austin - Texas National Security Review (WOTR) - Etc * University of Texas is Brennans Alma mater. Ryan Evans (WOTR): “As Founder and Editor-in-Chief of War on the Rocks, Ryan Evans summarizes, “think of us as the Washington-based action arm of the Texas National Security Network.” Very interesting 🤔 ♦️WOTR series part 2 War on the Rocks is partnered with the Texas National Security network to create the Texas National security Review. In fact, the Texas National Security Network flat out CLAIMS TO SPONSOR War On The Rocks! So, who all works with Ryan Evans of War On The Rocks at the Texas National Security Review? - Ryan Evans (WOTR) - David Petraeus ex CIA Dir - James G. Stavridis, admiral - Kathleen Hicks, senior vice president, Henry A. Kissinger Chair, and dir of the International Security Program at CSIS - David shed, Defense Intelligence Enterprise workforce Recall the Intelligence Studies Project is part of the Texas National Security Network. Here’s some of the staff at the Intelligence Studies Project: - John Brennan ex cia - Paul Pope ex cia - Stephen Slick ex CIA “Brennan is a Senior Advisor to the University’s Intelligence Studies Project (ISP) – a novel partnership between UT’s Clements Center for National Security and Robert S. Strauss Center for International Security and Law.” (Texas National Security Network is actually co-directed by the Clements Center and Strauss Center.) 4. Interesting side notes - John Brennan is a senior advisor at the International Institute of Strategic Studies headquartered in LONDON! Which is ran by the CLEMENTS and STRAUSS CENTERS! Many of the War On The Rocks staff are from Kings College in London! Ryan Evan’s was Kings College and OPCON/TACON to the British-led Task Force Helmand. 5. Texas Security Network leaders: - Stephen Slick, Dir Intelligence Studies Project - CIA - Bobby Chesney, Dir Strauss Center - William Inboden Executive Director - Clements Center 5. UT Austin’s Intelligence Studies Project and the Texas National Security Network announce the inaugural Texas Intelligence Academy (TIA), an intensive academic. Students selected for the first TIA cohort will be housed in the District of Columbia and study at the UT System’s Archer Center one block from the White House. 6. So you can see the commingling here’s an event held at the University of Texas at Austin. “Paul (Pope) is joined by John Brennan, former CIA director, retired Adm. William McRaven, former commander of the Special Operations Command, Farah Pandith, author and former National Security Council and State Department official, and Nicholas Rasmussen, former National Counterterrorism Center director. This talk took place at the University of Texas at Austin and was sponsored by the Intelligence Studies Project, the LBJ School of Public Affairs, the Robert Strauss Center for International Security and Law, and the Clements Center for National Security.” All facts to be sourced.

English
84
672
1.4K
150.3K
DataRepublican (small r)
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican·
Context: Peewit is a side character in the Smurfs who is an ally but also has a knack for getting in trouble. Peewit doesn't control anything. This story is an allegory for how cognitive biases can overtake someone's mindset and turn normally rational thinkers into irrational thinkers.
DataRepublican (small r) tweet media
English
18
27
417
9.2K
DataRepublican (small r)
DataRepublican (small r)@DataRepublican·
I'm a Smurf. I've been hired to run counter-intelligence operations at Smurf Village. My role is political; I've personally gone up against the evil wizard Gargamel. But once I'm on the inside, I discover that Smurf Village has a relationship with a goat-riding human boy called Peewit. Peewit isn't a Smurf. He's caused a lot of damage with his antics over the years. Why is he even here? I start digging. I pull up Papa Smurf's history with Peewit. Papa Smurf has been collaborating with this kid for years. Protecting him. Making excuses for him. Why? Peewit is reckless. Peewit makes messes. But Papa Smurf keeps letting him back in. The more I dig, the more Peewit I find. He's everywhere. In every file, behind every favor, connected to every mess. A picture forms in my head: if I'm looking for Peewit everywhere and I keep finding Peewit, the only logical conclusion is that Peewit is the one controlling Papa Smurf. Then a prominent Smurf gets assassinated. They say Gargamel's people did it. Case closed, move along. But I get access to the dead Smurf's private messages. And there's Peewit. Right there in the chats. The same Peewit I've been laser-focused on all year. Pressuring him. Making demands. I bring this to Papa Smurf and his inner circle. I bring it with alarm. Papa Smurf looks at me funny. And then — just like that — I'm kicked out of the investigation. No explanation. Just... out. This is the final proof that Peewit is controlling the Smurf Village. I know what I saw. I have to get the truth out there. So I do the unthinkable. I leak the information.
English
430
619
5.7K
339.2K
Nick Sortor
Nick Sortor@nicksortor·
🚨 BREAKING: Former National Counterterrorism Center Director Joe Kent is under FBI INVESTIGATION for allegedly leaking classified information "The investigation PREDATES his departure," per @IngrahamAngle Wow
English
1.3K
4.2K
15.6K
815.3K