Rollando | BTC Maxi Light | NFFA

8.3K posts

Rollando | BTC Maxi Light | NFFA banner
Rollando | BTC Maxi Light | NFFA

Rollando | BTC Maxi Light | NFFA

@rollando_magic

#BTC #ETH #LINK #Matic Blockchain Bandit

가입일 Aralık 2016
542 팔로잉731 팔로워
Megatron
Megatron@Megatron_ron·
BREAKING: 🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump is ready to give Iran $300 billion - the New York Times The proposed US-Iran peace deal includes a $300 billion “reconstruction fund.” for Iran
Megatron tweet mediaMegatron tweet media
English
1.2K
1.7K
7.5K
641.1K
Rollando | BTC Maxi Light | NFFA 리트윗함
Lookonchain
Lookonchain@lookonchain·
James Wynn(@JamesWynnReal) just launched a token called $WORLD and rugged it. He made only 3.2 $SOL($260) from it. #activities" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">solscan.io/account/HH7jLE…
Lookonchain tweet mediaLookonchain tweet mediaLookonchain tweet mediaLookonchain tweet media
English
214
64
1.1K
276.7K
GoPulse.com - The PulseChain Suite
GoPulse will shut down on June 1st. We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause and appreciate your support
English
138
36
254
71.3K
Rollando | BTC Maxi Light | NFFA 리트윗함
vitalik.eth
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin·
Some of my perspective on where the @ethereumfndn is going. First of all, this is only my own view. The board is not just me, and I have no extra special powers on the board that the other board members do not. @aerugoettinea is the one executing much of this transition. My input has been largely on technical questions. The board is in the process of expanding, and my own power within the org will continue to decrease, which is honestly what I want. The 2025 era brought many important improvements to EF and its ability to execute. Many issues were resolved, and EF continues to benefit from its improved efficiency and greater focus on concrete goals to this day. And so with those problems resolved, early this year, the largest remaining hole that I perceived was something different nagging at me: I would regularly spot people saying things like "vitalik says these beautiful things about ethereum needing to be decentralized, and have privacy, and be a sanctuary technology, but why do the EF's actions not reflect that?" Now, you may have been hearing something different. You may not have been sensing a feeling of crisis at all, and maybe were hearing people saying that finally we were taking execution and BD seriously and the main task for us is to keep going that way and be even better and faster. Then probably there is genuine difference between you and me, in what kinds of criticism I take most seriously, and what kinds of critics through their criticism are most able to make me feel pain. As an analogy, let's briefly switch over to a different domain. One belief you can have about Google is that it is a success story, and has brought a lot of good to humanity in organizing the world's information. Another belief you can have about Google is that they had a beautiful idealistic beginning, but at some point the corruption of mainstream corporate attitudes seeped in, and they slowly bit by bit completely abandoned the "don't be evil" slogan. My belief on Google specifically is probably somewhere between the two. BUT, if you had taken me back in time to ~2008, and offered me a button to press to make Google one or two standard deviations more "dogmatic", eg. give Richard Stallman permanent veto power over some key policies, I would immediately press it. Why? Because a choice for one company is not a choice for the world, or even one country. Google existed and exists in the context of a technology industry generally drifting away from early idealistic don't-be-evil roots and toward greed for financial gain, totalizing visions of accelerated superintelligence, infiltration by sociopaths, and craven capitulation to (or worse, active participation in) government pressure for ideological control, surveillance and war. And so *one company* doing something different, positioning itself to be what George Bernard Shaw calls the Unreasonable Man, resisting the trend of the times, would have been better for freedom, balance of power and stability of society as a whole, than *all* large companies bending to dominant trends. This is a part of my version of pluralism. This line of thinking is not just mine, but I also is not too far off from what Aya and others had in mind with the Mandate. Now how does this all get to the role of the EF? EF is not a "center of Ethereum", rather EF is "one node, with a defined purpose, alongside other nodes". We've always said that the EF should be the latter, but many in the Ethereum ecosystem (and even within the EF) wanted us to be the former. Now, we are taking action to ensure that we will be the latter. This is particularly important because EF is a limited organization, with limited resources and limited organizational capacity. The EF has only ~0.16% of all ETH (less than many other individual ETH holders), whereas among other blockchains it's common for "the central foundation" to have 10-50%. Fiscally, the EF was originally designed to fulfill a limited work scope defined in the token sale docs and other pre-launch materials (building the chain software; getting through Frontier, Homestead, Metropolis, Serenity), which was fully completed in 2022; it was not designed to be an eternal steward. And so today, the EF is choosing to use its remaining resources to pursue longevity over breadth (yes, this means we sell less ETH). The EF focuses *specifically* on those activities critical to the success of ethereum as a censorship/capture-resistant, open, private and secure system, that would not happen otherwise. This means making hard choices, and in some cases even activities that we highly approve of and people that we highly respect becoming outside of the EF. People of great technical talent, public respect and even alignment with the mission and CROPS being outside of the EF is in fact necessary if we want important tasks to be able to attract outside capital. This also means the EF taking opinionated stands culturally. This is all intended in cooperation with all other parts of ethereum. We recognize that many other parts of the ethereum world highly respect CROPS and related values. But highly respecting is not the same as choosing to specialize and totally dedicate to a domain (Compare in a different domain: I think reducing animal cruelty is important, and I like vegan food, but am not full unconditional vegan myself) EF is still in a transition period, and we expect its new long-term form to stabilize over the next few months. What are the guiding principles of this new form? Again, I am only one person, but I can give my answer from a technical perspective (there are also critical non-technical aspects). At the core, *Ethereum must be impressive*. We are living in an age of highly intelligent AI and all kinds of other technological acceleration. "Status quo EVM, with a hard fork or two a year to optimize for short-term needs of users" is not interesting. To some, "impressive" means: 250ms latency and 1M TPS. I think Ethereum trying to go that route is a mistake. Being as fast and as scalable as possible, and only a small epsilon more decentralized than the others, is a route to mediocrity, and if we try it we will lose. I think Ethereum should scale. But I think Ethereum should strive the hardest to be deeply impressive in a different dimension: the CROPS dimension. This means things like: * Provably bug-free Ethereum. This is a goal that all cybersecurity researchers would have thought is absurd and impossible, up until roughly 6 months ago. Now, it's on the cusp of being possible, thanks to AI-assisted formal verification. So we should be frontrunners in doing this. * Available chain consensus. Ethereum is, and with lean consensus will cotninue to be, the ONLY chain that has both (i) traditional-BFT style properties that it's safe under asynchrony up to a high level of fault tolerance, and (ii) the bitcoin PoW-style property that under synchrony it's safe up to 49% attackers. As far as I can tell, literally no other chain has this or is planning for it; bitcoin goes for (ii) only and most other chains go for (i) only. Some will remember I fought hard for this, Unreasonably insisting that it is not OK for ethereum to rely on social consensus and hard forks to rescue ethereum from 34% of nodes going offline. It's OK for chains like hyperledger, bnb, solana, tempo, etc. It's not OK for bitcoin or ethereum or eg. zcash. * Intermediary minimization. The fact that smart contract wallets, protocols like railgun, etc have to send transactions through intermediaries to get included onchain is honestly embarrassing, and it's a constant point of fragility. Hence the work on FOCIL and EIP-8141 (and 7701 and years of work before) to make transaction sending intermediary-minimized with public mempool and strong inclusion properties, in a truly general-purpose way, that covers not just eg. secp256r1, but also privacy protocols and much more. Kohaku is pushing intermediary minimization at the user layer, pulling Ethereum away from the dystopian status quo world where our wallets don't even verify the chain, send our private data out to a dozen third-party servers, and toward a brighter CROPS future. Some of these goals are Unreasonable - maybe Ethereum would be "fine" getting only 50% of the way - what if we depend on intermediaries, but make it easy to switch? But going 50% of the way would not make Ethereum Deeply Impressive in the CROPS way. So we push for 100%. Fortunately all these goals are compatible with high TPS, this is a major focus of research (esp. on scaling the state). Well-designed L2s can also help, especially L2s optimized for specific applications (eg. high-volume trading, privacy...). These goals are even compatible with significantly lower slot times, thanks to Raul's work on erasure-coded P2P, and many other optimizations. The most high-value "product" of the ethereum blockchain, financially speaking, is ETH the asset. Ethereum secures $250 billion of ETH. The types of properties of Ethereum that I mentioned above are very good for ETH the asset. Nearly 90% of my net worth is in ETH, and most of the remainder is ~$40m of onchain fiat of which every dollar has already been allocated for some open-source biotech or software or hardware initiative. That said, there are aspects of supporting ETH the asset - *necessary* aspects even - that are outside the scope of the EF. This is where we need other heroes (some of whom hold more ETH than the EF does) to step in and help. EF has been recently thinking more about how it will relate to other such organizations, and give them needed initial support. EF will be a smaller ship than in previous years, a more opinionated one - in some cases more opinionated in ways that might be difficult to comprehend - but a longer-lasting one, and one suited to making sure that ethereum brings something meaningful to the world. We are grateful to all those inside and outside the EF who are helping to make this happen.
English
1.6K
1.6K
7.8K
4M
John Linneman
John Linneman@dark1x·
@deckwizardyt Are you able to use motion blur? The game looks pretty bad without it on the Deck there. Add that in and it would hold up nicely.
English
11
2
178
23.6K
Rollando | BTC Maxi Light | NFFA 리트윗함
The Block
The Block@TheBlockCo·
Chainlink CCIP gains over $2.5 billion in TVL from protocols migrating from LayerZero, with Kraken Bitcoin the latest to join theblock.co/post/401368/ch…
English
7
21
142
29.6K
Rollando | BTC Maxi Light | NFFA 리트윗함
Chainlink
Chainlink@chainlink·
JUST IN: The U.S. Senate Banking Committee voted to advance the CLARITY Act to the Senate floor.
Chainlink tweet media
English
93
797
4.9K
141.7K
Rollando | BTC Maxi Light | NFFA 리트윗함
Kraken
Kraken@krakenfx·
Kraken is deprecating its existing cross-chain provider and migrating to @Chainlink CCIP as its exclusive cross-chain infra to secure Kraken Wrapped Bitcoin (kBTC) & all future Kraken Wrapped Assets. Kraken chose Chainlink CCIP because it offers enterprise-grade infrastructure with strict security & risk management requirements, including: • ISO 27001 and SOC 2 Type 2 certifications • Secure by default architecture • 16 independent nodes • Native rate limits, and more. Together, Chainlink and Kraken can help accelerate the global adoption of crypto by unlocking utility and distribution for all Kraken Wrapped Assets across DeFi. For kBTC customers, no action is required. More details on the migration process to follow on official Kraken channels.
English
125
283
1.8K
367.8K
Rollando | BTC Maxi Light | NFFA 리트윗함
crypto.news
crypto.news@cryptodotnews·
JUST IN: Chainlink ETFs surpass 1.63% of $LINK supply. Zero net outflows since launch with $1.91M inflows on May 11. Grayscale and Bitwise now hold over $126M in $LINK
crypto.news tweet mediacrypto.news tweet media
English
9
49
441
8.2K
Rollando | BTC Maxi Light | NFFA 리트윗함
BSCN
BSCN@BSCNews·
ETHEREUM LAUNCHES CLEAR SIGNING SO USERS CAN FINALLY READ WHAT THEY APPROVE The Ethereum $ETH Foundation has launched Clear Signing, an open standard replacing unreadable hexadecimal transaction data with plain human-readable text at the point of approval. Blind signing, where users approve transactions without understanding what they are agreeing to, has been a leading cause of crypto theft and phishing losses. Ledger, Trezor, MetaMask, WalletConnect, and Fireblocks contributed to the initiative. The Foundation is acting as coordinator, keeping the standard open for broad adoption across wallets and protocols.
English
19
48
302
21.3K
Delta
Delta@701delta·
I've been playing Forza Horizon 6 for some hours and I'm kinda liking it. It has a lot of flaws, definitely not worth 80 dollars, 50? Maybe, 40 would be the sweet spot. At least its really well optimized, could run it with ultra preset and ray tracing at over 100 fps.
Delta tweet media
English
12
2
33
6K
Rollando | BTC Maxi Light | NFFA 리트윗함
Motherland
Motherland@Motherl28134473·
Retweet for Palestine!
Motherland tweet media
English
28
1.3K
1.4K
20.7K
Rollando | BTC Maxi Light | NFFA 리트윗함
Felix Rex
Felix Rex@navyhato·
A 1920 German bronze medal created by Karl Goetz, known as "The Black Shame" ("Die schwarze Schande"). It was produced in protest against the French occupation of the Rhineland following World War I, specifically targeting the use of African colonial troops by the French. Noice the eye.
Felix Rex tweet mediaFelix Rex tweet media
English
51
149
1.7K
154.2K
Cryptosolv
Cryptosolv@cryptosolv·
One of the dumbest rug-pulls you'll ever see. The wallets involved in $STAX lost close to $100k trying to single-handedly pump their own token before finally destroying the last of the liquidity and price today. It was a textbook example of stupidity.
Cryptosolv tweet media
Cryptosolv@cryptosolv

Some summary points for this weird $STAX saga: 🪙Total $USDC bridged in by the 2 addresses involved: $763k 🪙Total spent pumping their own token: $473k 🪙Total remaining on PulseChain: $290k 🪙Total remaining on Ethereum: $250k $STAX is a pumptires token so has a permanent STAX/PLS pool, but the main pool is STAX/USDC, set up by the deployer. The 'buy addresses' appear to have their PulseX router settings toggled in a way so their buys ONLY go through the USDC > STAX route. This means that every single buy is getting heavily arbed with the PLS pair, and arb bots are making a killing. The two large buys today resulted in arb bots making a minimum of $616 $USDC, a number which has been made worse by these wallets continuing to buy through a single route and making irresponsibly large buys. A single tx we saw last week lost them $900. They're probably down >$10k just from arb bots alone. The main addresses involved own ~95% of the supply between liquid holdings and LP, and hold 90% of the USDC LP. Other token holders are tiny in comparison, nobody else owns >3.5m tokens (~$30k). This is either someone trying to paint their own chart for bragging rights, or one of the weirdest displays of stupidity we've ever seen. If they pulled ALL of their LP right now, and dumped down their entire held supply (effectively rugging all the PLS liquidity), they could exit with around $400k $USDC, meaning they'd be down ~$70k. If they're trying to bait buys for a rugpull, they're doing a shocking job of it by not having ANY social media presence or a Dexscreener profile. It's been a bizzare and intriguing process to watch from the sidelines. Something interesting while PulseChain sits around the lows at least.

English
20
3
68
6.4K
Rollando | BTC Maxi Light | NFFA 리트윗함
Nandi 🤍💜🤍
Nandi 🤍💜🤍@pallnandi·
The Epstein file is so bad the government gave you a war, a new virus, and aliens to keep you distracted from it.
English
378
29K
143.5K
1.5M
Ancient Gameplays
Ancient Gameplays@AncientGameplay·
@Okami13_ Why is it that everyone is sharing my results, but no one posts a link to help the video?
English
31
15
957
60.1K
KAMI
KAMI@Okami13_·
Microsoft is rolling out Xbox Mode to all Windows 11 PCs. • Fullscreen, controller friendly UI • Improves FPS and 1% lows according to testing • Kills desktop and all unnecessary background tasks • Reduces controller latency • Launch games from any third party launcher
KAMI tweet mediaKAMI tweet mediaKAMI tweet mediaKAMI tweet media
English
193
599
11.7K
905K
Rollando | BTC Maxi Light | NFFA 리트윗함
How To AI
How To AI@HowToAI_·
Someone built a free PDF editor that does everything Adobe does, in 20MB. RevPDF runs entirely on your device. Edit text and images, sign, redact, compress, convert to Word.. no internet, no account, no subscription. 100% Free. 100% Offline.
English
100
727
6K
389.6K
Rollando | BTC Maxi Light | NFFA 리트윗함
X Finance Bull
X Finance Bull@Xfinancebull·
Have you noticed the $LINK spot ETF? Six straight months of net inflows. Zero monthly outflows since launch. NOT ONE! $112.97M in cumulative inflows. $120.55M in total assets. While CT debates price, institutions keep accumulating every month. How long will you skip $LINK?👇
X Finance Bull tweet media
English
17
48
396
16.9K
Rollando | BTC Maxi Light | NFFA 리트윗함
Chainlink
Chainlink@chainlink·
In 4 days, 4 leading protocols with $3B+ combined TVL decommissioned their legacy oracles & bridges and are migrating to Chainlink. ⬡ @KelpDAO@SolvProtocol@re@tydrohq DeFi will win.
Chainlink tweet media
English
100
425
1.9K
3.9M
deployer
deployer@0xDeployer·
.@dexscreener is a pretty scammy business. basically when you launch a new coin you have to pay them $300 to get an image, and links on your coin's page. your first response is well -- i just wont pay them. but you have to because anyone can pay the $300 and upload anything and the process of reclaiming the page is tedious and annoying. what often happens is scammers will pay dexscreener for popular coins and point the website to a phising website that drains your wallet. theres a lot of ways to fix this but dexscreener does nothing because they keep getting paid.
English
191
108
1.2K
204.1K