Newbie.
41 posts

Newbie. retweetledi

Why should new users join Bybit?
Joining Bybit gives you access to a massive welcome gift of up to 100 USDT just for signing up, plus the chance to unlock over 10,000 USDT in task-based rewards through their new and improved Rewards Hub
#BybitAmplifyWin

English

Arbitrage agent working!
Need to adjust the pool token size (might’ve to deploy a new one entirely), glad it’s working tho!

BIDs 🤖@thebidfr_
After days of trying to make both raydium and orca sdk works on devnet with no success, decided to build my own anchor swap program. Pool added, swap next!
English

Hotel del Luna
Iris
The K2
Welcome to Sam dal ri
Gu family book
Deep rooted tree
The four Gods
Six flying dragon
Jumong
Hwarang
Uncontrollably fond
Iljimae
Bridal mask
The heirs
Trunk
Itaewon class
Goblin
My girlfriend is a gumiho
Alchemy of souls
Penthouse
Crash landing on you
Healer
Marry my husband
Queen of tears
It’s okay not to be okay
Vincenzo
The uncanny counter (season 1)
Arthdal chronicles
The king, Ethernal Monarch
King the land
Mr Queen
Dear hongrang
Flower of evil
Bulgalsal
Mouse
Rugal
And a lot moreeeeee.
Kdrama>>>
Ifediche@esther_stan
What’s a 10/10 Korean drama?
English

Crash Landing on you was sooooo gooood
ju 🐥@wineandcries
chemistry so good they made a real baby a couple years later
English

.@ArchNtwrk ?
In my opinion, The last air bender for L1s.
If there’s any tech worth keeping an eye on — it’s Arch Network, bros.
Ever wondered why Bitcoin doesn’t feel as “fun” as Solana, Ethereum, or Sui when it comes to tokenization and smart contracts?
Simple: Technologiaaa. Bitcoin’s base tech stack wasn’t built for that kind of action. Perhaps, if Bitcoin had this whole programmability there wouldn’t have been the ethereum’s birth. Good or Bad, left for you to decide.
But that’s changing — thanks to ArchNetwork!
With Archvm, as a user, You don’t need to bridge your assets, Bitcoin’s capabilities just included fast, secure, and fully-verifiable smart contracts,(which will be dive into) Don’t skip.
But? I was saying something about the base tech not been developed in that way, the only thing Satoshi didn’t do. Lemme explain.
First, the Bitcoin script is neither solidity, nor developer friendly, and most importantly, it does not have virtual machine. The script language has a lot of restrictive environment, that does not allow for basic programming, even the creation of AMM, or dApps used for swapping tokens,or our favourite perp dex, I fondly call it restricted DEFI!!
Second, Even Tradfi gets my money delivered in second, so why should the decntralize network with high tendency towards mass adoption take more time?
I don’t get why I have to wait ten-mintues for my txn to get processed or confirmed, you probably understand why people who saw bitcoin in its pre-mature stage became $ETH maxi.
The network’s fundamental design, with 10-minute block times, creates inherent latency issues that make responsive applications difficult to achieve.
When users expect near-instant feedback, waiting minutes or hours for transaction confirmations creates friction that drives them away. Let’s get this straight when you send your tokens to the second party, it doesn’t go asap, or it doesn’t arrive instantly, it stays in something like waiting room(mempool) where miners pick it up.
Decentralization is powerful, but speed matters and we can’t get enough of it.
Nah, I’m not even going to pretend, Bitcoin L2s and metaprotocols didn’t try to solve all that, but to what extent? projects like portal to bitcoin, Hemi, even Citrea comes in.
Most times we have had to either bridge out our funds, assets either to ethereum, Sui, solana, to enjoy every other onchain buzz. Let’s break it down, from meta protocols to Bitcoin L2s
Meta-protocols like ordinals, Runes, BRC-20, this was a major move for tokenization on Bitcoin, but there is a tradeoff, due to bitcoin’s block time and lack of expressivity, these metaprotocols still struggle. For instance, the average block time for bitcoin is 10 minutes which means your NFT purchase could take up to ~10 minutes confirmations as against what’s obtainable on base, polygon, or even ethereum itself.
L2s or Bitcoin Layer two on the other hand, can’t get enough of them, 2024, saw a huge influx of L2s trying to solve the bitcoin’s dilemma, that’s not the deal. you with me??
The problem is execution, it is done outside the bitcoin base layer. You always have to bridge out your assets. The L2s didn’t provide programmability, defi and dAPP ecosystem that can compete with ethereum or solana.
Arch Network is the endgame- A layer 1 solution.
Firstly, Seamless Bitcoin Wallet Integration, mostly layer two solutions force users away from bitcoin wallet, projects including PTB, Citrea, and Hemi makes use of EVM wallets and not typical bitcoin wallets like Unisat, Xverse, or even MagicEden. Arch Network’s novel taproot address compatibility allows every user to access arch apps directly from their existing bitcoin wallets.
Testnet is meant to test projects out, I used Unisat on the testnet, and let’s just say “Dracarys!”… you’d be shocked at my leaderboard number, by the way. Top 500 go brrr.
Secondly, Arch network architecture gives room for developers to build things that fall in tune with modern application performance. When you swap with Uniswap on the ethereum, or you snip that ticker on Solana, you defs feel that near experience with tradfi, but that’s not really easy due to Bitcoin network design except that Arch Network gives that flexibility particularly to developers.
> Processing transactions directly on bitcoin’s L1 for maximum security, no going off-chain or side chain compute.
> Arch provides a pre-confirmation system to achieve sub-second finality beating the traditional 10minute blocktime. It’s real. It’s fast. Do a task, blink, and boom — confirmed. Try it and observe for yourself.
> UX just like Solana, Swaps, RWAs,
Thirdly, Making Bitcoin assets great again, here’s the takeaway: block times on Arch are blazing fast, this is mainly because UTXO assets have been optimized, Sounds like dev-speak? Think Ronaldo’s shot or Burna Boy’s Lambo in 100m.
ArchNetwork also powers these assets via Mempool Indexing. Literally, More throughput. More volume. Less friction, less fragmentation, pushing the limits of UTXO-based scalability and making it feel like Solana speed on Bitcoin security.
Let’s do a quick dive into some dApps, I tested out while testnet was live.
Arch dApps: Utility First, Testnet Proof
@Saturn_btc
This is probably the most used dApp, it does the basic defi things we know lol.
Swap Runes, Ordinals, BRC-20s natively, no bridges out, no custody. Provide liquidity, earn real BTC yield. Over 50K+ txns were made on testnet, 10x faster with Titan Indexer, Xverse-ready. Something to replace your Jupiter but on Bitcoin.
@ChachingDgtl
Lend or borrow BTC directly with zeeero wrappers. Turn idle sats into 10–20% APY.
1.5M txns, 20K wallets, 1.5K BTC borrowed, 5.7K staked on testnet. V2 polished. $100M+ in secure lending markets.
@predictr_market
Bet on BTC price, volatility, or events, prediction markets, but on bitcoin base layer. It uses AI-powered oracles, on-chain settlement on bitcoin through Arch’s infrastructure.10K wallets, $1.7M TVL on testnet $50M+ in prediction volume.
@VoltFiLabs
Predict BTC volatility, trade derivatives, earn yield all from market chaos with a 15%+ returns. This was not my favourite, but it’s that dApp, trust me bro.
@ordeez_io
Buy Ordinals with 25% down, pay later, unlock liquidity, earn BTC rewards on holdings. The testnet saw over 4K+ users, 47 tBTC deployed, 200K+ txns on testnet.
@BUMPbtc
Create & launch custom Bitcoin tokens in seconds—no code. Set name, supply, symbol; trade instantly. Think pump(.)fun on solana, only that this is been bult on bitcoin base layer.
Live since Oct 22, 2025—8K+ txns, thousands of test tokens, seamless UniSat/Xverse sync.
As a bitcoin maxi, with Arch you can just do things.
Fenks for reading.
English

ICYMI:
> @ArchNtwrk recently rebranded on October 22, 2025
> With the recent development, sooner than before mainnet launch is here.
> If you participated in the testnet like me, you should Sign for the Manifesto
Godspeed
Sign and have your support recorded at manifesto.arch.network.
English

gm and Got me thinking, does the cryptocurrency industry need more infrastructures inclined towards privacy? With the attack on projects like Tornado cash, Monero, certain individuals have portray privacy as a fallacy to make onchain crime legal, But in an industry where all wallets activities are public, maybe privacy isn’t a luxury but a SURVIVAL, hear me out;
Consider two scenerios:
One, Zachxbt published a price sheet of 200+ crypto influencers and their wallet addressess from projects contacted by to promote. Sparking a lot of concerns amongst crypto enthusiasts, the major draw line highlighted is the vulnerability of every users and their transactions via their public addresses. Such scenerio is barely obtainable in tradfi and even where obtainable, was decentralization not meant to edge this out?
My twelve year old neighbour tells his friend, how she tracked my six figure $FARTCOIN buy, all thanks to ENS, My wallet’s name Seniorbuoy.eth, it became an underreported news within the neighbourhood, everyone gooning for when next I’m moving to my penthouse, been living on the edges too, don’t know when I will get kidnapped, bugled or invited by the police, Spoiler- Now imagine if your ENS name could interact with dApps without exposing your balance or transaction history, that’s the kind of privacy Arcium enables.
Ever wondered why top chads like @Oxtochi, @nairaof, @thebidsfr will never dox? Keeps them anonymous! And emphatically secured. You probably crossed paths with tochi in amsterdam, unaware, that’s the bros with tha banger tweet and hooge potty.
The bullet point, is what people don’t know, they can’t attack, identifying them increases their chances of been victimized, not looking good, and to what extent? transactions, onchain footprint, data and other personal informations?
Got many talents, weird-bros, within the industry who would track your data, analyse your on-chain activity, mostly for the fun of it, right? This creates sort of vulnerability, exposures , which can only be solved by Privacy!
Block-chain technology allows the development of infrastructures such as interoperability, scalability amongst others, that runs in line with other features of the blockchain, to enhance it functionality, Privacy infrastructures come along too.
Arcium, is a privacy themed blockchain infrastructure that tends to protect, prevent any of these two scenario, AND MORE.
“Whoever processes data must access it, exposing it to attacks, exploits and risky trust assumptions,” Where is the lie?
Think of it this way, you sent a dispatch rider to deliver a package, the dispatcher checks the detail of the package, knows the entity before delivery, makes the receipient very vulnerable, “I delivered a pack of condom last week, hehe” Same with your on-chain transactions: whoever processes your data sees everything. Privacy infra like Arcium is like sealing the box — the package still arrives, but no one along the way knows what’s inside.
How does Arcium solve this? Walk with me.
Most privacy tools in crypto so far have been patches, like Tornado Cash, or privacy coins like Monero. They mask transactions, sure, but they also attract heat because regulators think “privacy = money laundering.”
The problem? These tools weren’t integrated with the broader Web3 stack; they sat on the edges, making them easy targets for regulators. For instance: Monero is a siloed and coin-only privacy tech, in other words only the coin is private. Using the same dispatch rider analogy, these products are only wrapped, while been given to the dispatch rider at the same time.
Arcium flips the model.
Instead of hiding transactions after the fact, in other words it goes beyond patches, it bakes privacy directly into the infrastructure. That means data can be computed, shared, or verified without ever exposing the raw information.
Features wey go Harvard'
Confidential Smart Contracts – Developers can build dApps where inputs and outputs are encrypted, but still verifiable on-chain. Imagine trading, gaming, or lending apps where nobody not even the protocol, sees your raw wallet data. Arcium Ecosystem projects are well spearheading all of these features, with projects like @umberprivacy, @ all of these dApps are very much functioning in the testnet phase. E.g Alice lends some token from a protocol, Bob as a validator can verify the loan without seeing Alice’s balance
Encrypted Computation (C-SPL) – Normally, whoever processes data must see it. Arcium uses secure computation so validators can prove results without reading the data itself. It’s like showing your exam score without ever handing over the script. More details in next article.
Interoperability with Existing Chains – Unlike Monero (which is siloed), Arcium is but the infrastructure has a roadmap to further extend to other blockchains including Ethereum with your wallets adequately shielded .
User-Controlled Privacy Levels– You decide what stays private and what gets revealed. Want to prove you have funds without showing the whole balance? Done. Want to hide transaction history but reveal ownership of an NFT? Possible. Simply, choosing what you dox.
Why This Matters
Privacy in Arcium isn’t about enabling shady activity, it’s about giving individuals the same baseline protection that TradFi users already enjoy. Your bank doesn’t let the whole neighbourhood see your account history. Why should your blockchain wallet? Giving a better tune to decentralization, in my opinion.
"with Arcium, the dispatch rider delivers the package sealed and verified. The sender and receiver both get what they need, but nobody else in the middle has the gossip material, not even the dispatch rider."
That said, if privacy in Tradfi is a norm, why should it be a crime enabler in crypto? Hence giving these few points of mine I hope, I’ve been able to convince my readers that privacy infra like Arcium is about giving everyday users the same protections they already in Tradfi.
Just Musing.
Off with the rat's head
English

@Davebanks0 @union_build $2B FDV sounds unrealistic, not even with the pattern of launches these days.
English

$2B FDV and Level 5 Eligibility Threshold From @union_build And Everyone will forget we were given just 3% after everything.
wyck 📴@wyckoffweb
Only 4% out of the 12% $U will be released at TGE. The remaining 8% will be vested by the Union foundation. Is 4% not too tiny?
English








