Kayne

591 posts

Kayne banner
Kayne

Kayne

@0xKayne

谁是敌人,谁是朋友 。拥抱币安,拥抱BNB,拥抱币安人生。 Bullish on StandX & Variational

Katılım Mayıs 2024
2.3K Takip Edilen433 Takipçiler
Kayne retweetledi
Adam Ghowiba
Adam Ghowiba@adamghowiba·
JP Morgan's investment research team just shared exactly how they built their multi-agent system "Ask David", and it's the same architecture pattern showing up everywhere: - supervisor agent orchestrates - specialized subagents handle retrieval, structured data, analytics - LLM-as-judge reflection node before the answer ships - human-in-the-loop for the last accuracy gap worth watching for anyone building:
English
133
627
6.5K
1.8M
Kayne
Kayne@0xKayne·
理解cc的机制对于如何使用 coding agent 如何编写重点清晰的 prompt 确实很有帮助,里面的设计思想扩展到设计任何 agent 系统都很有用
Xiao Tan@tvytlx

x.com/i/article/2038…

中文
0
0
0
58
Kayne retweetledi
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
Andrew Ng dropped absolute gold on AI careers
English
11
270
1.5K
103.2K
Kayne retweetledi
太阳闯关记
太阳闯关记@dachaoren·
claude code教程,讲的非常仔细,新手完全能听懂并且落地,这教程在国内不得收费398,598元?估计还一大堆人抢着买。 静下心看完这一套完整教程,你就能真正用 AI 搭建工作流、实现自动化、处理复杂任务。
中文
298
2.8K
12.2K
799.2K
Kayne retweetledi
Web3老吴
Web3老吴@laowu3677·
这是马云在斯坦福大学的经典内部演讲 当年只对校内师生开放 全程严禁外传 现在全网都很难找到完整资源 每一句都是阿里创业的底层逻辑和真心话 内容太干太敢说了 很多人找了好几年都没挖到完整版 建议保存 多看几遍
中文
12
88
365
30.7K
Kayne retweetledi
Max
Max@0xMGB·
Max tweet media
ZXX
32
2
161
7K
Kayne
Kayne@0xKayne·
这么大个事,就这点反应啊,都给我冲 $币安人生 啊 “历史不会重复,但会押韵” 复刻一波去年的 $pnut 和 $act 我清楚地意识到我就是在赌 但是这种机会都不赌,还玩什么山寨 手里拿着 AK AA 不下注,玩什么德扑 看不懂的去问一下 AI 什么是 UTF-8
Binance@binance

We will be performing a system upgrade and testing for UTF-8 implementation on our Spot platform on December 17. Important: This upgrade will NOT affect spot trading or any related functions. During the testing phase, users may see test tokens and trading pairs appear. This is normal and routine. Please be aware that any tokens created on-chain with the same or similar test token names are NOT endorsed by Binance. ⚠️ Always do your own research before trading!

中文
0
0
2
655
Kayne
Kayne@0xKayne·
Volume/OI 指标现在成了评估perp dex真实交易数量的重要指标,perp dex 整女巫会被骂惨,那给持仓金额*持仓时长提供一定积分奖励如何呢 “Heres a quick look at the data ranked by ratio and rounded: Pacifica: $930M Volume - $60M OI - 15x Ratio Extended: $850M Volume - $85M OI - 10x Ratio Variational: $1200M Volume - $380M OI - 3.2x Ratio Avantis: $190M Volume - $65M OI - 3x Ratio Lighter: $4800M Volume - $1700M OI - 2.7x Ratio Aster: $6400M Volume - $2600M OI - 2.4x Ratio Paradex: $1000M Volume - $500M OI - 2x Ratio GMX: $150M Volume - $140M OI - 1.1x Ratio Ostium: $115M Volume - $160M OI - 0.7x Ratio Hyperliquid: $3200M Volume - $7500M OI - 0.4x Ratio Drift: $65M Volume - $380M OI - 0.2x Ratio”
pika2zero@ruggedpikachu

Pacifica and Extended are the most overfarmed, wash-traded perps DEXES out there by a wide margin. Almost nobody uses these to trade organically. Even Aster looks better now I ranked the most inorganic perps dexes on the market. and i was shocked to find some of my airdrop farms on there and how distorted their stats really are. These have insane wash trading, botting or points / incentives farming going on. Now of course it would be in my interest to say something bullish and just shill you my ref link. Especially since I'm an ambassador for both projects. (expect those perks to be gone by tomorrow) But the data is actually astonishing. Let me explain how i ranked these by volume / open interest: If you open a 1k trade you will generate 1k of volume and open interest for a DEX. A 1:1 ratio. Pretty organic. But if you open a trade ten times, to farm a protocol, you will generate 10k in volume but still only 1k in open interest. So a 10:1 ratio. That is what you see in the chart. And thats why OI is considered to be the more organic measure of activity on a dex compared to volume. Now you would of course expect the zero fee perp dexes to have more volume compared to the higher fees ones, but that is not the case actually, as Pacifica charges some of the highest fees on the market. Another explanation would be a high amount of day-traders compared to swing-traders elsewhere. But based on the markets available i dont see why these two specifically would have an order of magnitude more daytraders than lighter for example. If anything I'd expect lighter to have more short term traders, because of zero fees and forex pairs. Pacificas Volume / OI ratio is 14.8 meaning people open the same 1k trade almost 15 times before they leave it open once over night. For Extended the ratio is 10x more volume than open interest. That is not organic. And it's not just because they're an airdrop farm. Lighter for example sits at a 2.7 ratio which is much smaller and way more organic than those two. Despite running the most crowded points program in maybe ever. However compared to Hyperliquid, which is sitting at a 0.4 ratio, even Lighter has at least half of their trades attributed to wash trading and farming. (factoring in lower fees and forex) Ostium is the most organic airdrop farm with 115M volume and 160M OI or a 0.7 ratio. Meaning people open a trade and tend to leave it open for over a day, no mass farming going on. You can also see their volume dropping massively on every weekend as they focus on RWA markets like stocks, fx and precious metals which are closed then. Logical and organic once more. Paradex is another overlooked airdrop farm. They are sitting at a 2.0 ratio and are thus more legit than Lighter and 5-10x more legit than Pacifica and Extended. Even the perps dex everybody called 'fake' a while ago, Aster, is only sitting at a 2.4 ratio and thus quite organic nowadays. Of course compared to Hyperliquid there's still an awful lot of washtrading from CZ going on, but its not as extreme anymore. IMO if you want to airdrop farm anything you should focus on Paradex and Ostium. These two will have trading activity after points are over, they seem to have a legit community and their volumes will not drop that much after TGE. Another good one is Variational. Simply because of their unique architecture. Pacifica and Extended specifically are problematic as their volumes will literally drop 10x-20x after the snapshot. They can still launch their token at a high FDV potentially, think of attentionfi a'la lou*io. But their tokens value could collapse pretty rapidly if organic activity doesnt take over. Heres a quick look at the data ranked by ratio and rounded: Pacifica: $930M Volume - $60M OI - 15x Ratio Extended: $850M Volume - $85M OI - 10x Ratio Variational: $1200M Volume - $380M OI - 3.2x Ratio Avantis: $190M Volume - $65M OI - 3x Ratio Lighter: $4800M Volume - $1700M OI - 2.7x Ratio Aster: $6400M Volume - $2600M OI - 2.4x Ratio Paradex: $1000M Volume - $500M OI - 2x Ratio GMX: $150M Volume - $140M OI - 1.1x Ratio Ostium: $115M Volume - $160M OI - 0.7x Ratio Hyperliquid: $3200M Volume - $7500M OI - 0.4x Ratio Drift: $65M Volume - $380M OI - 0.2x Ratio Drift is on the other side of the spectrum where people seem to open a trade and then leave it unchanged for a week or so. Hyper-organic. Variational is also relatively high up on the list but this is somewhat to be expected as they offer both zero fees and loss-refunds for losing trades. While 3x is probably a higher ratio than they will have longterm i still like trading there, as it is not that extreme compared to extended or pacifica and also just slightly above lighter. DISCLAIMER: Now this is in no way meant to insult any team. If you feel insulted by me listing raw data available to anyone on defillama, then you should check on yourself first. This is just meant to highlight farming activity in hunt of points / incentives or wash trading by certain actors. This isn't a bear post or fud either. Those DEXes can still mature into a product with an organic userbase. This post is meant to highlight two things: A) For airdrop farmers to maybe cut back on their farming or to at least lower their expectations post TGE and B) Teams to maybe do something against mass farming with some anti-sybil, anti-washtrading measures. Now of course i get that teams dont want to do B as they are profiting massively off fees right now. Literally a gold mine for them. But it might be problematic in the long run. If you're a trader simply placing your regular trades there, like the team intended, because you like the interface or fees or whatever, then you dont have to worry. Just keep doing your thing. Your strategy is profitable anyway and any airdrop is just a bonus. If you're a farmer though, simply there to burn money on fees for tokens, then just keep this in mind and evaluate your strategy. And how this inorganic activity might effect TGE & valuations. Maybe it doesnt even matter at TGE, but definitely later on. Maybe hedge your bags. Feel free to leave any remarks in comments. Especially if you have other explanations for this behaviour.

中文
0
0
4
255
Kayne
Kayne@0xKayne·
@kiki520_eth extended升级了xvs金库机制,也开始走这种路线了
中文
0
0
1
141
庞教主
庞教主@kiki520_eth·
StandX交易积分正式上线,说下我对StandX的真正理解 StandX本质上是在改变perpdex的方程式,而不是复制粘贴 StandX解决了一个根本性问题: “为什么保证金只会占用,不会增厚?” 大家聊的比较多是StandX是前Binance合约团队做的,数据又很猛,15亿的tvl了,当然这些也确实很重要,尤其是团队的能力 在我眼里,多数 perp DEX 是把 UI/撮合/清算抄个八九成,然后在费率、空投、券商化运营上继续卷 StandX 从底层假设改: 保证金不是“闲置抵押物”,而是会生钱的资产池 合约标价不用 USDT,直接用 DUSD 定价,天然制造价差与可对冲的套利轨道 架构与交互全自研,信息层级和下单动作顺手到不需要“教育成本” 这不是“做得像 CEX”,而是把 CEX 的成熟交易直觉还给链上 我问自己:这群人为什么有机会跑出来? 答案很现实:把用户真正 care 的两件事做到位——手感与钱感 手感:交易像呼吸,别让我每笔都签、每次都卡、每秒都焦虑。Hyperliquid 把这条路打通了,StandX 沿着这条体验曲线,做了自己的审美与工程取舍。 钱感:你交易时资金不是躺尸。DUSD 的生息模型来自资金费率对冲,这玩意儿越热闹越香。牛市里最舒服的状态就是:我本来就爱做单,现在保证金还在后台替我干活。 这就是差异化,不是挂个“全链、全托管、全 zk”的大旗,而是把“收益流水线”做进产品骨头里 这也确实得益于StandX的团队 当年所有人都沿着 BitMEX 的反向合约跑,Binance 硬是把正向合约做成行业默认 理由很简单:对用户更顺。不用每个币单独准备保证金,USDT 一把梭,小币种流动性直接起飞 “既然稳定币已经这么大,为什么保证金还不能生息?为什么标价不能改?为什么 UI 还要照搬?” 这类“看起来多此一举”的问题,往往是范式拐点,这也是我看好StandX的原因 其实perp赛道马上就要进入新的一轮验证期,就是edgex、lighter这两家距离tge越来越近了,tge之后才是真正的考验 有人觉的还是hyperliquid做稳龙头,但perp DEX 的终局不会是“一个王朝”。CEX 的历史已经写过:龙头会换,位置要靠持续做对一串小决策叠出来 我的判断: 入口层会统治流动性,协议层比的是“被路由的资格” StandX 这套收益结构,对钱包和聚合器非常友好——它不是“又一个交易所”,而是“给用户多一份稳态收益的后端”。当入口层开始统一路由时,能加厚用户收益曲线的协议,优先被默认 只需记住,perp的战争永远还没有结束,StandX的产品设计让我看到了其独特性,然非蹭蹭perp的热点,甚至StandX一旦跑通,将直接给perp赛道带来第二波增长曲线 也欢迎使用体验StandX的产品,而非为了空投而玩 standx.com/referral?code=…
StandX@StandX_Official

The Trading Points Campaign is now live on Mainnet! The more you trade, the more you earn. In conjunction w/ @BinanceWallet, everyone using Binance Wallet Extension (Keyless) receives 10% Bonus Points. Stand to Earn.

中文
24
4
40
10.8K
Kayne
Kayne@0xKayne·
Extended 升级了金库机制,现在存入的资金在生息同时,部分份额仍可作为保证金进行交易,金库最早于 2025 年 4 月 29 日推出,整体 APR 为 13.91%。 用户将资金(如 USDC)存入 Extended 平台的 Vault(金库)时,会获得等值的 XVS 份额作为凭证。这部分资金在金库内会自动产生基础收益(Base Yield)。 XVS份额的一定比例(当前为 25%)可以作为交易保证金,当用户仓位面临清算时,会将 XVS 份额从金库中提出以补充保证金。 设计理念上和 StandX 还蛮像的
rf.extended@rf_extended

Now that XVS is live, it’s important to clarify how users can use it. In simple terms, XVS unlocks yield-bearing collateral for users. @extendedapp users can now deposit funds into the vault and use the same capital as yield-bearing collateral for their trading activity. When a user deposits into the vault, they receive the corresponding number of XVS shares into a sub-account. Currently, XVS shares earn base vault yield, contribute 75% of their value to account equity, and contribute 25% of their value to balance available for trading. Simple example: - User has $1,000 on the account: equity $1,000 and available balance $1,000. - User deposits into the vault and receives $1,000 of XVS: equity $750 and available balance $250. - User opens a $1,000 BTC long with 4× leverage: equity stays $750 and available balance becomes $0 ($250 - $1000/4). - If unrealised PnL becomes +$100: equity = $850 and available balance = $100. As long as equity is above maintenance margin requirements, the user is healthy. If equity falls below maintenance margin requirements, liquidation starts from XVS: the vault withdraws the deposit back to the user. Because XVS contribution < 100%, many liquidations stop here as users receive USDC from liquidating XVS. Over the next weeks we will: 1. Gradually increase XVS contribution to both equity and available balance to 90%. 2. Launch XVS Extra Yield on top of the base yield. Extra Yield will depend on user activity. The higher your rank in the Trading League of our points program, the higher your APR. Note: if you use XVS as collateral, it can be affected by trading losses and liquidation. If you want your vault deposit to stay independent of trading, please keep XVS in a separate sub-account. If you want more details on XVS liquidation logic or risk mechanics, please refer to my earlier tweet: x.com/rf_extended/st…

中文
0
0
2
153
zagen扎根(✱,✱)
zagen扎根(✱,✱)@0xzagen·
根据灰度的research, @opentensor bittensor的原生代币 $TAO 和btc一样四年减半,第一次减半将在5天之后(12.14),日常的排放从7200枚下降到3600枚 bittensor同时在吸引应用端和机构投资的注意,这里附上 @tengyanAI 整理的子网list:x.com/i/lists/186058… 我觉得英文社区对于 $tao 是非常bullish的,比如定位成ai版的btc,而且开创了ai板块的这种subnet结构叙事。
Grayscale@Grayscale

We agree so much we wrote a research paper about the $TAO Halving here: research.grayscale.com/reports/bitten… x.com/const_reborn/s…

中文
5
1
16
2K
Kayne
Kayne@0xKayne·
好细啊
AI索罗斯科特@0xScottBTC

Vibe Coding 用 Rust 接 HyperLiquid 时发现的一个关键差异 - Perp DEX 的底层逻辑带来的交易启示 最近迷上了 RUST 的性能,决定 Vibe Coding 用把之前的套利策略基础设施都用 Rust 重写了一遍,把各种“好用但黑盒”的官方 SDK 全部拆掉,自己直接对接 WebSocket 和 REST。在写 HyperLiquid(HL)接口、丢掉官方 SDK 之后,我发现它和币安、OKX 等 CEX 有一个本质差异:HyperLiquid 公共 WebSocket 的 l2Book 不是“增量 diff 流”,而是“按区块节流的完整快照”。 官方文档写到:l2Book 是 snapshot feed,只在新区块产生且距离上次推送 ≥ 0.5 秒 时,才推一次当前订单簿的完整状态。 1. 这跟传统 CEX 有什么不同? 在 CEX(币安 / OKX): - 撮合引擎在中心化服务器里连续运行; - 对外推的是「上一帧 vs 这一帧的变化」(diff + updateId); - 你本地需要不断把 diff 叠上去,维护一份“尽量实时”的订单簿。 在 HL: - 撮合和订单簿状态都在 L1 链上执行; - 只有区块提交时,状态才整体更新一次; - 公共 l2Book 的角色变成:每隔至少 0.5 秒,给你发一张「最新区块之后的高清截图」。 所以:你看到的永远是上一块之后的结果,而不是引擎正在“运转中的中间过程”。 2. 这种机制,对策略有什么影响? 可以先记住一句话:你是看着“上一帧”的盘口,下单去博“下一帧”的成交。 围绕这点,有三条很实际的启示: 1)吃单:你用的是“旧盘口”决策 你收到的快照,可能是 0.5 秒前那一块之后的状态; 等你算完、签好、发单,再进到下一个区块,中间又过去几百毫秒。 所以在 HL 上,简单的「见单就吃」要改成:模型里显式加上“一个区块时间 + 0.5 秒节流”的滑点预估; 只有当预期利润 > 手续费 + 预期滑点 时,才允许吃单;否则宁可不做,因为你可能在买“已经被人吃完的流动性”。 2)跨所套利:一条快腿 + 一条慢腿 做 Binance / HL 跨所时,本质是: - 一条腿在毫秒级确认的 CEX; - 一条腿在“按区块结算”的 HL。 结果就是:你很容易在 Binance 先锁住一腿,HL 那一腿因为入块延迟,价差已经没了,留下单边敞口。所以要 - 提前在模型里预留几个 tick 的波动空间; - 提高「最小可接受价差」门槛; - 给 HL 那条腿单独设最大仓位和回补规则。 3)微观结构:能用的信息变了 公共 API 给你的,是:节流后的 L2 快照;完整的成交流。 这意味着:依赖 L2 diff、排队位置的那类高频 order-book 因子,很难原样搬过来; 更现实的做法是: - 用 snapshot 看“区块级盘口轮廓”; - 用 trades 做“区块级的成交特征”(方向、冲击、imbalance); - 策略重心转向统计套利、动量、流动性溢价等以区块为时间单位的信号。 3. 自建节点能不能“解决”这些问题? 能缓解一部分,但不能改变“按区块更新”的本质。 官方文档里明确建议: 想要更低延迟、更细粒度数据,可以跑自己的 HL 节点; 再用官方示例的 order_book_server 或自己写服务,从节点输出构建 L4 订单簿 diff。 这么做的好处是: - 延迟更低:不用和公共 WS 抢带宽,直接连本地节点; - 粒度更细:可以拿到「每个区块的 L4 diff」,甚至所有订单事件,然后自己在内网还原非常细的订单簿和订单流。 但要看清两点: 即使你有了 L4 diff,状态更新还是按区块来的,不是变回“毫秒级连续时间”的世界; 自建节点+本地 order book,更适合做专业做市和高频研究,但还是在“下一个区块会怎样”这个框架里思考。

日本語
0
0
5
182
戈多Godot
戈多Godot@GodotSancho·
最近看到很多关于 @monad $MON 与公链护城河的讨论。作为 L2 的贡献者,真心感觉所谓的「构建生态」,已经被证伪了🥲 如果你从头搭建好了一条公链或者 L2,抱着完全赤诚的心,想建设好项目,那首先要考虑用户和链上资金从哪来。 当你四处求合作,会发现没有人搭理,甚至付费找 KOL 推广都会被拒绝。 这时你明白,大家最基本的需求,是确信你不会跑路,而不是关心你的公链性能和技术。你需要强力的 VC 融资来做品牌背书。 问题是,VC 投资看什么,你得有名校和大厂背景,最好还得有密码学背景,或者拥有密码学背景的合伙人。 假设你刚好都具备,也找到了密码学背景合伙人,顺利融到了资。这时,会有一小部分人顺着融资新闻尝试在你链上撸毛,KOL 也来找你询问合作机会。 然后就会面临一个问题,用户怎么把钱转到你的链上。 如果是公链,在没发币的情况下,只能靠测试网领水。 如果是 L2,要去找跨链桥合作,多数跨链桥都是池对池跨链,所以能到你链上的资金类型非常有限,只会局限在 USDT、USDC 这俩稳定币,和 ETH 及其 LST 资产。 当然资产数量不会太庞大,因为大家还是有点担心你会跑路。 而且最关键问题是,如果链上没有原生 USDT、USDC,那你链上的这俩代币,其实是锁仓在跨链桥的 USDT、USDC 衍生的,一旦跨链桥出现问题,你没有办法为用户兑付资产。 去找 Tether 和 Circle 聊合作?基本费用至少大几百万起步,还是算了吧。 好了,然后你链上的 DeFi 流动性局限在 USDT-USDC 交易对和 ETH-wstETH 交易对,毫无意义可言。 依靠跨链桥来到你链上的资产明显不足,流动性的中心是交易所,要是交易所能开放你的公链提币会是很大帮忙。 然后会发现绝大多数交易所上币是要收费的,最大的那家不收费,但是要对他们有价值。恭喜你,拿到 KPI 了。 TVL 怎么办?只能一家一家找机构、BD 巨鲸和大户,承诺收益。等发币了,用代币补足对方贡献 TVL 的 APY。 链上活跃呢?已经成熟的大 DeFi 项目不会理你,除非你能承诺给于巨大的流动性,也就是部署至少千万美元或者过亿美元的 TVL 到该项目,他们才会考虑在你链上部署。否则,深度不够,没人用,人家部署了也没有意义。 GameFi、NFT?基本已经死了。 来找你的项目,基本都是冲着 Grant 资助来的,随便抄一个现有项目,部署在你链上,等你发币问你要 Grant,拿到代币就套现,然后多链部署,寻找下一个公链或 L2。 就算他们是真心想在你链上部署,那人家也不会局限在你一条链上。因为人家也要市值。也需要扩展用户群体与市场规模,多链部署是最佳策略。 MEME 在多数人眼里是一个好方式,很多人觉得拉盘几个 MEME,链就能搞得定。但实际情况是,MEME 不能自己发,毕竟很多国家的监管不是吃素的。 其次,你也不能临时招聘一个做市团队,这也是成本。找第三方 MEME 发行团队合作?一开始几个代币可能还稳得住,前提是大户不止盈、不套现。 一旦新增用户变少,实际买盘不足,大户套现,MEME 就会在更低的价格接盘,盘面大阴线越来越多。 高频交易者的加入会让情况变得更糟,他们会拉高 Gas,狙击 MM 还来不及撤销的挂单。于是 MM 只能拉宽买一卖一间距,用户交易滑点越来越大。价格波动也就更猛烈。 慢慢地用户持仓时间越来越短,舔一口就跑。MM 维持价格的时间也只能越来越短。 不断博弈的结果就是比谁跑得快。最后,终于谁都不用跑了。 如果你最后侥幸达到了 KPI,终于要上币了。有个问题需要解决,VC 的利益你要不要保证?给你贡献 TVL 的巨鲸和大户呢?生态项目的 Grant 呢?MM 的流动性配资,交易所的上币空投、Stake 奖励,以及给用户的空投,还有团队。这里面你保住谁的利益,又该牺牲谁的利益呢? 最终你上币成功了,但交易所还是只会开放你的本币在链上的充提,最多加个 ETH。 Tether 和 Circle 依然收费大几百万到千万美元,链上就没有原生的 U,交易所没法开启基于你的链的 U 的充提,DeFi 巨鲸是不会相信跨链桥的安全性的,不会将大额资金跨链过来。 用户参与你链上活动,需要提你的本币,然后到链上再卖成 ETH 或者 U,其中的磨损本身就是门槛。 哦对了,没有原生 U,也就别指望会有 RWA 来部署了。甚至你的预言机,都用不了 Chainlink,因为他家收费也超级贵。 最后会发现,发行一条通用链来构建生态,是一个伪命题。 这其实就是一场巨大的「皇帝的新衣」,买盘也不是基于你的基本面,而是阴谋论,是感觉你背后有某某某坐庄,某某某支持。 你会发现自己链上的资金,最终还是会回归 ETH 和 SOL,可能还有 Base,这些链的马太效应已经非常明显了。 交易所开放的资产充提支持、链上已有资产流动性、DEX 的资金和交易滑点、DeFi 间规模和联动效应、DeFi 协议的种类和可组合性、现货合约期权等等不同交易类型、仓位能否对冲、能否构建债券产品、借贷协议的清算安全性,甚至是用户的交易习惯、用户已经形成的固定印象和路径依赖等等等等,全部都是这些成功公链的护城河。 所以,又回到那个为什么,用户为什么一定要用你的链,生态协议为什么一定要基于你的链部署?重要的不是技术本身,而是独特性。 这个独特性必须对交易和收益,这两大场景有帮助。而且得是共识层面的帮助,就像 Hyperliquid 撤单优先共识排序利于 MM 提供流动性,或者是 Solana 正在开发的 ACE 应用控制执行。 其实写到这里,我已经表达完了。 最后的最后,想说所以 Manta 孵化的项目,不会强制让其部署在 Manta 链上,而是可以自由选择觉得适合自己的链,比如 superfortune 在 BNB Chain 上,Junk.Fun 在 Solana 上等等。但他们的部分收入,需要回购 MANTA 。 以上。
戈多Godot tweet media
中文
110
60
341
109.9K
Kayne
Kayne@0xKayne·
StandX 1wu+ 资产挽救成功 非常感谢 FlashRescue @FalshRescue的白帽 Darcy @BitBull2003 和 mega @MegaKecc 此前在 FOMO Stable 存款活动的情况下,误签名了一个假 Stable 官网链接,几天后 EVM 链相关资产被转移,所幸该钱包中仅存放了一些 EVM 兼容链的 Gas 但这个钱包里在 StandX 的 Alpha 活动中还有 1wu 左右的 $DUSD 存款!提出存款需要 BNB 作为 Gas,黑客获取的离线签名可以在第二个区块直接转走 Gas 与其他代币 恰巧了解到好友 Darcy 近期开始做的 FlashRescue,试探性发起求助,沟通后得到存在挽回资金可能性的结论,Darcy 的心理按摩相当巴适 等待 StandX Alpha 活动结束,系统开放赎回功能后,Darcy 与其团队技术定制编写了脚本将资金分批顺利取回。 后续也请教了操作原理,可以将打入 gas 与转移 $DUSD 的操作在同一个区块中完成,并监听standx项目方的转币交易,将代币取回到安全地址。 虽然我作为技术出身也能理解其中原理,但没有实际操作经验,对其中的细节工程问题了解也不深,FlashRescue 还是非常靠谱!即使面对新项目也能具体分析灵活处理,赞赞!
中文
4
3
22
6.5K