Ryushe
179 posts




Linux sets rules for AI-generated code After months of debate, the Linux community has agreed on clear rules for using AI-generated code. Tools like GitHub Copilot are allowed, but maintainers have made it clear that low-quality “AI slop” will not be accepted. > “Humans take the fall for mistakes.” This means developers can use AI to help write code, but they are fully responsible for checking it, fixing errors, and making sure it meets Linux’s standards. The decision is backed by Linus Torvalds and kernel maintainers

AI agents are increasingly being used by some users to create a huge volume of low-quality, unverified submissions. We call this “sloptimism,” overly optimistic submissions driving large volumes of speculative or AI-generated reports.

Thrilled to announce the Monitor tool which lets Claude create background scripts that wake the agent up when needed. Big token saver and great way to move away from polling in the agent loop Claude can now: * Follow logs for errors * Poll PRs via script * and more!

Expect to see more of this

What happens when every single piece of software we rely on can be pwn’d in a for loop with a few hundred dollars of compute? I don’t think you guys are scared enough tbh.

🚨 Launching: The OSINT Tools Library A curated, investigator-first directory of tools used in real cases. → Tools.OSINTNewsletter.com We’re building the largest and best maintained OSINT tools resource and need your help. Reply and tag a tool we should add 👇

Nobody talks about the worst part of AI displacement. It's not losing the job. It's applying to 200 jobs after and hearing nothing. Because the same AI that replaced you is screening the applications.


First submission on h1 , 2x race condition, one reward and resolved💪





