Exposed

995 posts

Exposed banner
Exposed

Exposed

@0xSlap

Posting uncomfortable realities you won’t typically hear

Katılım Ekim 2021
709 Takip Edilen48 Takipçiler
Exposed
Exposed@0xSlap·
@Laurieluvsmolly @SamanthaTaghoy Is it?? The MMIWG issue is a serious concern.. for affected communities, but is MINIMAL to the scale of leading causes of death or overall volume of missing-persons reports there. @grok What are the most common causes of death & missing persons in Canada and at what rates?
English
1
0
0
4
🪴Laurie
🪴Laurie@Laurieluvsmolly·
@SamanthaTaghoy Just because you don’t belong to these groups, doesn’t mean there isn’t a huge problem.
🪴Laurie tweet media
English
275
9
336
98.6K
Samantha Smith
Samantha Smith@SamanthaTaghoy·
“MMIWG2SLGBTQQIA+” The Canadian government just dropped this absolute monstrosity (and no, it isn’t satire).
English
9.5K
9.4K
82.9K
96.1M
winny
winny@winternet·
@bdguan Very sad to see this post from you Brian. Your first statement is nullified by the following sentiment.
English
8
0
142
10.5K
brian
brian@bdguan·
I have deep love for trans people. They deserve respect and to be happy. But the more I interface with trans people, the more clear it becomes that being trans is a mental illness. I have plenty of mentally ill friends who I love and respect. But I don’t celebrate their illness. I don’t encourage it. I had a friend come out as trans recently, and I felt sad about it. Concerned for their wellbeing.
English
97
18
1.1K
123.2K
Exposed retweetledi
fejau
fejau@fejau_inc·
the denominator is worthless gn
English
75
256
2K
126.9K
Exposed
Exposed@0xSlap·
@dcs_vortex Oh! Was not expecting so much agreement haha, is there anything you found within it was flawed or you would disagree with ? Thank you so much for the long response, I really appreciate it!
English
1
0
1
28
Ashleigh
Ashleigh@dcs_vortex·
I like how it’s been written, it’s not derogatory or “attacking”. I really appreciate the tone and clarity of this piece. It’s rare to find a critique of transgender ideology that is both ‘principled and compassionate’ without resorting to hostility or emotional manipulation. The biological grounding, logical structure, and respectful delivery make it stand out. It thoughtfully separates fact from ideology while still emphasizing human dignity, which is exactly the kind of balanced discourse we need more of. Maybe I really like it because that is how I see it all, so my views on the essay could be bias? The part where they write about, Woman = A person who primarily conforms to the social expectations historically associated with the female sex. Man = A person who primarily conforms to the social expectations historically associated with the male sex. That already exists in transman/transwoman. People already recognise and for the most part accept that they are people who primarily conform to the historical social expectations associated with the sex they “identify” with. Man and woman have always stood for the adult version of boy and girl. Just like with cats, a queen and Tom are adult versions of their male and female kitten counterparts. These terms are biological designations, not subjective identities. I especially appreciated the inclusion of Kinsey and Money. Too often, people don’t realize that much of modern gender ideology has its roots in the manipulative and abusive practices of these men. Kinsey’s research didn’t promote sexual liberation, it blurred lines between science and deviance, and Money’s failed experiment tragically demonstrates the real-world harm of treating identity as malleable. It’s not an attack to bring this up, it’s a necessary warning about building ideology on corrupted foundations. I’m glad this piece didn’t shy away from confronting that. “Trans-identifying people deserve respect and contribute to society, but respect is not the same as agreement, and compassion does not require denying biology.” This! Exactly!
English
1
0
1
28
Ashleigh
Ashleigh@dcs_vortex·
Okies :) I’ll be able to sit down and read it properly (actually focus on taking in the information) in about 3-4 hours :) so please don’t take my silence as dismissive, I want to make sure I really take it all in. Also thank you for sharing, I’ve not read this one before and I truly enjoy reading new essays/articles/papers/research (im sure you get the point) so I truly appreciate you sharing this :)
English
1
0
1
44
Ashleigh
Ashleigh@dcs_vortex·
@0xSlap I tried to reply to your comment to me, I was trying to say thank you for sharing that link, I will have to read it later though and was sure if you wanted me to share my thoughts on it or if you just putting it there to be read?
English
1
0
0
48
Exposed
Exposed@0xSlap·
@zandermoricz @jubileemedia “A woman is someone who identifies as a woman.” This is not a definition—it’s a tautology. Without fixed meanings, categories collapse, and policy becomes incoherent. If we can't define "woman," we can't meaningfully protect women’s rights, sports, spaces, or statistics
English
2
0
7
420
zander moricz
zander moricz@zandermoricz·
I won’t excuse a lie. I went on @jubileemedia to call out misinformation in real time and shift the conversation toward the real crises our country is facing.
English
18
7
110
14.9K
Russell Brand
Russell Brand@rustyrockets·
With our world rapidly changing, we're going to have to learn new ways of understanding Scripture.
English
2.8K
329
3.9K
2.8M
Exposed retweetledi
Murdered By Crayons 🖍️
Murdered By Crayons 🖍️@CrayonMurders·
Andrew Tate made an unhinged video claiming he is being accused of tax evasion because the trafficking case is falling apart. I debunk his ridiculous claims in this video along with a special guest, Andrew Tate. :-)
English
43
142
646
119.9K
threadguy
threadguy@notthreadguy·
the winner is always right
English
11
15
253
111.5K
threadguy
threadguy@notthreadguy·
threadcast ep 12: andrew tate 3:33 closest anyone’s gotten to killing you 10:00 how do you decide what interviews you do 11:30 falling in love 14:45: changing views from government pressure 21:25 “if you don’t have a criminal case you’re not important” 22:45 ai will take over 28:45 the pendulum swings back 36:30 i lied to andrew tate 45:30 preparing for jail 53:20 being rich and alone 1:00:57 crypto 1:02:22 andrew publicly said he’d never endorse crypto a coin. what changed 1:20: "i will never let a tate fan lose money" 1:31:30 buttsex coin 1:37 a target on your back 1:47:39 tate back to jail? 2:01:33 his fathers death 2:06:02 his real start in crypto 2:12:01 getting rich ruins you 2:20:01 hyper gambling on society 2:23:11 the good side of crypto 2:30:30 decentralized future 2:34:21 canceled will inherit the earth 2:46:05 downfall of the west 2:57:03 will you be murdered? 2:59:42 Adin Ross 3:02:11 can you commit to crypto full time?
English
1.1K
1.1K
8.2K
8.9M
threadguy
threadguy@notthreadguy·
watch it on youtube too!!
threadguy tweet media
English
17
9
271
146.7K
threadguy
threadguy@notthreadguy·
what happens if the matrix actually breaks?
English
8
9
101
54.5K
threadguy
threadguy@notthreadguy·
do you love america?
English
7
7
133
79.6K
Exposed
Exposed@0xSlap·
This kind of denial and dishonesty leaves me with zero respect and complete loss of credibility for @ChrisCuomo. A man is only as good as his word. His word is not trustworthy.
Collin Rugg@CollinRugg

Chris Cuomo gets absolutely bodied after he says he "didn't like what people did to Joe Rogan" when he came out in support of Ivermectin. Cuomo: I didn't like what people did to Joe Rogan. Dave Smith (@ComicDaveSmith): You literally did it. Cuomo: No I didn't. *Clip of Cuomo shaming Joe Rogan for taking Ivermectin plays* Remarkable.

English
0
0
0
47