Blueberry
103 posts

Blueberry
@0x_Blueberry
Software Engineer at @1sixtech https://t.co/bVgDPEuk37 It's ok, pick up, move on.

some life updates in the thread, but tl;dr, i am looking for new opportunities please hit me up if you are hiring for product/tech strategy/solutions engineering, in finance or AI products would be also super grateful for likes and rt's!







SoftBank’s investor presentation is one of the greatest things ever made. I’ve been thinking about it all day. These are the real slides shown in a speech where Masayoshi Son said he wouldn’t retire for at least another decade. The goose stuff is perfect. group.softbank/media/Project/…





时隔半年,再来聊聊极度内卷的公链赛道。 结论放在前面:通用链已经趋于饱和,再跑出现象级的竞品不现实,新链的机会只存在于应用链(App-specific Chain)。 通用链的以太坊/ BNB/ Solana/ Tron/ Base 占据了近80% 的市场份额,这一轮诞生的新兴通用链对它们构不成任何威胁,是一个能打的都没有。 RaaS/ CaaS 的普及,让特定应用链也同样内卷,但能在激烈竞争中跑成细分赛道龙头的应用链,最终也能在极度内卷的公链赛道中占据一席之地。 比如新兴公链中专注于perp 的Hyperliquid, 专注于稳定币的Plasma; 老牌公链中专注于跨链/ 链抽象(Near Intents)的Near, 专注于支付的Polygon 等。这些老牌公链已经意识到问题的严重性,不在生态的多样性上内卷,转而深耕更细分的赛道。明面上的通用链,实际上就是拼命往应用链上靠。 而数以百计的其他公链们,最终都将在1-2轮周期中逐渐退出加密历史舞台。 对于新公链,大胆做空通用链,理性做多特定应用链,或许能少走很多弯路。













Trốn đăng bài 3 ngày, mình tạo ra "thằng em" còn "láo" hơn mình 😁 Hôm nay anh @khaihoan_ne kêu viết 1 bài cho xôm đi, mình chẳng biết viết gì nên vác cái báo cáo công việc tuần rồi lên đây luôn nha :))))) Tuần vừa rồi cũng mới chào sân mọi người, chỉ viết 5-7 trên group thôi mà trộm vía bài nào cũng mấy trăm like, được mọi người ủng hộ, xin “Kamsamita” 🙌 2 tháng học AI Vibecode, mình nhận về con số 0! facebook.com/.../32622.../p… Anthropic (Claude) bị leak code và đây là thứ họ giấu bạn! facebook.com/share/p/1KWGrf… Đây là cách team Anthropic dùng Claude để build công ty! facebook.com/share/p/1D2age… 💯 Nhưng đỉnh cao nhất phải là bài này, nhờ post này mới biết group toàn cao thủ, ít nhất là 100 người đã có kinh nghiệm thành công app hoàn chỉnh. Nên là anh chị em có build gì khó mà cần trợ giúp thì cứ đăng bài trong group, chắc chắn có người hỗ trợ nha. facebook.com/share/p/1FeJkb…

Earlier today, a user attempted to buy AAVE using $50M USDT through the Aave interface. Given the unusually large size of the single order, the Aave interface, like most trading interfaces, warned the user about extraordinary slippage and required confirmation via a checkbox. The user confirmed the warning on their mobile device and proceeded with the swap, accepting the high slippage, which ultimately resulted in receiving only 324 AAVE in return. The transaction could not be moved forward without the user explicitly accepting the risk through the confirmation checkbox. The CoW Swap routers functioned as intended, and the integration followed standard industry practices. However, while the user was able to proceed with the swap, the final outcome was clearly far from optimal. Events like this do occur in DeFi, but the scale of this transaction was significantly larger than what is typically seen in the space. We sympathize with the user and will try to make a contact with the user and we will return $600K in fees collected from the transaction. The key takeaway is that while DeFi should remain open and permissionless, allowing users to perform transactions freely, there are additional guardrails the industry can build to better protect users. Our team will be investigating ways to improve these safeguards going forward.





