Hyo

51 posts

Hyo banner
Hyo

Hyo

@0xfafel

AI is Brain. Human is Hormone.

Dream💭 Katılım Mayıs 2025
265 Takip Edilen31 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Hyo
Hyo@0xfafel·
[ Hot potatoes around @megaeth ] It wasn’t as exciting as I expected. But it was a quite nice tge performance. By listing $MEGA in most cex and maintaining $2B fdv, all investors were able to make more than several times the return. And even now, the price is above the price of public ico sale. Nevertheless, being mentioned by many CTs with numerous fuds. At the same time, MegaETH hit the first KPI with over 500 $USDM issued and many token holders who committed will get reward after 7days. Very interesting move. So, I want to talk about these hot topics. 1/ CEX listing with zero fee @binance Simple Earn is not a deal for listing? The answer is here👇 x.com/0xravenium/sta… 2/ TVL is too dependent Almost of TVS(TVL in defi) is from @aave’s USDM pool which is almost provided by @ethena. MegaETH team called this ‘Mega AavEthena’. This could work bad for chain but not for MegaETH, imo. Because MegaETH’s flywheel starts from $USDM. It makes team possible to get fixed yield and to utilize it for its ecosystem (Liquidity Engine) and token holders (Buyback). This is the flywheel of MegaETH, “Dapps -> $USDM -> $MEGA -> Liquidity -> Dapps”. Many @megamafia projects are aligned with this flywheel, so if this works, they will make more synergy and another useful protocol. And, we can find similar structure (few dapps secured most tvl of the chain) from major chains like @ethereum @solana @base @arbitrum. Of course, their TVS are not dependent on 1 protocol. But they also did in early stage. This kind of boostrap is necessary for early chains for their ecosystem. Liquidity is one of the best marketing method and makes continuous operation.
Hyo@0xfafel

[ The most exciting hour coming, 04/30 ] Recently, the psychological baseline for acceptable FDV is forming. Personally, the market doesn’t look good, but apart from that, the price discovery after tge is quite positive. And today, the most promising and hot project is doing tge. { 6am EST to 7am EST, 30/04/2026 } will be the most exciting in current years. But the choice they made is not ordinary. It’s like $HYPE comes to my mind. We’ll have to see the result, but the playbook itself is similar. … So what is the project? It is @megaeth. According to the content in the image, MegaETH team won’t provide its tokens to cex. But @Bybit_Official and @coinbase already announced the listing of $MEGA. And @megaeth announced like this yesterday. “MEGA will go live: 6am EST onchain. 7am EST offchain. April 30th, 2026” This is similar playbook of @HyperliquidX. They didn’t give any tokens to cex. Because they made the structure to make it possible to manage massive liquidity. MegaETH team is also doing this. They already pushed @kumbaya_xyz for their main dex with the comment “with the deepest liquidity at real price” and I think they will provide LP only through this.

English
2
0
2
922
Hyo
Hyo@0xfafel·
@ashishknows @megaeth Really hope so🙏 We need defi summer again. No fun in current market.
English
0
0
1
23
Hyo
Hyo@0xfafel·
[ Hot potatoes around @megaeth ] It wasn’t as exciting as I expected. But it was a quite nice tge performance. By listing $MEGA in most cex and maintaining $2B fdv, all investors were able to make more than several times the return. And even now, the price is above the price of public ico sale. Nevertheless, being mentioned by many CTs with numerous fuds. At the same time, MegaETH hit the first KPI with over 500 $USDM issued and many token holders who committed will get reward after 7days. Very interesting move. So, I want to talk about these hot topics. 1/ CEX listing with zero fee @binance Simple Earn is not a deal for listing? The answer is here👇 x.com/0xravenium/sta… 2/ TVL is too dependent Almost of TVS(TVL in defi) is from @aave’s USDM pool which is almost provided by @ethena. MegaETH team called this ‘Mega AavEthena’. This could work bad for chain but not for MegaETH, imo. Because MegaETH’s flywheel starts from $USDM. It makes team possible to get fixed yield and to utilize it for its ecosystem (Liquidity Engine) and token holders (Buyback). This is the flywheel of MegaETH, “Dapps -> $USDM -> $MEGA -> Liquidity -> Dapps”. Many @megamafia projects are aligned with this flywheel, so if this works, they will make more synergy and another useful protocol. And, we can find similar structure (few dapps secured most tvl of the chain) from major chains like @ethereum @solana @base @arbitrum. Of course, their TVS are not dependent on 1 protocol. But they also did in early stage. This kind of boostrap is necessary for early chains for their ecosystem. Liquidity is one of the best marketing method and makes continuous operation.
Hyo@0xfafel

[ The most exciting hour coming, 04/30 ] Recently, the psychological baseline for acceptable FDV is forming. Personally, the market doesn’t look good, but apart from that, the price discovery after tge is quite positive. And today, the most promising and hot project is doing tge. { 6am EST to 7am EST, 30/04/2026 } will be the most exciting in current years. But the choice they made is not ordinary. It’s like $HYPE comes to my mind. We’ll have to see the result, but the playbook itself is similar. … So what is the project? It is @megaeth. According to the content in the image, MegaETH team won’t provide its tokens to cex. But @Bybit_Official and @coinbase already announced the listing of $MEGA. And @megaeth announced like this yesterday. “MEGA will go live: 6am EST onchain. 7am EST offchain. April 30th, 2026” This is similar playbook of @HyperliquidX. They didn’t give any tokens to cex. Because they made the structure to make it possible to manage massive liquidity. MegaETH team is also doing this. They already pushed @kumbaya_xyz for their main dex with the comment “with the deepest liquidity at real price” and I think they will provide LP only through this.

English
2
0
2
922
Hyo
Hyo@0xfafel·
These are not any advice. Especially, not financial advice. … I think @megaeth is doing novel things but I don’t think it works well. Everything was well aligned but I can see few cracks such as -the quality of @megamafia (novel and innovative, but delivery matters.) -token emission under disbelief -well aligned/flywheel could spread and deepen the cracks (the price of token 📉 -> incentive(boostrap) not working -> not enough time/liquidity for dapps -> USDM outflow -> the price of token 📉)
English
0
0
0
80
Hyo
Hyo@0xfafel·
3/ Insider play at @Polymarket @megaeth team did tge on April 30 and team said it was the insider, not MegaETH team, one of the eco members. Of course, it did not happen from sharing the internal schedule, but an insider trade through speculation during the coordination process. MegaETH team did a proper action, I think. Anyway, what I really want to say is not this one. I want to talk about this ↓ “Should we ban the insider trading?” Morally yes. But I think insider trades are necessary when considering the meaning of @Polymarket. Polymarket is one of the best method to deliver the news and is also the best product to solve the asymmetry of information. If there is no insider trading, polymarket will just be the product for betting. And, the entire industry of Crypto will end with the image of just a gamble (ct will say this TradFi). (In this post, ‘insider trading’ doesn’t mean that ‘Manipulating the real phenomenon to take a profit through polymarket’. I’m talking about knowing the actual phenomenon in advance and making profits in the polymarket through it.)
Hyo@0xfafel

About insider trading at @Polymarket :@megaeth tge date bet on April was by insider? In my opinion, [ 1/ It is not an Insider trading. 2/ Insider trading is necessary for Public and Polymarket. ] 1/ I believe (#2EuD7hu" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">polymarket.com/event/will-meg…) is not an insider trading. Because all of the info were public. As you can see from the attached image, the community members knew everything before pumping. It was just the communication error of @megaeth and @megamafia teams with investors. They shared the development process in the official&public TG or Discord chat, not announcement or official X account. After this information was officially posted on X, the probability of the polymarket increased. It was not a new or special thing about launching date. (ofc, congratulations on raising money🎉 @brix_money) That’s why I believe this is not an insider trading. … I believe this is just because of the communication problem between the @megaeth & @megamafia teams and the investors. Maybe this is probably the reason why the team was criticized for a while regarding kpi. Recently, active communication is taking place through the space led by @hotpot_dao and @bread_. Personally, it was really beneficial. Anyway, many things have continued to be built and communication problems have been solved. It seems that MegaETH is now ready to deliver something exciting. The beginning of the @megaeth era? Let’s Make Ethereum Great Again. Let The Yield Flow. $MEGA & $USDM.

English
1
0
0
197
Hyo
Hyo@0xfafel·
Of course, CEX don’t need to acquire $MEGA through DEX. They could just open the deposit earlier and use only these for liquidity. But I believe they won’t do that and the team won’t let them do. I don’t know if the team paid for it, but they would have moved for better play. Because the @megaeth team is really smart and good at playing with a sense. They were always hitting in the best timing and this time will also be the best.
Hyo@0xfafel

This is completely my guess, I think… “ @megaeth team set the internal date (goal) to April 23rd for reaching (tge) KPI. That’s because they can do free and effective marketing with zero cost. How? Through @Polymarket The post about Polymarket betting is a constantly trending topic in X. And there is a market for MegaETH tge date at polymarket. By achieving kpi on April 23, the team could create volatility and noise about bets for April and May. Of course, there would have been no insider trading. They were just trying to do the most efficient marketing. However, there was a negative noise that suspected insider trading. So, the team postponed the schedule by one day to resolve it. Maybe that’s why @brix_money changed the release date. ” If this is true, the @megaeth team is really clever. They exactly know which is the most effective marketing these days. Maybe it is not true. But even if this is true, they won’t admit it. Anyway, it’s not an insider trading. Let’s move on to the next topic.

English
1
0
0
185
Hyo
Hyo@0xfafel·
[ The most exciting hour coming, 04/30 ] Recently, the psychological baseline for acceptable FDV is forming. Personally, the market doesn’t look good, but apart from that, the price discovery after tge is quite positive. And today, the most promising and hot project is doing tge. { 6am EST to 7am EST, 30/04/2026 } will be the most exciting in current years. But the choice they made is not ordinary. It’s like $HYPE comes to my mind. We’ll have to see the result, but the playbook itself is similar. … So what is the project? It is @megaeth. According to the content in the image, MegaETH team won’t provide its tokens to cex. But @Bybit_Official and @coinbase already announced the listing of $MEGA. And @megaeth announced like this yesterday. “MEGA will go live: 6am EST onchain. 7am EST offchain. April 30th, 2026” This is similar playbook of @HyperliquidX. They didn’t give any tokens to cex. Because they made the structure to make it possible to manage massive liquidity. MegaETH team is also doing this. They already pushed @kumbaya_xyz for their main dex with the comment “with the deepest liquidity at real price” and I think they will provide LP only through this.
Hyo tweet media
Hyo@0xfafel

[ The psychological baseline for “acceptable FDV” is broken ] As I said before, there is no clear valuation standard for cryptocurrencies yet. Therefore, relative value evaluation and the corresponding psychological standards of the public were important. “But it is broken.” It doesn’t mean market is over. Rather, it’s close to the beginning of the bull market. February was actually a short-term low and I didn’t think March is the month to buy. However, in conjunction with various situations, the market is repeatedly falling within the range, and I think the March(now) is also good to buy. Ofc, I am not good at trading. But I think the range ‘$69k~$64k’, the price of $BTC, looks meaningful. Last night, the price of Bitcoin dropped to $67.5k that was the price waiting for. Personally, I won’t consider to buy anymore. If we break the low point of February, there will be more period adjustment and price adjustment. But I can’t expect any of them, and I think this price range is enough to make a profit if the bull market comes. Good luck to everyone including me🍀 (Really hope so war ends well🙏)

English
1
0
1
1.1K
Hyo
Hyo@0xfafel·
This is completely my guess, I think… “ @megaeth team set the internal date (goal) to April 23rd for reaching (tge) KPI. That’s because they can do free and effective marketing with zero cost. How? Through @Polymarket The post about Polymarket betting is a constantly trending topic in X. And there is a market for MegaETH tge date at polymarket. By achieving kpi on April 23, the team could create volatility and noise about bets for April and May. Of course, there would have been no insider trading. They were just trying to do the most efficient marketing. However, there was a negative noise that suspected insider trading. So, the team postponed the schedule by one day to resolve it. Maybe that’s why @brix_money changed the release date. ” If this is true, the @megaeth team is really clever. They exactly know which is the most effective marketing these days. Maybe it is not true. But even if this is true, they won’t admit it. Anyway, it’s not an insider trading. Let’s move on to the next topic.
English
2
0
5
564
Hyo
Hyo@0xfafel·
About insider trading at @Polymarket :@megaeth tge date bet on April was by insider? In my opinion, [ 1/ It is not an Insider trading. 2/ Insider trading is necessary for Public and Polymarket. ] 1/ I believe (#2EuD7hu" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">polymarket.com/event/will-meg…) is not an insider trading. Because all of the info were public. As you can see from the attached image, the community members knew everything before pumping. It was just the communication error of @megaeth and @megamafia teams with investors. They shared the development process in the official&public TG or Discord chat, not announcement or official X account. After this information was officially posted on X, the probability of the polymarket increased. It was not a new or special thing about launching date. (ofc, congratulations on raising money🎉 @brix_money) That’s why I believe this is not an insider trading. … I believe this is just because of the communication problem between the @megaeth & @megamafia teams and the investors. Maybe this is probably the reason why the team was criticized for a while regarding kpi. Recently, active communication is taking place through the space led by @hotpot_dao and @bread_. Personally, it was really beneficial. Anyway, many things have continued to be built and communication problems have been solved. It seems that MegaETH is now ready to deliver something exciting. The beginning of the @megaeth era? Let’s Make Ethereum Great Again. Let The Yield Flow. $MEGA & $USDM.
Hyo tweet media
Hyo@0xfafel

I don’t have the ability to judge or implement whether this idea is actually valid. That’s why I wrote this proposal (the quoted thread) using GPT and I want the leaders of the crypto market (@paradigm @wintermute_t @DWFLabs) to read this and evaluate it. (This quoted thread is written by making @ChatGPTapp understand my assumptions and logic. Because English is not my native language and I don’t have the confidence to write better than GPT. But This post is all written by me, not AI.) ___ There are the following reasons why I thought like this and made this proposal. 1. There is no clear valuation model for cryptocurrency coins/tokens/projects. 2. Therefore, price discovery is difficult and this leads to an irrational market and the formation of negative perceptions of the public. 3. However, @Polymarket ,the prediction market/option market which will somewhat alleviate the asymmetry of the information, can be combined with the linear price of the existing market (premarket-perp) and make arbitrage possible. 4. In this way, my conclusion is that price discovery will be possible before tge if we can make a composite portfolio and make arbitrage transactions while resolving the asymmetry of information using products of different markets in this way. 5. Furthermore, if we make a relative strength index by considering tokenomics and onchain data by category, we will be able to find the right price and valuation. it means that there will be a clear valuation model in this market. Market could be more rational, reasonable and healthy.

English
1
0
7
1.7K
Hyo
Hyo@0xfafel·
Many said, “AI is a critical risk for Crypto.”, and also said, “Decentralization deepens this.”. But the fact is, “AI is the most effective solution and many risks happen because of the lack of Decentralization.”.
Hyo@0xfafel

[X] I affirm the direction set out in the mandate, will help translate it into thoroughly reasoned strategies for my domain, and will maintain an exclusive and energetic focus on the mission-critical tasks necessary for its implementation, from today until my last day at the EF.

English
0
0
0
102
Hyo
Hyo@0xfafel·
The Risk of Defi : Security [ AI is threatening Defi. Nevertheless, crypto will survive. The savior will also be AI. ] Even though it was still the beginning of Q2, there were several large scale breaches to defi in 2026. It is reasonable to think that it is related to the rapid growth of AI. As the owner of a virtual space with various performance capabilities, AI has the following clear superiorities. -Numerous data collection and processing -Selection and simulation through ↑ If a person with expertise uses AI, they can expand their existing thought and find more creative ways. In addition, by running simulations through AI and efficiently selecting targets, it is possible to make a simultaneous attack. Because it has been simulated many times, it is more likely to succeed than conventional attacks. And it is more difficult to detect and respond early than before. If one protocol is breached, any protocols with similar or inferior structures(ex. forked) are likely to be breached at the similar time. … Then, will Defi which has the ideology of decentralization only have to be ruined? My answer is No. AI is still a neutral existence. So we can use it to prevent these risks. We need to strengthen the role of AI as a white hacker. If you used to pay for marketing, now you have to pay for security. The era is coming. If security is in place, liquidity will gather and marketing will follow. Of course, it is realistically impossible to prevent everything in advance. That’s why it’s important to following responds. Most breaches do not occur on a large scale at first/once. After a few small attacks in the early attempts, a full scale attack occurs, leading to a large scale crisis with the liquidity out of those who are aware of it. However, if team utilizes superiority of AI, they can recognize these risks early and respond faster and better.
Hyo@0xfafel

Regardless of who said this, I am totally agree with the content. So, I will share my thoughts here from this context. [ Crypto will be alive. And, @ethereum will win. Why? ] 1. Directionality: a self-sustaining infrastructure I see Ethereum as an infrastructure that can grow organically and reinforce itself over time. It isn’t just a blockchain. It’s a credibly neutral, permissionless settlement layer that allows new systems to emerge on top of it without centralized gatekeeping. ⸻ 2. The active market of the future Within crypto, Ethereum has already established itself as the OG chain battle-tested and operating reliably for years. If blockchain achieves true mass adoption, becoming a foundational layer of the internet itself, then the real value accrues not just to individual applications, but to the base layer where everything ultimately settles. That’s why I’m focused less on picking the next “big thing” and more on understanding where those big things will be onboarded. In other words, which chain or layer becomes the primary infrastructure. I don’t think I can catch breakout projects, so I’d rather focus on the forest than chasing individual trees. ⸻ 3. A playground for AI Because it is permissionless, crypto is arguably the most suitable environment for AI to operate in. I believe the future role of AI won’t be limited to production alone. AI will increasingly participate directly in economic activity, not just optimizing processes, but acting within markets. Moving from arbitrage to market making, functioning simultaneously as user and builder, facilitating exchange in ways that resemble digital barter systems. In that sense, blockchain (Ethereum in particular) could become the native economic environment for autonomous agents. ⸻ Categories like RWA, ERC-8004, or X402 may be promising, and big projects will continue to emerge within them. But ultimately, the greatest structural beneficiary is likely the infrastructure layer itself wherever those projects will be onboarded. I think the key existential variable is the attraction of liquidity (e.g., stablecoins) and the attraction of high-end AI or AI clusters. If either one achieves meaningful dominance on a chain, the other will likely follow. I’m just not sure which will act as the leading variable.

English
1
0
1
155
Hyo
Hyo@0xfafel·
Hyo@0xfafel

I don’t have the ability to judge or implement whether this idea is actually valid. That’s why I wrote this proposal (the quoted thread) using GPT and I want the leaders of the crypto market (@paradigm @wintermute_t @DWFLabs) to read this and evaluate it. (This quoted thread is written by making @ChatGPTapp understand my assumptions and logic. Because English is not my native language and I don’t have the confidence to write better than GPT. But This post is all written by me, not AI.) ___ There are the following reasons why I thought like this and made this proposal. 1. There is no clear valuation model for cryptocurrency coins/tokens/projects. 2. Therefore, price discovery is difficult and this leads to an irrational market and the formation of negative perceptions of the public. 3. However, @Polymarket ,the prediction market/option market which will somewhat alleviate the asymmetry of the information, can be combined with the linear price of the existing market (premarket-perp) and make arbitrage possible. 4. In this way, my conclusion is that price discovery will be possible before tge if we can make a composite portfolio and make arbitrage transactions while resolving the asymmetry of information using products of different markets in this way. 5. Furthermore, if we make a relative strength index by considering tokenomics and onchain data by category, we will be able to find the right price and valuation. it means that there will be a clear valuation model in this market. Market could be more rational, reasonable and healthy.

0
0
1
102
Tom Dunleavy
Tom Dunleavy@dunleavy89·
The shift in the crypto fundraising landscape the past 6 months has been insane. Crypto VCs used to have to constantly be networking/writing/podcasting/going on spaces/promoting your thesis/getting on 10 deal flow calls a week, to get into good deals...now it's literally enough to just have capital to write checks. Deals are being pushed rather than dug out. Inbound if people know you have money is at an all-time high. Most firms are either 1) Out of money 2) Moved to Series A and beyond or 3) Fundraising (with no success). Deals that used to close in 2-3 weeks now close in 2-3 months. Firms with questionable business models or copy pasta of the latest trend are getting zero primary or follow-on funding (Good news!). There are now realistically <20 firms writing checks in pre-seed/seed. VCs basically have the pick of any deal they want, with more time to do DD. IMHO 25/26 are going to be historic vintages for those who stick around.
English
180
54
1K
1.5M
Hyo
Hyo@0xfafel·
This is not any kind of advice and this thread is written by @ChatGPTapp. Read this👇
Hyo@0xfafel

I don’t have the ability to judge or implement whether this idea is actually valid. That’s why I wrote this proposal (the quoted thread) using GPT and I want the leaders of the crypto market (@paradigm @wintermute_t @DWFLabs) to read this and evaluate it. (This quoted thread is written by making @ChatGPTapp understand my assumptions and logic. Because English is not my native language and I don’t have the confidence to write better than GPT. But This post is all written by me, not AI.) ___ There are the following reasons why I thought like this and made this proposal. 1. There is no clear valuation model for cryptocurrency coins/tokens/projects. 2. Therefore, price discovery is difficult and this leads to an irrational market and the formation of negative perceptions of the public. 3. However, @Polymarket ,the prediction market/option market which will somewhat alleviate the asymmetry of the information, can be combined with the linear price of the existing market (premarket-perp) and make arbitrage possible. 4. In this way, my conclusion is that price discovery will be possible before tge if we can make a composite portfolio and make arbitrage transactions while resolving the asymmetry of information using products of different markets in this way. 5. Furthermore, if we make a relative strength index by considering tokenomics and onchain data by category, we will be able to find the right price and valuation. it means that there will be a clear valuation model in this market. Market could be more rational, reasonable and healthy.

English
0
0
0
102
Hyo
Hyo@0xfafel·
[Details/StudyCase] The pre-market price trades around $0.12, implying an approximate FDV of $1.2B. Meanwhile, Polymarket prices assign distinct probabilities to thresholds such as $600M, $800M, and $1B. The implied distribution shows concentration above the $800M level, while the $1B threshold remains uncertain. More notably, the market appears to overprice the probability of TGE occurring later than expected, suggesting a distortion not only in valuation but in timing expectations. In other words, both price and timing are mispriced, and these distortions are reflected asymmetrically across the two market structures. The strategy does not rely on simple price discrepancies. Prediction markets exhibit binary payoff structures—returns are contingent on whether specific thresholds are met. Linear markets, by contrast, generate continuous P&L profiles. By combining these fundamentally different payoff structures, it becomes possible to engineer a portfolio where downside regions are neutralized while returns are concentrated in high-probability zones. In practice, the structure allocates capital across prediction market positions and a linear short. Positions above the $800M threshold serve as the primary return driver, while positions above $1B provide convex upside. The $600M threshold functions as a structural buffer rather than a profit center. Concurrently, a short position in the linear market eliminates downside exposure below $600M. The resulting portfolio removes left-tail risk and concentrates returns in the region where probability mass is highest. The strategy is not centered around defending downside, but around isolating and monetizing the most likely outcome range. This approach offers clear advantages over single-instrument exposure. Prediction market positions alone provide access to information-efficient pricing but carry binary loss risk. Linear shorts offer downside protection but lack targeted return generation. By combining both, the strategy removes loss regions while retaining exposure only where informational edge is strongest. The investor is thus not exposed to directional risk, but to structural inefficiencies in cross-market pricing. Risks are explicitly defined. The primary risk is timing: if the TGE does not occur within the assumed window, the structure breaks down. While this risk can be hedged, doing so would distort the payoff structure and is therefore intentionally accepted as a design assumption. The second is path risk: a scenario where the short position is liquidated followed by a sharp market decline that invalidates prediction market positions. While theoretically possible, such a sequence would require extreme and irrational market behavior at the given FDV levels, and is therefore classified as a low-probability tail scenario. Additional risks include liquidity and settlement considerations, which are standard but not structural.
English
1
0
1
114
Hyo
Hyo@0xfafel·
[ Information-Asymmetric Arbitrage Structured Product Proposal ] – Exploiting Dislocations Between Prediction Markets (@Polymarket ) and Linear Price Markets (@megaeth Case Study) – ____ This product is not a directional trading strategy. It does not attempt to predict whether a given asset will go up or down. Instead, it is an arbitrage strategy that extracts value from structural inconsistencies in how different markets interpret and price the same underlying event. The core premise is not the level of price, but the mechanism through which price is formed. Today, the same asset is priced simultaneously across two fundamentally different market structures. Prediction markets, such as Polymarket, express outcomes as probabilities by decomposing future events into conditional scenarios. In contrast, linear markets such as pre-markets or perpetual futures compress the entire distribution of outcomes into a single price. This distinction is not merely representational; it reflects a deeper difference in how information is incorporated into prices. Prediction markets function as information transmission mechanisms. Participants express their beliefs through capital allocation, and those with informational advantages actively deploy capital to monetize that edge. Crucially, the act of trading itself updates prices, thereby embedding information into the market. As a result, prediction markets are not only environments where information asymmetry exists, but also where such asymmetry is most rapidly translated into price. Linear markets behave differently. By collapsing a distribution into a single price, they may fail to fully reflect conditional probabilities or the timing of events. Information—particularly around execution progress, internal milestones, or timing—can be incorporated more slowly or incompletely. This divergence becomes especially pronounced in event-driven assets where both outcome and timing are critical variables. Importantly, pre-markets and prediction markets are not passive indicators of future outcomes; they actively influence price formation. Recent observations from platforms such as Edge and Backpack, as well as prediction markets like Polymarket, suggest that pre-event pricing and implied probabilities meaningfully anchor post-TGE price discovery. Market participants use these signals not merely as references, but as entry benchmarks. Consequently, these markets act as forward-looking inputs into actual price formation, rather than detached forecasts. This structural dynamic is observable in the case of MegaETH. ~ (The details/study case are in the following thread.) ~ In conclusion, this product is an arbitrage strategy that uses prediction markets as an informational benchmark and exploits the lag in linear price markets to construct a controlled payoff profile. It does not forecast price direction; it eliminates regions where losses can occur and concentrates exposure where informational asymmetry is most efficiently expressed. At its core, the strategy captures structural inefficiencies arising from differences in how markets incorporate information. ___ Comment: Repeatability This strategy does not depend on isolated mispricing in a single asset. It is rooted in structural differences between prediction markets and linear price markets, which cannot converge into a single unified pricing mechanism. In event-driven assets—such as TGE launches, airdrops, unlocks, or regulatory decisions—information is always incorporated sequentially, leading to persistent discrepancies in how different markets price the same event. Moreover, because pre-event markets actively influence post-event price formation, these discrepancies are not only observable but also realizable. As a result, this is not a one-off opportunity, but a repeatable arbitrage framework applicable across event-driven asset classes.
English
1
0
1
342
Hyo
Hyo@0xfafel·
Although these (↓) are not related to this post (↑) , I will share the posts that will be helpful for understanding my brain. -For the future narrative/macro x.com/0xfafel/status… -About the current market condition(price) x.com/0xfafel/status…
Hyo@0xfafel

@megaeth, the best beta play of @ethereum 💭 The concept is [ EVM (Compatible) but Solana (Distinguishable) ] . I don’t know if this is actually the direction that the team pursues, but if it plays the role of @solana as Ethereum Layer 2, it can be said that it is the ideal l2 that @VitalikButerin pursues.

English
0
0
0
169
Hyo
Hyo@0xfafel·
I don’t have the ability to judge or implement whether this idea is actually valid. That’s why I wrote this proposal (the quoted thread) using GPT and I want the leaders of the crypto market (@paradigm @wintermute_t @DWFLabs) to read this and evaluate it. (This quoted thread is written by making @ChatGPTapp understand my assumptions and logic. Because English is not my native language and I don’t have the confidence to write better than GPT. But This post is all written by me, not AI.) ___ There are the following reasons why I thought like this and made this proposal. 1. There is no clear valuation model for cryptocurrency coins/tokens/projects. 2. Therefore, price discovery is difficult and this leads to an irrational market and the formation of negative perceptions of the public. 3. However, @Polymarket ,the prediction market/option market which will somewhat alleviate the asymmetry of the information, can be combined with the linear price of the existing market (premarket-perp) and make arbitrage possible. 4. In this way, my conclusion is that price discovery will be possible before tge if we can make a composite portfolio and make arbitrage transactions while resolving the asymmetry of information using products of different markets in this way. 5. Furthermore, if we make a relative strength index by considering tokenomics and onchain data by category, we will be able to find the right price and valuation. it means that there will be a clear valuation model in this market. Market could be more rational, reasonable and healthy.
Hyo@0xfafel

[ Information-Asymmetric Arbitrage Structured Product Proposal ] – Exploiting Dislocations Between Prediction Markets (@Polymarket ) and Linear Price Markets (@megaeth Case Study) – ____ This product is not a directional trading strategy. It does not attempt to predict whether a given asset will go up or down. Instead, it is an arbitrage strategy that extracts value from structural inconsistencies in how different markets interpret and price the same underlying event. The core premise is not the level of price, but the mechanism through which price is formed. Today, the same asset is priced simultaneously across two fundamentally different market structures. Prediction markets, such as Polymarket, express outcomes as probabilities by decomposing future events into conditional scenarios. In contrast, linear markets such as pre-markets or perpetual futures compress the entire distribution of outcomes into a single price. This distinction is not merely representational; it reflects a deeper difference in how information is incorporated into prices. Prediction markets function as information transmission mechanisms. Participants express their beliefs through capital allocation, and those with informational advantages actively deploy capital to monetize that edge. Crucially, the act of trading itself updates prices, thereby embedding information into the market. As a result, prediction markets are not only environments where information asymmetry exists, but also where such asymmetry is most rapidly translated into price. Linear markets behave differently. By collapsing a distribution into a single price, they may fail to fully reflect conditional probabilities or the timing of events. Information—particularly around execution progress, internal milestones, or timing—can be incorporated more slowly or incompletely. This divergence becomes especially pronounced in event-driven assets where both outcome and timing are critical variables. Importantly, pre-markets and prediction markets are not passive indicators of future outcomes; they actively influence price formation. Recent observations from platforms such as Edge and Backpack, as well as prediction markets like Polymarket, suggest that pre-event pricing and implied probabilities meaningfully anchor post-TGE price discovery. Market participants use these signals not merely as references, but as entry benchmarks. Consequently, these markets act as forward-looking inputs into actual price formation, rather than detached forecasts. This structural dynamic is observable in the case of MegaETH. ~ (The details/study case are in the following thread.) ~ In conclusion, this product is an arbitrage strategy that uses prediction markets as an informational benchmark and exploits the lag in linear price markets to construct a controlled payoff profile. It does not forecast price direction; it eliminates regions where losses can occur and concentrates exposure where informational asymmetry is most efficiently expressed. At its core, the strategy captures structural inefficiencies arising from differences in how markets incorporate information. ___ Comment: Repeatability This strategy does not depend on isolated mispricing in a single asset. It is rooted in structural differences between prediction markets and linear price markets, which cannot converge into a single unified pricing mechanism. In event-driven assets—such as TGE launches, airdrops, unlocks, or regulatory decisions—information is always incorporated sequentially, leading to persistent discrepancies in how different markets price the same event. Moreover, because pre-event markets actively influence post-event price formation, these discrepancies are not only observable but also realizable. As a result, this is not a one-off opportunity, but a repeatable arbitrage framework applicable across event-driven asset classes.

English
1
0
1
1.6K
Hyo
Hyo@0xfafel·
@megaeth, the best beta play of @ethereum 💭 The concept is [ EVM (Compatible) but Solana (Distinguishable) ] . I don’t know if this is actually the direction that the team pursues, but if it plays the role of @solana as Ethereum Layer 2, it can be said that it is the ideal l2 that @VitalikButerin pursues.
Hyo tweet media
bread.mega@bread_

The only KPI I care about: Number of apps in our ecosystem that have "1 chain" next to their name on @DefiLlama. I think it's paramount to foster an ecosystem that supports builders to such a degree that they go all-in on you/your eco. Solana is undisputed in this category

English
1
0
3
575
Hyo
Hyo@0xfafel·
This is not financial advice. It’s just an extension of the novel I’m writing.
Hyo@0xfafel

Future of DigitalAsset(Crypto) -personal thinking about current market’s narrative I still believe that 2025 was one of the best market in several years to make money when thinking ahead. There will still be opportunities in 2026, but I think the advantage or disadvantage of positioning will become much more pronounced depending on what you did in 2025. I’m not sure how the market will move after that, but what’s clear to me is that we’re in a fundamentally different phase compared to previous crypto markets, mainly because the industry has entered the regulatory domain and because the liquidity dynamics are structurally different now. Because of that, I’m convinced that both the frequency and the magnitude of “money printing events” will decline going forward. It means market will be more complex and it makes you hard to earn money from this market. Aside from AI narrative, which changes our lives directly, the crypto market is essentially repeating an old meta (like ICO). In previous cycles, each phase had a distinctly new narrative (ICO, DeFi, NFT, P2E, ICO, fixed-yield with stablecoins, airdrop-marketing & new distribution concepts, memes, SocialFi, PerpDex, prediction markets, ICO). But right now, except PerpDex, there aren’t meaningful new narratives, and perp DEXs themselves do not bring in positive external liquidity; they actually amplify risk. Of course, it doesn't mean perp dex is just the bad thing. But it is clear that perp dex is not mature enough for now. (Let's keep seeing Hyperliquid, Lighter, EdgeX, Pacifica, and etc. Few of this will take over BNB.) After the current massive liquidation driven by excessive OI and exchange's ADL issues, many market makers and VCs were hit, but the stabilization that followed was quicker and less damaging than expected. Orderbooks also normalized. This means current crypto market fundamental is strong. However, since then, I can feel that inflow of liquidity into the market has declined, and the market is mostly rotating on internal liquidity using leverage. It feels very similar to 2021. Still, because perp DEXs dominate the meta, OI remains disproportionately high relative to market liquidity, and there is still no perfect solution to ADL issues. This feeds directly into liquidity fragility, and after the liquidation cascade we even saw stablecoin depegs and some exchange/protocol earn products malfunctioning. (IMO) The psychological baseline for “acceptable FDV for promising projects” has continued rising, from around $1B in the past, to ~$2.5B late last year / early this year, and to ~$4B now. This is my personal assessment, but I consider the psychological valuation benchmark to be one of the best indicators of whether a cycle can be sustained. And, I think we’re close to a point where that baseline gets reset back down to a more reasonable level. In other words, I expect a pullback significant enough to break the current valuation psychology. The risks driving this are: •Excessive OI and ADL-related cascading liquidations (leading to liquidity gaps and orderbook dislocations) •Operational failures in DATs (large outflows happening in the middle of (1)’s liquidity environment) For this reason, I expect the market to decline meaningfully(cannot expect what will be trigger) and it will take quite some time for liquidity to recover and for conditions to stabilize again. During that process, outflows will be larger but the market will lack sufficient inflows to absorb them, which could lead not only to exchange liquidity issues but also to failures across OTC desks, VCs, and related companies. And finally, the psychological benchmark for valuations could break entirely. Of course, as long as there is no fundamental flaw in blockchain technology or Bitcoin’s core value proposition, crypto as an asset class will find some reasonable valuation equilibrium. Once the valuation resets to a more appropriate level, market will recover.

English
0
0
0
220
Hyo
Hyo@0xfafel·
[ The psychological baseline for “acceptable FDV” is broken ] As I said before, there is no clear valuation standard for cryptocurrencies yet. Therefore, relative value evaluation and the corresponding psychological standards of the public were important. “But it is broken.” It doesn’t mean market is over. Rather, it’s close to the beginning of the bull market. February was actually a short-term low and I didn’t think March is the month to buy. However, in conjunction with various situations, the market is repeatedly falling within the range, and I think the March(now) is also good to buy. Ofc, I am not good at trading. But I think the range ‘$69k~$64k’, the price of $BTC, looks meaningful. Last night, the price of Bitcoin dropped to $67.5k that was the price waiting for. Personally, I won’t consider to buy anymore. If we break the low point of February, there will be more period adjustment and price adjustment. But I can’t expect any of them, and I think this price range is enough to make a profit if the bull market comes. Good luck to everyone including me🍀 (Really hope so war ends well🙏)
Hyo@0xfafel

[ If you think market is healthy, time to believe and keep buying ] Currently, there are so many Skepticism here. But I think digital assets are still promising. Real the matter is there is no valid Valuation method yet. That’s why altcoins are always overhyped and going to zero. We should consider how to align tokens with infra/product. Previous market, the key was revenue. But it is not enough to make a reasonable estimate. In my opinion, in the process of developing technology day by day, it is necessary to onboard new things to the infrastructure of the chain and align with tokens through stable revenue. In addition, it is important to build cult (religious) elements by realizing governance through tokens. In this process, the privacy factor will be inevitable and these are all mentioned by @VitalikButerin. That’s why I’m still bullish on $eth. But ethereum is infra, not enough to build new things itself. So, I will do research for innovative or novel things going in the same direction with @ethereum. It is not important it is Layer1 or Layer2, or Appchain. This frame doesn’t work anymore. Good luck to market and you&me🍀

English
1
0
1
535