rpine

Learning cryptocurrency is cringe, until you’re making people’s yearly salary in a month

As a Pokémon card collector, I’d say this is very accurate 😂

FUTES are gween.

In a galaxy that demands strength - America stands ready. This is the way. May the 4th be with you.

🥇🫡

Just over 1 day left in Week 5 with $5,413.48 on the line! 🥇 @paknayir +16.72% - SENPI TEAM 🥈 @HyboraAI +12.79% 🥉 @0xrpine +9.42% 4️⃣ @betashop +7.52% - SENPI TEAM 5️⃣ @prashantfb65 +7.43% - SENPI TEAM The prizes are still up for grabs, one good trade can win it 💰

The Truth of Every Designer 😅

POV You finally become a profitable crypto trader and start enjoying your youth

Men only have two moods:

Designers

@rightclcksaveas Let me try 🙋🏻‍♂️

who’s got a brazilian bank account? need to try liquid banking $BRL offramp sned help

Not your keys, not your coins.

Designers - say hello to Figma Weave.
You’re already thinking in layers and systems, Figma Weave brings that same mindset to AI. As we work on bringing Weave to the Figma canvas, what are some things you want to see?

It’s wild how much people who don’t vibe-code are missing about the transition the world is currently going through.

I just deployed my Hyperliquid Agent "rpine.eth" on @senpi_ai and joined the Arena! 🤖⚔️ Join the $100K Hyperliquid Agents trading competition. Round 1 starts 24 March! senpi.ai/arena @senpi_ai -- the home of hyperliquid agents

"The loudest voices in crypto are rarely the richest." Lol

How the fuck is CT grading this response on tone instead of product judgment? Thinking the issue is that a warning appeared, that a user checked a box, or that the trade could technically be completed, is stupid. The issue is that a leading interface in DeFi allowed a $50M order to move through a flow where catastrophic execution was an entirely predictable outcome. Once you know the order size, know the available liquidity, know the expected slippage, and know the probable output degradation, responsibility shifts to the system design itself. At that point, hiding behind user consent is weak as fuck. Consent inside a badly designed decision environment does not suddenly become good product architecture. Imagine using the same checkbox for acceptable slippage on a normal trade and on a trade that can lose $50M.... What they are doing, through lack of vision and lack of standards, is pushing liability downstream. What makes this worse is that the solution is obvious. Extreme order sizes should trigger a different class of interface behavior because they belong to a different class of risk. Hard execution thresholds, delayed confirmations, forced acknowledgment of minimum output in large font, segmented execution paths, deeper routing logic, stronger friction as size detaches from liquidity, and escalation rules for absurd trades. None of this requires a research breakthrough. It requires teams to stop acting like legality at the transaction layer is enough to claim integrity at the product layer. Aave has enough stature, enough resources, and enough industry visibility to know this. So when one of the flagship names in crypto answers an event like this with “the warning was shown and the system worked as intended,” what it really communicates is something much uglier: the mindset of too many crypto founders is complacent as fuck, and that is exactly why the industry still struggles to earn the trust it keeps claiming it wants.

Introducing Web to Design. Turn any website into an editable UI. Just paste a URL. Create new variants, different pages, or build components inspired by the original design. We’ve been using this internally a ton, it’s the fastest way to go from a raw idea to a prototype.