Mike Guess

126 posts

Mike Guess

Mike Guess

@1776theBest

#Marines #2A # MAGA

Katılım Mayıs 2026
187 Takip Edilen26 Takipçiler
Mike Guess
Mike Guess@1776theBest·
“They never sell it” — Yeah, genius. That’s called not realizing gains. You know who else does this? Literally anyone with a 401(k), IRA, or who just holds their house and doesn’t sell every year. The horror! Should we force middle-class homeowners to sell their suburban castles annually so the government gets its cut? “Live off the loans, pay almost nothing” — Loans have interest, dipshit. Banks aren’t charities handing out free money to billionaires while giggling about tax loopholes. Those loans are secured by volatile assets (stocks, art, etc.) that can (and do) drop in value. Margin calls exist. Ask the folks who got wrecked in 2008 or 2022. “Kids inherit it all tax-free” — Flat-out wrong. The US has an estate tax with a ~$13M exemption per person (step-up in basis helps, sure), but anything above that gets hit with 40%. Many ultra-wealthy do pay massive estate taxes or structure via trusts. But sure, let’s pretend it’s a magical tax-free paradise because one viral tweet said so.
English
0
0
0
19
Jackson
Jackson@Jacksonsrule·
Billionaires don’t have bank accounts like you and me. They have art collections, Yachts,Mansions,Stocks. None of it gets taxed until they sell it. So they just never sell it. They borrow against it instead. Live off the loans. Pay almost nothing. Then when they die, their kids inherit it all tax-free. The wealth never gets taxed, It just gets passed down. And we wonder why the gap keeps getting wider.
quote@itsmubashi

Hit me with the harshest reality truth.

English
78
336
1.8K
141.7K
Fermsy 🎒
Fermsy 🎒@Cryptoboyy_Aji·
The boomers that spent the 80s drunk driving to $5 steak dinners, buying houses on factory salaries, and retiring at 60 with a pension wants to explain to me why I’m bad with money. They lived like rockstars on a forklift salary and called it discipline. I live like a monk on a corporate salary and still can’t afford what they had at 28. The advice didn’t age well. Neither did the economy it was built on.
English
210
45
369
15.8K
Mike Guess
Mike Guess@1776theBest·
Oh look, it’s Fauxcahontas clutching her pearls again. Senator Warren, the woman who built a career on a fraudulent “Native American” claim (complete with that cringey DNA test flop), is suddenly an ethics crusader because Trump dares to have assets in the private sector. The hypocrisy is thicker than your “two cents on the dollar” wealth tax sales pitch. Trump’s holdings are in a blind trust managed by independent trustees and third parties with sole authority over trades. He doesn’t pick stocks or time the market based on Oval Office briefings. This is standard procedure for presidents to avoid exactly what you’re screeching about. But facts are pesky things when your entire brand is “Orange Man Bad.” Members of Congress — including your Democrat pals — have turned stock trading into an Olympic sport for decades. Nancy Pelosi’s husband has a spooky knack for timing tech trades right before big votes and announcements. Your own net worth ballooned while “fighting Wall Street” on the Banking Committee. Funny how that works. You voted against banning congressional stock trading multiple times. Where was the “plain and simple corruption” outrage then, Liz? Or is it only corruption when the other team does it? You spent years shrugging at Biden family influence-peddling, foreign cash flows, and “the big guy” getting his cut. Pharma money? Fine. Insider-ish trades by your colleagues? Business as usual. But Trump breathing near a company his policies might affect? Corruption! The pearl-clutching is so performative it needs its own Emmy category. You’re the same senator who wants to confiscate wealth from successful people via annual taxes on unrealized gains (good luck valuing those “yachts and Rembrandts” every year without tanking markets or driving capital overseas). Yet you cry foul when a guy who built real businesses — and lost money serving as president — has skin in the American economy. Projection much? Newsflash, Warren: The real corruption is a career politician like you, who lies about her heritage to game the system, lectures everyone else on “rigged” rules while getting rich in D.C., and only discovers ethics when it scores cheap political points. Trump’s not “pulling levers” for stock tips — he’s delivering results that actually grow the economy, unlike your endless plans that just grow government. Go trade some more Wells Fargo shares while investigating them, or whatever your specialty is. The American people see through the grift.
English
0
0
0
1
Elizabeth Warren
Elizabeth Warren@ewarren·
Donald Trump is trading stocks in companies his government affects through policy decisions. He’s holding the stocks while pulling the levers that determine their value. It’s corruption, plain and simple.
English
2.2K
1.2K
4.8K
96.5K
Mike Guess
Mike Guess@1776theBest·
Guy, you ex-junkie motivational speaker from the land of maple syrup and endless Trudeau apologies: You’re a Canadian lecturing Americans on democracy while your country elected a blackface drama teacher, then propped up his corpse party for a decade of decline. Trump won fair and square—twice—because voters picked results over your feelings. Stay in your lane, eh? Your brain’s still recovering.
English
1
0
6
852
guyfelicella🇨🇦🍁
guyfelicella🇨🇦🍁@guyfelicella·
As a Canadian, I have a serious question: How the hell is Donald Trump still in power after everything he's said, done, and been accused of? Explain it to me like I'm in kindergarten. Because nothing about it makes sense.
English
7K
932
6.9K
386.9K
Mike Guess
Mike Guess@1776theBest·
@TSDmemes Ma’am went full Pentecostal Colonel Sanders — she’s not just tasting the goodness, she’s speaking in 11 herbs and spices while riding the glory train to the drive-thru window of Heaven. Somebody get this woman a bucket and a tambourine before she resurrects the mashed potatoes!
English
0
0
2
35
THAT SOUTHERN DUDE
THAT SOUTHERN DUDE@TSDmemes·
It’s Saturday! The weekend has officially started. Be sure to taste the goodness of the biscuit today and every day.
English
72
158
1.2K
126.6K
Mike Guess
Mike Guess@1776theBest·
Oh, bless your tiny, pearl-clutching heart, Bobby. The “Trump regime” (how very dramatic—did you practice that in the mirror with your “resistance” scarf?) is sinking boats full of fentanyl precursors and cartel goons that have been flooding America with poison, and you’re out here calling it “murder” because no judge read them their Miranda rights mid-chase on the high seas. Newsflash for the Berkeley bubble: These aren’t your vegan co-op delivery kayaks. They’re go-fast vessels, often with no fishing gear, running dark, dodging authorities, hauling chemicals that kill tens of thousands of Americans every year. Drug overdoses—especially fentanyl—have been a rolling national emergency. Interdicting them isn’t “lawlessness”; it’s basic border/coast defense that previous admins treated like a suggestion box. Your selective outrage is chef’s kiss. Where was this principled stand when Obama was drone-striking American citizens abroad with zero due process? Or when your side cheered “mostly peaceful” riots, open borders, and sanctuary policies that let cartels operate like Amazon Prime for death? Crickets. But Trump actually tries to stop the poison and suddenly it’s a human rights crisis for the smugglers. 197 suspected traffickers vs. the mountain of dead Americans from the drugs they deliver. Tough choice for a guy who spent years shrieking about inequality while ignoring the working-class carnage from this garbage. Maybe worry less about cartel employees’ civil liberties and more about why your crowd spent years making it easier for them to reach our streets. “Lawlessness” is watching 100k+ overdose deaths and pretending the real villain is the guy sinking the delivery trucks. Sit down, Professor. The adults are securing the country.
English
0
0
2
160
Robert Reich
Robert Reich@RBReich·
Reminder that the Trump regime is still blowing up suspected “drug boats” — killing 197 people since September. But no judge or jury has found these boats were trafficking drugs. We're taking Trump's word for it. This is murder. We must not lose sight of this lawlessness.
English
1.8K
4K
11.3K
124.3K
Mike Guess
Mike Guess@1776theBest·
Lies. We’re not pumping pure moonshine into your F-150. E15 is still 85% gasoline. The incremental hit from 10% to 15% ethanol? A measly 1-2% drop in MPG. Not “twice the fuel, half the range” apocalyptic nonsense. This is the same hyperbolic script as the original video: turn a tiny, well-known trade-off (slightly lower energy density for cheaper, more abundant summer fuel) into conspiracy-level panic. Most cars have handled E10 for years. E15 under the EPA waiver isn’t dissolving engines or turning highways into walking trails. Reality: You’ll lose maybe 5-8 miles per tank on an average vehicle. That’s it. If that’s ruining your life, the problem might be your fragile worldview, not the 5% extra corn squeezings. Cry harder, champ. The sky remains firmly un-fallen.
English
0
0
0
2
Jason Young
Jason Young@JasonYoung76881·
@realericmoutsos it takes two gallons of alcohol to go the same distance as one gallon of gasoline
English
1
0
1
87
Eric Moutsos
Eric Moutsos@realericmoutsos·
Are you running out of gasoline faster than normal? Maybe this is why…
English
63
284
889
16.8K
Mike Guess
Mike Guess@1776theBest·
Most people have been pumping E10 (10% ethanol) into their tanks for well over a decade without the world ending. Yes, bumping it up to E15 will lower your MPG — roughly 1-2% on average. This video is pure fear-mongering nonsense and hyperbolic garbage. On a typical car or SUV, that works out to about 5 miles less per tank. For a full-size pickup? Maybe 8 miles. Boo-fucking-hoo. Cry harder, retard.
English
0
0
2
41
Mike Guess
Mike Guess@1776theBest·
Truthfully, I never followed Charlie Kirk and didn’t know much about him. I assumed a lot of what I heard was exaggerated or outright lies, but I still believed there was probably some truth to the claims that he was a bigot and a racist. Then he was murdered. Like many others, his death prompted me to finally look into the man for myself. I spent days watching speeches, interviews, and debates—going straight to the source instead of relying on secondhand narratives. A good friend of mine, a Black engineer, texted me the news of the shooting. He wrote, “No one deserves to be killed over words, but his racist rants are why this happened.” At the time, I didn’t push back because I was still ignorant about Kirk’s actual views. After doing my own research, I came back to him with what I’d learned. To this day, he refuses to watch or read any of it himself. He still leans on mainstream media portrayals instead. It’s disappointing—especially because he’s an intelligent, accomplished guy. If someone like him can be so thoroughly misled by the narrative, it shows how easy it is for anyone to be manipulated. The Left has become a hate machine that runs on outrage and caricature. That’s how it sustains itself. I wish more people would take the time to examine things for themselves instead of outsourcing their thinking to partisan sources.
English
2
2
19
225
Mike Guess retweetledi
Mila Joy
Mila Joy@Milajoy·
This guy heard Charlie Kirk was a racist so he decided to sit down and listen to him. You know what happens next.
English
105
1.3K
4.6K
44.4K
Mike Guess
Mike Guess@1776theBest·
Shocking. She moved to America, picked a punchy pen name “Ayn Rand,” and legally became Alice O’Connor after marriage. Newsflash, genius: Immigrants and writers do this constantly. Mark Twain wasn’t born “Mark.” George Orwell wasn’t “George.” Half of Hollywood changed their names to sound less ethnic. Rand didn’t forge documents, scam investors, or pretend to be royalty—she just wanted a name that didn’t scream “fresh off the boat from Bolshevik hell.” Her background was never hidden; it’s in every biography. This “fraud” claim is weaker than a soy latte. It says way more about the your desperation than Rand’s ideas. Yes, after a lifetime of paying into the system (forced payroll taxes, no opt-out, remember?) and battling cancer with crushing bills, Rand collected benefits in her final years. Cue the victory laps from people who couldn’t debate her on epistemology if their lives depended on it. Here’s the part these clowns always omit: Rand called it exactly what it was—legalized plunder. She viewed the welfare state as immoral coercion. Taking the money back wasn’t “embracing socialism”; it was restitution from a system that stole from her at gunpoint (via IRS). She and her associates made clear she did it pragmatically while still fighting to abolish the damn thing. Refusing it wouldn’t have ended Social Security—it would’ve just let the looters keep her cash. It’s like being robbed at knifepoint, then grabbing your wallet back from the thief’s pile while yelling “this system sucks.” Only a midwit calls that hypocrisy. Try harder next time, champ.
English
0
2
27
262
smashterror!
smashterror!@_smashterror_·
@sowelleconomics she was a fraud. that wasn't even her real name. Her name was Alisa Rosenbaum, and she happily took her social security checks.
English
11
0
67
2.8K
Sowell Economics
Sowell Economics@sowelleconomics·
Ayn Rand response to, "How do we build roads, hospitals etc.? If the government doesn't force taxpayers to do so?"
English
353
1.7K
8.6K
340.6K
Mike Guess
Mike Guess@1776theBest·
Not really true. This was a prospective observational cohort (not a randomized controlled trial). 197 cancer patients prescribed compounded ivermectin (25 mg) + mebendazole (250 mg) capsules via a U.S. telemedicine platform (linked to The Wellness Company). Only 122 (61.9%) completed the ~6-month follow-up survey. The outcomes were self-reported via digital surveys: 84.4% “Clinical Benefit Ratio” (no evidence of disease 32.8% + tumor regression 15.6% + stabilization 36.1%). 15.6% reported progression. BUT, many patients were also on standard treatments (chemo ~28%, radiation ~21%, surgery ~20%, supplements/diet changes ~37-49%). There was no control group. Results were self reported. And the patient selection was biased. Is it worth a further look? Sure. But It’s retarded to even pretend this is some cure for any cancers, much less “85% of all cancers”.
English
2
1
3
582
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH@NicHulscher·
BREAKING: Largest Human Cancer Study of Ivermectin + Mebendazole Is Now PEER-REVIEWED and PUBLISHED in a MAJOR Cancer Journal 84.4% of cancer patients taking ivermectin + mebendazole for 6 months declared either CANCER DISAPPEARANCE, TUMOR REGRESSION, or CANCER STABILIZATION. Our study, “Real-world Clinical Outcomes of Ivermectin and Mebendazole in Cancer Patients: Results from a Prospective Observational Cohort,” is now peer-reviewed and published in Anticancer Research—a major international oncology journal of the International Institute of Anticancer Research (IIAR), established in 1995. The results represent one of the most compelling clinical signals ever documented for repurposed anti-parasitic therapies in oncology. A diverse population of cancer patients (n=197) was prescribed compounded ivermectin–mebendazole through a U.S. telemedicine platform, with each capsule containing 25 mg ivermectin and 250 mg mebendazole. Participants were followed for approximately six months using standardized digital surveys assessing cancer outcomes, medication adherence, and tolerability. At approximately six months post-treatment initiation, we observed an 84.4% Clinical Benefit Ratio (CBR)—meaning more than four out of five patients reported either: No evidence of disease (32.8%) Tumor regression (15.6%) or Cancer stabilization (36.1%) Importantly, adherence was remarkably high, with 86.9% completing the initial prescription and 66.4% remaining on therapy at six months. Side effects were predominantly mild and manageable, reported in 25.4% of patients (primarily gastrointestinal), with 93.6% of those experiencing side effects continuing treatment after minor dosing adjustments. This groundbreaking peer-reviewed publication was made possible through a unique collaboration between The Wellness Company, the McCullough Foundation, and the Chairman of the President’s Cancer Panel—uniting real-world clinical data, frontline medical experience, and epidemiologic expertise to evaluate inexpensive, repurposed therapies with major translational potential. With these extraordinarily promising results, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials are now required. In the meantime, many cancer patients are exercising their right to try. @twc_health @McCulloughFund @IIAR_Journals @P_McCulloughMD @DrHarveyRisch @DrKellyVictory @jathorpmfm @drdrew @PeterGillooly @FosterCoulson
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH tweet media
English
520
14.7K
30.2K
1.2M
Mike Guess
Mike Guess@1776theBest·
Lmao, “even Hitler admired the West”? That’s your big brain historical flex? The guy who gassed 6 million Jews, invaded half of Europe, and got his ass curb-stomped by the Allies while hiding in a bunker? Yeah, real endorsement there, champ. Hitler was a fanboy of efficiency, not Western values—he hated liberal democracy, individualism, and everything that made the Enlightenment worth a damn. British Empire, French, Spaniards built global trade networks, spread rule of law, ended local slavery in many places, invented modern medicine/science, and dragged humanity out of feudal shit. Yeah, conquest happened—every civilization did it, including your African tribal kings selling their own people by the boatload for centuries. Arabs ran the East African slave trade longer and crueler than the Atlantic one. Ottomans, Mongols, Aztecs—all empires ran on “theft and conquest.” Europeans just did it better and eventually invented abolitionism and human rights to feel bad about it. Meanwhile, your “sit down bitch” routine is peak projection from someone whose side still can’t stop the fatherless homes, crime waves, and dependency that started after the welfare state kicked in. Cry more about “mean words” while posting bitch-made slop. History’s not your friend here—go read a book that isn’t curated by Twitter communists. 🖕 back at ya. Pussy
English
1
0
1
10
Lynx
Lynx@AimbotActive·
@1776theBest @xKnowledgeBANK Dude, even Hitler admired the west. The British Empire, the French and the Spaniards are among the most violent colonialist of the modern era. Most European culture is built upon theft and conquest. And now you cry over mean mean words. Sit down bitch go read some history lol 🖕
English
1
0
0
14
Knowledge Bank
Knowledge Bank@xKnowledgeBANK·
The trans-Atlantic slave trade, which began as early as the 15th century, introduced a system of slavery that was commercialized, racialized and inherited.
English
305
786
4.9K
476K
Mike Guess
Mike Guess@1776theBest·
Oh no, not the groundbreaking Wingstop exposé! Bro just discovered that restaurants… buy ingredients from suppliers?? Next he’ll blow the lid off McDonald’s for not raising their own cows in the parking lot, or Starbucks for not growing coffee beans on the roof. “WHOA, they’re using Tyson chicken?! And charging more than wholesale?! This changes everything!!” Yeah man, the $15 wing basket also covers: • The building rent • Employees who show up (sometimes) • Fryers, oil, sauces, boxes, delivery apps taking 30% • Insurance so some idiot doesn’t sue when they burn their mouth • And the sheer audacity of wanting to eat without cooking or cleaning Mind-blowing stuff. Truly the hero we needed in 2026 — the guy who ran the numbers and realized businesses try to make profit. Next video: “Water is just hydrogen and oxygen, stop buying bottled!!”
English
0
0
5
4K
Wall Street Apes
Wall Street Apes@WallStreetApes·
Wingstop employee wants Americans to know when you go to Wingstop you’re just buying regular Tyson chicken. He shows all the boxes as proof I ran the numbers on Tyson wholesale chicken prices and compared it to Wingstop prices They markup the chicken over 500% - Wholesale Tyson chicken wings typically cost restaurants $1.50–$2.50+ per pound - A pound of bone-in wings yields roughly 8–10 wings - Cost to Wingstop: $0.20–$0.35 per wing that’s including sauce, seasoning and prep - Selling price: $1.00–$1.50+ per wing, or even higher in combos - Markup is 300–500%+ on chicken cost You’re just paying for regular Tyson chicken wings in sauce that’s fried Make it at home and save yourself the 500% markup
English
3.1K
3.2K
18.8K
3.8M
Mike Guess
Mike Guess@1776theBest·
Every race and civilization has its hall of shame — African kingdoms sold millions into slavery, tribal genocides, Arab slave trade, Aztec sacrifices, endless European wars, Asian purges. America confronted its sins, abolished slavery (which existed globally), fought a civil war over it, passed Civil Rights, and built the wealthiest, most opportunity-rich nation on Earth. ‘Get over that’ isn’t denial — it’s refusing to let one chapter of history be weaponized forever while ignoring today’s realities and other groups’ far worse body counts. Progress demands truth, not perpetual grievance. Black Americans are the only group in modern America actively encouraged to dwell obsessively on historical grievances, while every other race and ethnicity—Asians, Irish, Italians, Hispanics, Native Americans—is expected to move on, build, and compete. This double standard doesn’t reflect respect or justice. It reflects a patronizing view that treats Black people as uniquely fragile and infantile, incapable of the same resilience and agency demanded of everyone else who ALSO had slavery and violence done to them in their past. If blacks would only realize that no one cares about their skin color. Honestly. It’s your behavior that makes people not want to be around you. Get over it, children.
English
0
0
0
7
Save Our Citizenships 🔻
They Say “Get Over That”… Without Sanctuary proves white supremacy didn’t just murder Black bodies, it smiled for the camera, sold the postcards, then have the audacity to say “move on.”
English
59
545
1K
18K