Dunc H

34.8K posts

Dunc H banner
Dunc H

Dunc H

@182_DuncH

Critical Rationalist . Libertarian. White, Objective, Knowledgeable, Enlightened , not your usual WOKE.

Manchester Katılım Haziran 2020
1.5K Takip Edilen1.1K Takipçiler
Dunc H
Dunc H@182_DuncH·
@_Ava_VT Accept it, then headbutt them.
English
0
0
0
4
Ava ☆
Ava ☆@_Ava_VT·
SERIOUS QUESTION: If somebody handed you $800,000 and said it's because you're ugly, would you accept it?
English
5.6K
1.4K
73.7K
1.8M
Dunc H
Dunc H@182_DuncH·
@Cornishview Only is you pay someone else to install them.
English
0
0
0
3
Cornishview
Cornishview@Cornishview·
people with Solar panels are very keen to tell us how much they save on electricity - but omit to say they shelled out 8 to £10K to get them in the first place.
English
37
16
136
3.3K
Dunc H
Dunc H@182_DuncH·
@godblesstoto It's to protect his State income that he is prepared to sacrifice yours.
English
0
0
0
7
🙏🌧🌍
🙏🌧🌍@godblesstoto·
Tony Blair thinks the elderly in our country don't deserve a state pension as it's 'unaffordable'. He himself has claimed the near maximum allowance of up to £115,000 a year as a former PM since 2007. That's a total of around £2 mil, despite having significant personal wealth.
🙏🌧🌍 tweet media
English
159
1.9K
4K
46.7K
Peter Hitchens
Peter Hitchens@ClarkeMicah·
The ridiculous overuse of cars (a 3000 lb vehicle carring a 180 lb person) has obliterated a huge amount of other forms of travel, especially by children. Not just trains. Trams, bicycle , foot . And they have led to towns in which simple journeys have become far longer, as they are designed with drivers in mind .@182_dunch
Dunc H@182_DuncH

@ClarkeMicah Mathematically, lines times the number of trains. Car travel freed the plebs from their slums; trains are a backward step.

English
32
23
219
10.7K
Peter Hitchens
Peter Hitchens@ClarkeMicah·
Shouldn’t be so, @hygge_lee. The supposed tax income from cars is cancelled out by the vast costs of congestion, road carnage and the huge fuel cost of using backward high-friction road transport instead of advanced low friction rail.
JLee@hygge_lee

@ClarkeMicah @visitcamberwell is it not just a case that car ownership is a masive tax creator - the tax created by car ownership could never be replaced by public transport usage - governments now are driven by tax revenue not by citizen wellbeing.

English
12
0
19
5K
Dunc H
Dunc H@182_DuncH·
@LeeySaxophone @kemixtryset @IndieChris71 @ClarkeMicah LOL. Very little would go to workers. Huge construction firms that spent money on lobbying would get it. Workers would get the inflation associated with mass money printing and the minimum wage. Do you understand what constitutes the real economy?
English
1
0
0
13
Mark
Mark@LeeySaxophone·
@182_DuncH @kemixtryset @IndieChris71 @ClarkeMicah You mean, "how much money could the gov print and directly give to workers supporting the economy?" Not a clue mate! But it'd increase our economy and quality of life greatly! People would get jobs instead of sitting on the dole, unless you'd prefer people on the dole?
English
1
0
0
11
Dunc H
Dunc H@182_DuncH·
There have historically been many regimes that have tried to impose their ideologies on their populations; they all fail. The concept of our democracy is based on freedom of speech and freedom of choice. People will choose to have private transport, given a choice, and they have always done. Not needing them is irrelevant.
English
0
0
0
25
Dunc H
Dunc H@182_DuncH·
@stuey_beef It was a PONZI scheme and we are the victims. Nobody will face jail time over it, though. Funny that.
English
0
0
3
99
Stuey Beef 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
The state pension is not a random government favour, it’s the back end of a 35–40 year compulsory “contract” where people are forced to hand over National Insurance on the clear promise of a basic pension at the end. Politicians and think tanks helped design an unfunded, pay‑as‑you‑go system where today’s workers pay today’s pensioners, then have the gall to call it “unsustainable” as if the public dreamt it up. If a private firm sold you a retirement product on fixed terms, took your money for four decades, then announced at 66 that you “didn’t really need it” and would henceforth be means‑tested or frozen, they would be in court for mis‑selling and fraud. The crisis here is not pensioners “leeching off the young”, it’s a political class that built a Ponzi‑style NI system, diverted the proceeds for other spending, and now wants to default on the people who kept their side of the bargain. You do not blame the victims of a defective product for believing the brochure; you go after the people who wrote it.
English
275
2.6K
8.4K
108.5K
Dunc H
Dunc H@182_DuncH·
Or wait for a bus that doesn't arrive in rainy Manchester, then get sacked because you are late again. None of Mr Hitchen's employers has ever been overly concerned with his timekeeping, although from his personality I imagine he is usually early, but it does give him a biased view of public transport.
English
0
0
0
12
Sunday Shanks
Sunday Shanks@shanks_it·
@ClarkeMicah @182_DuncH In Peter Hitchens mind there is no rational reason that people would avoid public transport. I invite him to ride the bus in East Croydon.
English
1
0
1
55
Peter Hitchens
Peter Hitchens@ClarkeMicah·
This is just unthinking abuse, .@182_dunch. The civilised world's crazy abandonment , since about 1918, of advanced rail transport in favour of backward, inefficient,dangerous, ugly,dirty road transport is an astounding development which needs to be understood and reversed.
Dunc H@182_DuncH

@PincherMartin8 @ClarkeMicah @BigMing15 Exactly this, he yearns for the old days where the middle classes led idyllic lives, cycling through the empty streets of sunny Oxford, without the gastly plebs impinging on their pleasure..

English
9
2
38
6.1K
Dunc H
Dunc H@182_DuncH·
@Helldivers_NOW Many now seem to be impervious to bullets until they manage to get the call off, same with bots.
English
0
0
23
858
Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪
A little econ 101 for the silly socialists. The natural state of the economy is deflationary. As humans we innovate, we become more productive so everything ‘should’ get cheaper to produce. Well it does, everything you see getting more expensive is getting cheaper to produce but the inflation of the money supply is causing prices to go up. So what is the mechanics of this, the two primary ones are: 1. Governments keep running deficits because democracy rewards them for lying and spending. 2. Banks create money out of thin air through lending and the people closest to credit get it first. Asset prices pump and wealth shifts toward those who already have assets. When things go up in price, say energy due to war, this is not inflation. Some politicians say it is, but they are lying or stupid. That’s a supply shock. Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon. Inflation is good for the state, it wipes away their debt. The mechanics of inflation are good for the rich, because they have assets. Inflation is terrible for everyone else - products get smaller, ingredients get worse and prices go up. It’s how companies manage inflation. Inflation forces dependency policies so people can scrape by - minimum wage, energy caps, renters rights. They are demanded by the public. But this the slow hollowing out of society, it is what breaks everything which is good. It puts pressure on a system which takes us from high trust to low trust. Why do I make fun of @zackpolanski and the socialists? Because they will run this experiment on crack. The Green’s model as far as I can see is: - Attack the productive class - Reward the unproductive class The problem with this is the rich will leave, the ambitious may leave and they will face the same question as both Labour and the Conservatives which is how do we pay for this? They will either have to raise taxes or borrow (print) more money, which accelerates the problem. So we will get lower productivity, higher taxes, more borrowing and guess what, more inflation. This is the exact mechanics which have destroyed every socialist state. I get it, socialism sounds warm and fuzzy - nobody should go without, free stuff for everyone. But the end result is poverty and misery, as it has been every single time. If you want jobs, good, medicine then you need a growing and prosperous economy which means unshackling the entrepreneurs. There is no other option on the table. It is the only thing that has ever worked. I haven’t voted in three elections. I will only vote if someone comes with a real economic plan which means a chainsaw to the state and driving growth.
English
132
274
1.5K
36.4K
Peter Hitchens
Peter Hitchens@ClarkeMicah·
2/2 .@182_dunch I am a longstanding opponent of HS2. The money should have been spent on undoing the Marples-Beeching cuts of medium speed rail.
Dunc H@182_DuncH

@ClarkeMicah @Jasonohoe Choices are good, freight is better off the roads, and people prefer private transport. Taxes are bad, and the country is broke. We saw how much HS2 cost; can we afford a rail network update that people won't use?

English
13
3
27
2.9K
Peter Hitchens
Peter Hitchens@ClarkeMicah·
Really .@jasonohoe? Funny the way huge-scale rail freight periusst in the US, then. And that the intrrstates put passenger rail between major cities out of business.
Jasonoho1913@Jasonohoe

@ClarkeMicah @Ami61495883 Those interstates where built mostly for truck freight. Door to Door logistics is how we outproduced the USSR per unit of labor.. Its also why China is so furiously building freeways now..

English
2
0
4
3.1K
Philosophy Of Physics
Philosophy Of Physics@PhilosophyOfPhy·
Einstein’s path to the discovery that mass warps spacetime began with a profound thought experiment in 1907, which he later called, the happiest thought of my life. It started with the question he asked to himself, "If a person falls freely from the roof of a house, will they feel their own weight?" When Einstein realized that a falling person would feel weightless. In their perspective, gravity would effectively disappear. This led to several game-changing realizations; First one is, The Equivalence Principle; He concluded that gravity and acceleration are essentially the same thing. If you were in a windowless elevator in deep space being pulled upward at a constant speed, you wouldn't be able to tell the difference between that and standing still on Earth. Next one is, Gravity as Geometry: Because gravity affects everything exactly the same way regardless of mass, Einstein reasoned it isn't a "pulling force" like magnetism. Instead, it must be a property of the environment itself, which we know now as the fabric of spacetime. Last but not least, Warping Spacetime; If gravity is equivalent to acceleration, and acceleration can curve the path of light, then gravity must also curve light. The only way for light which always takes the shortest path to curve is if the ground it's traveling on spacetime which is itself curved by mass. For those just looking for fancy science fact it's just one of the discoveries about nature but Einstein himself it was the way of living life.
Philosophy Of Physics tweet media
English
71
217
1.2K
61K
Feduptony
Feduptony@Feduptony153815·
@ClarkeMicah @182_DuncH HS2 was one of those things we must have because other countries have them like a ferris wheel in your big cities.
English
1
0
0
29
Philosophy Of Physics
Philosophy Of Physics@PhilosophyOfPhy·
"If all of mathematics disappeared, physics would be set back by exactly one week." - Richard P. Feynman
Philosophy Of Physics tweet media
English
66
103
1.3K
1.4M
Dunc H
Dunc H@182_DuncH·
@ClarkeMicah @policy_uk Give people choices, and they pick the best one. Build more roads, and people will use cars more, because it's a definite advantage for them.
English
0
0
1
26
Dunc H
Dunc H@182_DuncH·
@SEAFtrooper Time for payback, stamping on Helldivers a top priority.
English
1
0
1
51