RustyWhiteBird

@FortySacks Same. I was never a hockey boy. I was never into sports in general, but I'm thinking I should have played more.

The least Canadian thing about me, is that I’ve never particularly cared for hockey.

@junonewscom I almost replied "This has to be a joke" until I realized what day it was hahahaha

Juno News hires Rachel Gilmore as fact-checker junonews.com/p/breaking-jun…

@vrilliumlive Nah, I don't think so.

I’m not a white supremacist, I’m a WASP supremacist. I’m starting to think the white ethnics aren’t nearly as smart as us

@matthew_sede @NovusOrdoWatch That kind of mental gymnastics would cause a rift in the fabric on space-time and spawn like a hundred black holes.

@NovusOrdoWatch Imagine reconciling this with the majestic Mortalium Animos of Pius XI?

Leo XIV Prays for ‘Fruitful Service’ of First Female Archbishop of Canterbury (Anglican) - novusordowatch.org/2026/03/leo14-…

@nayibbukele You are an inspiration.

Cuadra por cuadra... tardará un poco, pero quedará hermoso.

@FrLavery Very upsetting that they would run from the discourse in this way. I do think that Bp. Sanborn's hard-line stance against una cum Masses is correct, but he doesn't seem to budge on what I think are mistakes. I really wish more open debate on all these issues could happen.

Blocked by Bp. Sanborn's media outlets in spite of almost never engaging with either of these accounts. Why am I not surprised? There is something in the catechism about resisting the known truth... He and his priests have, since last summer, been promoting the claim that they neither have jurisdiction for confession given them by the Church (or any authority in the Church) nor need anyone to give it to them, since they say they have it already from Holy Orders. They say this is all they need, since the requirement for jurisdiction from the Church, according to them, is merely an ecclesiastical law like matrimonial form. They say it is merely "permission" from the Church. This totally contradicts the unanimous teaching of theologians and the decrees of Trent. Fr. Dutertre attempted to defend this error by referring to a quote from Cardinal Journet which was not from Journet at all but from a priest writing post-V2. Then he attempted to reference another theologian from about 1960 who turned out to be a total modernist with many thoroughly modernist writings, including the one Fr. Dutertre used to defend himself, which was written at the request of arch-modernist Karl Rahner! If you believe that in following the RCI clergy you are getting the epitome of sound doctrine, you are in for a rude awakening. The only qualification for sound doctrine at RCI is whether or not it agrees with the Thesis. Otherwise doctrines and definitions of terms change as necessary to support the Thesis. There is not even much carefulness about facts at RCI. Statements are made about things without taking the trouble to verify them or to give the matter the necessary study. A prime example is the criticism of the Fatima prayers which Bp. Sanborn made multiple times last year. He had almost zero research on the matter and yet was telling people he didn't think they were approved and that it is not prudent to say them in public. First he claimed you would lose the indulgences of the rosary. When I presented the reply approved personally by Pius XII in the 1950s, in which the Pope said the Fatima prayer could be added to the rosary in public and private without loss of indulgences, Bp. Sanborn acknowledged this as something "someone" came up with, then continued to argue we should not be saying it in public. Yet it was approved and indulgenced by the very same bishop who approved the apparitions of Fatima, long before Vatican 2. Various bishops in the United States and many other countries also approved it. Wouldn't it have been wise to research this before voicing such a reckless opinion? Unfortunately, this is standard mode of operation at RCI. They also criticize anyone who believes traditional clergy can make decisions in marriage cases today in the absence of diocesan tribunals. Yet, their own RCI statutes allow their priests to declare certain marriages null. One only needs to read canon law and the various decrees on marriage to see that even these marriage cases handled by Bishop Sanborn require the *judicial jurisdiction* of the bishop of the diocese and are not merely paperwork. In other words, they require ordinary jurisdiction which Bishop Sanborn certainly does not possess and which he accuses others of usurping. This has been pointed out to them, but they have repeatedly deleted the mention from their social media, and in a recent live stream they pretended it simply had to do with death certificates. That is clearly not the case, because a second marriage after death does not mean the previous marriage was null! The RCI statutes refer to "declaring" marriages "null." This is truly unconscionable behavior for a group that claims to want only the truth.

@_BattleForTruth @NormieChick Modern Vatican never ceases to reach absurd levels of cringe

@NormieChick vatican.va/content/leo-xi…

Pope Leo congratulates Female Anglican Pro-LGBT, Pro-Abortion ‘Archbishop', with “May the Holy Spirit come down upon you and make you fruitful in the Lord's service.”, while the SSPX receive threat of excommunication for wanting to consecrate Catholic Bishops. Mind blowing.

@vrilliumlive Don't ever give up, Will. I don't care what or who you used to be; that doesn't matter anymore. Keep making good propaganda.

You idiots need to understand that if I ever quit, that’s a victory for the Jews. Not only is it a victory for the jews, it’s a sign that they can start canceling you people again. That all they gotta do is make some people dislike you and you’ll be silenced. Think.

@__DreamSeeker__ @vrilliumlive by being tactful; Lucas Gage got away with worse

@vrilliumlive How have you been able to be so antagonistic towards the Jews without having your accounts removed?

@FrLavery @et_interrapax Hey, Fr., are you aware of any efforts to elect a pontiff? It really would be a nice way to get us all together

A truly sad thing for a good bishop to say. If he does not hold the Thesis errors, the only theologically defensible position is that the power to elect devolves on the Church as a whole in the absence of Cardinals. The only ones who could do this today are the traditional bishops, since laity cannot. To call such an extraordinary election a "conclave" when it is not, is to further the unjust criticisms and terminology of Bp. Sanborn. To call efforts to unite all Catholic bishops in adopting a true solution "weird" is to work against the Catholic Church herself of which SGG claim to be pastors last I checked. This is very unfortunate.

Bishop McGuire's thoughts concerning the rumor of a conclave, made up of traditionalist bishops to elect a pope... *Taken from the St. Gertrude the Great Bulletin. #Catholic #Pope #Conclave

@vrilliumlive He shouldn't have told the world though...

He gets a loyal woman who can throw it back like crazy… Why are yall hating?

@CatTurdIsGay @realBacklash Who is this Molly lady? I've never heard of her, yet she blocked me. She seems to have interesting posts though

@realBacklash Lol Dave, I always knew you were a fucking cucked, coward PUSSY! 🤣🤣🤣 Fade into insignificance like the Groyper movement! x.com/i/status/20361…

Episode 128 — Foreign War, Domestic Chaos: How to Prepare for What’s Coming w/@PNWGuerilla x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

@realBacklash @gareth_gore I would respect your work if you respected the ventures of your erstwhile partners

HUGE, in-depth interview with @gareth_gore dropping tomorrow at 6pm Eastern about Opus Dei and its connections to Zionism, Intelligence, and POWER. You won't want to miss this! youtu.be/AIYDIO1sonk

@Blondes_tweets I lost all respect for Dave after seeing this. What a man-child!

Unfortunately, in an attempt to get my YouTube channel removed, what is left of the Backlash has begun issuing illegal copyright claims on my original work. I will be deleting all of these videos to try to retain my YouTube channel, but it may be too late. Please follow my new YT channel and Rumble (Pinned tweet)

@anthokni @vrilliumlive That is the unfortunate angle that many take

@vrilliumlive It’s an anti colonial cause. I wouldn’t say that’s traditionally “right wing”.

Palestine IS a right wing cause. It’s literally ethnonationalism. They want a Palestinian state For Palestinians, by Palestinians Led by Palestinians Populated by Palestinians Ask any of them if they’d be okay with a jewish president of Palestine…

@martinez_clips @Know_More_News Adam Green is actually slow

New book just arrived. @Know_More_News

@vrilliumlive L take. I don't agree with the abuse you're getting in the thread, but I think we can do without vice-filled creatures in our movement.

He’s absolutely right. Elijah was one of the first to help me out after my scandal, he’s a good man and understands coalitional politics.

@SecondSonsCA What she's doing is like stepping into a battle and crying because the enemy shot back.

😭 - Part 2

@GodlyNations Boom, Boom, Tel Aviv 🔥🔥🔥 This is what you get for all your evil deeds

@FortySacks Literally promoting invasion. This should be taken as an act of war at least on par with sanctions.

This should radicalize you beyond all recognition. There are 2 billion people in the Indian subcontinent and only 27 million Canadians.