1st Class Maths

Will ClassWiz+ cause chaos in your maths lesson? Absolutely not. ✅ We explain why the core consistency remains and lessons stay on track: education.casio.co.uk/blog/calculato…

From investigating real-world data to visualising probability distributions, the fx-CG100 is a powerful tool for tackling statistics in A-level maths. education.casio.co.uk/blog/visualisi…

@mcwardgow Thanks that is very kind of you!

@1stclassmaths absolutely loved the questions on your capture-recapture exam questions 🤣🤣🤣 kept my Y11s engaged and really made my day! Thank you 😁

My school will be advertising a maths teacher job vacancy this week. Please get in touch by DM or email if you're interested and want more information. Happy to show potential candidates around. Brilliant team, amazing maths results, happy students. Teaching KS3-5. South London.

Do the notional component boundaries (by paper) need to sum to the overall boundaries? I make AQA foundation 160 for a 4 based on components but it is 158 overall? cdn.sanity.io/files/p28bar15…

Last month, selected #year12 students took part in a roundtable discussion with ITN Journalist and Reporter Lewis Denison, exploring topics such as online education, digital resources, and teacher–student engagement. It was an articulate and thoughtful conversation that gave our Year 12 students the opportunity to share their views on the ongoing debate surrounding the accuracy of online and social media resources. @ITVNewsPolitics @itvnews @DennyTheJourno #debate #conversation #ambition

'Wild west of education': How pupils trust TikTok teachers more than their school teachers, @DennyTheJourno reports itv.com/news/2025-11-2…

I did what 99% of creators think is impossible - I legally defeated YouTube. How does YouTube react? They're pretending it never happened. Let me tell you a story that proves the system is designed to crush creators - even when you WIN legal case and the law is on your side 👇 ➡️ June 2024: My channel "Chase Car" (20k subs) gets demonetized for "reused content." I appeal. A HUMAN reviewer checks everything - my editing timeline, voiceovers, scripts. They email me: "This is original content, you follow all the guidelines." Monetization restored. I'm relieved. A human verified me. I'm safe now. ➡️ November 2024: I wake up to find my entire channel TERMINATED. Same content. Same videos. Different result. Reason: "Spam, deceptive practices and scams policies". Wait... what? A human JUST cleared me months ago. Since I was verified by a YouTube employee, I knew my content was fine. I was creating EV news/car review videos that the YouTube Team had already accepted. Yet, the AI bot didn't care this time. I appeal → INSTANT rejection from the AI bot. Most creators give up here. But as a European Union citizen, I have the opportunity to defend myself as a creator using European Union law. I filed a formal case with ADROIT, an official European Union certified dispute body. March 2025: Case filed. July 23, 2025: Decision arrives (attached) The verdict: ✅ "Complaint is UPHELD" ✅ "YouTube's termination was NOT RIGHTFUL" ✅ "YouTube failed to specify violating content" and my channel should be reinstated. An independent legal body ruled YouTube was WRONG. The best part? YouTube defended itself during the process but could not show what I had violated. I WON. Here's where it gets terrifying - My channel is STILL terminated. I've been emailing YouTube's legal team for 4 MONTHS. Bot replies and complete silence. I never gave up; I fought fairly for my rights as a creator using the tools I had, and I won fair and square. Yet, they're acting like it never happened and the decision doesn't exist. Think about that for a moment. Even when you: ➡️ Follow every rule ➡️ Have a YouTube employee confirm that your content follows the policies ➡️ Win an official legal case ➡️ Have a documented decision that your channel should be reinstated ...YouTube's AI system just ignores you, and contacting a human is impossible. If they can do this to me AFTER I won, what chance does any creator have? I'm not giving up. I am filing a complaint with the Irish regulator @CNaM_ie to force YouTube to honor the decision. But I need your help: RT this and tag @TeamYouTube . Make them respond, so they can't pretend this isn't happening. Because if they can ignore a legal ruling, no creator is safe. #YouTubeAIWrongedCreators @YouTube @YouTubeCreators @YouTubeInsider

Are your students using studyapps? There are plenty out there teaching them the wrong content... My thoughts on the one most aggressively marketed right now (MedlyAI) youtube.com/watch?v=zom5ps…

@itvnews/video/7575215781760240918" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">tiktok.com/@itvnews/video… ITV news piece on influencers, predictions and exams. Still some people don’t think TikTok is an issue

@YouTubeInsider @TeamYouTube USE HUMANS NOT AI

I’m being tagged in a lot of questions and comments about content moderation right now, and so is @TeamYouTube. We see it, we feel it, we take it super seriously, and we want to address it:

Anyone able to take on a year 10 tutee? A good friend of mine has asked me but I cannot dedicate the time. Rather than navigate the tuition market I am hoping someone suitably qualified might have space on here. DM me.

@YouTubeInsider @TeamYouTube Do you not think it is ridiculous that the only way people get support from an actual human is to go to a completely different platform (THIS ONE) and hope that enough people make the same noise that they might get a reply.

I'm human. Also a creator. I care enormously. @TeamYouTube are some of the very best humans I've ever met. They care about creators to a truly heroic degree No one is perfect. Not every decision is perfect. Not everyone is happy even with very carefully considered decisions. We hear it, we work really hard to help and to constantly improve. We care. A lot 💛

@YouTubeInsider @TeamYouTube You are right that "No one is perfect" but the problem is the decisions are not made by humans, they are overly reliant on AI. I've had videos nuked because AI marks them "made for kids" when they are clearly not and support are refusing to have a human look at them.

@YouTubeInsider The decisions are clearly incorrect and when an actual human does the review they agree but despite all previous appeals being successful (which I take as admission of error from YouTube!!) I am being capped. My monetisation has halved and my audience cannot comment. It's awful!!

@YouTubeInsider why is it that after successfully appealing 11 videos that YouTube (AI lets face it...) marked as "not for kids" I am now being told future appeals will not be reviewed due to a limit of appeals per channel. AI is making the wrong decisions that humans would not.

I have posted key topics for Edexcel Paper 2 but not been able to do AQA as I haven't seen the papers. I can do this tomorrow still if anyone has a copy but otherwise not a lot I can do I am afraid.

I am happy to analyse the GCSE papers in the coming week and suggest key topics for paper 2/3. This will depend entirely on if I can get eyes on a paper so no promises. Given the very short period between each paper, it might not happen.

I’m on a roll. Higher GCSE Maths Unit 3 - use it as a worksheet for a revision lesson. Or set it as easy peasy cover with the video that goes alongside the worksheet. Unit 3 Foundation is filmed too, just need to edit! Get them here: hannahkettlemaths.co.uk/cover