1treetree7

5.3K posts

1treetree7 banner
1treetree7

1treetree7

@1treetree7

Father, AI SWE & investor - $TSLA, $PLTR, $LMND, $NVDA, $HOOD, $DUOL - “Pessimists sound smart, optimists make money”.

Katılım Kasım 2020
1.7K Takip Edilen237 Takipçiler
1treetree7 retweetledi
Shai Wininger
Shai Wininger@shai_wininger·
LoCo, @Lemonade_Inc's insurance OS, is great for humans, but it's practically heaven for (ai) agents. More on this at Investor Day...
English
16
14
297
16.6K
1treetree7 retweetledi
Shanky
Shanky@shankky_·
This is one of the LinkedIn posts of all time, but also cool $LMND
Shanky tweet mediaShanky tweet media
English
1
4
59
6.4K
1treetree7 retweetledi
Tesla Manufacturing
Tesla Manufacturing@gigafactories·
750,000 cars built at Giga Berlin. Here’s what it takes.
English
657
1.7K
14.5K
55.4M
1treetree7 retweetledi
André Thierig
André Thierig@AndrThie·
Today, we announced a $ 250m investment for our Giga Berlin Cell factory. This will enable 18GWh of annual 4680 cell production and create more than 1500 new jobs. Good news during challenging times for the German industry.
André Thierig tweet media
English
192
653
6.3K
283.7K
1treetree7 retweetledi
Wes
Wes@wmorrill3·
Every one of these dots is an actual crash from the fleet. Real world speeds, collisions, and people. Not just the regulatory test cases. The richness of this data is what enabled the result. With simulation we can replay the crashes and measure the forces on the human body model. Then sweep through restraint deployment times to find that deploying earlier gives the time for the bag to be inflated optimally and seat belt pretension before the occupant has moved out of position. But it takes time for crash accelerometers to be certain. Lowering that time threshold risks unwanted deployments. Using vision gives the vehicle confidence to reduce that timing. The camera sees the impending impact and together with the sensors tell the restraint controller to reduce the filter and act sooner. The Y Axis shift in Predicted Injury Severity is based on sensors in the human body models from rerunning the crash simulations with the faster detection threshold. Such a reduction in injury severity across the spectrum is unheard of, let alone doing this via an update over the air. I'm extremely proud of the analysis team's work and dedication. Going above and beyond to ask "we have the safest car on the road but can we make it even safer?" And then working with the vision team to build the predictions needed to make it happen. Rigorously tested in simulation and then in physical crash testing. Now deployed and improving lives. I watch the video on loop and just imagine each dot, a person.
Tesla@Tesla

Tesla Vision allows us to deploy airbags up to 70 milliseconds earlier if your Tesla detects an unavoidable collision This can be the difference between serious injury & walking away from a crash

English
385
829
6.1K
16M
1treetree7 retweetledi
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
The human-perceived RGB is image 1 and the Tesla AI photon count reconstruction is image 2. This is why Tesla FSD can see so well at night or through extreme glare.
Elon Musk tweet mediaElon Musk tweet media
English
6.2K
18.5K
212.4K
40M
1treetree7 retweetledi
Rubrik
Rubrik@rubrikInc·
You can’t have one without the other. Without Rubrik Agent Cloud, who knows if your AI agents are operating safely and within approved boundaries. Learn more about unleashing your agents 👉 rbrk.co/4edRdHx
Rubrik tweet media
English
0
1
21
557
1treetree7 retweetledi
Chad Wahlquist
Chad Wahlquist@chadwahl·
If your CEO and Chairman isn’t talking like this on your earnings call, you are going to have a hard time competing against those that do 💪 “Using Palantir's Foundry platform, we expanded our ontology, a digital map of our business that included our underwriting processes, workflows and data relationships. This ontology, coupled with orchestration, will enable us to deploy multiple AI agent teams to integrate with our core systems, which will improve decision-making and reduce costs over time.” Must listen to the whole clip!!!
English
16
63
399
50.5K
1treetree7 retweetledi
Rubrik
Rubrik@rubrikInc·
Google Cloud SQL is one of your most critical workloads in Google Cloud. As your data estate grows, so does the need for cyber resilience. Rubrik now delivers immutable, automated protection for Cloud SQL that works alongside your existing disaster recovery strategy. No trade-offs. Now generally available 👉 rbrk.co/4eOSUva
Rubrik tweet media
English
0
2
24
761
1treetree7 retweetledi
Paper Bag Investor
Paper Bag Investor@PaperBagInvest·
$LMND 🍋 Q1 2026 Earnings are Up! Here is the Letter to Shareholders: lemonade.com/investor-relat… I will be posting analysis here in this thread as well as doing a video this morning on it.
Paper Bag Investor tweet media
English
7
17
182
33.4K
1treetree7 retweetledi
Rose Celine Investments 🌹
Rose Celine Investments 🌹@realroseceline·
Yes $TSLA FCF is going negative but context matters. There’s a difference between a business burning cash because it has to and a business choosing to deploy cash into potential high return opportunities. With $TSLA, you have to put all the cards on the table. Yes, FCF will go negative, but look at what’s actually happening. They are investing in dojo, robotaxi, robotics, semi, and scaling energy simultaneously. That’s not maintenance capex, that’s building entirely new unprecedented businesses at the same time. Auto and energy are already generating significant cash and effectively funding a large portion of this. This isn’t a company that needs outside capital to execute. It’s largely self funding its own expansion and $TSLA has $45b cash on its balance sheet, plenty of liquidity. What looks like capex today is really $TSLA buying a portfolio of call options on multiple massive markets. If even a few of these succeed the payoff is asymmetric. We’ve seen this before with $NFLX, $AMZN, etc during heavy investment cycles, the numbers looked really bad, but that was exactly when the foundation for the next phase was being built. Negative FCF doesn’t tell you if a business is getting weaker or stronger. It just tells you cash is leaving. What matters is where that cash is going! The real risk isn’t that $TSLA invests too much. The real risk is misreading investment as deterioration and missing what it’s becoming. And at the end of the day, you’re not just analyzing a number, you’re deciding who you trust to allocate your capital. With $TSLA, you’re effectively reinvesting alongside Elon, who has consistently shown a willingness to reinvest aggressively and think in decades, not quarters. Historically, that approach has created enormous value for shareholders, myself included. The real risk isn’t that $TSLA invests too much. The real risk is misreading investment as deterioration and missing what it’s becoming. 🌹
Fiscal.ai@fiscal_ai

Tesla expects to nearly triple CapEx this year. What will Free Cash Flow look like in 2026 for Tesla? $TSLA

English
31
20
201
24.4K
1treetree7 retweetledi
Rubrik
Rubrik@rubrikInc·
Everyone is talking about Mythos and the race to patch AI-discovered zero-days. But while we build higher walls, attackers are walking through the front door. Here’s why your recovery strategy, not your patch window, is your only real defense 👉 go.rbrk.co/i324bdp7
Rubrik tweet media
English
0
1
13
474
1treetree7 retweetledi
Rubrik
Rubrik@rubrikInc·
Microsoft Copilot and Copilot Studio promise productivity gains through Agentic AI, but how useful is it if your #M365 data isn’t safe? Discover how Rubrik Agent Cloud delivers real-time policy enforcement and Agent Rewind capabilities directly to your Copilot environment 👉 go.rbrk.co/4t5i6h
English
1
1
17
755
1treetree7 retweetledi
Rubrik
Rubrik@rubrikInc·
From malware hidden in a backup tool to 100,000 snapshots scanned in less than 60 seconds. Not bad. Carhartt has bolstered its data resilience with Rubrik, embracing a zero trust mindset and implementing a holistic data security solution that offers peace of mind their brand depends on. Be an un-victim like Carhartt 👉 go.rbrk.co/1riphz3c
GIF
English
1
2
23
581
1treetree7 retweetledi
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
Salesforce co-founder Parker Harris just said the quiet part out loud: "Why should you ever log into Salesforce again?" That's a $41B revenue company telling its own customers their seats are optional. Headless 360 launched at TDX last week. Every Salesforce capability, Sales Cloud, Service Cloud, Data 360, Slack, all of it, exposed as APIs, MCP tools, and CLI commands. 60 new MCP tools. 30 coding skills that drop straight into Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and Windsurf. Agentforce Vibes 2.0 ships with multi-model support including Claude Sonnet and GPT-5. Agents render natively inside Slack, Teams, ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, anywhere with MCP. The browser is optional. The Salesforce UI is optional. The Salesforce UI is the thing customers pay $165 a seat per month to access. Now look at what every other apex SaaS CEO is doing this same week. Microsoft is bolting Copilot on top of Office seats and double-charging. ServiceNow is layering Now Assist on top of Pro seats nobody wants to give up. Workday won't even discuss AI pricing on earnings calls. Every other apex SaaS founder is defending the seat model. Benioff just published the API spec for replacing it. The reason is in Salesforce's own field data. Their internal Agentforce instance resolves 84% of support cases with zero human intervention. A sales engineer running 90 enterprise accounts already sees seat counts down 10%. Benioff watched the compression hit from inside the building before the market could price it from outside. Run the unit economics. A CRM rep costs $80K loaded. Replacing them with an agent at $0.10 per Flex Credit action across 5,000 actions per month runs $6K a year. The customer captures $74K in labor savings, Salesforce captures $6K in software, up from the $2K/year that seat used to generate. 3x revenue per "user" if Salesforce can land it, on a TAM measured in compute hours instead of work hours. That's the bet. Take the smaller-but-faster-growing pie before someone else takes it from you. Headless 360 is the wager that Salesforce would rather be the agent runtime every AI calls into than the SaaS the agents bypass. The stock is down 35% because the market hasn't decided whether the pivot is working. $800M Agentforce ARR on a $41.5B base, growing 169% YoY in 18 months. Faster than any product Salesforce has ever launched. The next four quarters tell you whether Benioff was 18 months ahead of every other SaaS CEO or whether he just open-sourced the eulogy for his own business model. Apex founders don't dabble. They re-platform. Benioff already pulled the trigger.
Aakash Gupta tweet mediaAakash Gupta tweet media
English
16
28
249
65.1K
1treetree7 retweetledi
Sawyer Merritt
Sawyer Merritt@SawyerMerritt·
Accelerating the world's transition to sustainable energy is pretty philanthropic. Giving low income/rural or disaster/storm hit areas access to high-speed internet via Starlink is pretty philanthropic. Giving disabled people the ability to control computers & robotic arms with their thoughts is pretty philanthropic. @elonmusk's companies are doing more to improve quality of human life than any "charitable" giving from any other billionaire on that list.
Forbes@Forbes

Elon Musk is the planet’s richest person by far, worth $839 billion as of Forbes’ annual World’s Billionaires list. He also ranks among the least philanthropic billionaires. Sure, Musk has transferred $8.5 billion of Tesla stock to his charitable foundations (1% of his net worth)—but nearly all of it is still sitting there idle. Only an estimated $500 million, or 0.06% of Musk’s vast fortune, has ever been disbursed to those in need. His lack of giving raises a question: What would our billionaires ranking look like if the world’s most generous people had never donated a dollar to charity? forbes.com/sites/mattduro…

English
156
283
2.7K
129.1K