truly retweetledi
truly
13K posts

truly retweetledi

@wealthmoose @Blue22Dave The same people who believe Canada has some of the cheapest gas in the world believe there are 26 people in this country with a strain of hantavirus that can only be spread by close prolonged exposure to someone who has it. STUPID 🤪
English

🚨🇨🇦 Mark Carney: “Canada has some of the cheapest gas in the world.” ⛽
REALITY CHECK 🧮:
🇺🇸 USA — ~$0.95/L equivalent
🇨🇦 Canada — $1.60-$1.80/L
🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia — ~$0.30/L
🇷🇺 Russia — ~$0.50/L
🇲🇽 Mexico — ~$0.95/L
We’re not even close.🙇🏻
The Prime Minister of Canada
just lied to your face.
On camera. 📹🇨🇦
Video : @MelissaLMRogers
#CdnPoli #MarkCarney #GasPrices #CarbonTax #Affordability #Inflation
English

@AmazingZoltan @Martyupnorth So if you put a blue bowl on your head and throw a mop and two dead birds on it you will be heard in parliament. 😂
English
truly retweetledi

@coreyhoganyyc Kindly go fuck yourself. This is still the attitude and opinion of Canadians towards Alberta and Albertans 120 years of eastern exploration of the west.

English

@coreyhoganyyc Nothing says unity like pushing back against the people of Alberta. This isn’t Canadas fight to fight. It’s Alberta’s.
English

@mrsunshinebaby This physician is obviously a good agent for China. They need infants for organs. This is sacrificial.🤢
English

JOHN PODESTA WAS JUST IN TORONTO, INVITED BY MARK CARNEY & THE LIBERALS.
John Podesta is one of the sickest human beings to ever walk the planet.
And I am not even being over dramatic.
The outrage would finish the liberals if Canadians knew about him.
IF YOU GO DOWN THE JOHN PODESTA RABBIT HOLE, YOU WILL NEVER BE THE SAME.
(I strongly caution you - it is disgusting.)

English
truly retweetledi

Today's big bold announcement.
"Canada’s new government is launching a new National Electricity Strategy. This plan will double the capacity of our grid by 2050 and supply clean, reliable, affordable power across the country for decades to come."
No one ever bothers fact-checking these clowns.
Electrification of Canada began in the 1880s, but took off in earnest in the 1930s. There was a huge push in the 1970s, especially in Quebec, BC and Manitoba.
It took over 100 years, and more than a trillion in investment to get it to where it's at. Just maintaining the system is costing in the order of $20-25 billion a year, with all the aging infrastructure.
There's no way we will double our capacity in 24 years.

English

@funtomvids It wasn’t up to government to consult First Nations as the petition was filed by the people of Alberta and not the government.
English

🟥 LOL! 🤦🏻♂️
What a shameless hypocrite Premier Danielle Smith is.
Today an Alberta judge quashed the separatists petition, ruling that the provincial government had a duty to consult with First Nations.
Something EVERY rational person on the planet has long known would happen... 🤷🏻♂️
And then, speaking through both sides of her perfidious mouth 🗣️🗣️, she says that while her government supports Alberta staying in Canada, she will be APPEALING the court decision.
Huh?? 🤔
Man ...they are so desperate to keep the “separatist” grift going, even though they know FULL WELL it will never get anywhere. 😌
It’s GREAT for fund raising you see 💰💰, and for manipulating and influencing hundreds of thousands of gullible Alberta voters.
It’s a political scam.
English

@unfilteredwkels The judge’s ruling will fail in an appeal. Her ruling stating “the government failed to consult with First Nations”, this wasn’t a government led petition this was 300,000 Albertans who did. I wonder if Quebec consulted the First Nations?
English

BREAKING: An Alberta judge has officially quashed the citizen-led independence referendum petition, ruling the government failed to consult with First Nations.
Legally, Elections Alberta cannot count or verify the 300,000+ signatures gathered.
Now, the pressure shifts completely to Premier Danielle Smith. The citizen initiative is dead, but she still has the power to introduce her own government-led question for the October 19th ballot.
What do you think?
Will Danielle Smith step in and put independence to voters anyway? Drop your thoughts below! 👇
English

@RealAndyLeeShow Funny how Quebec never had this much pushback for separation. I wonder why?
English

It’s a hostage situation
zerohedge@zerohedge
CANADA COURT THROWS OUT PETITION FOR ALBERTA INDEPENDENCE VOTE
English

@ItsDeanBlundell @GadSaad Dean, we have politicians running our country who hate Canadians and the Canadian people pay them to shyt on them.
He is a private citizen exercising free speech he can say what he wants.
Maybe hold government more accountable.
English

If you wonder who pays @GadSaad to shit on Canada/Caadians, here you go.
He's a traitor.
Dean Blundell🇨🇦@ItsDeanBlundell
You don't love Canada. You hate Canadians. You tweet about it every day and paint everyone up here with the same bullshit suicidal empathy brush. You spend your days shitting on 40 million people and the freest country in the world because that's what your masters pay you to do. You're nothing but a fucking con artist and a foreign agent. Go fuck yourself, Gad. Truly and deeply. - Canada
English

@AreOhEssEyeEe I think this judge just made the case for an independent Alberta.
English
truly retweetledi

Today’s ruling by Justice Leonard essentially found that the citizen-led independence petition process cannot proceed because the government did not fulfill certain constitutional responsibilities owed to First Nations.
But here is the important point: the Alberta government did not initiate this petition process. Citizens did, through a lawful statutory mechanism created by the Legislature itself. So how does a court conclude that the government failed to fulfill duties that had not yet even arisen or been carried out, particularly when the government itself had not initiated the referendum process?
It is also important to understand that the Alberta government has always had the ability to call a referendum on independence at any time if it chose to do so. That is not in dispute, and it was not the legal question before the Court in this case. Nothing in today’s ruling prevents the Alberta government from calling the very same referendum itself tomorrow.
So think about that carefully.
A citizen-led democratic process established by law is effectively halted, not because citizens failed to follow the legislated process, but because of obligations assigned to government itself. Yet the government retains the full ability to ask the same question directly.
Courts and those in government must always have regard to the overall interests of justice, including democratic participation, the integrity of legislated statutory processes, and public confidence in lawful democratic frameworks established by the Legislature.
I figured it would be appropriate to reflect on a few words from the Supreme Court of Canada:
“…liberal democracy demands the free expression of political opinion” and political speech lies at the core of the Charter’s guarantee of freedom of expression. The Court further affirmed that freedom of expression includes “the right to attempt to persuade through peaceful interchange.” — Harper v. Canada
The Supreme Court of Canada has also held that:
“…the right of each citizen to participate in the political life of the country is one that is of fundamental importance in a free and democratic society.” — Figueroa v. Canada
And in the Reference re Secession of Quebec, the Supreme Court of Canada recognized that democracy is grounded in the participation and democratic will of the people, and that a clear expression of the will of citizens carries constitutional and political significance that cannot simply be ignored. Specifically, the Court confirmed:
“The democratic principle identified above would demand that considerable weight be given to a clear expression by the people of Quebec of their will to secede from Canada…” — Reference re Secession of Quebec
So how does any of this truly reconcile with a situation where government itself can ask citizens a question through a referendum process, but a group of citizens following a lawful statutory process established by the Legislature is not permitted to ask the question?
What message does that send when citizens engage in lawful democratic participation, comply with the very process created by government, and yet their voices are disregarded or treated as something to be feared?
Democracy is not strengthened when lawful citizen participation is restrained or silenced. In this case, it was not government stopping the process, but the Court. That reality raises profound questions about the role institutions play in democratic participation and how citizen engagement is treated when it touches controversial political issues.
After all, citizens do not hold institutional power. Their power is their voice. And if even that voice can be restrained after citizens lawfully engage in the exact democratic process created for them, what meaningful role are citizens truly left with in shaping the political future of their province and country?
What do you think? Should lawful citizen participation be encouraged, even when institutions disagree with the message?


English

Oh look... The same guy that pushed Covid vaccines is now magically a passenger on the Hantavirus cruise ship.
AND if that wasn't enough, he is also an intern at the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs. 🙄
Isaac’s Army@ReturnOfKappy
The same man who aggressively pushed the COVID vaccines is now the one standing on the hantavirus cruise ship… Reading from a script..? Oh… and he did an internship in Jerusalem… Same players…. Different virus…. You still think it’s random…?
English
truly retweetledi











