DressedSalad

@basedganyu Not even coffee dates, lol. How about you stay alone then. Annoying, is the first date. They want that expensive date so bad

"I want to go on a date" Ok where "No you have to plan it, otherwise you're a cuck" Oh ok, well- "Also, we're not allowed to go anywhere or do anything, I have a very specific idea of a perfect date and if you get any aspect of it wrong, I'm ghosting you" ....

@denpafish All day just for $100 not doubt

would u lick someone’s feet for $100

@radiosylent_vt Yeah, best to approach this now is as a anti censorship theme. Cause there is still much in the gray about why and who this person is. If it is just drawings is fine but about the person in question we have to wait for more info if any by the uk.

I still think this changes nothing Yeah, the drawings are weirder, but same can said for other art I extremely dislike. I will still defend freedom of expression, no matter how weird it is. Either all of it is okay or none of it is Unless there is real proof, I will stand firm

@MizutamariVT And even if I dislike that Mimi was a man despite never really interacting with "her". All this switch up is because of that, she was a man so all the cute art of a pink girl now is "fat pedo"

@MizutamariVT Yep, lot of it is art. Art that could be seen as extreme but still shouldn't be a thing to allow to be censor. And the closest mention to it was that lazy town drawing that wasn't a dorect implication. This is a dox used to stir hate than waiting for the charges and trial

So it seems the main driving force for the shift on Mimi is this thread by proctor which basically just lies about everything found in the KF thread. The most damning (and only one that really matters) is an allegation that Mimi was liking tons of art depicting a real life girl who played the main character on Lazy Town. In reality the actual allegation is that they followed an artist who, exactly one time, drew that. It's also worth noting the thread contains two allegations mixed in together. Artists Mimi followed and art Mimi actually pressed like or save on. ALL of the most objectionable art WAS NOT in Mimi's likes, they were simply other pieces people found by digging through the artists profile. Now, here's the rub, if Mimi actually is a pedo, that's fucked and they need to be in a facility, a mental health facility. But that doesn't change that all of the art is just that, art is fictional characters who aren't real and don't resemble real people. If you truly value free speech, the idea an evil person has free speech too shouldn't get you to turn on your principles. I would also be remiss if I didn't mention proctor has a long history of exaggerating claims about lolicons to try and justify his hatred of them. This same guy tells everyone who will listen that I'm a pedo for making a thread fully explaining the history behind Minus8 and his famous disapprence. He then started slandering anyone who talked to me as a pedophile defender. This guy will say literally anything to try and get one over on a lolicon and anything he says must be taken with the entire salt shaker. x.com/ProctorZ/statu…

Just don't let censorship of the worst gets you to agree and open the door for the mild stuff

Irl stuff are despise by some lolicon over here. You can make the separation on morality and being legal or not. There is for sure more to the story and he is on bail so we don't know why if it was bad stuff or just very criminal fetish drawing that UK did not like

I understand the dissappointment in finding the little girl was actually a man, we have lost the old scripts with the vtuber stuff, and him being such a gooner. If he was found by cops there are too options, his internation purchase got looked into and it was based on the art

@junoluvbone They are pretty

So m-mean to.. m..meee … cums

@tunafan68 I stil haven't found this zone. The map is a bit too dark

Bro I just wanted to drive a mini cooper, how'd it come to this....

@GrimmiVT No way that water was just liquid

We drank this and opened it after.

@lolyomie1 Without* socks 😭

@lolyomie1 With socks is the trick. Still, neat cosplay

no one will care about my azula cosplay so i’m posting it on this account as an excuse to why it will have no likes

@furuunya Double cord, well fed as a baby

fun fact: i have 2 belly buttons

@AI_EmeraldApple Is disgusting at best. But is still a digital drawing, more than that is not rare that police can investigate if there are any type lf download that are illegal so is a different topic to just comments on sick fiction

@AI_EmeraldApple This is a lot of new info wow. But i would agree if its on the art that was public as commission it is still going to the easy catch before devolving into the more light ones. There is a lot of those type of people on different forums, what they type to the art is -

Mimi Yanagi update... and an unpopular take. Various people have been dropping evidence on Kiwifarms, Reddit, The Virtual Asylum, and here on X of disturbing new information. The person was not an artist or a VTuber in the normal sense, but was a transgender communist by the name of Jordan Williams. The person commissioned art from various artists on FurAffinity, Pixiv, Baraag, Deviant Art, and VGen. Specifically, Jordan paid Imeoowto about $200 to make the rigged Vtuber model. Jordan was the client and not the creator of these artworks and drawings. Most of the artists he commissioned from are unnamed or anonymous... not tied to any known artist. The drawings contained extreme fe****es, and themes... like b******ity, multi p********tion, ga******gs, depicting this character and others in every combination of these disgusting scenarios possible. Is it gross? Yes. Is it offensive? Yes. Is it obscene? Yes. Is it evil? Yes. It's something I'd rather not see or be exposed to. Based on what is uncovered so far, no real children, no photos, no actual victims, no real animals, just illustrations. The worst one is the LazyTown Stephanie art, which is based on an animated character design and not from the actual child actress. Any association with real children appears to be a misattribution to artists who did "shadman" style art, and no actual real children were involved in the production of the materials. If that changes ill update it, but so far I don't see anything connected to real victims. That said, the person is likely to be a real pedophile, someone who is attracted to real children, by his saying it's a sub for CSAM and by the evidence uncovered. But "likely" is not a criminally prosecutable bar that holds up in court unless you are in the UK. This kind of "art" is perfectly legal in Japan, and one would assume, because of that, child SA must be rampant. The UK claims that these kinds of materials can normalize pedophilic ideation and be used in grooming, but without any backing based on real data. Instead, Japan is one of the safest countries in the world, while the UK is one of the least safe, where sex crimes are anywhere from 10x to over 50x Japan's rate. Here is the unpopular take... Based on the UK's law, I knew to some extent that this was likely the nature of the artwork in question. They don't arrest you for just the run-of-the-mill lolicon illustration. Despite all that, it is still a waste of money, time, and effort... all a symbolic effort to protect the kids, while the actual victims in the UK, being r***ed, get ignored. Even if it's absolutely disgusting, it is still in the 'thought crime' category, and it's a slippery slope. It's this kind of issue that is why the UK is in the quandary it is right now with hate speech laws, online monitoring of speech, and the Online Safety Act. Places like the US are more resilient when it comes to offensive political speech because the law in the states clearly distinguishes between fiction and reality. The US's First Amendment was crafted precisely because of the UK's tendency towards tyrannical framing of opinions and political speech. We shouldn't decide what is allowed and not allowed based on disgust, because if that becomes normalized, the First Amendment is no more.