Alleck Ollpheist

Y'all go ahead and have your race wars. Fight over which demon you consider best. Celebrate your flesh and let doctrines of devils soothe your itching ears. Jesus is Lord. To the j€w$ & pagans, I declare as Joshua declared that fateful day:

@FaceLikeTheSun @WeazyCough God says "us" because he's referring to the Godhead - body (Lord Jesus aka the voice aka the Word), the spirit (Holy Spirit aka Holy Ghost aka Comforter), the soul (God). Together HE is the Godhead. Man is made in His image. We simply can't commune with our own spirit or soul.

@WeazyCough If you study the work of Dr. Michael Heiser, you’d know that redeemed humans are brought into God’s council to share rule, effectively displacing the authority of rebellious divine beings. So there’s actually some precedent to the concept

Hear me out ⌛️ The Watchers (sons of God in Genesis 6) are humans from the future The thesis goes that the reason why they're called "sons of God" is because they are the ones who decided to rebel AFTER humans are fully restored to the divine council In other words, the Watchers are people with eternal life that all believers are awaiting, with eternal bodies (1 Corinthians 15) They travel BACK IN TIME to the days of Noah (leave their own domain, Jude 1:6), and lust after the daughters of Adam (because they are more genetically pure or closer to the source of mankind) They teach mankind all the things mentioned in 1 Enoch and reflected in Genesis 4 with the line of Cain; the main tenets of civilization like metal working for war, cutting of the root for psychedelics, makeup for women, abortion, etc. The New Testament references to these angels that sinned, who did not stay in their proper domain (Jude 1:6, 2 Peter 2:4), are said to be imprisoned in chains of darkness until judgment So how would that work? It could be that God permits a kind of closed temporal loop for entities that disrupt His created order! Follow the line of thought: If the angels who sinned (the Watchers, the sons of God) are imprisoned after the events described in the Book of Genesis 6, yet are also spoken of as being released for a future judgment (Jude 1:6; 2 Peter 2:4), then it is possible to frame that “judgment” not merely as a future endpoint, but as the very event of Genesis 6 itself. In that sense, the rebellion happens once, but its point of origin lies outside the human timeline as we perceive it. From our linear perspective, it appears in ancient history. From their perspective, it originates in a future state, perhaps within a post-restored humanity. This would mean the event is not repeated, but contained in a single transgression anchored in history, yet sourced from beyond it. This could be why God declares Himself to be the Alpha and Omega. These Scriptures hit a little differently when you think about this possibility... Revelation 1:8 “I am the Alpha and the Omega…who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty.” Isaiah 44:6 “I am the first and I am the last; besides me there is no god.” I recall this conversation around 2010-2011, when I first started making content around these topics. I'm sure someone has written on it before. Stay Watchful ✝️

Infected tooth? Can't make the dentist yet? 2 drops oil of oregano 8 oz water, warm Bit of salt Mix until salt dissolves Swish and spit. I know it's going to suck at first. Keep doing it. And then do it some more. Eventually that raging pain will become a dull roar.

@SammyObeid So, the fellow classmate judge glazer went easy on? Turned out to be a repeat offender and was right back in court for the same nonsense.

A Florida student is facing up to 15 years in jail for a Netanyahu joke, so here’s 20 more Netanyahu jokes

@WallStreetApes Never forget - Arizona PD gunned down Milton William Cooper in his driveway - author of B3h0ld 4 P4l3 H0r53. Archived report. Make of it what you will. archive.org/stream/Arizona…

Phoenix Arizona Police Department police-cam footage catches a conversation indicating they have DUI quotas They even talk about framing Americans with DUIs to meet their quotas Officer conversation “They're gonna kick me off squad if I don't get a DUI, but I'm like, I can't just conjure one up. I have tried.” Then there is footage of a woman who passed breathalyzer with all zeros, she passed field sobriety tests, camera footage catches the officer saying they don’t believe she’s under the influence, and then they arrest her for a DUI anyway The woman was pulled over for running a red light, the footage shows it was green Arizona police are pulling over law abiding Americans and charging them with DUIs to meet their quotas (Real police footage shown that proves all claims)

youtu.be/k8kc1_-cj6w?t=… Best way to remove the broom is to start by breaking the hands of the sweeper.

@Aku_700 youtu.be/k8kc1_-cj6w?t=… Best way to remove the broom is to start by breaking the hands of the sweeper.

🚨 HORRIFYING: "HELP ME! PLEASE HELP ME! THEY ARE GOING TO RAPE ME!" 15-year-old British girl screams for help as two Muslim men drag her away to rape her in Leamington Spa park. She recorded the entire attack on her phone. The Muslim attackers were Afghan asylum seekers. Lawyers warned: "If the footage is released, there would be riots across the country."

@KnightRider1223 @RickD_GK ADL openly bragged about how they train United States officers every year - 20,000 a year. They're not just govt lackies; they're the golem for the k¡k3$.

@RickD_GK Americans dislike police because police are majority government lackies, not protectors of citizens.

He was at a town hall or board meeting previously, and was threatened by the Board members, and bullied a little by Law enforcement. The next meeting, he brought around 200 other "masculine" men, and called them all out. He's right tho. Nothing they can do if we stand together. This is the only way we will be able to start fixing all of the problems in our world. UNITY

@NateTalksToYou Here is an exhaustive list of things conservatives have conserved: -massive wealth for seniors -massive wealth for Jews *end of list*

@Cdnbuddyguy @BeNice2MeProd x.com/53616c74/statu…

@BeNice2MeProd Wait a minute…. Is there a possible connection? x.com/cdnbuddyguy/st…

Doing costume research for Extreme Peace season 2 & came across this episode of PowerRangers where Lord Zedd marries Rita Repulsa. There's some interesting music playing at their wedding reception😂Keep in mind Zedd is the Emperor of Evil. The most evil being in the universe lol

@BeNice2MeProd What are the henchmen again? Oh that's right putty patrol. The villainess was literally summoning golems to do her bidding.

@freedivevault @libsoftiktok You're no better than Eve - putting words into God's mouth. That's why she was deceived. Best to stay silent and consult your husband when it comes to scripture, assuming you're married and he's saved. 1 Timothy 2 covers everything I've stated.

@libsoftiktok so now they're concerned abotu kids being around gays but the bible says sodom and gomorrah were destroyed for violence and greed not just gay stuff

Israel’s massive lgbtq pride festival on the ruins of Sodom and Gomorrah is also having a “family friendly” area with children’s activities. Demonic as hell

“But even if we or an angel [e.g., Mormonism’s ‘Moroni’, Islam’s ‘Gabriel’] from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed. As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed.” Mormonism and Islam both damn, and both are anti-Christian and cannot be tolerated. Joseph Smith and Muhammad are both in Hell.

@resisfertile 1 Timothy 5:8 (KJV): "But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel." What do they think this is talking about. This verse will judge them on the last day.

@resisfertile They are worse than unbelievers

The fact this needs said is such a shame to modern Christians and churches. The entire Bible gloriously displays God's goodness in that he never expects his children to pick themselves up by their bootstraps, and there are no "self-made" men in the Scriptures.

@AugustusApollo7 @Devon_Eriksen_ Your ad hominem is a non response. Since you've nothing of structure to add, I'll consider you're either a troll or you thrive on being unnecessarily combative, which is ironic given your stance on this litmus test. Have a day.

@53616c74 @Devon_Eriksen_ Are you retarded or something? Wtf are you on about.

The Mailbox Test, like the breakfast test, is an excellent way to tell who you can allow to wield power in your society. Goes like this: If someone is hurt trying to destroy someone else's stuff in order to take pleasure from their pain, do you sympathize with... The aggressor because he got hurt? Or with the guy who owns the stuff, because he wasn't the aggressor? You can have people in your society who fail the Mailbox Test. That's okay... they can work at hospices, or shelters for orphaned kittens, or something. But you cannot allow them to vote, or otherwise wield political power. Because if you do, they will open the gates of the city to the enemy. I am personally tired of everyone pretending that people who enjoy ruining things for random strangers are just kewt smol beans who are only aggressive because of all the complex socioeconomic factors and lack of resources. They knew someone would be hurt by what they did. They knew that someone had done literally nothing harmful to them. And those two ideas, in combination made them feel pleasure. And they went and did it. That is the sign of a rotten soul. Defending ourselves and our property is not just a right, it's a moral obligation. Otherwise, we just kick the can down the road for someone else to deal with, someone who may not be able to defend herself. I don't care if a vandal breaks his arms trying to destroy my stuff. Because I value my stuff more than a vandal's arms. And the fact that he tried to destroy somebody else's stuff shows that he, too, values his arms less than the opportunity to hurt somebody. We cannot allow such people inside the city, and we cannot give the keys to those who would open the gates for them.

Onboarding orientation. Who's leading it? A -stein. How are they literally everywhere for only being 2%?

@AugustusApollo7 @Devon_Eriksen_ A thief seeks to steal and by proxy kill and destroy. If it's no big deal, give away your money one bit at a time. Leave your windows and doors not just unlocked but open. Or choose to fortify that which is yours, and the thief shall suffer natural consequences of actions.

@53616c74 @Devon_Eriksen_ Breaking into someone’s home is entirely different than petty vandalism typically done by teens in rural areas. Midwit comparison.

It’s never been more obvious ITS THE jews Hate communism? Thats jews Hate that the Epstein files aren’t released? That’s jews Hate feminism and porn? That’s jews Hate Israel genociding people? That’s jews Hate the corruption of the GOP? That’s jews Hate the corruptions of Dems? That’s jews Hate the trashy goyslop in Hollywood? That’s jews Hate insane bank loans/usury? That’s jews Hate being told you’re worthless because you’re White? That’s jews Hate blacks being here and commiting violence on our communities? Thats jews Hate the the LGBTQ cult? That’s jews Hate abortion? That’s jews Hate what happened on 9/11? That’s jews Hate degenerate music becoming mainstream? Thats jews Wake the fuck up people

@Anarseldain I like to think these words directly from Lord Jesus Himself speak loud and clear, but then a cück like "blessed salt" comes along and surprises me.

The fact that someone is an aggressor justifies a disproportionate use of force against them, on account of the nature of their act, which is itself an escalation. 90% of internet “Christian morality” is just people who want martyrdom and can’t attain it. Masochism, all. If someone is aggressing against you by destroying your mailbox for absolutely no reason, then you would be morally justified using some kind of device which would total their car beyond all use, and which may cause permanent, life-changing injury, simply by virtue of the fact that you are the innocent party. In discussions of maintaining law in a society which is at existential threat, at every moment of every day, mentions of “morality” are quaint at best, and we all know it. “Only between equals in power do rights enter into the discussion,” “peace goes unmolested only for fear of strength,” and so on. But let us now entertain the moral quandary for a moment. The matter should be *obvious* even on a philosophical level: by virtue of the fact that you are an innocent victim, the “immoral” action taken against you is far more severe than whatever “moral” infringement the act itself carries. Talking about “justice” requires that the additional, or aggravating “evil” of harm to an innocent party receives additional (and steep) retribution. You are absolutely justified to use, for example, hidden spikes, to flatten the tires of someone who runs over a Trump sign. You would in fact be justified to use a land mine to do so, provided that you could be certain that it wouldn’t kill some neighbourhood kid by accident – because they are not only extra evil for being a libtard (and make no mistake, libtards are genuinely evil people), but because they are aggressing against the innocent, even if in a minor way. Seeing as mailboxes are fundamental utilities that could meaningfully impact the course of your life, I’m guessing you can estimate my view. And, in addition, severer the retribution, the more wholly you fulfill your moral duty to prevent future victims. If someone breaks into your house with a baseball bat and threatens to break your legs, you are unequivocally “morally” justified in escalating to immediate and unhesitating use of lethal force. In fact, that would be the case if the person simply threatened to punch you, because their aggressing against you, and infringing on your ability to be a sovereign within your own home, is such a heinous act unto itself. In all of these cases, restricting yourself and showing mercy is an additional charity beyond what is owed. You could even praise someone for doing so (though in the majority of cases it is not in fact an extension of charity, but merely a manifestation of cowardice, and therefore deserves rebuke rather than commendation), but you are in fact acting “immorally” by trying to impose it on them as a duty, given that it would not otherwise be, and they have no “moral” imperative to do so. It would be akin to demanding that, on top of tithing, a man charitably donates an extra 10% of his income to, say, the Boy Scouts; an act which, though commendable (if the Boy Scouts hadn’t become libtarded), is far beyond his duty, and is an unreasonable act of giving out of true generosity, and therefore cannot be “morally” made mandatory. You are now not only a civilisation-destroying force, a rot, in your disregard for human and societal rights, all out of a need to serve your own masochism, but also a tyrant. But, if we’re to be honest, you’re just virtue-signaling and wish that you could paint yourself as a righteous victim. It’s a martyrdom-desire complex rather than a martyrdom complex. By the way, Medieval Christians executed so many people for petty thievery that it removed 1% of each generation from the gene pool and created prosperous societies of future-consequence-understanders the likes of which had not been seen since the rigorous breeding and eugenics of the ancient Hellenes. You’re just a coward.