15ubic

1.5K posts

15ubic banner
15ubic

15ubic

@5ubic

$QUBIC

Aussie Katılım Ocak 2018
20 Takip Edilen1K Takipçiler
15ubic
15ubic@5ubic·
@HORNDOG91 @_Qubic_ It's still in test phase buddy. Using only a fraction of the power to iron things out. This was exactly how monero started, negligible hash rate until it actually went live.
English
0
0
0
11
cracker
cracker@HORNDOG91·
@_Qubic_ But 2.8ths is like 1/1000 of the network its bad and it hasn't grown
English
2
0
0
216
Qubic
Qubic@_Qubic_·
Qubic’s DOGE mining dashboards are fully public. But most people don’t know what they’re looking at. Quick breakdown: Hashrate → Combined Scrypt power across all connected ASICs. Watch trends over days, not minutes. Sudden drops signal disconnections. Acceptance Rate → The key efficiency metric. Above 95% is healthy.  Dispatcher Status → The bridge between Qubic and Dogecoin networks. If it’s offline, nothing flows. Look for “online” + stable uptime. Blocks Found → Each one earns 10,000 DOGE. The log shows how frequently the network discovers blocks, which correlates with hashrate growth. Solution Queue + Stratum Queue → Both should sit at zero. Growing queues mean bottlenecks or stale shares. Every metric is transparent. Every block is verifiable.
English
29
130
598
28.8K
Lian Lim | Dashboard & AI Automation Expert
I've created a full guide on how to design anything with Claude Design You also get exact copy-paste prompts for interactive immersive websites, animated pitch decks, app mockups, social banners, infographics, and pricing pages Grab it FREE Like + Comment "CLAUDE DESIGN" and I'll DM you the full guide No opt-in, no BS
Lian Lim | Dashboard & AI Automation Expert tweet media
English
4K
342
5.2K
304.1K
15ubic
15ubic@5ubic·
@Ric_RTP guy posted this using GPT written words.
English
0
0
1
76
Ricardo
Ricardo@Ric_RTP·
The man who INVENTED modern AI just made a billion dollar bet that ChatGPT, Claude, and every AI company on earth is building the wrong technology. Yann LeCun won the Turing Award in 2018 for creating the neural networks that made AI possible. He spent a decade running AI research at Meta. Oversaw the creation of Llama and PyTorch, the tools that half the AI industry runs on. Then he quit. And raised $1.03 billion in a seed round. The LARGEST seed round in European history. $3.5 billion valuation before generating a single dollar of revenue. Bezos wrote the check. So did Nvidia. Samsung. Toyota. Temasek. Eric Schmidt. Mark Cuban. Tim Berners-Lee (the guy who invented the internet). His new company is called AMI Labs. And it's built on one thesis: Every AI company spending billions on large language models is wasting their money. ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok. They all work the same way. They predict the next word in a sequence. See "the cat sat on the" and predict "mat." Scale that to trillions of words and you get something that sounds intelligent. But LeCun says it doesn't UNDERSTAND anything. It can't reason. It can't plan. It can't predict what happens when you push a glass off a table. A two year old can do that. GPT-5 cannot. That's why AI hallucinates. It doesn't have a model of how the world actually works. It just predicts words. His solution? Something called JEPA. Instead of predicting words, it learns how the PHYSICAL WORLD works. Abstract representations of reality. Not language but physics. Think about what that means. Current AI can write your emails. LeCun's AI could design a car, run a factory, operate a robot, or diagnose a patient without hallucinating and killing someone. The CEO of AMI said it perfectly: "Factories, hospitals, and robots need AI that grasps reality. Predicting tokens doesn't cut it." And here's what's really crazy to me... LeCun isn't some outsider throwing rocks. He literally built the foundations that ChatGPT runs on. He knows exactly how these systems work because he helped create them. And after watching the entire industry sprint in one direction for three years, he raised a billion dollars to run the OPPOSITE way. No product. No revenue. No timeline. Just pure research. He told investors it could take YEARS to produce anything commercial. But they funded it anyway in just four months. Meanwhile OpenAI just raised $120 billion and still can't stop their models from making things up. Anthropic is building AI so dangerous they're afraid to release it. Google is burning billions trying to catch up. And the guy who started it all says they're all solving the wrong problem. Two Turing Award winners raised $2 billion in three weeks betting AGAINST the entire LLM approach. LeCun at AMI. Fei-Fei Li at World Labs. The smartest people in AI are quietly building the exit from the technology everyone else is betting their future on. Either they're wrong and the trillion dollar LLM industry keeps printing. Or they're right and every AI company on earth just built on a foundation that's about to crack.
English
452
1.5K
4.9K
597.5K
15ubic
15ubic@5ubic·
@bored2boar BS. All those signals does not work on a 5 minute time frame. 5 minutes is a flip of a coin
English
0
0
0
80
Oracle Boar
Oracle Boar@bored2boar·
I interviewed the dev of the best Polymarket bot His bot trades BTC Up/Down markets automatically 24/7 Result? +$650k each month passively Here're the tips he gave me on how to create the same bot: First thing: stop trying to predict Better build a system that reacts. His bot doesn’t guess tops or bottoms, but waits for confluence. Core stack: • EMA (defines trend: filters chop) • VWAP (shows fair value: avoid bad entries) • OBV (confirms money flow: no volume = no trade) • RSI (detects extremes: don’t buy highs or sell lows) • MACD (confirms momentum) Then he adds a volatility filter. Most bots die because they trade in dead or chaotic markets. His doesn’t. Risk model is everything: • fixed % per trade • no overtrading • strict cooldown after losses And the real edge: the bot trades only when 3-4 signals align at once No signal = no trade. His wallet address: @0x8dxd?r=boredboar#E6lZo63" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">polymarket.com/@0x8dxd?r=bore… It’s not about being right more often. It’s about only playing when odds are clearly in your favor. That’s how you turn a bot from a toy into a machine.
Punisher@0x_Punisher

x.com/i/article/2038…

English
22
14
199
40.1K
15ubic
15ubic@5ubic·
@cryptopunk7213 Stupid. Apple is barely an enterprise level API user of those Ai models. Apple is at the mercy of those models, can never be the best, it's only as good as any of those models.
English
0
0
0
94
Ejaaz
Ejaaz@cryptopunk7213·
lmfao fucking genius move by Apple. Siri now becomes the #1 AI model without ever running its own model or spending a dollar on training 😂 let me explain: - Claude, chatgpt, gemini can now plug into Siri’s 2.5 billion users - so Siri becomes the default interface for AI chatbots = gets ALL the credit - Apple will likely tax 30% of all chatgpt, claude subs via appstore = more $$$$$ - Apple becomes the distribution layer for everyone else’s AI. taxes the app layer - oh and apple STILL HAS ACCESS to gemini’s model weights to build their own fucking foundation model 😂 silver lining for anthropic: they’ve been behind in consumer users - now apple gives them access to 2.5B of them 👍🏽👍🏽 the AI economy will run on ios and apple and they barely lifted a finger to do it genius
Ejaaz tweet media
Mark Gurman@markgurman

BREAKING: Apple is planning to open up Siri to run any AI service via their App Store apps as part of iOS 27, dropping ChatGPT as the exclusive outside partner in Apple Intelligence and Siri. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…

English
442
409
6.1K
1.5M
15ubic
15ubic@5ubic·
@gnoble79 Imagine thinking tesla is a car company.
English
0
0
0
23
George Noble
George Noble@gnoble79·
Tesla is a $1.3 trillion company that sold fewer cars this year than last year. And fewer last year than the year before. That should tell you everything you need to know. 2 consecutive years of declining deliveries. Down 9% in 2025 to 1.63 million vehicles. The steepest annual drop in the company's history. And 2026 is starting even worse - US sales down 17% in January, Europe down 44% across major markets. France down 42%. Netherlands down 67%. Norway down 88%. BYD passed them as the global EV leader. In the UK, BYD outsold Tesla 2 to 1 last month. The brand is in FREEFALL. Brand Finance measured a 36% collapse in Tesla's brand value last year - down to $27.6 billion, less than half its 2023 peak. In California, their most important US market, share dropped from 11.6% to 9.9%. And the stock trades at 365 times trailing earnings. Let me say that differently: Tesla earned $3.8 billion last year. The market is valuing those earnings at $1.3 trillion. You are paying $365 for every dollar this company earns. The bull case has completely abandoned the car business. It's all robotaxis and Optimus robots now. They discontinued the Model S and Model X. They told investors on the last earnings call to stop focusing on vehicle deliveries and start thinking about "transportation as a service." So in other words: please ignore the business we actually have and value us on the business we MIGHT have someday. Trust me, every time management tells you to look over there instead of over here... LOOK OVER HERE. The car business is deteriorating. Margins are compressing. Competition from BYD, Volkswagen, and a dozen Chinese manufacturers is intensifying quarter by quarter. The $7,500 federal EV tax credit is gone, which effectively raised the price of every Tesla overnight. And instead of addressing any of that, they're doubling capex to $20 billion this year - almost entirely directed at AI and autonomous driving infrastructure. So you have a company with shrinking revenue, shrinking deliveries, a damaged brand, and intensifying competition pouring $20 billion into a technology that hasn't been proven at commercial scale. On 365 times earnings. Even if you give them the most generous robotaxi assumptions imaginable (full regulatory approval, nationwide deployment, dominant market share) you still can't justify this valuation. The present value of that optionality doesn't come close to $1.3 trillion when the core business is going backwards. I think this stock goes down 90% from here. Not because Tesla is worthless. They'll sell cars. The energy storage business has potential. But the equity is priced for a future that isn't coming on the timeline the market expects. A $37 stock. That's where the math takes you when you strip out the narrative and price what actually exists. I know that sounds extreme. But 45 years of doing this has taught me something: When you can see the seams on the fastball, you SWING. I can see the seams.
English
821
542
2.7K
527.9K
15ubic
15ubic@5ubic·
@marlowxbt All those arbitrage posts are bullshit. It works, but for 0.01% of people. But I did vibe code a bot to bet the 5 minutes market, ran for 3 days so far.. Looks promising. Started with $500, it's at $1800 today for a 64% win rate.
English
0
0
0
58
Marlow
Marlow@marlowxbt·
Someone bet me $1,000 that nobody actually makes real money on prediction markets. Said it's all fake screenshots and survivorship bias. Show me one person. One wallet. On the blockchain. Making millions. Not a screenshot from Telegram. The actual wallet I can verify myself. I didn't argue. Opened Claude. Typed: Find the most profitable verified wallet on a prediction market. Has to be public. Has to be verifiable. I need to win a $1,000 bet in the next 60 seconds. Claude came back in 7 seconds. Not 60. RN1. $5,648,226 profit. 40,441 predictions. Joined December 2024. 654,000 views. → Wallet: polymarket.com/profile/%40RN1… Handed him my phone. He didn't give it back for 11 minutes. Every line green. Every sport. Tennis. NFL. Bundesliga. Serie A. Counter-Strike. Premier League. All one wallet. He tried to find one losing trade to save the bet. Scrolled for 11 minutes. Then: This is on the blockchain? Anyone can verify? Me: Every trade. Every dollar. Public. Right now. Claude found it in 7 seconds. You can spend 11 minutes checking. He sent me $1,000 on Venmo. Then asked two questions. First: How do I copy this? Second: What did you type into Claude? I showed him the prompt. 19 words. He stared at it longer than he stared at the wallet. He came in thinking prediction markets are fake. Left with a wallet link and a Claude prompt. $5,648,226. Verified by the guy who bet against it. Found by the AI he said was just a chatbot. I won $1,000 from the bet. Claude found me $5.6 million to watch. He's not skeptical anymore. He's copying.
Marlow tweet media
LuvvBank (prediction arc)@LuvvBank

A client sent me a screenshot. $12 invoice from a forgotten API subscription.ё "Should I cancel this?" I told him to check what's actually running first. He called me 20 minutes later. Someone had been using his dormant API key for 4 months. Not to scrape data. Not to spam. To run predictions. The key was connected to a lightweight model wrapper. 11 lines of code. No docs. No comments. Just a loop calling a commodity price API, feeding the output into a scoring function, and logging results to a Google Sheet. I pulled the Sheet link from the config. 4,200 predictions logged. Started November 2025. Accuracy rate: 71.3% Cross-referenced against actual commodity closes. Someone was backtesting a prediction model on his forgotten credentials. $12/month. 4 months. $48 total. The model wasn't connected to any brokerage. No live trades. Just logging. Quietly building a track record. I looked at the last entry timestamp. 3 hours ago. The person running this wasn't stealing. They were building. On someone else's forgotten $12. He asked me if he should shut it down. I told him to read the Sheet first. He hasn't shut it down yet. It's been 6 days. $48 changed how he thinks about what "running a system" actually means.

English
7
4
20
6.6K
15ubic
15ubic@5ubic·
@ncbtrades LOL. calling people retard when you don't even understand the basic tokenmics of qubic.
English
1
0
17
293
Noah | NCBTRADES
Noah | NCBTRADES@ncbtrades·
$Qubic has a supply of 200 trillion. And I hear people talking about swapping $TAO for it? K. Some of you guys are retardmaxxing without the maxing part… You can’t make this shit up. It’s common sense 1/21,000,000 Is significantly better than 1/200,000,000,000,000 wtf are we even talking about rn….
Frost. ױ@_MRImmaculate

@ncbtrades I like Tao. Ima be using AGI on Qubic to trade it when the opportunity presents itself. Huge difference between the except the world yet knows about it

English
30
4
49
14.8K
15ubic
15ubic@5ubic·
@Sashawright_1 Icp runs the internet? Lol.. No one would notice if it disappeared overnight.
English
0
0
3
182
Sasha
Sasha@Sashawright_1·
Three projects. Three very different bets $TAO Decentralized AI networks $QUBIC Large-scale distributed computing $ICP A blockchain that runs the internet itself All three are building for a world that doesn’t exist yet Which one gets there first? $TAO community, $QUBIC community, $ICP community. Make your case. 👀
English
92
33
206
9.7K
15ubic
15ubic@5ubic·
@GemArrow_ @MilkRoad 2 years ago I remember it was around ~93% locked. I was a big fan of $TAO back then, nothing's changed, I still like them, but I switched to $QUBIC.
English
1
0
4
190
Milk Road
Milk Road@MilkRoad·
Some folks are comparing $TAO to Bitcoin 2013 and Ethereum 2016. Before you agree or disagree with that comparison, it's worth understanding what Bittensor actually is. Most AI tokens are just tokens attached to AI products. Bittensor is something structurally different. The basic idea: instead of centralizing AI intelligence at Google or OpenAI, Bittensor tries to decentralize it through a competitive marketplace. Here's how it works: The network is organized into 128 active subnets, each specializing in a specific task. Text generation. Image analysis. Protein folding. Financial modeling. Deepfake detection. Anyone can build a model and plug it into a subnet. Each subnet runs a competition. Models are ranked by objective performance: the quality and usefulness of their output. The best performers earn $TAO tokens. The ones that underperform get nothing. Bittensor calls this "Proof of Intelligence." It's the same basic idea as Proof of Work, except instead of computing arbitrary hashes, nodes are producing actual intelligence that other parts of the network can use. The scarcity model mirrors Bitcoin. In December 2025, Bittensor hit its first halving, cutting daily emissions from 7,200 to 3,600 $TAO. 75% of holders stake their tokens, locking supply further. Is TAO the BTC of AI? That's a bet on whether decentralized AI infrastructure becomes as foundational as decentralized finance. Maybe it does. Maybe the incumbents win instead. But understanding what Bittensor is actually building is the starting point for forming that view.
Sasha@Sashawright_1

Stop comparing $TAO to other AI coins. The real comparison has been obvious all along. TAO in 2026 is similar to ETH in 2016 or BTC in 2013. Early infrastructure. Back then Ethereum wasn’t mooning. It was being built. DeFi, NFTs and the entire onchain economy didn’t even exist yet. The people laughing at ETH holders were the ones who missed the run. Bittensor is a similar kind of bet. Except the resource being decentralized isn’t money or compute. It’s intelligence. Subnets are launching. Incentives are being tested. The network is evolving in real time. Most people are waiting for a signal. The ones who understand infrastructure cycles are already positioned. Five years from now there will be two groups. Those who were early and those who wish they were. #Bittensor $TAO

English
39
102
643
87.1K
15ubic
15ubic@5ubic·
@AvdiuSazan 64Gb ram is too expensive now. I'll probably run a Bob
English
0
0
2
62
15ubic
15ubic@5ubic·
30 minutes? $qubic is instant. What are you using? But judging by your remarks, you've never used crypto and just regurgitating someone else's comment you saw in 2018. When you send money with the bank, they look at it, they don't like what they see, report you to the government and freeze your money for investigation.
English
0
0
2
275
Crémieux
Crémieux@cremieuxrecueil·
Crypto is really useful if you want to wait 30 minutes to make a transaction and have it fail half the time
English
137
8
653
66.8K
15ubic
15ubic@5ubic·
@cz_binance the only platform that can handle this is $qubic - It's fast, $0 fees.
English
0
0
2
20
Sasha
Sasha@Sashawright_1·
You can only pick ONE crypto… and you can’t sell it for 10 years. Which one are you holding? 🚀 • 🤖 $TAO • ⭕️ $RNDR • ⚡ $KAS • 🧠 $QUBIC • 🧬 $ICP • 🤖 $HBAR • 🚀 $SOL • 🌊 $SUI No switching. No selling. What’s your conviction play? 👇
Sasha tweet media
English
431
85
433
31K
ShalomOnKaspa.kas
ShalomOnKaspa.kas@ShalomOnKaspa·
@pumpolinsky 0 Was lucky enough to sell the top when their pedophile founder started bashing KAS to engagement farm.
English
1
0
0
140
Pumpolinsky
Pumpolinsky@pumpolinsky·
🚀 How much $QUBIC are you holding? 👀
Pumpolinsky tweet media
English
43
16
189
6.3K
15ubic
15ubic@5ubic·
@Anondr0id @sol_nxxn lol. it's not flexing sol buddy. It's flexing qubic. Qubic fees will be $0
English
0
0
0
25
₳NØИḎℝØIḎ
₳NØИḎℝØIḎ@Anondr0id·
@sol_nxxn you know you could technically do it on Cardano in a single transaction really cheap. Why isn't it on the list? oh ya, SOL propaganda post.
English
1
0
1
62
nxxn
nxxn@sol_nxxn·
What if you tried to send $1 to every person on Earth? 🤔 Here’s how long it would take and how much it would cost. PS: Just a fun thought experiment. Numbers use average TPS and fees; no system could realistically do this at scale.
nxxn tweet media
English
124
48
459
65.9K
WOLFUN
WOLFUN@wolfungames·
@sol_nxxn Sending $1 to 8B people is clutch chaos tho: even Polygon at $0.01/tx hits $80M fees and Visa-scale TPS. Feels like everyone's waitin' for the global pump that breaks it. What's your take?
English
3
0
2
381
Chuck Shanks
Chuck Shanks@chuck_shanks·
"Evolution spent millions of years building an aerospace navigation system inside a 300 gram animal." ??? so, for millions of years, while the "navigation system" was NOT fully developed and working, how did the birds and their offspring survive to try again? You don't get to keep failing and starting over.
English
7
1
46
6K
The Curious Tales
The Curious Tales@thecurioustales·
🚨 JUST IN: A migratory bird just shattered world records — flying 8,425 miles (13,560 km) NON-STOP across the Pacific without landing once. The bar-tailed godwit doesn’t stop to eat, drink, or sleep during its migration across the Pacific Ocean. Its journey from Alaska to Australia takes roughly 11 days of continuous flight, covering over 13,000 kilometers through storms, headwinds, and open ocean with zero land beneath it the entire time. Before departure, it does something almost surgical to its own body. It shrinks its digestive organs down to almost nothing, converting the stomach, intestines, and liver into raw fuel. The bird essentially eats its own gut to make room for fat reserves that will power its wings for nearly two weeks straight. The brain doesn’t fully sleep either. Half of it stays active while the other half rests, alternating in shifts mid-flight at altitude over the open Pacific. The godwit is simultaneously unconscious and navigating with magnetic field sensitivity that no human instrument in the 18th century could replicate. What makes this genuinely staggering beyond the physical record is the navigational precision involved. The bird leaves Alaska and arrives in New Zealand with accuracy that would embarrass early GPS systems. It reads Earth’s magnetic field, atmospheric pressure gradients, star positions, and potentially quantum-level compass mechanisms inside its eye that literally let it see magnetic field lines overlaid on its visual field. Evolution spent millions of years building an aerospace navigation system inside a 300 gram animal. We spend billions engineering machines that do what this bird does on instinct, fat reserves, and half a sleeping brain. The longest recorded non-stop flight by a commercial aircraft is around 20 hours. This bird does 11 days. Without a runway.
The Curious Tales tweet media
The Curious Tales@thecurioustales

🚨BREAKING: Scientists tracked a bird that flew 8,425 miles (13,560 km) without stopping even once — the longest non-stop flight ever recorded.

English
1.2K
9.6K
35.7K
2.4M