Jake VanDorn
2.4K posts



Never have i seen a “they needed an editor” critique that I agreed with. Go nuts and be totally self indulgent. Probably more interesting that way



















Criterion, how have you managed to do this to Eyes Wide Shut? This should have been a definitive 4K release — a reference-grade presentation of one of Kubrick’s most precise, most controlled, most intentional films. Instead, what you’ve put out feels like a compromise dressed up as prestige: a substandard home-video version that flattens the image into something lifeless, electronic, and fundamentally wrong. A 10-bit, Dolby Vision minimal-enhancement, TV-version approach to a film that demands cinema-grade 12-bit full 4:2:2 treatment, this is not “good enough.” It isn’t even close. Compared to the DCP, the disc looks drained of depth — the texture, the nuance, the delicacy of shadow and colour separation are gone. The atmosphere that is the storytelling in this film has been thinned out until it feels generic. That isn’t “a different look.” That’s damage. And the most infuriating part is what this disrespects: the work. Larry Smith’s cinematography and grading choices weren’t accidental decoration — they’re the film’s bloodstream. Every subtle tonal decision, every controlled shift in warmth and cold, every balance between glamour and dread was crafted to serve Kubrick’s intent. When you blunt that, you don’t just change the picture — you change the film. I worked on this film. I know what it’s meant to be. And I’m appalled at how casually this release treats that legacy — not just Kubrick’s, but everyone who carried this to the finish line: Larry Smith DoP, Jan Harlan Producer, Joe Dunton cameras and the Deluxe lab teams, the entire chain of authorship. This isn’t “Criterion being Criterion.” This is the physical-media market slipping into a depressing new normal where “4K” becomes a badge, not a promise. And it’s the same rot everywhere: compromised masters, missing premium audio, releases pushed out that feel like the minimum viable product rather than a definitive archival edition. If physical media is supposed to be the last refuge of quality and permanence, why are we accepting versions that are visibly and audibly second-rate? Eyes Wide Shut is not a casual catalogue title. It’s a landmark. A final statement. A defining piece of cinema. If you’re going to put that “C” on the box, then act like it means something. Because right now, Criterion, this is not preservation. It’s vandalism. @Criterion @warnerbros @mdbmhk #EyesWideShut @Dolby @BrightSideHT @LegalBeagleOK @RalphAVSreviews














