Darwin.D.W

8.5K posts

Darwin.D.W banner
Darwin.D.W

Darwin.D.W

@67darwin

Technologist / Engineering @inngest / INTJ-A / ときどき日本語 Views are my own Bluesky: https://t.co/HLDzYphxPW

Silicon Valley Katılım Nisan 2012
190 Takip Edilen582 Takipçiler
Darwin.D.W
Darwin.D.W@67darwin·
My only comment on the directives matter is I'm incapable of taking someone seriously for being pro-directives.
English
1
0
0
93
Darwin.D.W
Darwin.D.W@67darwin·
@Duderichy Wrong question, should be why are US transports so bad across the board?
English
0
0
0
27
Darwin.D.W
Darwin.D.W@67darwin·
Hahahaha yeah logic wise it make sense to an extend but if this is the conclusion its still dumb af. It’s like an exec is so afraid of a rising star that they’ll burn their bridges with allies to cripple them. How tf does that work? I think I know whose idea this is.
Matthew Prince 🌥@eastdakota

I’m playing everyone’s favorite party game: guess the Trump administration’s strategy. Like most of you, I have no inside information. But that’s what makes it fun. Here’s my best theory. Some assumptions first: 1) They’re not crazy. There is a strategy. It doesn’t align with conventional economic principles. But there’s something they’re playing toward. 2) They’re not stupid. I know enough of the players involved to know they’re not idiots. They may be making what will turn out to be accurately predicted to be horrible decisions, but they do have a plan and it’s coherent. As part of this, while I think they think they can increase U.S. manufacturing, they don’t really believe they can bring everything on-shore. 3) They’re intentionally being opaque as to what the real plan is. Trump fashions himself a negotiator. Holding his cards close to his vest, even lying about what cards he has, is part of the game. 4) They’re not just in it for themselves. I get that this has become non-conventional wisdom, but I am going to assume for this that the goal isn’t merely grift. Even if you believe it is, suggest that’s an easy out to thinking through what may be more complex motivations. 5) China is the real enemy. China has done some things in the last two years that have made even the China doves in the last administration into hawks. Again, I know there’s lots of media saying Trump wants to kiss up to Xi. But, having spent enough time with enough folks in this and the last administration, they really worry about China morning, afternoon, and all night. So with that context, I posit the strategy is entirely: destabilize and ultimately decapitate China. If that’s right, you could just impose tariffs on China. But China has lots of export markets, so goods will just flow out through those. What if instead you impose tariffs on everyone? While China and the U.S. have similar GDPs, China is much more dependent on exports. That means while the countries of the world like cheap Chinese exports, they don’t depend on the Chinese market for their exports (yet). China has actually been on a nationalistic spree recently so foreign brands are more out of favor, meaning they’re an even less interesting market to sell to. The U.S., on the other hand, is the world largest buying market. We are the consumers to the world. If we stop buying, everyone suffers. That means nearly everyone needs to come to the table with the U.S. if there are universal tariffs. The U.S. is also unique in that it is among the only countries that doesn’t need to import anything. Don’t get me wrong, we want to import iPhones and PlayStations and French wine and German cars. But we don’t need oil or food or water or most the other raw materials to make sure people stay alive. So the U.S. will hurt under a high tariff regime but won’t collapse. Some manufacturing will move back on shore. But the biggest thing is every country needs to negotiate with the U.S. What does the U.S. ask for? I’m sure a bunch of nits with every country. But what if the big ask is: it’s us or them. You either trade with the United States, or you trade with China, but trading with both isn’t acceptable anymore. For some countries — Vietnam, Indonesia, Philippines — the promise is to be the next China, but this time under more careful rules dictated by the U.S. For most the rest of the world, they’re already massive net importers from China. Forced to make a choice between selling to China or selling to the U.S. I’d guess most will pick the U.S. German automakers are terrified of BYD. And the Italians and French haven’t proven they can sell wine or cheese to China at any real volume. What’s China’s response? It’s tricky because they’ve preached self-sufficiency and internal focus. But if the whole world order suddenly aligns against them, what do they do? I have no idea if this is the Trump administration’s plan. But it’s the only thing I’ve come up with that passes the sniff test.

English
0
0
0
256
Darwin.D.W
Darwin.D.W@67darwin·
デジタル庁ってAWS使ってんの? そこは日本のクラウド使うべきじゃなくて?
日本語
0
0
0
190
Darwin.D.W
Darwin.D.W@67darwin·
The peek of Japanese software mediocrity. Instead of figuring out a way to handle increased website load, create a queue for checkout with over 1h wait time.
Darwin.D.W tweet media
English
0
0
0
178
Darwin.D.W
Darwin.D.W@67darwin·
@martin_casado The technical stuff I care about are mostly gone from Twitter at this point. We probably just have different interests. To an extend, most of what I’m seeking these days are more encapsulated in talks or books, than some random halfass opinion on social media.
English
1
0
1
23
martin_casado
martin_casado@martin_casado·
@67darwin Man I've tried Bluesky. Spent a few hours again yesterday. I find it just as insufferable with far less quality content. Maybe I'm doing it wrong, but I've tried it a few times now.
English
1
0
0
46
martin_casado
martin_casado@martin_casado·
I don't know what happened to technical discussion on X, but I miss it. Would love recommendations for technical (particularly CS / systems) accounts 🙏 ...
English
90
27
1.1K
208.1K
Darwin.D.W retweetledi
Kane 謝凱堯
Kane 謝凱堯@kane·
San Francisco is a geographically blessed city w a $14B budget for 800k people. That's the highest in the entire USA other than DC. This means every SF crisis is self-inflicted by political incompetence or straight up corruption. This election we can fix it. Voting guide 🧵:
English
63
373
5.8K
745.1K
Darwin.D.W
Darwin.D.W@67darwin·
@joonas The top few are 1. Publish rate is rather limited with replication 2. A stream can’t scale horizontally 3. Weird bugs during disaster recovery
English
0
0
0
138
Joonas Bergius
Joonas Bergius@joonas·
@67darwin I’m idly curious to hear what kind of problems you ran into, in case you were willing to elaborate on your experience 😄
English
1
0
0
72
Darwin.D.W
Darwin.D.W@67darwin·
Turns out NATS jetstream is not that scalable
English
2
0
0
251
Darwin.D.W
Darwin.D.W@67darwin·
@LocBibliophilia @thegartsy @acohenNY @SpeakerPelosi I have a verrryyy good idea of how computers work though. It'll be more interesting to see an AI system hack through a locked down system, instead of seeing it hacking through a scientist docker container whom they have no idea how to secure. If you have examples for those.
English
3
0
0
20
Tess Hegarty 🔸
Tess Hegarty 🔸@thegartsy·
Am I reading this correctly? Sure reads like @speakerpelosi is insulting my intelligence in this messaging. Claiming this bill favored big tech is ridiculous. It’s a nice sounding justification, but sure doesn’t make it true. We know the real reasons.
Nancy Pelosi@SpeakerPelosi

AI springs from California. Thank you, @CAgovernor Newsom, for recognizing the opportunity and responsibility we all share to enable small entrepreneurs and academia – not big tech – to dominate. gov.ca.gov/2024/09/29/gov…

English
8
5
103
14K
Darwin.D.W
Darwin.D.W@67darwin·
@LocBibliophilia @thegartsy @acohenNY @SpeakerPelosi That's based on the assumption of jurisdiction that can be applied. Not true for nation states though? I'm not underestimating risks just to be clear. Though I also fail to see any of it being an effective response.
English
2
0
0
13
Darwin.D.W
Darwin.D.W@67darwin·
@LocBibliophilia @thegartsy @acohenNY @SpeakerPelosi Another thought. Why use humans to defend something that's faster and potentially smarter than us? Why not try to deploy AI to fight AI? There're a lot of examples of using the poison to fight poison example around the industry.
English
1
0
0
16
Darwin.D.W
Darwin.D.W@67darwin·
@LocBibliophilia @thegartsy @acohenNY @SpeakerPelosi Playing the devil's advocate here. What makes you think legislation will help with any of that? Bad actors are "bad" for a reason. Hacking systems is not new. Disincentivizing builders with updates doesn't mean models won't get exploited.
English
2
0
0
20
Darwin.D.W
Darwin.D.W@67darwin·
@LocBibliophilia @thegartsy @acohenNY @SpeakerPelosi A very recent example. The Presidential immunity ruling for Trump. The constitution seems pretty obvious to me, but the supreme court interpret it differently. This is a bit of an extreme case, but you get the idea.
English
0
0
0
15
Darwin.D.W
Darwin.D.W@67darwin·
@LocBibliophilia @thegartsy @acohenNY @SpeakerPelosi And I will say it again. There is no such thing as plain English, French or Japanese when it comes to law. There are _always_ room for interpretation. That's just language, and law is based on that. It's not 0 or 1s, which will be so much easier.
English
1
0
0
18