Darwin.D.W
8.5K posts

Darwin.D.W
@67darwin
Technologist / Engineering @inngest / INTJ-A / ときどき日本語 Views are my own Bluesky: https://t.co/HLDzYphxPW
Silicon Valley Katılım Nisan 2012
190 Takip Edilen582 Takipçiler

Great milestone, and more exciting things to come!
Inngest@inngest
Big news. We’re excited to announce our $21m Series A! Inngest now powers 30B monthly executions, helping product teams build reliable products efficiently, at scale. As AI moves to production, the need for fast, durable workflows is essential. Read the announcement post👇
English

@Duderichy Wrong question, should be why are US transports so bad across the board?
English

“why are Japanese trains so good”
maybe because they have 120 million people in a straight line
Massimo@Rainmaker1973
The true size of Japan vs the US east coast.
English


@martin_casado The technical stuff I care about are mostly gone from Twitter at this point.
We probably just have different interests.
To an extend, most of what I’m seeking these days are more encapsulated in talks or books, than some random halfass opinion on social media.
English

@67darwin Man I've tried Bluesky. Spent a few hours again yesterday. I find it just as insufferable with far less quality content. Maybe I'm doing it wrong, but I've tried it a few times now.
English
Darwin.D.W retweetledi

@joonas The top few are
1. Publish rate is rather limited with replication
2. A stream can’t scale horizontally
3. Weird bugs during disaster recovery
English

@67darwin I’m idly curious to hear what kind of problems you ran into, in case you were willing to elaborate on your experience 😄
English

@LocBibliophilia @thegartsy @acohenNY @SpeakerPelosi I have a verrryyy good idea of how computers work though.
It'll be more interesting to see an AI system hack through a locked down system, instead of seeing it hacking through a scientist docker container whom they have no idea how to secure.
If you have examples for those.
English

Am I reading this correctly?
Sure reads like @speakerpelosi is insulting my intelligence in this messaging.
Claiming this bill favored big tech is ridiculous. It’s a nice sounding justification, but sure doesn’t make it true.
We know the real reasons.
Nancy Pelosi@SpeakerPelosi
AI springs from California. Thank you, @CAgovernor Newsom, for recognizing the opportunity and responsibility we all share to enable small entrepreneurs and academia – not big tech – to dominate. gov.ca.gov/2024/09/29/gov…
English

@LocBibliophilia @thegartsy @acohenNY @SpeakerPelosi Regardless, good chat.
Have to sleep now, but will continue to follow this debate.
English

@LocBibliophilia @thegartsy @acohenNY @SpeakerPelosi Just thinking if there are other more effective ways.
English

@LocBibliophilia @thegartsy @acohenNY @SpeakerPelosi I don't disagree with the fact we're playing with fire here though just to be clear
English

@LocBibliophilia @thegartsy @acohenNY @SpeakerPelosi That's based on the assumption of jurisdiction that can be applied.
Not true for nation states though?
I'm not underestimating risks just to be clear. Though I also fail to see any of it being an effective response.
English

@LocBibliophilia @thegartsy @acohenNY @SpeakerPelosi Another thought.
Why use humans to defend something that's faster and potentially smarter than us?
Why not try to deploy AI to fight AI?
There're a lot of examples of using the poison to fight poison example around the industry.
English

@LocBibliophilia @thegartsy @acohenNY @SpeakerPelosi Playing the devil's advocate here.
What makes you think legislation will help with any of that?
Bad actors are "bad" for a reason. Hacking systems is not new. Disincentivizing builders with updates doesn't mean models won't get exploited.
English

@LocBibliophilia @thegartsy @acohenNY @SpeakerPelosi A very recent example.
The Presidential immunity ruling for Trump.
The constitution seems pretty obvious to me, but the supreme court interpret it differently.
This is a bit of an extreme case, but you get the idea.
English

@LocBibliophilia @thegartsy @acohenNY @SpeakerPelosi And I will say it again.
There is no such thing as plain English, French or Japanese when it comes to law.
There are _always_ room for interpretation. That's just language, and law is based on that.
It's not 0 or 1s, which will be so much easier.
English

