Jay Basso

NEW DEFINITION OF “HOPELESSNESS”

Don't push a good person too far.

@Sadie_NC @NanLee1124 Umm 🤨 I don’t watch tv shows so where will I be?

Oh my, I am in The Man In The High Castle 😳😳😳

"Why would you trust your kids to be educated by the government?" What do you think?

I'm melting this is so cute!!! 🤩🐎❤️

@AntiLeftMemes 10

Mr. President Trump Has Directly Informed Me That We Have Completed Our Primary Objective. Children Before DECLAS. My Military Contract Is Coming To A Closure. It Started In "Linear Time" Of 2011-2012. It Was Estimated That I Would Need Four 20 And Back Programs For A Total Of 80 Years. With God On Our Side We Completed It In 45 Linear Years, God Bless America 🇺🇸 You're The First To Know That We Saved Our Innocent Children From The Invisible Enemy. Reptilians, Vrills, Greys And Evil Higher Beings - Don't Forget Those Ghouls, Goblins, Vampires And Nanotechnology. They All Existed Before, But No Longer. The Human Race Is No Longer Slaves To The Matrix And Artificial Intelligent Humanoids. Our Tesseract World Is Safe From Any Enemy, Invisible Or Visible. Space Force Guardians At The Ready I AM Commander Valiant Thor At The Ready. I Serve At The Pleasure Of The President Via Executive Order 13818.

They didn’t go to the Moon

Happy hump day, here’s your daily does of silliness🤣 Does your cat have any special or unique habits? Check out these cute and silly cats 🐈

@grey4626 SAY IT LOUDER I DON’T THINK THEY CAN HEAR 👂🏻 YOU! and ty for explaining it in plain sight

OH MY FUCKING GOD... you dense, brain-rotted low-IQ conspiracy tourists who still can’t grasp basic English after a decade of Trump speaking in plain sight... When Trump called it the “Jeffrey Epstein Hoax” back in July 2025, he was surgically eviscerating the Democrat-manufactured smear campaign that desperately tried to chain his name to Epstein’s pedophile network like some grotesque political blood libel. He was calling out the lie that he was a client, a participant, a co-conspirator...that...was the hoax. The orchestrated, malicious, legally actionable defamation that the media and the left ran 24/7 to paint him as a child predator. He never...NOT FUCKING ONCE...said the files themselves were fake, fabricated, or nonexistent. He said the narrative tying HIM to the crimes was the scam, the con, the weaponized bullshit designed to kneecap him politically. You people are so psychologically marinated in confirmation bias and Trump Derangement Syndrome that your brains short-circuit the moment you see the word “hoax.” You hear it and instantly hallucinate that he’s denying the entire existence of documents, lists, or evidence...like some Pavlovian reflex triggered by years of media gaslighting. It’s pathetic. It’s infantile. It’s the same mental weakness that makes you fall for every fake narrative the regime media shovels into your skull. Legally? That smear was textbook defamation per se...accusing a sitting president of heinous sex crimes with zero evidence, knowing it would destroy reputation and invite violence. Trump knew exactly what he was doing: labeling the false accusation as the hoax while later green-lighting full release because he had nothing to hide. And when the files dropped and his name wasn’t on the client side of that depravity? The silence from the smear merchants was deafening. But you? You’re still here, drooling over your keyboard, pretending Trump denied the files because it fits your pre-chewed narrative. You’re not truth-seeking; you’re narrative-shopping. You’re the useful idiot the machine counts on to keep the division churning. Get it through your thick fucking skull: Trump called the smear against him a hoax. The files are real. The resignations prove it. And the only hoax left is the one you’re still peddling by deliberately misreading plain English. Fucking embarrassing. 💀

MY BEEF WITH STEVE BANNON My problem with Steve began when he testified under oath to the House Intelligence Committee, as I did, and correctly said he and I had never discussed WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, or the emails Democrats were claiming had been stolen. But then, to the surprise of the MAGA movement, Steve popped up as a MUELLER WITNESS at my trial and said the direct opposite—essentially perjuring himself and siding with the Mueller witch hunt in a trial against me that was meant to take down President Trump. George Washington University Law School professor Jonathan Turley noted the inconsistencies and told The New York Post, “He [Bannon] has two diametrically opposite sworn statements.” I first noted a story in the New York Post reporting that Steve Bannon had been seen entering Epstein's palatial home in Manhattan in 2018. The NY Post would go on to also report that Bannon visited Epstein at his Paris apartment. Who cozies up to a man then-convicted of sex crimes in Florida involving children? I said so on Infowars at the time. Communications between Steve Bannon and Jeffrey Epstein, recently declassified by the DOJ, show Bannon denigrating Trump, calling him "stupid," calling for his removal as President under the "25th Amendment," and bragging about Bannon's undermining of Trump's China trade policy. Bannon pleaded guilty to DEFRAUDING donors of the We Build the Wall nonprofit of $15 million. It had nothing to do with Trump. His two co-conspirators served long prison sentences. Bannon, on the other hand, was given no jail time. Bannon would then be named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the $1 billion fraud trial of his shady Chinese patron, who is convicted of various financial crimes—but Steve is not prosecuted. Now there seem to be legitimate questions and a lawsuit pertaining to Bannon's management of a Bitcoin company. Any reasonable reading of the texts and emails released by the DOJ shows the intimacy between Bannon and Epstein—with Bannon saying in an email to Epstein that he, "not DJT," was the center of the movement. Bannon began attacking @elonmusk when Musk began calling for full disclosure regarding Jeffrey Epstein. Bannon claimed that Elon was not a legitimate U.S. citizen and demanded that Musk lose all federal government contracts such as SpaceX and Starlink. Elon said Bannon would be in the Epstein files and that Bannon will yet go to prison—I believe Elon will yet be proven completely right about Steve Bannon. Bannon went to prison because he decided to completely ignore a subpoena from a House investigatory committee. He could have simply fulfilled his legal obligation by showing up for the hearing and asserting his Fifth Amendment rights, which both General Flynn and I did; not because I have anything to hide, not because of anything I know, but because I have extensive experience with Democrats turning honest testimony into a process crime. For some reason, Bannon decided to be a martyr, or he just had bad lawyering. Now we are told the DOJ is essentially moving to vacate the charges Bannon was convicted of for defying the House subpoena; then I ask: When will Peter Navarro, whose brutal arrest on the same charge is unforgivable, also have the charges he was convicted of vacated? It is widely believed that Bannon was paying and continues to pay a small army of influencers—many of whom seem to be SILENT regarding these shocking disclosures. I believe much of the 13 hours of video, which has not been released by the DOJ, includes Bannon further coaching Epstein on how to parry tough questions about the allegations against him. All 13 hours should be release now unedited. The claim that it was all for a "documentary" won't wash because Bannon is in the Epstein emails COACHING Epstein about HOW TO ACT, saying, "First we need to push back on the lies; then crush the pedo/trafficking narrative; then rebuild your image as philanthropist." If it was a documentary—it was a documentary to redeem Epstein. Was Steve getting paid, or was the payoff yet to come? Indeed, Bannon was scheduled to visit the man he called "God" and "brother" in the emails only two days after Epstein was arrested while landing in his private jet from Paris at Teterboro Airport in New Jersey. My name appears in the Epstein files because in an email Epstein complains to Bannon about an interview I did on Infowars in which I connected Epstein to the Clintons. I'm damn proud of that. That is my beef with Steve Bannon. MAGA, Roger Stone

Look at how EXCITED Democrats were on election eve 2016. I could watch this over and over. They never thought she’d lose.

Oui…

Don't ever allow the treatment of the unvaccinated to be erased from history.

✨✨✨

Mind of Man

🚨Ever wonder why Joe Rogan seems like the ultimate outsider, railing against the system while pulling in millions? He's actually a classic gatekeeper, designed to redirect the overflow audience that's waking up to mainstream narratives—keeping them hooked on his "independent" takes without ever leading to real action or change. By appearing anti-establishment, he siphons off those disillusioned folks, pacifying them with endless discussions that go nowhere. And let's not forget: he sold his podcast to Spotify for a reported $100 million back in 2020 (though later reports pegged it closer to $200 million), and Spotify has major institutional backing from firms like BlackRock, which holds about 6% of its shares as a top investor. If you think that kind of money and corporate ties don't come with strings attached, you're buying into the illusion—he's part of the machine, subtly steering the conversation to safe harbors. As for my take: Joe Rogan has built a massive platform by hosting diverse guests and tackling controversial topics, which does give him a degree of freedom compared to traditional media. However, his Spotify deal—initially valued at over $200 million in 2020 and renewed for up to $250 million in 2024 —inevitably involves some corporate oversight, especially given Spotify's public status and investor pressures from entities like BlackRock (a significant but not controlling shareholder at around 5.8-6%). He's faced pushback, like episodes being removed or flagged for misinformation, suggesting limits on what he can say without repercussions. That said, evidence of a "hidden agenda" is speculative; he might just be a savvy businessman navigating big-money media while staying true to his style. Ultimately, no one with that level of reach is entirely "free"—influence comes with trade-offs, but calling him controlled opposition feels more like conspiracy than proven fact. What are your thoughts, is he the real deal, neutral or the ultimate Globalist Gate Keeper? Regardless, it is tough to deep delve and question characters like him when you admire and like them. However, you can't let that cloud your judgement. @joerogan @joeroganhq @RealAlexJones @AJNlive