6481
128 posts
OpenAI has filed a court statement alleging that Elon Musk contacted Greg Brockman two days before the trial to gauge interest in a settlement, and when rebuffed Elon said 'By the end of this week, you and Sam will be the most hated men in America. If you insist, so it will be'.
English
Elon's going to show up uninvited to this GPT-5.5 party like the witch in sleeping beauty and deliver a powerful curse.
English
If you are surprised by the GPT-5.5 being good at cyber thing, you have Big AI Lead Delusion. There are none
(sidenote, I'm not 100% clear if this is GPT-5.5 or GPT-5.5 Cyber. Naming conventions are so chaotic + there is ~no info on the latter that it is hard to say)
English
incredible things are happening
2017-2023 OpenAI glazer
2024-2025: OpenAI hater
2026 ?
Lisan al Gaib@scaling01
Evolving story. Reporting live from the ground.
English
we love seeing our users win.
we want to give you the best tools, lots of compute, and watch you do the magic.
English
@scaling01 Are these moves related to the recently joined salesforce people?
English
it's really the dumbest fucking thing I've seen from Anthropic
you know how much I love them
but this is borderline suicidal
they could've just said:
"here's Haiku and Sonnet 5 and btw Pro subs no longer get access to Opus and only low thinking effort"
but removing claude code entirely is such an idiotic move when everything you are known for is coding
especially in the same week we likely get Spud/GPT-5.5 and potentially DeepSeek-V4
they are begging you poor shits to unsubscribe and to either pay up or to get lost so that they can allocate that juicy compute to higher-margin customers
Lisan al Gaib@scaling01
Anthropic removed Claude Code from the Pro plan I'm obviously going to cancel my subscription if I lose access to Claude Code Mythos was actually the top of the Anthropic hype cycle
English
We’re starting with Pro users on macOS, except in the EU, UK, and Switzerland, while we learn where it helps most and improve the experience.
developers.openai.com/codex/memories…
English
Last week, we released a preview of memories in Codex.
Today, we’re expanding the experiment with Chronicle, which improves memories using recent screen context.
Now, Codex can help with what you’ve been working on without you restating context.
English
I’m glad a feature I’d been waiting for for a long time has finally launched, but it’s disappointing that I can’t use it because I’m on Windows.
An OpenAI employee said in a tweet that the computer use feature will be coming to Windows soon, so I guess I’ll have to wait a bit longer.
That said, does it actually work well? Or is it still just an interesting toy?
Once again, computer use has been released, but I’m seeing the same pattern where there are no noticeable real-world user reviews or demos showing up in my feed.
NomoreID@Hangsiin
@SQMah It appears that computer use performance has been enhanced in GPT-5.3-Codex. Are there plans for native integration with Codex?
English
10th time in a row that GPT-5.4 Pro Extended thinks for just 1 to 5 minutes instead of the typical 15-30 minutes. Same kind of prompt.
Right before this response, I got an "evaluate this answer" popup, but it disappeared due to an error. I strongly suspect they're testing a new model or tweaking something under the hood.
Has anyone else noticed this drop in thinking time?
English
@bcherny @DurhamVSmith Opus 4.7 is a research preview so you have to request for access and make a new aws account, as my understanding
English
@DurhamVSmith Do you have the model provisioned for your Bedrock account?
English
Opus 4.7 uses more thinking tokens, so we've increased rate limits for all subscribers to make up for it. Enjoy!
English
@Yuchenj_UW Model untouched but I think they touched thinking juice (when using claude,ai)
English
Seeing rumors that Claude Opus 4.6 got nerfed.
Usually this boils down to 3 cases:
- Unintentional. For example, a regression caused by changes in the inference stack or Claude Code. This is what evals are for before rolling out.
- Intentional “optimizations” (quantization, reduced reasoning). If so, say it. If users pay for a model, they should get that model.
- User psychology. The more you use a model, the dumber it feels.
English
@rezoundous 5x: Matches old pro plan limits during the 2x event
20x: ~1.8x old pro plan base (~3.6x with event if applicable)
Plus: ~60% of the old 2x event limit
English
@trq212 @apeatling @steipete 5.3 codex also got messy with false positives before and fixed it fast, feels similar to that. Honestly i don't think anthropic did something bad on purpose.
English
@apeatling @steipete I know, it's a very difficult problem but need to do better
we do get a lot of abuse and freeing that capacity up for our customers is very valuable
English
Yeah folks, it's gonna be harder in the future to ensure OpenClaw still works with Anthropic models.
English
BRUH...
The gates are closing down
Wall St Engine@wallstengine
Axios: OpenAI is planning a staggered rollout for a new model with advanced cybersecurity capabilities, limiting access to a small group of companies over fears the tool could be misused. The move would mirror Anthropic’s restricted release of Mythos.
English
I agree directionally but disagree with the details. Just like with responsible disclosure, it makes perfect sense to first release cyber capabilities for defenders and only later in general, and even after still have some restrictions to tilt the offense defense balance.
But strong models should not be only available to few large companies.
Ilija Lichkovski@carnot_cyclist
On Mythos: I know it feels utterly wrong and bad to say it's better/safer if this capability was widely available and e.g. open sourced, but it actually might be. Anthropic could now be sitting on so many zero-days for countless companies, institutions, etc... It's noble of them to not deploy and build this defensive coalition first, but historically these kinds of power overhangs are very risky In the short term, it's positive that this capability is not open; IMO in the long term, we're all better off if it's diffused so that power is not centralized with one actor (no matter how noble). So kudos to Anthropic for taking the step; now the open source frontier will and should catch up; it'll be a bloodbath at first but it'll lead to better security mindset and infra
English
