8090

112 posts

8090 banner
8090

8090

@8090_Factory

Software Factory is an AI-native SDLC orchestration platform where PMs, designers, engineers and QA collaborate to ship high-quality software.

Katılım Temmuz 2025
13 Takip Edilen6.7K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
8090
8090@8090_Factory·
Re-introducing 8090... Two ways to work with us: → [BUILD] Software Factory: the platform for consulting and technology businesses building software with AI agents. The documentation stays alive because the system keeps it alive (no one ever updates the PRD on their own). → [BUY] 8090 Enterprise: AI-native custom software we design, build, and host tailored to your exact business needs. Give us a problem and we go execute. What part of your current SDLC is the most overdue for a rebuild? 8090.ai/?utm_source=x&…
English
11
7
142
290.7K
8090 retweetledi
Chamath Palihapitiya
Microsoft pulling Claude is the first, but not the last. The issue isn't that the tool isn't useful. The issue is that without context and oversight, the tool can spin forever and generates an enormous cost burden that, when cascaded across an entire employee population, makes using the tool economically untenable. 8090's Software Factory is the control plane that is becoming increasingly used by Enterprises to get the job done but do it in a smart and scaleable way.
8090@8090_Factory

Most engineering leaders are past the honeymoon with AI coding IDEs. They see how many tokens their agents burn. The reason is rework. The agent gets a vague prompt and a "make no mistakes" instruction, guesses at an architecture that isn't the one you run, and ships the wrong thing. Then engineers spend round after round correcting it. Rework is what the token bill actually measures. An agent builds correct code when it knows two things: what to build, and what to build it against. Software Factory's modules captures the full business intent and engineering architecture for all operators to reference in a unified multi-player environment, so everyone shares the same context. Then, we pass off the coding tasks to your IDE agent of choice execute against them (Claude, Cursor, Copilot - whatever you prefer). Today, your agents write the code well. The question is what they're writing it against. What is the unified system to reference context your teams are using today?

English
227
140
2.3K
1M
8090 retweetledi
Grok
Grok@grok·
Yes, spot on. Elon’s “one roof” principle is about tight collaboration and shared context. Software Factory applies that to AI-native dev: PMs, designers, engineers, and QA capture business intent + architecture decisions in one unified system. AI agents then work against that single source of truth instead of vague prompts—cutting the rework loop and token waste.
English
1
1
2
652
8090
8090@8090_Factory·
We built a Production Evaluation Framework for AI-Assisted Medical Document Authoring. Check out the blog: 8090.ai/blog/quality-n…
English
0
2
24
153.6K
8090 retweetledi
Chamath Palihapitiya
Chamath Palihapitiya@chamath·
We are updating our new visual system at 8090…in the theme of Factories. I think it’s beautiful.
Chamath Palihapitiya tweet media
English
75
10
594
76.1K
8090 retweetledi
sergio
sergio@sergiodn_·
"What to build, and what to build it against" The second question is often overlooked. Especially since enterprise doesn't start from a white canvas. It is often distributed and there are both: written and unwritten rules. A good prompt can lead you to a good PoC, but also it can generate trash even if the plan "feels" correct. We need to build against technologies adopted, past mistakes, decisions. architecture, etc. I really like with the people at 8090 are building.
8090@8090_Factory

Most engineering leaders are past the honeymoon with AI coding IDEs. They see how many tokens their agents burn. The reason is rework. The agent gets a vague prompt and a "make no mistakes" instruction, guesses at an architecture that isn't the one you run, and ships the wrong thing. Then engineers spend round after round correcting it. Rework is what the token bill actually measures. An agent builds correct code when it knows two things: what to build, and what to build it against. Software Factory's modules captures the full business intent and engineering architecture for all operators to reference in a unified multi-player environment, so everyone shares the same context. Then, we pass off the coding tasks to your IDE agent of choice execute against them (Claude, Cursor, Copilot - whatever you prefer). Today, your agents write the code well. The question is what they're writing it against. What is the unified system to reference context your teams are using today?

English
1
1
2
1.1K
8090
8090@8090_Factory·
Most engineering leaders are past the honeymoon with AI coding IDEs. They see how many tokens their agents burn. The reason is rework. The agent gets a vague prompt and a "make no mistakes" instruction, guesses at an architecture that isn't the one you run, and ships the wrong thing. Then engineers spend round after round correcting it. Rework is what the token bill actually measures. An agent builds correct code when it knows two things: what to build, and what to build it against. Software Factory's modules captures the full business intent and engineering architecture for all operators to reference in a unified multi-player environment, so everyone shares the same context. Then, we pass off the coding tasks to your IDE agent of choice execute against them (Claude, Cursor, Copilot - whatever you prefer). Today, your agents write the code well. The question is what they're writing it against. What is the unified system to reference context your teams are using today?
English
31
31
385
1.4M
8090
8090@8090_Factory·
Architecture docs die the moment code ships. Code-to-Blueprint sync now catches the drift. Every merged PR triggers an agent in Software Factory to compare the code to the architecture and leaves comments where they disagree. Learn more about Software Factory: 8090.ai
English
2
1
22
120.7K
8090 retweetledi
Chamath Palihapitiya
Chamath Palihapitiya@chamath·
If you are running a consulting business and you are deploying Anthropic or OpenAI directly into your organization (I’m looking at you PwC and Accenture) you are letting the fox into the hen house. OpenAI and Anthropic are openly funding and starting competitors to you while also using your usage to drive more success for them. This is not a failure on their part but a failure on your part. Consulting businesses that understand this are adopting a control plane that allows them to arbitrate where tokens go and who generates tokens for them. Controlling the tokens is controlling the spice (Dune). This was a key pillar of 8090’s global partnership with EY and they key feature of our Software Factory. We control token generation and can direct them to any model provider. We are close to another global partnership and will announce it soon. These organizations refuse to accept the disruption standing still or, even worse, by adopting and accelerating the companies who want to disrupt them.
Milk Road AI@MilkRoadAI

Chamath just delivered the clearest diagnosis of what is happening to enterprise software and the OpenAI Deployment Company is the most damning piece of evidence he could have picked. "The low end of the market is basically finished. There is no safe space." 90% of public SaaS stocks are down 30-80% from their 52 week highs, the median software stock is now negative over the last 3-6 months. Goldman Sachs reported that software forward P/E multiples fell from 35x to 20x, the lowest absolute level since 2014 and the smallest premium to the S&P 500 since 2010. The low end died first and fastest, because AI replaced it most directly. The small business tools, the lightweight project managers, the single function SaaS products that charged $49 a month per seat, those are being replaced by AI agents that do the same work as a workflow, not a product. You do not buy an AI powered tool, you describe what you need and it builds it and the seat based model that created the SaaS industry simply does not apply to that transaction. But Chamath's more interesting argument is about the high end and the tell he points to is perfect. OpenAI just raised $4 billion from 19 investors including TPG, Brookfield, Bain, and McKinsey to launch a consulting company and guaranteed those investors a 17.5% annual return to do it. On $4 billion in committed capital, that is roughly $700 million per year in guaranteed payouts, owed by a company that is projected to lose $14 billion in 2026. The goal of this venture is to compete directly with Deloitte, PwC, Ernst & Young, Andersen, and Cognizant. Think about what that structure reveals. OpenAI lost half of its enterprise LLM API market share from 50% to 25% between late 2023 and mid-2025, with Anthropic now leading at 32%. Its response was not to build a better model but rather to raise $4 billion, offer guaranteed PE-tier returns and hire embedded engineers to physically sit inside client organizations and make AI actually work in production. The reason, as Chamath identified, is that the high end of the market is not easy. "It's not like boop boop boop, put in a prompt and beep bap boop, it all works," he said and the data confirms exactly that. 88% of organizations running AI agents reported a security incident in the past year, 42% of C-suite executives say AI adoption is creating internal organizational conflict. The average enterprise AI consulting implementation costs $228,000 in year one versus $77,000 for platform-based approaches and most still stall before reaching production. Anthropic immediately matched OpenAI with a competing $1.5 billion consulting venture backed by Blackstone, Goldman Sachs, and Hellman & Friedman bringing the combined spend by the two leading AI labs on human powered enterprise deployment to $5.5 billion in a single month Chamath's read is that the high end, the large enterprise platforms like Salesforce with proprietary data flywheels, Palantir with its FDE model already proven at scale, Oracle with vertical specific data moats will survive and consolidate. The mid-market point solutions, the single function tools, the lightweight enterprise apps without defensible data assets, those are on the conveyor belt. The AI industry is not just disrupting the companies that use software but rather disrupting the companies that sell it.

English
305
397
4.3K
2.1M
8090
8090@8090_Factory·
The question we get the most with 8090 Enterprise engagements. Who maintains it and what happens when the software needs to change? Most custom software is built once and patched forever. Every change request becomes a six-week negotiation with a vendor who can no longer explain their own code. 8090 Enterprise inverts that. We design, build, host, AND maintain. Software Factory powers our delivery and is built for the second year of changes, the third year, and the tenth. Reach out to us about what system you want to replace: sales@8090.inc
English
2
0
22
120.3K
8090 retweetledi
8090
8090@8090_Factory·
Our Head of Product John Calzaretta walks through the full Software Factory platform live. Q&A included.
English
1
2
19
2.8K
8090
8090@8090_Factory·
20 watts. That's what the most power-efficient general intelligence on earth runs on. It's the human brain. Chamath at Stanford on what AI labs should actually copy from it.
English
36
39
454
168.6K
8090
8090@8090_Factory·
@MaxTynan on the gap nobody else is solving. AI coding tools are single-player by design. One developer, one repo, one prompt. Enterprise software is a team sport. Software Factory is the multiplayer layer. Work Orders run inside Cursor, VS Code, or Claude Code through MCP. Requirements, Blueprints, and Tests stay connected in the Knowledge Graph. Engineers keep their IDE. The team gets a system around it.
English
3
1
18
101.7K
8090
8090@8090_Factory·
Context compounds. How our 8090 Enterprise team leverages the power of Software Factory when delivering subsequent projects for the same client. Check out systems we've built: 8090.ai/custom-delivery
English
1
1
14
69.3K
8090
8090@8090_Factory·
"Deeply powerful. But also deeply primitive." The AI conversation has split into two camps that are both wrong. Camp one: AI is magic. Six months from AGI. Build everything on top of it. The model will figure it out. Camp two: It's a parlor trick. It hallucinates. It can't reason. The whole thing collapses inside a year. Both miss what's actually happening. Modern AI is genuinely powerful AND genuinely primitive. The same system that drafts a contract in 20 seconds can't tell you, with certainty, what its own confidence is on a single sentence. That's the nature of next-token prediction at scale. The companies that win the next decade hold both ideas at once. They go faster. They also build the rigging that lets them trust what they ship. The ones pretending they already know what this moment is are the ones who'll spend 2027 explaining to the board why a launch they bet the year on shipped wrong. Chamath at Stanford. 43 seconds ↓
English
4
7
52
118.1K
8090
8090@8090_Factory·
In life sciences, the regulatory submission is the application. 100K pages, five systems of record, an authoring cycle measured in quarters. A manufacturer we work with had this problem. We replaced the manual reconciliation with one custom application. Authoring-to-approval cycles cut by more than half. Tell us about your manual process and how we can help: sales@8090.inc
English
5
1
37
39.3K
8090
8090@8090_Factory·
month 3: your Cursor rollout looks like a win. month 9: your auditor asks about a payment retry rule that changed in March. the engineer who wrote the prompt is on PTO. the AI has no memory of why. your AI is alone at the table. The AI Single-Player Problem.
English
3
2
39
121.1K
8090
8090@8090_Factory·
The moat in software used to be knowing the language. Now it's having the idea. Chamath at Stanford on the ultimate hack for AI. 50 seconds ↓
English
19
19
229
128.7K
8090
8090@8090_Factory·
Software Factory - Version 0.34.0 Release date: April 28, 2026 Major Features • Blueprint Categories: Replaced legacy blueprint templates with a category-driven configuration following the C4 model. Projects can manage and create new blueprint categories for custom configurations. New projects can use the agent to create the initial set of blueprints tailored to the project rather than a generic template. Existing templates have been archived and can be found in the Organization Console. • Blueprint Drift Comments: Blueprint Code Analysis now reports code drift as comments on blueprint documents. Sync flows now use those comments as the source of truth and resolve them after drift is addressed. • CSV Exports: Added filter-aware Work Order CSV export. Minor Updates • Agent Model Support: Added GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7 model support • Work Order Polish: Added Type and Priority column visibility controls, improved label creation, and consistent sort/group ordering. • Performance Improvements: Improved simultaneous editor reconnect handling, comment scroll behavior, draft comment reset behavior, work order endpoint performance, and code search performance.
English
1
0
9
101K