America First Graphs

@RichWright284 They might not be common now, but will be a lot more common in the future due to birth rates.

Not to "blackpill" but I really don't see much evidence for this high-IQ right-wing elite. Any remotely independent, intelligent person on the right will get mercilessly purged for speaking out against the others. Until that changes, all we're going to have is a cult. Well, that and what we have currently: this J-aligned tech right using MAGA for their own ends. I just don't see the right building its own MSM like libs have/had.

Very intelligent, conservative people have higher birth rates than anyone else:

@xwanyex Not true:

"Oh, criminals are just dumb" is one of those realizations after which everything makes so much more sense

Criminality is not just about having a low IQ. Black people, for instance, are a huge outlier in homicide rates, even when adjusting for IQ.

@Based_Mr_L This literally disproves your point. He’s saying to vote dem in 26 not 28.

Hello hello you stupid dumbass groyper npc x.com/i/status/20491…

Nick Fuentes' opinions every 3 weeks be like:

In 2012 a majority of young people talked to their neighbors. Now less than half do.

@nim973 @StephenM Soros identifies strongly as a Jew, albeit a “universalist” rather than “particularist” Jew. He sees his philanthrophy as in line with that identity.

@AF_Graphs, your point actually proves the deeper insanity: why do we still call people like George Soros or SBF “Jewish” when they reject or actively fight everything Jewish? - Soros. He’s an atheist who explicitly said he doesn’t want to be “part of” Jewish national existence. His Open Society Foundations have poured millions into anti-Israel NGOs (per their own hacked documents and NGO Monitor reports). - SBF. He’s openly secular/atheist with zero connection to Jewish religion, holidays, or Israel — his thing is effective altruism and utilitarianism, not Judaism. Yet they are Jewish **forever** despite being atheist, and anti-Israel. Belief doesn’t matter. Practice doesn’t matter. You can hate the Bible, reject the culture, fund groups that attack the Jewish state… and the system still says “you’re Jewish.” That’s not a religion (where belief and choice define membership). It’s not culture (where you can opt out). It’s an inescapable ethnic/genetic brand you can never renounce. Calling that “Jewish” while someone like Soros openly undermines Israel and Jewish interests is like a trans man claiming to be a woman while hating women. The label is being used as a shield and a weapon at the same time. Jews who actually Hate Jewish survival, tradition, and Israel get to own the ADL and the “Jewish” label? No. If you reject the whole package — religion, peoplehood, self-defense — you’re not Jewish. Full stop. The ADL is to Jews what the SPLC is to Blacks: a captured, corrupt org that weaponizes identity while advancing the opposite of what it claims to protect.

Speaking as a Jew: ADL is NOT a Jewish organization. It is an ultra-left activist org that pushes radical transgenderism, border erasure, police dismantlement, and the demolition of free speech—deploying rank slander, bullying and character assassination to achieve its aims. These views and tactics are expressly contrary to sacred Jewish and biblical teaching. When justly criticized, ADL and its defenders falsely claim anti-Semitism, thereby diminishing all past and present victims of anti-Semitism. In fact, conflating criticism of ADL with criticism of Jews is itself an anti-Semitic trope. Bottom line: ADL is a disreputable organization that has gravely undermined Jewish interests and is worthy of the strongest condemnation.

@wil_da_beast630 ~4% of black men murder someone in their lifetime, ~.2% of white men do:

Correct. A tiny and amusingly diverse cohort of fatherless young males commits almost all crime. We should kill them.

The OK Cupid chart:

The famous OK Cupid chart showing women’s rating of men as extremely negatively skewed is not replicated in all studies. Other studies show that ratings of women get a bump in comparison to men, but not nearly the same skew as in the OK Cupid chart.

@jacktronprime @afgrypr @helen44767171 Let’s “go down this avenue”. What proof do you have? Please be specific.

@afgrypr @helen44767171 Buddy that’s really not an avenue you wanna go down. If you wanna keep simping for that semen swirling butt pirate you can do that, but the rest of us can see the writing on the wall.

How convenient is it that Nick Fuentes takes a sick day right when it comes out that the Charlottesville “Unite the Right” rally that he was apart of was funded by the SPLC? One of the organizers was paid $270,000 and has remained anonymous in the indictment, simply referred to as F-37. Is Nick F-37? I’m just asking questions.

This rabbi, Yosef Pinto, was hired by LeBron James to provide “spiritual guidance”. He also went to prison for bribery in Israel:

“I shure did love my white fokes” - Catherine Scales, former slave. The experience of American slavery was positive for the slave surprisingly often and depended heavily on the cruelty or kindness of the master. Reviewing 87 slave narratives from North Carolina, I found: 35 described their treatment, or their families’ treatment, as positive 23 as negative 13 as mixed Another did 16 not give enough information to make a judgment. From reading the positive descriptions, the Gone With the Wind narrative of a happy plantation with mutual love between slave and master does not at all seem far-fetched. Many slaves described this love explicitly, and many explicitly said that they preferred slavery to freedom. Some even went as far as supporting the KKK after the war. Others in the positive group said that, though they were treated well, they still wanted to be free. It should be pointed out that many of the slaves left when they were children, so nostalgia or the lighter workload for children may play a part in some of these slaves’ positive view of slavery. The location, North Carolina might play a role too. Unfortunately, this positive experience was not at all universal. Many slaves also described their masters as cruel, with capricious beatings and, in some cases, poor food and living conditions. These slaves were very likely to say that slavery was a bad thing and that they were glad it was gone. Others had mixed assessments. Several describe one of their masters as kind while their spouse was mean, and the kind master would protect the slaves from the cruel one. One slave was sold from a cruel master to a kind one. The Union army is described in many of these stories, usually negatively. They come through and rob the plantations, often meaning tough years for the newly freed slaves and master alike. Family separation is unfortunately very common, and it even happens for several of the slaves who describe their treatment positively. Whippings are also common, but not universal. They also vary greatly in frequency and intensity. They range from almost nothing to terrible beatings that leave lifelong scars. Many slaves were not angry about an occasional whipping, and some say that when they happened, they were deserved. Separating the categories took a lot of judgment calls, so please read for yourself and reach your own conclusions. I have attached a high-resolution image of the slaves, key quotes, and my categories to this post. Make sure to tap, hold and load in 4k to see the higher resolution image. Link: tile.loc.gov/storage-servic…

@PopeThe48695 @latent_bug @RichardHanania He’s open about his wealth and his superchats are public which is how they were able to do this analysis. He is also banned on most platforms and from most banks. Even on X he’s denied verification.

@latent_bug @RichardHanania He wants to maintain that he’s oppressed yet he gets almost a million dollars a year

The Washington Post used AI to go through Nick Fuentes’ stream and count up the donations. They found he received about $900K since the start of last year. 550 people, 5% of donors, are responsible for almost half of all donations.