Jeff Lin
45 posts


【遣返罪犯回國會令城市更安全嗎?】 寮國裔男子Tou Lue Vang在2002年至2004年期間,多次性侵一名當時年只有10歲的明尼蘇達州女童。2005年,他在明尼蘇達州法院認罪,罪名包括多次性侵兒童等重罪,被判處刑期 這禽獸原本因罪行而失去了永久居留權,並早已收到最終遣返令,即將被驅逐出境。沒想到「衛生巾沃爾茲」使用他州長的身分,對Tou Lue Vang發佈州赦免令 「我找不到任何理由認為,如果將他遣返到他自孩童時期以來未曾回去的國家,明尼蘇達州會因此更安全或更好。」這就是差點成為副總統的沃爾茲的偉見 美國國務卿盧比歐見狀,立刻介入此事件,馬上終止Tou Lue Vang在美國的合法身份,並確保ICE將他遣返回寮國。盧比歐表示,此舉是為了保護其他兒童免受這隻禽獸的侵害 7月10日,這隻禽獸成功被遣返到它自孩童時期以來未曾回去的國家 有時候比禽獸更禽獸的,是那些對罪犯過度同情的政客和法官

Feels bad, -49.4% drawdown this month after the recent crash. My portfolio is mainly AI chokepoints and bottlenecks. In the memory, photonics, robotics, and upstream semis, (on margin) which all tend to be higher beta than others. But reduced leverage recently from the crash. I see a lot of people making fun of the drop or AI names, saying it’s obvious that: - “AI is a bubble” - “memory/kospi is a bubble” - “photonics is a bubble” - “humanoids won’t get anywhere” - “neoclouds will get replaced by hyperscalers like Meta” And a bunch of retail + bots saying “sell everything, it’s never going to recover”. But I have conviction that all these themes are backed by structural revenue growth or technological shifts. And I’ve had similar drawdowns back when there admin threatened global tariffs, before markets pulled off a recovery. I personally have a longer horizon + higher tolerance for volatility than others, to see how this plays out. Especially considering a lot of retail view things on a week to week basis: no, my thesis isn’t wrong yet if I project revenue inflection in H2 2027 and it’s 2026 now. Anyway, feels bad short term just wanted to share anyway for transparency.

























