Arturs Logins

Review by John Brunero. Logins, Artūrs. Normative Reasons: Between Reasoning and Explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022, Pp. 251. $32.99 (paper). | Ethics: Vol 134, No 3 journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/72…

Out of curiosity, why didn't we call logical atomism post-idealism?

Who was the first to use 'bachelor ' is 'an unmarried man' example?

@cmlittlejohn Found the passage that I had in mind. Page 100 of Between P and C. Introduces interest relativity in normic support

@cmlittlejohn Right. I thought that appeal to stakes was supposed to sweeten the pill of no reasonable belief in preface. But I have to check. Also, I am confused: you accept RM?

@cmlittlejohn Right. I remember Smith's move was to go pragmatic encroachment to account for preface, right?

@cmlittlejohn Can you remind the rationale behind RM? Smith focuses on normic support, right? Do you accept normic support view of rational support?

Super excited that the entire symposium on my Normative Reasons book is now published in Philosophia! Grateful to Mitch Green and Philosophia for this opportunity! Many thanks to my critics, Miriam Schleifer McCormick, Steve Finlay, Davide Fassio, and Eva Schmidt, for their...

The more I teach the problem of mental causation, the less I know what its solution could be.

@SamuelLepine23 I think it depends on the license

Went to Maine to swim in this ocean! Beautiful and warm!

After being called 'Otter' in a U.S. coffee shop, I am on the brink of naming myself Artūrs 'Archie' Logins.

Is anti-trust distrust?

@lasouda000 What is this?

Inquiring inquiry, as usual

@DeusExCaseum I see. Yes, makes sense. But I also feel there's the background of 'realpolitik' involved

@ALogins But one can also associate word realism with a broadly naturalistic commitment. And in that sense politics qua identity expression is more straightforwardly “naturalisible” view. This is not to defend this view of politics, yet naturalisms are hotter than non-naturalisms :p

Reading bits of political epistemology. Came across the view called "political realism," where politics are about group alliances and not deliberation and voting preferences. This sounds to me like 'political skepticism', not realism. What am I missing?

@jan_plate Looks like.

@ALogins Maybe someone took the word 'Realpolitik' and understood the word 'realism' based on that.