Fellow Mind

442 posts

Fellow Mind banner
Fellow Mind

Fellow Mind

@DeusExCaseum

A philosophy PhD student in the University of Geneva

Katılım Aralık 2012
52 Takip Edilen15 Takipçiler
ᴅᴀɴɪᴇʟ ᴍɪᴇssʟᴇʀ 🛡️
This is why I’ve been so pissed at all these people attacking Anthropic on moral grounds. Claiming they’re the bad guys, the worst of the worst, etc? Really? The people doing the most on AI safety all this time? The people publishing their own mistakes the most? And now the people holding the line on how their tech can be used. Be pissed all you want about their prices, or their handling of the subscription communications. But don’t conflate your desires to use their services at other companies’ prices with them being morally rotten. Far as I can tell they’re the cleanest out there in terms of having a pro-human goal and actually doing what they say.
Anthropic@AnthropicAI

A statement from Anthropic CEO, Dario Amodei, on our discussions with the Department of War. anthropic.com/news/statement…

English
29
20
310
23.7K
Fellow Mind
Fellow Mind@DeusExCaseum·
@obie I get novelty seeking and rapid context switching parts, but why conscientiousness?
English
0
0
0
90
Obie Fernandez
Obie Fernandez@obie·
People who thrive on this are selecting for a specific neurotype: high novelty-seeking, high conscientiousness, tolerance for rapid context-switching. That’s maybe 10-15% of the population. The other 85% will experience the same tools as overwhelming, not energizing. And that split is going to define the next decade of who captures value from AI and who gets displaced by it.
GIF
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta

This is a dopamine loop, and it’s one of the most powerful ones humans have ever encountered. Every time you prompt an AI and get a useful result back in seconds, your brain gets a hit. Variable-ratio reinforcement, same mechanism as slot machines, except the reward is real: actual output, actual progress, actual leverage on your ideas. Traditional work follows a delayed-reward structure. You write code for 6 hours, maybe it compiles, maybe you get feedback in a week. The gap between effort and reward is wide enough that motivation decays constantly. AI compresses that loop to seconds. Effort → reward → effort → reward. Your prefrontal cortex stays engaged because the next payoff is always one prompt away. This is why people describe it as “fun” when they’re actually working 14-hour days. The subjective experience of effort disappears when reward frequency is high enough. The “harder than ever” part is real too. When your bottleneck shifts from execution to imagination, you run out of excuses to stop. There’s no “waiting on the build” or “blocked by review.” Every idea you have can be tested immediately, which means your brain never gets a natural stopping point. People who thrive on this are selecting for a specific neurotype: high novelty-seeking, high conscientiousness, tolerance for rapid context-switching. That’s maybe 10-15% of the population. The other 85% will experience the same tools as overwhelming, not energizing. And that split is going to define the next decade of who captures value from AI and who gets displaced by it.

English
7
9
179
28.7K
Fellow Mind
Fellow Mind@DeusExCaseum·
@alex_usyd >Rousseau She’s in a (very) bad company already
English
0
0
2
400
Alexandre Lefebvre
Alexandre Lefebvre@alex_usyd·
My 17 y/o read Rousseau and Plato carefully over the summer and wants to build her senior thesis around them. Teachers: great — now add Deleuze, Derrida, Foucault, Cixous, and Butler. As a prof and dad, that burns my potatoes.
English
66
25
1.7K
116.6K
Fellow Mind
Fellow Mind@DeusExCaseum·
@vividvoid >high quality work > The “relationship discourse” people talk about is pure governance. Excuse me?
English
0
0
0
284
Heinrich
Heinrich@arscontexta·
agentic note-taking finally makes vault restructuring fun used to be such a grind going through every file, not breaking links, staying consistent across hundreds of notes now i just talk to claude code and watch it happen i can go full architect mode and design how knowledge flows instead of grinding through files feels like magic
English
7
1
52
3.5K
Fellow Mind
Fellow Mind@DeusExCaseum·
@HiPhiNation Read a lot of DFW, but never got to Infinite Jest. Id love to have some "public reading group" for the hippopotamus! Otherwise, his "Oblivion" short stories are amazing, can be a good way to get an idea whether you need it or not.
English
0
0
1
13
Hi-Phi Nation
Hi-Phi Nation@HiPhiNation·
I’m getting fed a lot of “Infinite Jest” content lately. I’ve long avoided it, maybe because of all the hype, the commitment, it sounded exhausting. I haven’t seen Game of Thrones or The Sopranos for the same reasons. But 30 years is long enough. Should I read it?
English
8
0
13
1K
Nick Milo
Nick Milo@NickMilo·
If you don't have a shared Obsidian vault with your AI, how do you even survive?
Nick Milo tweet media
English
10
0
40
5.4K
Fellow Mind
Fellow Mind@DeusExCaseum·
@freganmitts @M43437986 So a relation of a token thought to a token expression of natural languages is contingent after all? Because if a thought can be expressed by a structure and a structure can be expressed by different sentences, the language-thought link is contingent after all, no?
English
0
0
0
10
Megan Fritts
Megan Fritts@freganmitts·
I appreciate this comment because I think it illuminates a (imo) common error in this debate. The “effort filter” of the writing task IS your thoughts. Your thoughts aren’t floating abstracta whose relationship to language is contingent. The expressing IS the thinking.
Dave Creamer@EnderSword

@freganmitts But this could flip that, quicker results in getting your thoughts into the final product, less of an effort filter between your thoughts and the result.

English
22
183
2K
55.9K
Fellow Mind
Fellow Mind@DeusExCaseum·
@theo I sorta have an opposite issue on my apple devices. I tell them "yes you can update overnight" and they never manage to.
English
0
0
0
8
Theo - t3.gg
Theo - t3.gg@theo·
I disabled auto update. I disabled auto download. I disabled everything I could. I must updated Final Cut and Safari, and it updated my whole Mac to MacOS 26. I’m going to throw this laptop off of a bridge.
English
160
29
2.3K
356.4K
Fellow Mind
Fellow Mind@DeusExCaseum·
@bcherny The main update of 2026 is rolling out early, huh?
English
0
0
0
6
Boris Cherny
Boris Cherny@bcherny·
In the next version of Claude Code, you can customize spinner verbs for yourself and your team
Boris Cherny tweet media
English
363
119
4.1K
390.7K
taoki
taoki@justalexoki·
ok let's try this. politically you mostly feel like
English
27
1
70
6.9K
Fellow Mind
Fellow Mind@DeusExCaseum·
@ErrorTheorist Insane, when I started to actively use twitter, you were the best part of it. Then you left and I stayed. Then I left for a long while. Two days ago I decided to check in. And here you are. Glad you are alive too!
English
0
0
1
51
Fellow Mind
Fellow Mind@DeusExCaseum·
@Letta_AI forming memories in the background **while whispering hidden messages**. What can possibly go wrong!
English
0
0
0
12
Letta
Letta@Letta_AI·
Meet Claude's subconcious - an experimental plugin for Claude Code (built on @Letta_AI) that gives your Claude a split brain. Claude's subconcious watches everything Claude does, forming memories in the background while whispering hidden messages back to "main Claude".
Letta tweet media
English
11
3
44
4.1K
J.P.A.
J.P.A.@2Philosophical_·
Naturalism nicely accounts for everything in reality — apart from: • value • normativity • consciousness • rational moral agency • psychophysical harmony • nomic harmony • the existence of a contingent, fine-tuned universe • the effectiveness of math • teleology
English
42
19
174
9K
florence 🦐🪻
florence 🦐🪻@morallawwithin·
Hi! So I have some personal news. In short, I’ve apostatized, so I’m not a Christian anymore. Some comments: 1. I’ve made the decision that I should not discuss why I came to this conclusion. I’m really sorry about this, I know Christians who care about me have an interest in these things, but I promise (i) I have decisive reason to reject Christianity, and (ii) I have really really good reason to not be open to discuss about my reasons for this. All I can give you is my promise, and I am sorry for that. 2. I expect that there are people who followed me because the only thing we had in common is we’re both Christian. If you want to unfollow me or break mutuals (in which case I ask you to soft block me) because of this, I understand, and I have no hard feelings. 3. I still think it’s pretty likely that God exists, but I do not adhere to any particular religion as of now. 4. I greatly value the time I spent as a Christian. I love the people I met because of it, and I have no regrets. 5. I, like you, prioritize the truth and (derivatively) the good over everything else, no exceptions. If Christianity is true, then I will come to believe it again; you have nothing to worry about. Epistemological mistakes are generally not imputable to an agent. If we all just pursue what is good, we have nothing to worry about. God does not want anything bad or unfair for us.
English
108
10
888
147K
Rhonda Santis
Rhonda Santis@MardinSquale·
@morallawwithin @pot8um And what country did the majority of those fleeing 20th century fascism run to? Is it a country that’s still safe and appealing to start a new life in?
English
4
0
46
1.7K
Fellow Mind
Fellow Mind@DeusExCaseum·
@RobertTalisse Probably those living in areas the most affected by housing crisis
English
0
0
0
19
Robert Talisse
Robert Talisse@RobertTalisse·
9% have a "very or somewhat favorable" opinion of the plague
Robert Talisse tweet media
English
15
10
88
4.9K
Fellow Mind
Fellow Mind@DeusExCaseum·
@lenamex Ну, тело твое (да и не только) — предмет, а личность твоя (да и не только) — абстракция. В чем проблема?
Русский
0
0
0
27
издательский дом «злая пизда»
сука мужики просто блядь даже не замечают как они ставят женщин в один ряд с предметами и абстракциями а потом такие вы все гоните это блядь вы все время гоните даже не приходя в сознание
Русский
108
15
864
106.6K
Fellow Mind
Fellow Mind@DeusExCaseum·
@NeilLevy10 @NoamChompers Does it entail that it is impossible to cognitively approach campaign making, more specifically when it comes to learning in lessons from the previous failures?
English
0
0
0
40
noam chompers
noam chompers@NoamChompers·
A lot of you would sound smarter if you just said ‘I don’t know why Donald trump won the election’
English
6
2
107
3.9K