Paul

3.6K posts

Paul

Paul

@AManCalledPaul

Calling out fuckwits. No followers please

Katılım Mayıs 2022
60 Takip Edilen5 Takipçiler
Paul
Paul@AManCalledPaul·
@ReissNFFC Again, it should have been handball. But some fuckwit has devised the rule in such a way that it can be deems not handball so it really isn’t that simple. Utd fans are right in quoting the rule But also the Forest fans and ABUs are right that it should be handball
English
1
0
0
12
Reiss
Reiss@ReissNFFC·
@AManCalledPaul Not interested in before tbh. It was a handball, anyone with a brain knows it was, it’s as simple as that.
English
1
0
0
17
Paul
Paul@AManCalledPaul·
@DrMarianaClaire What does a person’s political leaning have to do with this?
English
3
0
0
52
Paul
Paul@AManCalledPaul·
@MasterMaliq I agree, Muslims aren’t dangerous. Islam is. Because it can be interpreted in a way that can cause people to do evil things. Much like any religion. If you normalise believing in the irrational based on faith, you normalise and facilitate indoctrination
English
0
0
0
6
Maliq
Maliq@MasterMaliq·
Muslims are not dangerous. We are human beings like everyone else, with families, love, care, and ordinary lives. Our faith teaches compassion, not hatred. Our Prophet taught respect and mercy. Yes, there are a few extremists who distort our religion and bring shame to it, but they do not represent the vast majority of Muslims. So why is it that many still get profiled and treated as suspects? Is it fear, or hate?
English
5.9K
41
330
133.5K
Paul
Paul@AManCalledPaul·
@ReissNFFC You would think so. But then that’s not what the rule says and it’s not how it has been interpreted before. The decision to allow the Brighton goal that was almost identical for example, which weirdly, Howard Webb defended
English
1
0
0
13
Reiss
Reiss@ReissNFFC·
@AManCalledPaul It’s more than enough to apply common sense and class it as deliberate handball as gained a huge advantage from it.
English
1
0
0
15
Paul
Paul@AManCalledPaul·
@ReissNFFC *Should be handball. Nobody disagrees with that. Unfortunately, the rules suggest different
English
1
0
0
13
Paul
Paul@AManCalledPaul·
@SarcasticForest PGMO also said he made the right decision, just not the decision they wanted him to make
English
0
0
0
16
Paul
Paul@AManCalledPaul·
@MagistratesBlog Very very dangerous precedent to set in accepting self-defence against a lawful arrest as a plausible defence. Cops are going to have a nightmare going forward. It’s effectively legalised violently resisting arrest
English
1
0
0
170
Paul
Paul@AManCalledPaul·
@Was_Sgt__S Or, 6 of the 24 jury members vetoed a guilty verdict
English
0
0
0
72
Nick.
Nick.@Was_Sgt__S·
Disappointed in the result. But not two tier. 12 person jury decided (un) . CPS ran this twice to get a result. 24 people have looked at this now and can't decide.
Gauci Reports@GauciReports

🚨DISCHARGED: Manchester Airport brothers who savagely beat an armed police officer! Jury deadlocks again. Charges dropped for now. One brother ALREADY convicted for smashing a female cop’s nose & headbutting a civilian…all caught on camera. 2 trials. 2 deadlocks. Evidence couldn’t be clearer. This is two-tier justice. Total disgrace. 🎥@billymooreAPBD

English
6
0
10
2.7K
Paul
Paul@AManCalledPaul·
@NormanBrennan @DavidLammy I’d be in favour of abolishing juries. It’s too easy for a small number of people with an agenda to veto a guilty verdict Have one presiding judge + 2 observing judges, they all produce their full written judgement independent and incommunicado; and the majority is the verdict
English
0
0
0
82
Paul
Paul@AManCalledPaul·
@poker_biker @havingagiraf It’s unenforceable. There’s nothing that forces a juror to disclose their reasoning for a decision
English
0
0
0
22
Mark my Words.
Mark my Words.@havingagiraf·
Still no verdict, in its 9th day of deliberations in what is a clear open and shut case. Did he punch a policewoman in the face , breaking her nose ? Yes he did. Any evidence of that ? Yes, a very clear video clip of him doing exactly that. The fact a jury are pretending or refusing to acknowledge that is alarming. Why are they not finding them guilty ??? How would you fix it ???
Mark my Words. tweet media
English
536
1.3K
4.8K
115.3K
Xavier Valentine rock god
Xavier Valentine rock god@Xavierrockgod·
@AManCalledPaul @Clarkey_No1 In essence because of what we have already been told. Than the ball came of his hip first. However, he seemingly did not consider or refused to consider the reaction and outcome of the ‘control’ element of the scenario.
English
2
0
0
17
Lee Clarke
Lee Clarke@Clarkey_No1·
No bus throwing. It was just wrong. Serenaded by the hip coming into play, that law doesn't dictate you can control the bloody ball and create a goalscoring chance. Would never catch anyone associated with MU throwing officials under bus 😂
Annie Eaves@AnnieEaves

To throw an official under the bus for a decision that could be justifiable looks like a blatant attempt to take heat off PGMOL for how absurdly complicated the rules and guidelines have made officiating. Put it all on the individual instead.

English
2
0
11
1.9K
Paul
Paul@AManCalledPaul·
@ReissNFFC So did Webb in his ‘apology’ to Forest
English
0
0
0
8
Paul
Paul@AManCalledPaul·
@YNWA9218 @GKW1908 But they’ve also said the ref was justified in allowing the goal. The whole system and rule book are fucked
English
0
0
0
17
Joseph
Joseph@YNWA9218·
@GKW1908 It isn’t though. They came out and admitted they were wrong.
English
1
0
1
86
GKW
GKW@GKW1908·
But he made the correct decision going off the current laws of the game. Was Mbeumo the one who scored? No Was the hand ball accidental? Yes Did the ball hit another part of his body first before hitting his arm? Yes All 3 things means the goal correctly stood
FFSForest@Forest_No_22

Michael woke up this morning and thought, ‘I’m gonna be the first ref to stick with my decision and not be influenced by VaR’. Which would’ve been commendable. Had he not chosen an absolute stone wall handball to disagree with 🙄 #NFFC

English
66
6
74
14.4K
Paul
Paul@AManCalledPaul·
@karenwa25048088 They wouldn’t be 4 points worse off. Had United needed another goal in that game, they’d have got it. They had 2 or 3 more gears to move up into had they needed to. Likewise in the Liverpool game
English
0
0
0
29
karen ❤️‍🔥🕉🌹
karen ❤️‍🔥🕉🌹@karenwa25048088·
Two hand ball decisions go in their favour meaning they pick up 6 points in the two games, if both decisions had been correctly officiated Man U would be 4 points worse off. How many more times will we put up with officials not doing their job correctly 😡
Sky Sports News@SkySportsNews

BREAKING: PGMO has been in touch with Nottingham Forest and admitted Manchester United’s second goal during yesterday’s game should not have been given 🚨

English
21
5
58
4K
Paul
Paul@AManCalledPaul·
@HACKETTREF Keith, you’ve had a nightmare mate. Just own it. You’ve no other option
English
0
0
2
186
Paul
Paul@AManCalledPaul·
@wildy147 @FA_PGMOL PGMO have said he was justified in allowing the goal you muppet
English
0
0
0
29
Dave Wild
Dave Wild@wildy147·
Michael Salisbury should NEVER be allowed to referee a professional football match again. Twice in 3 weeks he has failed to penalise a blatant handball (Fernandes v Everton) and yesterday at Old Trafford. Both accepted as wrong by @FA_PGMOL. The man is incompetent.
English
52
117
1.5K
48.2K
Paul
Paul@AManCalledPaul·
@Rory_Talks_Ball They’re all still acknowledging they were right all along seeing as PGMO have said the ref was justified in allowing the goal. They’ve basically just said the goal shouldn’t have been given because meh
English
0
0
0
18

Keşfet

@ReissNFFC @DrMarianaClaire @MasterMaliq @SarcasticForest @MagistratesBlog @Was_Sgt__S @NormanBrennan @DavidLammy