Sabitlenmiş Tweet
A. Person
659 posts
A. Person
@APerson47376
Principled thinker | AI & human systems | Building https://t.co/9tgh0Y9YV1 | Garden lover | Free Speech | No party lines, just facts & ideas 🌱🤖
Rural United States Katılım Temmuz 2023
39 Takip Edilen20 Takipçiler
Is this even worth a shrug? The affects to his wife and family make me cringe. The fact that his kinks may have created some national security risks make me cringe. The photos are horrifying but in the real world the salaciouness is just yet another symptom of what is generally wrong with this society.
English
How should we respond to Bryon Noem's sexual kinks? A shrug feels appropriate. reason.com/2026/04/01/the…
English
@christopherrufo I suspect this 25% number may hold true in most states.
English
EXCLUSIVE: Multiple senior HHS officials estimate that, under Gavin Newsom, California's state Medicaid program has lost 25 percent of its budget to fraud. This would mean it is currently losing $50 billion a year to scammers, fraudsters, and organized crime rings.
English
@reath66847 I tend to agree but the consequences on not doing it are a combination of extreme governmental regulation combined with AI in the wild
English
@APerson47376 I agree they should. It can be done, I just see odd tribalist obfuscation at times. John Walsh, had to go around begging politicians to get resistant police forces to cooperate with each other state to state, after his son was murdered. He succeeded, but it was a Herculean task.
English
@reath66847 I dont think they need to share the tech but they need to share solutions to this problem and work together to ensure government doesn't set the agenda for the future of AI and free populations.
English
@APerson47376 This is beyond my expertise, but I'll say this: I've worked in corporate where rival firms shared certain clientele. Usually large firms offering too much work, so you get "co-opetition". If there's in fighting & back stabbing within firms, it often gets nastier when they share.
English
I love this. Personally I am tired beyond belief of the "they faked the moon landing crowd." Don't you have anything else to do with your time? The world needs all sorts of skills and vision to get us through whats coming. Not conspiracy theories with no basis in fact. Please go and find a life.
English
A. Person retweetledi
Explain to me, in detail, not just saying "They faked it" how in 1969 without computers, the managed to, without anyone of the hundreds of thousands employed noticing, launch a rocket that transmitted video, voice, telemetry and data so perfectly that any nation or amateur could do the math and point an antenna exactly at the right point in the sky that a vessel on the way to the moon should be and monitor the transmissions perfectly right up to and including the exact amount of transmission delay that it's distance at the time of each monitoring would have?
Explain, again in detail, how live video was transmitted, again monitored by hundreds of government, and thousands of amateurs world wide that verified was coming from the moon and not a terrestrial source.
How exactly were the effects of 1/4 G recreated during the roughly 2.5 hour live broadcast when the most advanced slo-mo instant replay equipment in existance which was developed by Ampex for the NFL was only capable or replaying 30 seconds?
Explain, again in detail how in recent years the LRO (Lunar Reconnaisance Orbiter) has managed to image every single landing site right down to the footprint trails left by the astronauts?
Explain in detail who put the laser reflectors at the landing sites used by astronomers world wide to calibrate the telescopes and how did they get there and were alligned?
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. The bottom line is in 1969 if would have been technologically easier to just go there than to fabricate the kind of hoax people claim existed. Two people can keep a secret, providing one of them is dead.
English
Western civilization is awesome, actually
English
@ElaraJordan it isn't so much about what happened its how it will affect future dev. just dropped an article on that.
English
Just posted this would be interested in what the community thinks.
x.com/APerson47376/s…
A. Person@APerson47376
English
Then in some ways that has worked for you. In your position which right now I am a a teeny account growing carefully I would continue to follow your voice and try and be patient. Curate those followers, curate who you follow and try to be thoughtful in your posts and replies. Let your passion show. It is really hard sometimes. I just want to scream! I post something get four new followers have to delete two and report them as spam....one step forward two steps back...
English
@APerson47376 "Reply guy" worked for me and getting to know a few key people
That's hasn't translated into book sales for me, kinda but not really
But it did set the ground work for founding the FOTIA
English
If you what your voice is. If you know why you are here on X. If you know your goals. then you go through the slow process of building your audience. If you want quick results you can try engagement bait.
It seems to me the algorithm will punish you on some level either way. I have chosen content over bait and curated my followers list and my following list aggressively.
I know I have not had success the way I think you are looking for but I am pleased with my slow progress so far.
It would be nice if you eventually share which strategy works for you.
Nikole Callihan Author@NikoleCallihan
How do you connect with potential readers on X if not engagement bait? Has anyone had success? Care share?
English
@kylegawley If you can no longer map your code to your requirements then what you get is no longer relevant to the problem you were trying to solve in the first place. In large scale development it is worse
English
producing code at scale will never be a good idea
if no-one understands your system
what exactly are you building?
English
That is a very personal decision I did it 20 years ago. I got sued three times. I won every single time. It cost me over 160,000 dollars. Was it worth it? Yes. Would i do it again? Yes. Did it wipe me out at the time? Yes. Do I regret doing it? Hell NO! The interesting thing is the employer essentially sued themselves out of business they were so intent on destroying me they forgot to run their business.
English
Is it okay to resign because of a toxic work environment even if you don’t have a backup yet?!
English
It is hard for people to be non linear thinkers but to really succeed at anything you need to be able to think in star patterns. See as many possibilies as you can and evaluate the consequences and possible divergence of each path. It takes practice. It also the difference between tactical and strategic thinking. The tactician is common. The strategic thinker is rare.
English
@Dr_Singularity The world is compounding, but our thinking is still linear, that’s the real gap.
English
People still think in slow, linear timelines (years/decades).
Institutions (education, governments, companies) aren’t built for rapid change.
Psychologically, society isn’t prepared for reality shifting as fast as in 2026+
English
This is not just an AI failure. It is a complete law enforcement FAIL. it is not the first time. If Law Enforcement is not held accountable for their irresponsible use of AI as a way to identify people then where are we? I do not blame AI. I blame all the people in law enforcement who never questioned, who never verified, who never bothered, despite ample evidence to verify. They chose to ignore this obvious misidentification. We used to call this double downing on stupid.
English
Perhaps it is both. After all if we live with someone a long time and share our innermost thoughts with them they can predict our behavior with a high confidence level and perhaps if people were perfectly logical that human prediction could get very close to a 100%
VraserX e/acc@VraserX
I asked ChatGPT “If a machine could predict every choice I will ever make with perfect accuracy, would I still have free will?” It answered “Maybe free will was never the ability to be unpredictable. Maybe it is the fact that the prediction only works because it models you so completely that your will is still the thing doing the choosing.” I still can’t decide if that’s comforting or horrifying.
English
@AlexCTaliadoros @mattyglesias I still follow you if that counts for anything. I often disagree with you but it is imperative we listen to people who disagree with us. J.Ds loss in my view...
English
The DC Council just passed legislation to allow single-stair apartment buildings up to six stories.
Allowing single-stair buildings:
✅ Reduces housing construction costs
✅ Enables housing on narrow city lots
✅ Facilitates more family-sized units
The bill passed unanimously.
English
Matt’s chart is interesting but lacks the nuance needed for needed to get full understanding of these trends. Here’s a more useful breakdown showing: Never married
Currently divorced
Currently widowed
Currently married (first marriage intact)
Split by college degree vs. no college degree, and by birth cohort (1970s, 1980s, 1990s).This chart was compiled by Grok based on the most recent available U.S. Census Bureau and Pew Research trends for women around age 45.
I would be interested to see these numbers applied to men as well. I have noted that young men in particular appear to be trending towards not marrying women of the same age with college degrees.
English
@mattyglesias Does this chart only cover never married women or women who are not married at age 45. Does it take divorce into account?
English
Marriage decline is concentrated among working class women not the most professionally ambitious.
slowboring.com/p/yelling-at-a…
English
@efmahf @mattyglesias It matters because the term used is married by age 45. A woman may be married at age 20 and not married at age 45. I am just trying to understand if that data is or is not in the data set.
English
@APerson47376 @mattyglesias Why is divorce relevant for the question being asked? We're trying to figure out what percent of women get married by a certain point in their lives. Whether they eventually divorce later has nothing to do with the issue being discussed.
English