Andrew Song

5.5K posts

Andrew Song banner
Andrew Song

Andrew Song

@ASong408

Climate dad | San Jose native | Climate 🤠 @MakeSunsets | YC & NYU alum | ex-Scale, Indiegogo, Drop, HackerRank, & SaaS startups | collegiate swimmer | do it!!

California, USA Katılım Aralık 2011
1.1K Takip Edilen2.1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Andrew Song
Andrew Song@ASong408·
You’re really lucky, you know that? You didn’t have to wait your whole life to do something special. - Walter White
English
1
0
11
2.3K
Andrew Song retweetledi
Crémieux
Crémieux@cremieuxrecueil·
Eli Lilly has done it. They've gone and made what seems to be a powerful, permanent gene therapy for LDL cholesterol. That means they'll be able to effectively prevent most heart disease with a single infusion!
Crémieux tweet media
English
410
1.2K
12K
3.2M
Andrew Song
Andrew Song@ASong408·
@SexyLikeMeiosis How did the cars win over the horses? We gotta deploy some Henry type of energy to silence the degrowthers.
English
0
0
1
32
whimsy lohan (in SF)
whimsy lohan (in SF)@SexyLikeMeiosis·
Love how into this everyone is but I'm going to need y'all to calm down so I can go back to being dumb and feral online instead of engaging in thoughtful discourse about the world
whimsy lohan (in SF)@SexyLikeMeiosis

Worth noting that the current datacenter backlash is what 40 years of anti-nuclear activism looks like in the present tense. The same movement that killed clean baseload is now mad that compute is straining the grid. Colossal self-own.

English
2
0
18
882
Andrew Song
Andrew Song@ASong408·
Like seriously: how transparent has Israel been about its nuclear program? Now we’re supposed to trust a group of former nuclear scientists from that same national-security culture to become the global leaders in controlling how much sunlight reaches Earth? That seems politically explosive. Solar geoengineering is already one of the most contentious technologies imaginable. It affects the whole planet. So legitimacy cannot come from a small group of experts, a private company, or one desperate government writing a check. It has to come from radical transparency, public scrutiny, and earned trust. That’s why I think @MakeSunsets is the better model. We have been transparent from the beginning about what we are doing, what we are releasing, why we are doing it, and how we think about scale. You may disagree with deployment, but at least the public can see the work, scrutinize it, criticize it, and force the conversation into the open. For a technology that could affect global sunlight, that matters. A lot.
Andrew Song@ASong408

Depends. But the bigger question is: why hide it until now? Why not disclose, as early and clearly as possible, what material they intend to put into the atmosphere, at what scale, and under what conditions? What I still don’t understand is their thesis that deployment only happens if a government pays for it. Any government willing to partner on this would have to be desperate enough to attempt reflecting 1–2% of the Sun’s energy back into space, while also being willing to absorb massive domestic and international backlash. That seems politically unrealistic without first earning public trust. You need buy-in from ordinary people before deployment, not just approval from elites or a single government. I don’t think this can succeed as a purely top-down project. And that’s before you even get into the geopolitical issue of where this technology is being developed and who the rest of the world would trust to control it.

English
0
1
3
289
Andrew Song
Andrew Song@ASong408·
Depends. But the bigger question is: why hide it until now? Why not disclose, as early and clearly as possible, what material they intend to put into the atmosphere, at what scale, and under what conditions? What I still don’t understand is their thesis that deployment only happens if a government pays for it. Any government willing to partner on this would have to be desperate enough to attempt reflecting 1–2% of the Sun’s energy back into space, while also being willing to absorb massive domestic and international backlash. That seems politically unrealistic without first earning public trust. You need buy-in from ordinary people before deployment, not just approval from elites or a single government. I don’t think this can succeed as a purely top-down project. And that’s before you even get into the geopolitical issue of where this technology is being developed and who the rest of the world would trust to control it.
English
0
0
3
328
Clinton M
Clinton M@CooKeMonter·
@ASong408 Aren't silicates toxic? Why would they even write an article about that?
English
1
0
0
43
Andrew Song
Andrew Song@ASong408·
It was never about the particles, this article is worthless. Until I see an announcement where Stardust convinces more than 1,000 people or one government to send their particles into the stratosphere, it's aerosolware.
Eric Niiler@eniiler

Stardust reveals its recipe for cooling the Earth: tiny spheres of silica and calcium carbonate. Here's a look at how that would work and the risks of privatizing geoengineering. @nytimes @nytclimate nytimes.com/2026/05/14/cli…

English
1
0
4
302
Megan Nyvold
Megan Nyvold@MeganNyvold·
Every once in a while I workout pretty hard (weightlifting not cardio) and the next day I’m like entirely shot. Full and absolute exhaustion. Body feels like there is no amount of caffeine or nicotine that can save me. Happens like twice a year, is this diagnosable ?
English
35
0
65
9.3K
Clayton Mooney
Clayton Mooney@MooneyMillions·
One of the biggest reasons most vertical farms failed was that they were run by people who were embarrassed to call themselves farmers.
English
1
0
2
146
steve hsu
steve hsu@hsu_steve·
Once you notice the lifts these guys wear you can't unsee it 🫪 CEOs and Presidents know: height matters in ape social dynamics. Select from 10 embryos to get +2 or 3 inches = these crazy platform lifts! 🤔
steve hsu tweet media
English
41
41
601
687.1K
Andrew Song retweetledi
Ivan Kirigin
Ivan Kirigin@ikirigin·
Bit of an IQ test. - industry already emits SO2 (640K tons/yr) - 1:1M mass ratio of CO2 warming : SO2 cooling. You'd need <250K tons. - constant addition requirement means natural reversibility - upper atmosphere natural diffusion and dilution - a local test in Caribbean would lower hurricane intensity, paying for itself in year one.
English
1
6
17
895
Andrew Song retweetledi
Casey Handmer
Casey Handmer@CJHandmer·
I think @MakeSunsets might be an even better razor than opinions on Elon.
English
13
6
127
13.1K