A. W. Hurt

@hicasamadim 4 vertices

mantığını anlamadan bu soruyu çözmen imkansız! çözebilir misin?

@Velvet_Calamity @1_mincrafts Except that someone is very likely to die because of this fix you are so enamored by.

I love all the experts on here. With their armchair experience. Regardless of this working and being functional for an extended period of time or failing immediately is beside the point. The individual(s) in the video - adapted and fixed the problem. I would bet that most of you, if not all, couldn't even attempt this. It's easy to judge others on something, from a distance and behind a screen, when you yourself are not available to be put to the very same test.

Amazing and incredible work how to fix

@Ambar_SIFF_MRA “I have a masters degree” obviously it’s not it comedy

One of the male dominated fields that women should not attempt to get into is stand-up comedy. "We still mine?" "What do we mine for?" Then she proceeded to act like she is smarter than him because she has a master's degree.

@hicasamadim 72

bunu çözersen, IQ seviyen ortalamanın üstündedir. çözebilir misin?

@WallStreetApes Feeding a baby pizza, they really are fucking retarded

American goes into Little Caesars Pizza and doesn’t have enough money to buy a pizza She films the interaction, getting more furious with each passing moment She’s mad because the worker wouldn’t give her the extra money she was short to buy the pizza. So she’s putting it on social media to try and get people to boycott Little Caesars Pizza I can’t believe this needs to be said, but it’s no one obligation to help you buy anything if you don’t have the money The entitlement in America needs to come to an end immediately. We have to stop enabling this. We have to stop putting up with this

@AchillesVoid_ @AffluentMist You should hold your breath while you’re waiting

@AffluentMist I can’t wait for racism to die.

She shot her shot respectfully and bro responded like a full time racist supervillain 💀

@cpenn4thewin @IAmTwoCoolFourU @Rees10Aj It’s not an act, you really are stupid.

@IAmTwoCoolFourU @Rees10Aj Huh

I’m really trying to figure out what’s so legendary about her career so far

@truth_teller58 @SaltyBitch_52 It’s cool that they give them fake hair and fake lashes to go with their fake degrees.

What a horrible behavior - uncivilized and totally ghetto. You rarely see people with good manners and self-respect behave like that. Sadly, those patterns often continue throughout their whole lives. That kind of conduct is simply not compatible with decent human behavior.

@KathleenWinche3 Bush doubled it then Obama doubled it and Trump signed every bill they put in front of him and blew money on Covid. So I assume Trump but it’s probably Biden

Well I believe it was BO.

@IndianaFever How long ago did you waive her hair line?

we have waived guard Shatori Walker-Kimbrough. thank you, Tori ❤️

@FunkerDer @TheBrancaShow You don’t have to announce your departure

@TheBrancaShow @AWHurtz Troon out

WHAT A GREAT DAY FOR DALTON EATHERLY! TLDR: The State's case against Eatherly appears to be utterly lacking in ANY LEGAL MERIT WHATEVER, based upon what appears to be the official Affidavit of Complaint just made public (attached). This in a case in which the State's BURDEN is proof of guilt, and disproof of self-defense, beyond ANY REASONABLE DOUBT. All of it: So, it appears the affidavit of complaint against Dalton "Chud the Builder" Eatherly has been made public, and the contents will ABSOLUTELY SHOCK many of you. FIRST SHOCKER: THERE IS NOT A SINGLE WORD ABOUT DALTON HAVING UTTERED ANY RACIAL SLUR TOWARDS JOSHUA FOX WHATEVER, SO AS TO HAVE PROVOKED THE FIGHT AND THUS TO HAVE LOST THE LEGAL JUSTIFICATION OF SELF-DEFENSE. NOT. ONE. WORD. That was Dalton's biggest potential vulnerability on self-defense, and we can now be confident that we can put that concern to rest. But it gets even BETTER for Dalton. SECOND SHOCKER: Even if self-defense IS NOT EVEN CONSIDERED, the Affidavit of Complaint fails to present ANY evidence-based narrative that Dalton has committed ANY CRIME WHATEVER. (But, of course, self-defense WILL be raised, only further buttressing Dalton's legal position.) Specifically, there's literally not a SINGLE WORD in this Affidavit of Complaint that describes ANY criminal conduct whatever. I've embedded the Affidavit in my possession, but for purposes of succinctness, the relevant portions reads: "... Dalton Eatherly and Joshua Fox engaged in a verbal altercation in front of the Montgomery County Courthouse." This is not a crime, unless it's merely the misdemeanor of disorderly conduct, which would apply equally to both Eatherly AND Foxx. And in any case Eatherly has not been charged with disorderly conduct (nor Fox, of course). "During this verbal altercation, Mr. Eatherly turned his body in a bladed stance towards Mr. Fox ..." There's nothing unlawful about taking a defensive stance when dealing with an angry antagonist. Certainly Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "taking a bladed stance." "... and reached for his firearm located in his right jacket pocket." Again, there's nothing unlawful about reaching for a firearm in one's pocket in preparation for possible necessary self-defense. Note that Eatherly is not charged with the "crime" of "reaching for a firearm in located in his right jacket pocket." "Thereafter, a physical altercation ensued." Note the passive voice. The "altercation ensued." There's no claim that EATHERLY initiated the "altercation." Indeed, if anything, to the extent the affidavit has detailed Eatherly's conduct, the absence of any representation of his conduct to indicate that it was EATHERLY who initiated the altercation, we can only infer that it was instead FOX who initiated the altercation. This would, of course, make Eatherly the VICTIM of Fox's unlawful attack upon him. The next paragraph: "Mr. Eatherly discharged his firearm, striking Mr. Fox multiple times." There's nothing inherently unlawful about discharging a firearm and shooting someone multiple times. Thousands of shootings that fit this description occur every year, and qualify as perfectly lawful self-defense. Of course, now self-defense need actually be put on the table. Then there's a discussion of Fox being flown to a hospital, followed by: "In addition, at the time shots were fired, there were several innocent bystanders in the area. Surveillance video fo the incident shows a ricocheting projectile hitting nearby walls." Again, there is nothing inherently unlawful about firing shots that miss the intended target. Police involved in lawful shootings of suspects routinely miss about 70% of the shots fired. Those shots ALSO go flying about the neighborhood until they hit something. None of that is a crime, absent evidence of recklessness--and the affidavit provides no statement of recklessness. Indeed, not a word of recklessness. Note that if the shots were fired in lawful self-defense, as a matter of law they were not fired recklessly. I would also note that there's not a word in this affidavit that even contests, much less contradicts, even a single legal element of Dalton's anticipated claim of self-defense. Not Innocence, not Imminence, not Proportionality, not Avoidance, and Not Reasonableness. Not a single element. Not a word of it. If this were a civil case, I would argue that this complaint fails to state a cause of action. Indeed, it's hard to recall the last time I saw an Affidavit of Complaint so utterly lacking in legal substance whatever. At this point I have to say that I've never felt more positive about Dalton Eatherly's claim of self-defense, at least based upon the representations of this apparently official "Affidavit of Complaint." If these facts provided in this Affidavit of Complaint are all the State of Tennessee has on which to prosecute Dalton on the attempted murder, aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, and malicious firearms possession charges brought against him, I simply don't see any prospect to any reasonable degree of legal certainty of prosecutors securing a conviction on any of those charges beyond a reasonable doubt on the legal merits. HEY! IF YOU LIKE THIS KIND OF USE-OF-FORCE LEGAL ANALYSIS, and would like to know more about how to be HARD TO CONVICT if YOU are ever compelled to defend yourself, your family, or your property against criminal predation, consider picking up a FREE copy of my best-selling plain-English book, "The Law of Self-Defense: Principles" (we only ask that you cover the S&H). lawofselfdefense.com/FREEBOOK @AmiriKing @ArchetypeTheory @JackPosobiec @DLoesch @Timcast @TheOfficerTatum @MyronGainesX @TateTheTalisman

@BenH347393 @A_Literal_Ng @TheBrancaShow He’s not gonna fuck you

@A_Literal_Ng @AWHurtz @TheBrancaShow All he did was explain the legal analysis. That's it. It was people like you who wanted the legal analysis ignored entirely and the system short circuited because you liked the guy they arrested.

@JohnFreeze88 @TheBrancaShow He posted that and then blocked me. I must have hit a nerve.

@TheBrancaShow @AWHurtz I like your content, but showing followers' numbers as a means to disregard a point is a fallacy. Many people have small followers because so many accounts have been censored/banned, and you know that.

@StutteringCraig Kickass torrents

Name your favorite website ever.

@GeraldoRivera Everything is nauseating when you get your ass sewn to your nose

Giving taxpayer money to January 6 rioters is nauseating.

@bedeliapilled Ellaria Sand, paramour of The Red Viper

this might be a stupid question but do girls born out of wedlock also get given the bastard surname? and would it be viewed with the same distain? or is it less relevant due to the time period view of women's roles in society

@Andrew_Maj42 @SaltyBitch_52 Have you tried supporting your country instead of a gay subversive agenda?

🏳️‍🌈 Someone stole a pride flag. It’s a small act, but it hits harder than it should. It was only noticed while reviewing footage for something else, and for a moment, everything just stopped. A replacement will be purchased through an LGBTQ+ organization that supports the community, and a police report will be filed for documentation purposes. Feeling sad and angry… but still standing firm. ❤️

@yvessirae They sure trust Planned Parenthood even though they have the same stated goal

And people still ask why Black women don’t trust the medical system like history didn’t literally weaponize healthcare against them.

@NYCMayor Do you have a picture of these starving people? Obese gimmigrants aren’t starving

In the richest city in the richest country in the history of the world, nobody should be going hungry. That's why we're opening five city-owned grocery stores, one in each borough, starting with The Bronx. Lower Prices. Good food. Publicly owned. Hunts Point next year. Every borough by 2029.