Reid & Right

@dcgamester @CassiusTonelust @mafoshizzy @Babsreuss @worldranking_ Following that logic, we should issue multiple ID's as a valid treatment for schizophrenia.

@CassiusTonelust @mafoshizzy @Babsreuss @worldranking_ gender dysphoria is a recognized medical condition by the AMA and APA. so by your own standard it's exactly "fixing what's wrong." you're not making an argument, you're just deciding whose suffering counts.

@Mishi_2210 I'm guessing 2...

This is supposed to be one of the hardest problems ever to solve. Is it? Or isn’t it?

@mwebster1971 @SaiMorphX @YangTrader @elonmusk Me, or the other guy? Imo, the "food or not" argument is more about semantics. I wouldn't eat a horse, for example, even though it's not a mammalian predator - but I do think there's a case to be made about mammalian predators not being considered food.

@SaiMorphX @A_FlusterCluck @YangTrader @elonmusk I’m guessing you are a bot. Have a good day

😂

@mwebster1971 @YangTrader @elonmusk Mammals don't generally eat other mammalian predators. Lions have even been recorded killing hyenas and leaving their corpse behind, so it's not just about the risk of injury either. There's an increased risk of parasites, but I doubt the lion truly understands this.

@YangTrader @elonmusk Well then…dog is food, cat is, dolphin, horse…HUMAN FACT or opinion🤔

@XNovaToday @fasanenkahn You also can't be certain that each hole we see in the front is two holes - it could one giant hole in the back

@fasanenkahn 8. You can't count the top and bottom as a hole, only the top. If you laid it flat on the floor, the bottom would sprawl out revealing the single top hole in the middle.

@1989healy Her name was 22?

@nocontextmemes Reminds me of "Sober" by Tool: "I am just a worthless liar I am just an imbecile I will only complicate you Trust in me and fall as well. I will find a center in you. I will chew it up and leave. I will work to elevate you Just enough to bring you down Trust me Trust me..."

@2i2i_l Awesome concept, but the king shouldn't be there and I'm not sure what that extra piece is even supposed to be...

@Math_files 3³?

@PhilosophyOfPhy 8 is incorrect. "observation" doesn't affect reality, the interaction of particles does.

Find the incorrect one ✍️.

@chess_feed Bh1 fails to Qg2+ so nvm for that one

@chess_feed Bh1, Be4, Bd5, Bc6, Kf8, Kh8. Don't all of these work?

White to move, mate in 2!

@BGatesIsaPyscho The same thing happens to my hand when I do that because it's not my hand or the snow burning - it's just soot from the lighter.

🇺🇸 American’s keep repeating the same experiment with fresh snow and keep getting the same result. Snow shouldn’t burn black.

@Lilly_22100 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 10 9 12

Can you find the mistake in this watch?

@SandyofCthulhu For the people who disagree with this post - how do you know that the person who broke into your home is "just a thief"? I'm not taking any chances with my family. It's not about protecting property, though I firmly believe that protecting property is reason enough.

Everything I own, I pay for by giving up part of my life, literally. Say I earn about $50 an hour. To buy a meal for me and my wife at a mid-range place, I must work for an hour to get that money. To buy a new computer costs about $1200, and that would take me about 24 hours of work - three days of toil. It's literally life for goods. If you break into my house, vandalize a few thousand dollars worth of goods, and steal a few thousand more, you have literally stolen a sizable chunk of my existence. All the time I spent earning those was now completely wasted. Therefore, a thief is stealing your life too, and arguably is worthy of death. Certainly a thief who breaks into your house must be treated as a dangerous enemy. He might be armed. He'll react violently if caught. I can't take the chance that he'll peaceably leave, and leave my goods intact. Even the broken window he entered by will cost me a day's wages. I am not saying I would always shoot to kill, but I certainly wouldn't show any mercy on such an intruder. He didn't value MY life or MY safety, so why should I value his?

@rukky_nate Stocks

You’re given $2m. You have 20 minutes to spend it. You can’t spend it on cars, airplanes, yacht or a house. You can’t spend it on golds or diamonds either. What will you buy?

@realCarola2Hope Straight out of Dr Seuss

Desde esta mañana no dejo de ver esta imagen. Juré que era fake. No lo es. La realidad supera cualquier montaje. Ni la IA hubiera creado una imagen así. 🤯

@RaykiruS @_rod_lander_ @wendelltalks The premises of the argument is flawed because Atheism doesn't postulate that the existence/ nonexistence of God cannot be proven. Atheist proclaim unequivocally that God does not exist. This is why ppl say Atheism is a religion; it's a belief system that can't be proven.

@A_FlusterCluck @_rod_lander_ @wendelltalks Good point, you've pointed out inconsistencies in my prior statement, which disproves it. However, the cat is actually immortal, it doesn't require food, air etc.

Atheism is never beating the atheism is a religion allegations. Atheists swear they’re not religious, yet they’re out here creating non profit organizations to promote atheism. Some have actually founded “godless churches” and hold Sunday services. They treat guys like Dawkins/Sagan as prophets and quote their writings like its infallible holy scripture.

@RaykiruS @_rod_lander_ @wendelltalks Cats require food, water, and respiration. An intangible being cannot eat, drink, or inhale. Therefore, invisible, intangible cats do not exist

@_rod_lander_ @wendelltalks You can't prove a negative, or the non-existance of something. Try proving invisible intangible cats do not exist

@chess_feed Kb5 Kb6 allows black to pin the pawn (Rd7) and force a draw. Kc5 allows black to skewer the king (via Rd1 then Rc1+). Anything else allows Rc5 and the pawn falls.

There is only one way for White to win. Be careful, it’s not as easy as it looks.