A Harbor
568 posts

A Harbor
@A_Harbor_
Community Advocate; Small Town-Big Picture; Summerland Society for Civic Engagement-Director; Pintail Ponds Wetland Preservation Society-President








Meanwhile, OneBC losers are calling her a Liberal... Very entertaining


BOMBSHELL: Here is a section from Caroline Elliott's SFU Thesis on Indigenous Governance from 2024. She is in fact a Woke BC Liberal. "I am mindful of [the colonialism] concern and I am hopeful that readers of my research will be as well; in fact, it leads directly to a final cautionary note: the fact that I am, intellectually, a product of Western political theory. As much as I sincerely try to accurately, fairly, and sensitively consider Indigenous constitutionalism, this remains the case." "As Carens writes, “[a]ny non-Aboriginal person like me who writes about the topic of Aboriginal self-government is bound to think about the problem of perspective” (2000 180). In his view, which I agree with, the problem really lies in any suggestion that non-Indigenous analysis is the one right way to think about these issues." She is being apologetic for being non-Indigenous writing on Indigenous topics LOL. summit.sfu.ca/item/39197





KELOWNA, B.C. — Caroline Elliott has scheduled a campaign rally for April 8 at the Ramada by Wyndham Kelowna, with doors opening at 6 p.m., directly overlapping with a leadership debate organized by Juno News. The debate, hosted by Aaron Gunn and Lindsay Shepherd, is expected to feature candidates answering questions in a live, unscripted format aimed at conservative voters. The scheduling conflict effectively prevents her participation. That decision lands hard. Elliott built her campaign on sharp commentary and media presence. She steps into the arena as a communicator. Leadership demands more than controlled messaging. It demands confrontation. It demands exposure. Her campaign fills rooms with supporters. The Kelowna rally pushes energy and optics. Friendly crowds deliver applause on cue. That environment offers zero resistance. A debate stage delivers the opposite. Real questions. Real pressure. Real risk. This race remains volatile. Polling shows a narrow lead with a massive undecided bloc watching closely. Those voters expect to see candidates tested. They want contrast. They want clarity under pressure. Skipping a debate hosted by voices trusted within the conservative grassroots sends a signal. Campaign strength looks conditional. Access looks selective. Confidence looks managed. #cdnpoli #bcpoli

After decades of being licensed in BC I reached the difficult conclusion not to renew And on the very day this new Act came into force the Minister of Health publicly accused me of lying and then alleged that I was spreading false health information What’s the likelihood that six of her appointees would find me “guilty” of a complaint?


Jeremy is probably on the phone with his CSIS handler now, so he's leaving the tweeting up to his girlfriend. That's a good idea -- she's less emotional. I won't reply to all your slop, but here are a few points: * MacKenzie was the one who thought it was a good idea to go to court to have a trial about his reputation. Now you're saying you don't trust the court and the process that you chose. It's never your fault, is it? It's always the Jooos. * I literally posted all the passages in the verdict about him being a fed. I want people to read it. It proves he's a fed. Imma start calling you Mrs. Fed. * If you think "Rosenberg" is biased why don't you have the courage to come out and say so? Why don't you appeal the ruling? By the way, why did you choose your lawyer ("Wu") who obviously had no clue? Maybe you should have hired a Jewish lawyer. * You make it sound like ratting people out to the police is something that everyone does all the time. Probably true in your world -- I bet 50% of Second Sons are informants and undercover agents. * "Jeremy is Ezra's biggest competition". You've got me there!



















